Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan Hendrycks

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Although I'm curious at how the nominator found AFD on their 5th edit. And thanks to the anonymous IP editor who actually tagged the article. Maybe there should be a higher bar to nominate pages for deletion...but that's a discussion for another forum. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:11, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dan Hendrycks

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability: the subject is insignificant and the page was written like a promotion. Wikipedia is not a place for personal curriculum vitae Zusf (talk) 05:15, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - The wording may need to be changed, but being covered in The Boston Globe is note-worthy. APK whisper in my ear 05:50, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:03, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:03, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The topic of whether the page met notability guidelines was raised before by another user, but we agreed that the subject meets the notability criteria for academics. Enervation (talk) 06:42, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Meets WP:PROF. Thriley (talk) 04:12, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.