User contributions for TheDookieMan

This account is currently blocked. (Show block details) The latest block log entry is provided below for reference:

20:52, 20 April 2006 Syrthiss talk contribs blocked TheDookieMan talk contribs with an expiration time of indefinite (sockpuppetry disruption)

Search for contributionsshowhide

⧼contribs-top⧽

Username, IP address or CIDR range:

Namespace:

Invert selection

Associated namespace

Tag filter:

Invert selection

Only show edits that are latest revisions

Only show edits that are page creations

Hide minor edits

⧼contribs-date⧽

From date:

To date:

Show only edits pending review

Hide probably good edits

19:3719:37, 19 April 2006 diff hist −311 Joseph Sobran partial RV
19:3419:34, 19 April 2006 diff hist +1,693 Talk:Joseph Sobran No edit summary
19:1519:15, 19 April 2006 diff hist −114 Joseph Sobran See talk page, I did searches and found nothing from Sobran from LA Times or UPS in their records
19:1119:11, 19 April 2006 diff hist +9 Joseph Sobran No edit summary
19:0919:09, 19 April 2006 diff hist +129 Joseph Sobran If we're going to put all this other stuff about him then the thing that makes sig to most Wikireaders should be listed in the headline in addition to his works
19:0719:07, 19 April 2006 diff hist −309 Joseph Sobran No edit summary
19:0519:05, 19 April 2006 diff hist +221 Talk:Joseph Sobran No edit summary
06:1706:17, 19 April 2006 diff hist +217 User talk:DJac75 No edit summary
06:1606:16, 19 April 2006 diff hist +217 Talk:Joseph Sobran No edit summary

18:0918:09, 17 April 2006 diff hist +115 LewRockwell.com rv with a change...see talk page for explanation
18:0718:07, 17 April 2006 diff hist +552 Talk:LewRockwell.com No edit summary
16:2916:29, 17 April 2006 diff hist +174 Talk:LewRockwell.com No edit summary
05:3105:31, 17 April 2006 diff hist +224 N User talk:Larougite No edit summary current
05:2205:22, 17 April 2006 diff hist −1 LewRockwell.com rv...I just really can't figure out why anyone would want to defend Joe Sobran??
05:1605:16, 17 April 2006 diff hist +278 Talk:LewRockwell.com No edit summary
05:0605:06, 17 April 2006 diff hist +10 Institute for Historical Review RV...Here's to hoping that the edit war ends here!
05:0405:04, 17 April 2006 diff hist −1 LewRockwell.com RV from POV...you know..I was really hoping it wouldn't come to this

23:5323:53, 16 April 2006 diff hist +243 Talk:Joseph Sobran No edit summary
23:5223:52, 16 April 2006 diff hist +87 LewRockwell.com Rogerman's right here...no reason not to provide clarification..the fact that North has called for the stonings isnt explicitly in the source either so why remove this...it gives the reader more info
00:1900:19, 16 April 2006 diff hist −135 Norbert Brainin This information will be removed until proper citation is placed

17:3117:31, 15 April 2006 diff hist −375 Lyndon LaRouche The citation that was listed went to a blank page...so that information will be kept off this page until proper documentation can be put forth...as per Wikipolicies...sorry Rouchers
05:2205:22, 15 April 2006 diff hist +254 User talk:12.218.144.90 No edit summary
05:2005:20, 15 April 2006 diff hist +228 User talk:203.213.77.138 No edit summary
00:0000:00, 15 April 2006 diff hist −764 Abraham Foxman Again, no sourcing, obviously POV and not suitable for this article...

23:5923:59, 14 April 2006 diff hist −176 Abraham Foxman POV statement that lacked any sourcing...

22:1322:13, 23 March 2006 diff hist +133 User talk:Bdj No edit summary
22:1222:12, 23 March 2006 diff hist −166 LewRockwell.com Reversion from vandalism
22:1122:11, 23 March 2006 diff hist +729 Talk:LewRockwell.com No edit summary
22:0822:08, 23 March 2006 diff hist +713 User talk:Bdj Vandalism
21:3321:33, 23 March 2006 diff hist −167 LewRockwell.com RV vandalism
21:1521:15, 23 March 2006 diff hist −167 LewRockwell.com This is ridiculous, the Institute for Historical Review openly admits it denies the Holocaust...

23:4923:49, 22 March 2006 diff hist −23 LewRockwell.com DickClarkMises, Please stop vandalizing this page.
23:4023:40, 22 March 2006 diff hist −770 LewRockwell.com As per WillBeback's suggestions
04:0404:04, 22 March 2006 diff hist +248 User talk:DickClarkMises 3RR
04:0204:02, 22 March 2006 diff hist +141 Stephan Kinsella Not sure that DickClarkMises should be the one editing the article as he is an associate of Kinsella's organization, The Mises Institute
03:2803:28, 22 March 2006 diff hist −320 Joseph Sobran DJac75..you have violated Wikipedia's 3RR rule. Please avoid vandalizing articles in the future. Cheers, TheDookieMan

23:0723:07, 21 March 2006 diff hist −275 LewRockwell.com RV. DickClarkMises, please be sure to avoid 3RR violations.
22:3022:30, 21 March 2006 diff hist −246 Joseph Sobran DickClarkMises, please consider your position. I've looked through the history here, and it seems that the Wikipedia community doesn't believe your version is a fair portrayal of Sobran.
22:0822:08, 21 March 2006 diff hist −246 Joseph Sobran Reversion
22:0722:07, 21 March 2006 diff hist −275 LewRockwell.com Reversion of vandalism via DickClarkMises

17:3817:38, 20 March 2006 diff hist −241 LewRockwell.com rv...Kinsella is not notable..nor is this POV information appropriate for this page...lets keep it copesitic...please
17:3517:35, 20 March 2006 diff hist −4 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring No edit summary
17:3417:34, 20 March 2006 diff hist +915 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring No edit summary
17:1817:18, 20 March 2006 diff hist −241 LewRockwell.com DickClark, I'd suggest that you take a loot at the other discussions regarding Kinsella. However notable he is in your eyes, he is not notable as per Wikipedia's guidelines.
17:1617:16, 20 March 2006 diff hist −311 Joseph Sobran DickClark, I'll conceed the point with regards to accused rather than identified. But the rest of DJac's insertions have to go----, it's completely POV and counterfactual, and counter to Wikrules
17:1217:12, 20 March 2006 diff hist +218 User talk:DickClarkMises Controversy
15:4115:41, 20 March 2006 diff hist −308 Joseph Sobran My reading is evidentally different from yours DJac, because I see Buckley as being fully clear on why he fired Sobran---the reason being what he describes as "Sobran's anti-semitic prejudice".
15:0915:09, 20 March 2006 diff hist −308 Joseph Sobran Not exactly happen that I'm participating in a rv battle but what the heck eh?
01:0301:03, 20 March 2006 diff hist −241 LewRockwell.com I've looked over the history here and it's clear the decision was made to keep this discussion limited. DickClarkMises, if you want to pump up Lew Rockwell, do it on your blog, not here.
01:0001:00, 20 March 2006 diff hist +176 N User:TheDookieMan No edit summary

19 April 2006

17 April 2006

16 April 2006

15 April 2006

14 April 2006

23 March 2006

22 March 2006

21 March 2006

20 March 2006