Systems Biology Ontology

This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages) ‹ The template below (Promotional) is being considered for merging. See templates for discussion to help reach a consensus. › This article contains promotional content. Please help improve it by removing promotional language and inappropriate external links, and by adding encyclopedic text written from a neutral point of view. (July 2023) (Learn how and when to remove this message) This article is written like a manual or guide. Please help rewrite this article and remove advice or instruction. (July 2023) This article relies excessively on references to primary sources. Please improve this article by adding secondary or tertiary sources. Find sources: "Systems Biology Ontology" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (July 2023) (Learn how and when to remove this message) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

The Systems Biology Ontology (SBO) is a set of controlled, relational vocabularies of terms commonly used in systems biology, and in particular in computational modeling.

The rise of systems biology, seeking to comprehend biological processes as a whole, highlighted the need to not only develop corresponding quantitative models but also to create standards allowing their exchange and integration. This concern drove the community to design common data formats, such as SBML and CellML. SBML is now largely accepted and used in the field. However, as important as the definition of a common syntax is, it is also necessary to make clear the semantics of models. SBO tries to give us a way to label models with words that describe how they should be used in a large group of models that are commonly used in computational systems biology.^[1][2] The development of SBO was first discussed at the 9th SBML Forum Meeting in Heidelberg on October 14–15, 2004. During the forum, Pedro Mendes mentioned that modellers possessed a lot of knowledge that was necessary to understand the model and, more importantly, to simulate it, but this knowledge was not encoded in SBML. Nicolas Le Novère proposed to create a controlled vocabulary to store the content of Pedro Mendes' mind before he wandered out of the community.^[3] The development of the ontology was announced more officially in a message from Le Novère to Michael Hucka and Andrew Finney on October 19.

SBO is currently made up of seven different vocabularies:

• systems description parameter (catalytic constant, thermodynamic temperature...)
• participant role (substrate, product, catalyst...)
• modelling framework (discrete, continuous...)
• mathematical expression (mass-action rate law, Hill-type rate law...)
• occurring entity representation (biochemical process, molecular or genetic interaction...)
• physical entity representation (transporter, physical compartment, observable...)
• metadata representation (annotation)

To curate and maintain SBO, a dedicated resource has been developed and the public interface of the SBO browser can be accessed at http://www.ebi.ac.uk/sbo. A relational database management system (MySQL) at the back-end is accessed through a web interface based on Java Server Pages (JSP) and JavaBeans. Its content is encoded in UTF-8, therefore supporting a large set of characters in the definitions of terms. Distributed curation is made possible by using a custom-tailored locking system allowing concurrent access. This system allows a continuous update of the ontology with immediate availability and suppress merging problems.

Several exports formats (OBO flat file, SBO-XML and OWL) are generated daily or on request and can be downloaded from the web interface.

To allow programmatic access to the resource, Web Services have been implemented based on Apache Axis for the communication layer and Castor for the validation.^[4] The libraries, full documentation, samples and tutorial are available online.

The SourceForge project can be accessed at http://sourceforge.net/projects/sbo/.

Since Level 2 Version 2 SBML provides a mechanism to annotate model components with SBO terms, therefore increasing the semantics of the model beyond the sole topology of interaction and mathematical expression. Modelling tools such as SBMLsqueezer^[5] interpret SBO terms to augment the mathematics in the SBML file. Simulation tools can check the consistency of a rate law, convert reaction from one modelling framework to another (e.g., continuous to discrete), or distinguish between identical mathematical expressions based on different assumptions (e.g., Michaelis–Menten vs. Briggs–Haldane). To add missing SBO terms to models, software such as SBOannotator^[6] can be used. Other tools such as semanticSBML^[7] can use the SBO annotation to integrate individual models into a larger one. The use of SBO is not restricted to the development of models. Resources providing quantitative experimental information such as SABIO Reaction Kinetics will be able to annotate the parameters (what do they mean exactly, how were they calculated) and determine relationships between them.

All the graphical symbols used in the SBGN languages are associated with an SBO term. This permits, for instance, to help generate SBGN maps from SBML models.

The Systems Biology Pathway Exchange (SBPAX) allows SBO terms to be added to Biological Pathway Exchange (BioPAX). This links BioPAX to information useful for modelling, especially by adding quantitative descriptions described by SBO.

SBO is built in collaboration by the Computational Neurobiology Group (Nicolas Le Novère, EMBL-EBI, United-Kingdom) and the SBMLTeam (Michael Hucka, Caltech, USA).

SBO has benefited from the funds of the European Molecular Biology Laboratory and the National Institute of General Medical Sciences.

• www.biomodels.net
• Hucka M, Finney A, Sauro HM, et al. (March 2003). "The systems biology markup language (SBML): A medium for representation and exchange of Biochemical Network Models". Bioinformatics. 19 (4): 524–31. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.562.1085. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btg015. PMID 12611808.
• Lloyd CM, Halstead MD, Nielsen PF (2004). "CellML: its future, present and past". Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 85 (2–3): 433–50. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.460.934. doi:10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2004.01.004. PMID 15142756.