Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christina Karnebeek-Backs
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete and redirect to Oldest people#Chronological list of the oldest known living person since 1955. Sandstein 18:46, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Christina Karnebeek-Backs (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The article teaches us that Ms Karnebeek was born, got married, worked a farm, died at 110, and was posthumously recognized as the world's oldest known living person for about a year. This last fact is her only claim to notability, therefore her mention in the list of oldest people is enough coverage in Wikipedia. Delete and redirect there. — JFG talk 12:34, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete and redirect per nom. Very little coverage of this subject, and what is there is very minimal; thus, per WP:NOPAGE, a redirect to an entry on oldest people makes the most sense. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 13:50, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 14:00, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 14:00, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete and redirect This article clearly fails WP:GNG and WP:BIO1E because there is only WP:ROUTINE coverage of her that fails to demonstrate notability and there is no notability guideline that "the oldest x" is notable. It's also blatant WP:NOPAGE. All she needs is a redirect to her listing on oldest people. Newshunter12 (talk) 23:37, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
- Keep. Anyone who was ever world's oldest person should always be guaranteed an article. LE (talk) 18:14, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete amd redirect. There is not even any proof he was the world's oldest person. No records exist for China, India, Russia, Africa etc born people so there is a very good chance he was not the oldest person. WP:NOPAGE applies here. Legacypac (talk) 22:45, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
- She, not he. And the lack of records elsewhere only points out the notable rarity of someone being that old, that early. LE (talk) 17:42, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. In the most categorical and clear terms, Wikipedia is not here to offer all information about everything! Sources and wikinotability are what guides content. And we do not have truly verifiable sources for even this rather weak claim to one-of-a-kind fame. -The Gnome (talk) 13:09, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.