Examine individual changes

'{{Infobox legislation |short_title = |legislature = <!-- Name of enacting legislature, wikilinked. Autofills image if available. --> |image = |imagesize = |image_upright = |imagealt = |caption = |long_title = |citation = |territorial_extent = [[France]] |enacted_by = <!-- For bicameral legislatures, this is the chamber the bill was first introduced. --> |date_enacted = 11 April 2011 |date_passed = <!-- Pick one of date_enacted or date_passed as appropriate in jurisdiction. --> |enacted_by2 = <!-- For bicameral legislatures only. Use if bill passed the second chamber. --> |date_enacted2 = <!-- For bicameral legislatures only. Pick one of date_enacted2 or date_passed2 as appropriate in jurisdiction. --> |date_passed2 = <!-- For bicameral legislatures only. Pick one of date_enacted2 or date_passed2 as appropriate in jurisdiction. --> |date_assented = <!-- Pick none or one of date_assented, royal_assent or date_signed as appropriate in jurisdiction. --> |royal_assent = <!-- Pick none or one of date_assented, royal_assent or date_signed as appropriate in jurisdiction. --> |date_signed = <!-- Pick none or one of date_assented, royal_assent or date_signed as appropriate in jurisdiction. --> |signed_by = <!-- Only use if date_signed is used. --> |date_commenced = <!-- Pick one of date_commenced or date_effective as appropriate in jurisdiction. --> |date_effective = <!-- Pick one of date_commenced or date_effective as appropriate in jurisdiction. --> |date_of_expiry = |date_repealed = |administered_by = |bill = <!-- Name of relevant bill debated in the chamber listed in enacted_by or considered_by. Omit if the legislation is still a bill in this chamber and the bill name used in short_title. --> |bill_citation = |bill_date = |introduced_by = <!-- Name of member introducing the bill in the chamber. --> |1st_reading = |2nd_reading = <!-- Specify date range for multi-day readings. --> |3rd_reading = |conf_committee_passed = |committee_report = |bill2 = <!-- For bicameral legislatures only. Name of relevant bill debated in the chamber listed in enacted_by2 or considered_by2. --> |bill_citation2 = <!-- For bicameral legislatures only. --> |bill_date2 = <!-- For bicameral legislatures only. --> |introduced_by2 = <!-- For bicameral legislatures only. Name of member introducing the bill in the chamber. --> |1st_reading2 = <!-- For bicameral legislatures only. --> |2nd_reading2 = <!-- For bicameral legislatures only. Specify date range for multi-day readings. --> |3rd_reading2 = <!-- For bicameral legislatures only. --> |conf_committee_passed2 = <!-- For bicameral legislatures only. --> |committee_report2 = <!-- For bicameral legislatures only. --> |date_conf_committee = |white_paper = |amends = <!-- Citations of other notable legislation that this legislation amends; wikilink or external link where possible. --> |repeals = <!-- Citations of other notable legislation that this legislation repeals; wikilink or external link where possible. --> |amended_by = <!-- Citations of other notable legislation that amends this legislation; wikilink or external link where possible. --> |repealed_by = <!-- Citation of the legislation that repealed this legislation; wikilink or external link if possible. --> |related_legislation = <!-- Names and citations of any other related legislation; wikilink name and external link citation where possible. --> |summary = Ban on [[face cover]]ing |keywords = |status = <!-- not yet in force/not fully in force/current/in force/amended/expired/spent/repealed/struck down/halted --> }} {{Use dmy dates|date=July 2020}} [[File:Balaclava_3_hole_black.jpg|thumb|right|upright|A [[balaclava (clothing)|balaclava]] is an example of a face covering banned intentionally in public in France]] [[File:Muslim woman in Yemen.jpg|thumb|right|upright|A [[niqāb]] is an example of a religious face covering banned intentionally in public in France]] [[File:June 1984 Snap Shot.jpg|thumb|right|upright|A [[costumed character]] is an example of a face covering banned unintentionally in public in France]] [[File:Zentai in gold 373.jpg|thumb|right|upright|[[Zentai]] is an example of a face covering banned unintentionally in public in France]] The '''French ban on face covering''' ({{lang-fr|Loi interdisant la dissimulation du visage dans l'espace public}}, "Law prohibiting concealment of the face in public space") is [[legislation]] passed by the [[Senate of France]] on 14 September 2010 which imposes a full nation ban on face covering in public places in France except under specified circumstances. Examples for such face covering headwear are [[balaclava (clothing)|balaclava]]s, [[niqāb]]s, [[burqa]]s, [[helmet]]s and [[mask]]s. As a result of the ban, some unintentional side effects has occurred for example [[costumed character]]s and [[zentai]] have been banned as both do cover one's face.<ref>{{cite news |title=Veiled women arrested at Paris protest {{!}} CBC News |url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/veiled-women-arrested-at-paris-protest-1.1004020 |accessdate=3 October 2018 |publisher=Canadian Broadcasting Corporation}}</ref> The bill had previously been passed by the [[National Assembly of France]] on 13 July 2010.<ref name="nyt20100713">{{Cite web|url=http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/14/world/europe/14burqa.html|title=Parliament Moves France Closer to a Ban on Facial Veils|last=Erlanger|first=Steven|date=13 July 2010|work=The New York Times |accessdate=14 September 2010}}</ref> Public debate exacerbated concerns over immigration, nationalism, secularism, security, and sexuality.<ref name="Friedman">{{cite journal |last1=Friedman |first1=Barbara |last2=Merle |first2=Patrick |title=Veiled Threats: Decentering and unification in transnational news coverage of the French veil ban udies |date=November 2013 |journal=Feminist Media Studies |volume=13 |issue=5 |pages=770–780 |doi=10.1080/14680777.2013.838357}}</ref> Arguments supporting this proposal include that face coverings prevent the clear identification of a person (which may be a security risk, or a social hindrance within a society which relies on facial recognition and expression in communication), that the alleged forcing of women to cover their faces is sexist, and that Muslims who continue this practice should be forced to assimilate into traditional French social norms. Arguments against include that the ban encroaches on individual freedoms,<ref name="sky" /> and that it discriminates against interpretations of [[Islam]] that require or encourage women to wear face coverings, that it takes away the choice of women to decide whether to dress according to a particular standard of modesty, and prevents anonymity in situations where it might be socially or personally desirable. Opponents{{who|date=October 2018}} accused President [[Nicolas Sarkozy]] of fostering [[Islamophobia]] and using the law for political gain.<ref name="Friedman" /> For them to not allow the face veil is stopping Muslim women from performing their religion freely. Research shows that the headscarf ban reduced the economic and social integration of Muslim women into French society.<ref>{{Cite news|last=|first=|date=2019|title=How will Austria’s new headscarf ban affect Muslims?|work=The Washington Post|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/06/03/how-will-austrias-new-headscarf-ban-affect-muslims/|access-date=}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last=Abdelgadir|first=Aala|last2=Fouka|first2=Vasiliki|date=2020|title=Political Secularism and Muslim Integration in the West: Assessing the Effects of the French Headscarf Ban|url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/american-political-science-review/article/political-secularism-and-muslim-integration-in-the-west-assessing-the-effects-of-the-french-headscarf-ban/2934B2DD5336FF53B8881F3F0C506B41|journal=American Political Science Review|language=en|volume=114|issue=3|pages=707–723|doi=10.1017/S0003055420000106|issn=0003-0554|via=}}</ref> As of 11 April 2011, it is illegal to wear a face covering veil or other masks in [[public space]]s. Veils, scarves and other headwear that do not cover the face are unaffected by this law.<ref name="cnn20100914"/> The law imposes a fine of up to €150, and/or participation in [[Citizenship education (immigrants)|citizenship education]], for those who violate the law.<ref name=texte524/><ref name="telegraph14sep"/> The bill also penalises, with a fine of €30,000 and one year in prison, anyone who forces (by violence, threats, or abuse of power) another to wear face coverings; these penalties may be doubled if the victim is [[Minor (law)|under the age of 18]].<ref name=texte524/><ref name='penalty'/> As a result of the law, the only exceptions to a woman wearing a face covering veil in public will be if she is travelling in a private car or worshiping in a religious place.<ref>[http://www.thejournal.ie/france-face-veil-ban-to-take-effect-next-month-2011-03/ France's face veil ban to take effect next month] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110721133032/http://www.thejournal.ie/france-face-veil-ban-to-take-effect-next-month-2011-03/ |date=21 July 2011 }} 4 March 2011</ref> ==Background== [[File:Full-face veils ban in Europe.svg|thumb|right|200px|Europe Burqa Bans. Map current as of 2019<br /> {{Legend|#b34452|National ban – country bans women from wearing full-face veils in public}} {{Legend|#db8e97|Local ban – cities or regions ban full-face veils}} {{Legend|#e29882|Partial ban – government bans full-face veils in some locations}} ]] Initial instances of the French government's actions towards a full face covering ban can be traced back to the "[[Islamic scarf controversy in France|Scarf Affair]]" of 1989. Under this law, hijabs were no longer allowed to be worn in French public schools. Permission was granted to school administrators to declare when this law was being violated by students. Contempt for this bill led to the adaption of a nation-wide and religiously consistent plan.<ref name=":0">{{cite journal|last1=Fredette|first1=Jennifer|year=2015|title=Examining the French Hijab and Burqa Bans through Reflexive Cultural Judgment|journal=New Political Science|volume=37|pages=48–70}}</ref> The [[French law on secularity and conspicuous religious symbols in schools|Law of Secularity and Conspicuous Religious Symbols]] in Schools was passed in September 2004. This law stated all religious items could no longer be worn in public schools including but not limited to: kippah's, catholic crosses, and Muslim religious attire.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Bruckner|first=Pascal|date=December 2010|title=Unveiled: A Case for France's Burqa Ban|journal=World Affairs|volume=173|pages=61–65|via=JSTOR}}</ref> Despite targeting all religions, the law seemed to unevenly target Muslim individuals.<ref name=":0" /> The French Parliament began an initial inquiry on the issue shortly after President [[Nicolas Sarkozy]] stated in June 2009 that religious face veils were "not welcome" within France.<ref name='notwelcomquote'>{{Cite news | agency = Associated Press | title = French Senate bans burka Bill awaits President Nicolas Sarkozy's signature | date = 14 September 2010 | work = CBC News | publisher = Radio Canada | url = https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/french-senate-bans-burka-1.891246 | access-date = 14 September 2010 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20101101195119/https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/french-senate-bans-burka-1.891246 | archive-date = 1 November 2010 | url-status = live}}</ref> Sarkozy had stated that the law is to protect women from being forced to cover their faces and to uphold France's secular values.<ref name='secularvalues'>{{Cite news | first = Aliyah | last = Shahid | authorlink = Associated Press | title = French Senate bans burka Bill awaits President Nicolas Sarkozy's signature | date = 14 September 2010 | url = http://www.nydailynews.com/news/world/2010/09/14/2010-09-14_french_senate_agreeing_with_president_nicolas_sarkozy_bans_women_from_wearing_bu.html | work = Daily News|location=New York | access-date = 14 September 2010 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20100918022921/http://www.nydailynews.com/news/world/2010/09/14/2010-09-14_french_senate_agreeing_with_president_nicolas_sarkozy_bans_women_from_wearing_bu.html#ixzz0zX1uBEiR | archive-date = 18 September 2010 | url-status = live}}</ref><ref name="georgetown1">{{cite web|url=http://berkleycenter.georgetown.edu/resources/countries/france |title=France |publisher=[[Berkley Center for Religion, Peace, and World Affairs]] |access-date=14 December 2011 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110206213909/http://berkleycenter.georgetown.edu/resources/countries/france |archive-date=6 February 2011 }} See drop-down essay on "Contemporary Affairs"</ref> A poll carried out by [[Pew Research Center]] leading up to the vote indicated that 80% of French voters supported the ban.<ref name='Pew'>{{Dead link|date=August 2016}}{{Cite news | first = Frederic | last = Dumoulin | title = French parliament adopts ban on full-face veil | date = 14 September 2010 | agency = Agence France-Presse | url = https://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5gNCFdNZ4r-9aDEBG0G_OUSMKoASw | access-date = 14 September 2010 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20130518083647/https://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5gNCFdNZ4r-9aDEBG0G_OUSMKoASw | archive-date = 18 May 2013 | url-status = live}}</ref> It was estimated that about 2,000 women wore the head coverings to be banned by this bill.<ref name="nyt20100714">{{Cite web|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/14/world/europe/14burqa.html|title=Parliament Moves France Closer to a Ban on Facial Veils|last=Erlanger|first=Steven|date=13 July 2010|work=The New York Times|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110429195753/http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/14/world/europe/14burqa.html|archive-date=29 April 2011|access-date=14 September 2010|url-status=live}}</ref> In 2010, the Belgian [[Belgian Chamber of Representatives|lower house of parliament]] approved a bill to ban facial coverings, but this was not voted into law as the Belgian government fell before the Senate could vote on it.<ref name=foxy>{{Cite web |url=http://www.foxnews.com/world/2010/04/29/belgiums-lower-house-parliament-supports-burqa-ban-question-arises-senate/ |title=Belgium ban burqa-type dress; Law cites public security, securing emancipation of women |access-date=16 September 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100505001816/http://www.foxnews.com/world/2010/04/29/belgiums-lower-house-parliament-supports-burqa-ban-question-arises-senate/ |archive-date=5 May 2010 |url-status=live}}</ref> As of 2010, when the French law was being debated, partial bans were being discussed in the Netherlands and Spain; bans had been announced locally in Italy but later declared unconstitutional, leading to a national law being proposed; and public debate on the issue was starting in Austria, while Germany, the United Kingdom and Switzerland did not consider legislation, although in the UK, directives had been issued leaving the issue to the discretion of school directors and magistrates.<ref name='penalty'/><ref>{{Cite news | last = Jamet | first = Constance | title = Législation sur la burqa : ce qui se fait ailleurs en Europe | newspaper = [[Le Figaro]] | language = French | date = 15 June 2010 | url = http://www.lefigaro.fr/international/2010/04/22/01003-20100422ARTFIG00487-legislation-sur-la-burqa-ce-qui-se-fait-ailleurs-en-europe-.php | access-date = 24 March 2011 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20110214094009/http://www.lefigaro.fr/international/2010/04/22/01003-20100422ARTFIG00487-legislation-sur-la-burqa-ce-qui-se-fait-ailleurs-en-europe-.php | archive-date = 14 February 2011 | url-status = live}}</ref> [[Fadela Amara]], who had recently served as a junior minister in the French government and is a Muslim, had previously declared: "The veil is the visible symbol of the subjugation of women, and therefore has no place in the mixed, [[Laïcité|secular spaces]] of [[education in France|France's state school system]]."<ref name="guardian.co.uk">{{Cite news | url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2006/jul/17/france.politicsphilosophyandsociety | work=The Guardian | location=London | title=Ghetto warrior | date=17 July 2006 | access-date=5 May 2010 | first=Rose | last=George | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130830072547/http://www.theguardian.com/world/2006/jul/17/france.politicsphilosophyandsociety | archive-date=30 August 2013 | url-status=live}}</ref> These actions taken by the government stem from the long history of separation between Church and state experienced in France. Established in 1905, [[Laïcité]], the French term for separation of church and state, governs that no religion can influence government affairs and policies. Anastasia Comobiso writes regarding the topic, "The State abolishes the particular rights granted to institutions or religious congregations, and confines religion itself to personal and private subjectivity".<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.institutmontaigne.org/en/blog/laicite-why-french-secularism-so-hard-grasp|title=Laïcité: Why French Secularism is So Hard to Grasp|website=Institut Montaigne|language=en|access-date=2019-11-10}}</ref> Muslim face coverings, according to the French government, hinder universal women's rights and threaten the safety of the public.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/belief/2010/may/23/france-veil-ban-burqa|title=Laïcité and the French veil debate {{!}} Nabila Ramdani|last=Ramdani|first=Nabila|date=2010-05-23|work=The Guardian|access-date=2019-11-10|language=en-GB|issn=0261-3077}}</ref> ==Bill== The bill was passed by the National Assembly by a vote of 335–1. The sole vote against the ban in the National Assembly was cast by [[Daniel Garrigue]], who warned that "to fight an extremist behavior, we risk slipping toward a totalitarian society."<ref name="nyt20100713"/> It was passed by the Senate by a vote of 246–1, with 100 abstentions.<ref name="cnn20100914">{{Cite web|url=http://edition.cnn.com/2010/WORLD/europe/09/14/france.burqa.ban/?hpt=T1|title=French senate approves burqa ban|date=14 September 2010|publisher=CNN|access-date=14 September 2010|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100916204951/http://edition.cnn.com/2010/WORLD/europe/09/14/france.burqa.ban/?hpt=T1|archive-date=16 September 2010|url-status=live}}</ref> The bill prohibits the wearing of face coverings in public places and also applies to foreign tourists visiting France.<ref name='penalty'/> The law imposes a fine of up to €150, and/or participation in [[Citizenship education (immigrants)|citizenship education]], for those who violate the law.<ref name=texte524>{{Cite web |url=http://www.assemblee-nationale.fr/13/ta/ta0524.asp |title=Texte adopté n° 524 – Projet de loi interdisant la dissimulation du visage dans l'espace public |publisher=assemblee-nationale.fr |access-date=15 September 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100915235142/http://www.assemblee-nationale.fr/13/ta/ta0524.asp |archive-date=15 September 2010 |url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="telegraph14sep">{{cite news|title=French Senate approves 'Burka ban'|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/france/8002914/French-Senate-approves-Burka-ban.html|newspaper=The Telegraph|date=14 September 2010|access-date=3 April 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171114184541/http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/france/8002914/French-Senate-approves-Burka-ban.html|archive-date=14 November 2017|url-status=live}}</ref> The bill also penalises, with a fine of €30,000 and one year in prison, anyone who forces (by violence, threats or by abuse of power) another to wear face coverings; these penalties may be doubled if the victim is [[Minor (law)|under the age of 18]].<ref name=texte524/><ref name='penalty'>{{Cite news | title = French Senate votes to ban Islamic full veil in public | date = 14 September 2010 | url = https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-11305033 | publisher = BBC | access-date = 14 September 2010 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20100915043321/http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-11305033 | archive-date = 15 September 2010 | url-status = live}}</ref> The [[Constitutional Council of France]] declared the ban constitutionally valid on 7 October 2010, clearing the final legal obstacle for the law, but the law was designed to come into force after the elapse of six months from the day of its publication in the [[Journal Officiel de la République Française|''Journal Officiel'']].<ref name='penalty'/><ref name="cnn20101007">{{Cite web|url=http://edition.cnn.com/2010/WORLD/europe/10/07/france.burqa.ban/?hpt=T2|title=French burqa ban clears last legal obstacle|date=7 October 2010|publisher=CNN|access-date=7 October 2010|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101011160108/http://edition.cnn.com/2010/WORLD/europe/10/07/france.burqa.ban/?hpt=T2|archive-date=11 October 2010|url-status=live}}</ref> Article 2 of the law provides that "The prohibition provided for in Article 1 does not apply if the attire is prescribed or authorized by legislative or regulatory provisions [for example a motorcycle helmet], if it is justified for health or professional reasons, or if it is part of sporting activities, parties or artistic or traditional events." Consequently, wearing surgical masks in public, widely practiced during the COVID-19 pandemic, is authorized by this statute. ==Response== Dalil Boubakeur, the [[mufti|grand mufti]] of the [[Paris Mosque]], the largest and most influential in France, testified to parliament during the bill's preparation. He commented that the niqāb was not prescribed in Islam, that in the French and contemporary context its spread was associated with [[Islamic fundamentalism|radicalisation]] and [[crime|criminal behavior]], and that its wearing was inconsistent with [[Laïcité|France's concept of the secular state]]; but that due to expected difficulties in applying a legal ban, he would prefer to see the issue handled "case by case".<ref>{{Citation | title = ''Testimony at the'' mission d’information sur la pratique du port du voile intégral sur le territoire national | date = 8 October 2009 | url = http://www.droitdesreligions.net/actualite/nouvelleactu/novembre_2009/003.htm | access-date = 24 March 2011 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20120321191747/http://www.droitdesreligions.net/actualite/nouvelleactu/novembre_2009/003.htm# | archive-date = 21 March 2012 | url-status = dead}}</ref> [[Mohammed Moussaoui]], the president of the [[French Council of the Muslim Faith]], opposed using a law but favored discouraging Muslim women from wearing the full veil.<ref name="nyt20100713"/> Abroad, in July 2010, hundreds of Muslims protested against the bill in [[Karachi]], Pakistan. The chief of the Pakistan-based [[Jamaat-e-Islami Pakistan|Jamaat-e-Islami]] Party demanded that the UN take immediate action against France.<ref name="ap20100719">{{Cite web|url=http://www.ndtv.com/article/world/hundreds-in-pakistan-protest-france-s-burqa-ban-38407|title=Hundreds in Pakistan protest France's burqa ban|date=19 July 2010|publisher=NDTV|agency=[[Associated Press]]|access-date=15 September 2010|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100722083529/http://www.ndtv.com/article/world/hundreds-in-pakistan-protest-france-s-burqa-ban-38407|archive-date=22 July 2010|url-status=live}}</ref> [[Nasharudin Mat Isa]], leader of the [[Pan-Malaysian Islamic Party]], said that the ban had made Muslims around the world angry but stated that he hoped that it would not provoke any terrorist incidents.<ref name="aol20100916">{{Cite web|url=http://www.aolnews.com/world/article/muslim-world-at-odds-over-french-burqa-ban/19634944|title=Muslim World at Odds Over French Burqa Ban|last=Kennedy|first=Dana|publisher=AOL News|access-date=16 September 2010|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100917002953/http://www.aolnews.com/world/article/muslim-world-at-odds-over-french-burqa-ban/19634944|archive-date=17 September 2010}}</ref> Abdel Muti al-Bayyumi, a member of the council of clerics at [[Al-Azhar Mosque]] in [[Cairo]], Egypt, applauded the ban and stated that the niqāb has no basis in [[Sharia]]. He also said: "I want to send a message to Muslims in France and Europe. The niqab has no basis in Islam. I used to feel dismayed when I saw some of the sisters (in France) wearing the niqab. This does not give a good impression of Islam."<ref name="afp20100915">{{Cite web|url=https://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5jNAnCNRui8FnoLVQ0OSJ8Mj9Qm6Q|title=Egypt Al-Azhar scholar supports French niqab ban|date=15 September 2010|agency=[[Agence France-Presse]]|access-date=16 September 2010|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100918131651/http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5jNAnCNRui8FnoLVQ0OSJ8Mj9Qm6Q|archive-date=18 September 2010|url-status=live}}</ref> [[Yusuf al Qaradawi]], another prominent Egyptian Islamic scholar, stated that in his view "the niqab is not obligatory" while criticizing France for violating the freedom of those Muslim women who [[Islam and clothing|hold the view that it is]] and criticizing France in that "they allow other women to freely dress in a revealing and provocative manner".<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.onislam.net/english/shariah/contemporary-issues/interviews-reviews-and-events/449388-sheikh-qaradawis-first-interview-with-onislamnet.html?Events= |title=Sheikh Qaradawi's First Interview with Onislam.net |author=Ahmed El-Gharbawy |date=18 October 2011 |work=website |access-date=13 March 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110723235901/http://www.onislam.net/english/shariah/contemporary-issues/interviews-reviews-and-events/449388-sheikh-qaradawis-first-interview-with-onislamnet.html?Events= |archive-date=23 July 2011 |url-status=live}}</ref> [[Hamza Yusuf]] criticized the French government for the ban, writing: {{Quote|text = While I am personally opposed to the face veil, it is a legitimate, if minority opinion, in the Islamic legal tradition for a woman to wear one. Most women who wear it believe they are following God’s injunction and not their husband’s. French [[laicism]] seems as fundamentalist as the very religious fanatics it wants to keep out. On a trip to France a few years ago, I was shocked to see [[pornography]] openly displayed on the streets in large advertisements. How odd that to unveil a woman for all to gape at is civilized, but for her to cover up to ward off gazes is a crime... While the [[Nicolas Sarkozy|French Prime Minister]] sees no problem with exposing in public places a woman’s glorious nakedness, he is oddly and quite rabidly disturbed by allowing others to cover it up. The sooner secular nations learn to allow people of faith to live their lives in peace, the sooner peace will flourish.|sign = Hamza Yusuf|source=[https://www.sandala.org/blog/pourquoi-no-burqa ''Pourquoi No Burqa?'']}} [[Amnesty International]] condemned the passage of the bill in the Assembly as a violation of the freedom of expression of those women who wear the burqa or hijab.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://articles.cnn.com/2010-07-13/world/france.burqa.ban_1_burqa-ban-veil|archive-url=https://archive.is/20120708224037/http://articles.cnn.com/2010-07-13/world/france.burqa.ban_1_burqa-ban-veil|url-status=dead|archive-date=8 July 2012|title=Burqa ban passes French lower house overwhelmingly|date=13 July 2010|publisher=CNN|access-date=15 September 2010}}</ref> [[RTBF]] columnist [[Francis De Smet|François De Smet]] responded that this could not be considered a matter of freedom of expression or even religion since face coverings are but a relic of tribal tradition; that it is face coverings that amount to violation of the freedom of expression as they block the exchange of facial expressions which as [[Emmanuel Levinas]] pointed out are the basis for a moral participation in society; and that the neurotic search for purity that motivates facial coverings ultimately represents the "radical rejection of others" and conveys contempt for others who are not deemed worthy of sharing the wearer's facial expressions.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.rtbf.be/info/chroniques/chronique_voile-integral-la-nevrose-de-la-purete?id=6005603|title=Voile intégral : la névrose de la pureté|date=26 April 2011|publisher=RTBF|access-date=23 May 2011|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110504073039/http://www.rtbf.be/info/chroniques/chronique_voile-integral-la-nevrose-de-la-purete?id=6005603|archive-date=4 May 2011}}</ref> Individuals who continue to battle legislation argue that this law infringes on the human rights of women, possibly even further discriminating against them. Hebah Ahmed, a female Muslim activist, stated when asked about the topic, "I think that it’s a bad idea because I think it’s yet another example of men telling women how to dress, how to live their life. It’s another way to try to control women. And to take it to a government level and to try to legislate the way that a woman dresses is not just wrong and against human rights, but it really violates the whole basis [of] democracy"<ref>{{cite web |last1=Sztokman |first1=Elana |title=The Feminist Debate Over France's Burqa Ban |url=https://forward.com/sisterhood/136982/the-feminist-debate-over-frances-burqa-ban/ |website=Forward |accessdate=8 November 2019}}</ref> [[Hassen Chalghoumi]], a notable imam of the mosque in [[Drancy]] near Paris who had earlier received death threats and seen his religious service interrupted by Islamists because he supported dialog with the French Jewish community, later expressed support for the ban. He stated that the full facial covering "has no place in France, a country where women have been voting since 1945" and that "the burqa is a prison for women, a tool of sexist domination and Islamist indoctrination".<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/expat/expatnews/7053101/Paris-imam-backs-Frances-burqa-ban.html|title=Paris imam backs France's burqa ban|date=22 January 2010|newspaper=The Telegraph|access-date=23 May 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100125152544/http://www.telegraph.co.uk/expat/expatnews/7053101/Paris-imam-backs-Frances-burqa-ban.html|archive-date=25 January 2010|url-status=live}}</ref> === Salafi Jihadism === In October 2010, [[Osama bin Laden]] accused France of preventing "free women from wearing the burqa" in a released recording. The ban against the face covering veil is a frequent theme in publications linked to [[Salafi jihadism|Salafi jihadist]] organisations such as [[Al-Qaeda]] and the [[Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant]].<ref name=":7">{{Cite journal|last=Bindner|first=Laurence|year=2018|title=Jihadists' Grievance Narratives against France|url=https://icct.nl/publication/jihadists-grievance-narratives-against-france/|journal=Terrorism and Counter-Terrorism Studies|pages=6|doi=10.19165/2018.2.01|doi-access=free}}</ref> ==Implementation== The legislators provided that, once the law was declared constitutional, a six-month period for discussion and education of the affected public would follow before the law came into force. In a program overseen by the Muslim women-led [[Ni Putes Ni Soumises]], NGO representatives and [[social work]]ers conducted individual and group information meetings with women in towns and suburbs with large Muslim populations. The representatives reported instances of some women deciding to file [[complaint]]s against their husbands once informed of their rights; of some others stating that they were waiting for the law to come into force so that it would compel their husbands to release them from wearing the veil; and of some others stopping the wearing of the facial veil outright after the information meetings. While no disturbances were reported during the personal meetings with the women who could be reached, the representatives reported instances of local [[Ulama|Islamic clerics]] issuing [[fatwā]]s against them, of being verbally harassed, of being threatened including with implied [[death threat]]s, and in one case of being [[assault|physically assaulted]] by men. In the last preparatory phase, larger meetings and public debates were organised.<ref>{{Citation | last = Menegaux | first = Charlotte | title = Niqab : l'audacieux pari des "ambassadrices de la laïcité" | newspaper = [[Le Figaro]] | date = 23 March 2011 | url = http://www.lefigaro.fr/actualite-france/2011/03/23/01016-20110323ARTFIG00736--niqab-l-audacieux-pari-des-ambassadrices-de-la-laicite.php | access-date = 24 March 2011 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20110324170513/http://www.lefigaro.fr/actualite-france/2011/03/23/01016-20110323ARTFIG00736--niqab-l-audacieux-pari-des-ambassadrices-de-la-laicite.php | archive-date = 24 March 2011 | url-status = live}}</ref> Before the law entered into force, French Interior Minister [[Claude Guéant]] instructed the police to enforce the law "with tact and sensitivity", and stated that under no circumstances could force be used to remove facial coverings in public; individuals should instead be invited to show their faces to permit identification. Guéant also instructed that people arrested for wearing full facial coverings should be told about the law's motivations in a spirit of education, as the law provides. ===ECHR Case=== On 22 September 2011, Hind Ahmas and Najate Nait Ali became the first women to be fined under the burqa ban after having been arrested in May for attempting to deliver an almond cake to the mayor of Meaux (a supporter of the ban) whilst wearing niqabs (the French word for fine, ''amende'', is similar in sound to almond.) They were fined 120 and 80 Euros. Hind Ahmas announced her intention to take the case to the European Court of Human Rights. Kenza Drider announced her intention to run for the presidency whilst wearing a niqab.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/france/8781241/Burka-ban-French-women-fined-for-wearing-full-face-veil.html|title=Burka ban: French women fined for wearing full-face veil|newspaper=The Daily Telegraph|date=22 September 2011|access-date=5 March 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111229000236/http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/france/8781241/Burka-ban-French-women-fined-for-wearing-full-face-veil.html|archive-date=29 December 2011|url-status=live}}</ref> Some [[Balaclava (clothing)|balaclava]]-wearing sympathisers of [[Pussy Riot]] were arrested in [[Marseille]] in August 2012 for being in breach of the ban.<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.english.rfi.fr/europe/20120818-pro-pussy-riot-demonstrators-arrested-marseille |title=Pro-Pussy Riot demonstrators arrested in Marseille |access-date=28 August 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120823012013/http://www.english.rfi.fr/europe/20120818-pro-pussy-riot-demonstrators-arrested-marseille |archive-date=23 August 2012 |url-status=live}}</ref> In 2013 they stood outside Elysée Palace in niqab and subsequently received a criminal conviction. The French criminal courts noted in 2014 that the lower court was wrong to dismiss her rights covered under article 18 but dismissed her appeal.{{rp|16}} The French delegation argued that wearing face coverings violated the principle of "living together". Judges Nußberger and Jäderblom dissented, calling the concept, "far-fetched and vague."{{rp|61}} Going on to note that the very decision of declaring what a woman is allowed to wear was hypocritical and antithetical to the aim of protecting human rights.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/app/conversion/pdf/?library=ECHR&id=001-145466&filename=|title=GRAND CHAMBER CASE OF S.A.S. v. FRANCE (Application no. 43835/11) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG|date=1 July 2014|publisher=ECHR|access-date=7 March 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190331235410/https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/app/conversion/pdf/?library=ECHR&id=001-145466&filename=|archive-date=31 March 2019|url-status=live}}</ref> The committee came to the determination in 2018 that the case had been incorrectly dismissed after review by a single judge on the grounds that, "the conditions of admissibility laid down in articles 34 and 35 of the Convention [had] not been met." Upon review the committee concluded that the applicants's human rights had been violated under article 18 and 26 of the [[International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights]].{{rp|13}} The committee dismissed the notion of "living together" as a vague notion not protected under international law.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/treatybodyexternal/Download.aspx?symbolno=CCPR/C/123/D/2747/2016&Lang=en|title=CCPR/C/123/D/2747/2016; Human Rights Committee Views adopted by the Committee under article 5 (4) of the Optional Protocol, concerning communication No. 2747/2016*,**,***|date=7 December 2018|access-date=11 April 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190331235408/https://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/treatybodyexternal/Download.aspx?symbolno=CCPR%2FC%2F123%2FD%2F2747%2F2016&Lang=en|archive-date=31 March 2019|url-status=live}}</ref> Under the Optional Protocol, the government of France has been given opportunity to respond before the committee finalises their decision. ===Reactions to the law's introduction=== On 9 April 2011, 61 people were arrested in Paris for holding an unauthorized demonstration against the impending law.<ref name="France24" /> The law came into effect on 11 April 2011. To protest the law's introduction several veiled women protested outside [[Notre Dame de Paris]]. One of the protestors, Kenza Drider, stated that she was "just expressing [her] freedom to be."<ref name="sky">{{Cite web|url=http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/World-News/Video-Burka-Ban-France-Women-Banned-From-Wearing-Full-Face-Veil/Article/201104215969972?lpos=World_News_First_Home_Article_Teaser_Region_4&lid=ARTICLE_15969972_Video_Burka_Ban_France%3A_Women_Banned_From_Wearing_Full_Face_Veil|title=Arrests As France Enforces Veil Ban|publisher=Sky News|date=11 April 2011|accessdate=11 April 2011}}</ref> The French government stated that the burqa damaged community relations.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-13031397|title=Women in face veils detained as France enforces ban|publisher=BBC|date=11 April 2011|access-date=11 April 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110411034343/http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-13031397|archive-date=11 April 2011|url-status=live}}</ref> Supporters of the bill also stated that it promoted gender equality and secularism.<ref name="France24">{{Cite web|url=http://www.france24.com/en/20110411-ban-islamic-veil-sparks-protest-arrests-paris|title=Police arrest veiled women at 'burqa ban' protest|publisher=France 24|date=11 April 2011|access-date=11 April 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110413223748/http://www.france24.com/en/20110411-ban-islamic-veil-sparks-protest-arrests-paris|archive-date=13 April 2011|url-status=live}}</ref> Police unions said in a statement that the enforcement of the law would be "extremely difficult ... if not almost impossible".<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-fg-france-veil-20110412,0,3195242.story|title=Women detained at veil protest in France|author=Kim Willsher|work=Los Angeles Times |date=12 April 2011}}</ref> Interior Minister Claude Guéant pointed out that notwithstanding any implementation difficulties "the role of the police and gendarmerie are to ensure that the law is respected."<ref name="OF20110412">{{Cite news|url=http://www.ouest-france.fr/ofdernmin_-Voile-integral-une-amende-de-150-euros-pour-une-femme-des-Mureaux-78-_6346-1761681-fils-tous--22050-abd_filDMA.Htm|title=Voile intégral : une amende de 150 euros pour une femme des Mureaux |work=Ouest France|date=12 April 2011}}</ref> In fact, there were no publicized enforcement problems at the outset. The few demonstrators being arrested on the first day were brought in for discussion, as planned by the Interior Ministry and as consistent with the law's provision for citizenship education in lieu of a fine, and the first fines were imposed subsequently "without incident".<ref name="OF20110412"/> William Langley, a commentator for the ''[[The Daily Telegraph|Telegraph]]'', noted that beside support across the political spectrum, "the public overwhelmingly sees the ban as right for France, beneficial to its Muslim communities and justified", and concluded that the ban and its application "demonstrate that France has a more sophisticated concept of tolerance than Britain."<ref name="langley">{{Cite news|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/france/8444177/BurkaFranceNational-FrontMarine-Le-PenMuslimFadela-AmaraAndre-Gerinhijab.html|title=France’s burka ban is a victory for tolerance|work=The Daily Telegraph|date=11 April 2011|access-date=3 April 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180116132845/http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/france/8444177/BurkaFranceNational-FrontMarine-Le-PenMuslimFadela-AmaraAndre-Gerinhijab.html|archive-date=16 January 2018|url-status=live}}</ref> as of 2011, five months after the law came into effect,<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/affichTexteArticle.do;jsessionid=40BC96921C6F4CD934A5BC74B95C3CCE.tplgfr24s_1?idArticle=JORFARTI000022911677&cidTexte=JORFTEXT000022911670&dateTexte=29990101&categorieLien=id|title=LOI n° 2010-1192 du 11 octobre 2010 interdisant la dissimulation du visage dans l'espace public|access-date=7 March 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190308080910/https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/affichTexteArticle.do;jsessionid=40BC96921C6F4CD934A5BC74B95C3CCE.tplgfr24s_1?idArticle=JORFARTI000022911677&cidTexte=JORFTEXT000022911670&dateTexte=29990101&categorieLien=id|archive-date=8 March 2019|url-status=live}}</ref> the police had noted 100 incidents of women being stopped under the law. None of them led to a punishment, though "fewer than 10" were going through the courts. Some police have wrongly given on-the-spot fines, which were later annulled. [[:fr:Collectif contre l'islamophobie en France|French Collective against Islamophobia]] reported an increase in the number of physical attacks on women wearing the niqab. Hind Ahmas, a protester against the law, was twice arrested for wearing a niqab.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2011/sep/19/battle-for-the-burqa?INTCMP=ILCNETTXT3487|title=France's burqa ban: women are 'effectively under house arrest'|newspaper=The Guardian|date=19 September 2011|access-date=5 March 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131005104846/http://www.theguardian.com/world/2011/sep/19/battle-for-the-burqa?INTCMP=ILCNETTXT3487|archive-date=5 October 2013|url-status=live}}</ref> Some law enforcement officers have complained of being attacked, physically while enforcing the law and then afterward in the media's portrayal.<ref name=point130724/><ref name=lef130724/> In July 2013, a husband allegedly attempted to strangle a police officer during a check of an entirely-veiled woman in [[Trappes]] and the next night a group of 250 youths threw projectiles at a police station.<ref name=point130720/><ref name=reuters130720/><ref name=yahoo130721/> Clashes continued the following night and spread to [[Élancourt]] and [[Guyancourt]].<ref name=bbc130721/> In the Mirail district of [[Toulouse]] in April 2018, police asked a woman to remove her face covering veil so she could be identified, but she refused and while being taken into the police vehicle started screaming. The French article states that a video recording of the event circulated social media showing the woman being beaten by police.<!--Une vidéo circulait lundi sur les réseaux sociaux dénonçant les méthodes de la police et où l'ont voit des policiers ceinturer et plaquer au sol la femme qui se rebellait. --> Shortly thereafter, about 30 individuals assaulted the police officers by throwing objects at them. The officers responded with [[tear gas]] and [[stun grenade]]s and had to use their weapons 18 times before being able to leave.<ref name="francetvinfo">{{Cite news|url=https://france3-regions.francetvinfo.fr/occitanie/haute-garonne/toulouse/toulouse-controle-police-femme-portant-niqab-degenere-1459529.html|title=A Toulouse, le contrôle par la police d'une femme portant un niqab dégénère|access-date=20 April 2018|language=fr|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180421035031/https://france3-regions.francetvinfo.fr/occitanie/haute-garonne/toulouse/toulouse-controle-police-femme-portant-niqab-degenere-1459529.html|archive-date=21 April 2018|url-status=live}}</ref> Later the same night, there was further rioting associated with this incident in the Renerie and Bellefontaine districts of Toulouse where [[Arson|11 vehicles were set afire]].<ref name="francetvinfo"/> On 23 October 2018, the United Nations Human Rights Committee published a statement coming down against France for human rights violations. The committee was responding to two complaints about women being prosecuted for wearing clothing that violated the French ban on face coverings. This was a landmark case for the UN Human Rights Committee seeing as it was the first case by the committee to address the Islamic veil. The committee concluded that France had not provided a strong enough reason for their ban of face veiling. France had initially argued that it was a necessary law in order for their community to better coexist and live in harmony.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Kuruvilla |first1=Carol |title=UN Panel Declares France's 'Burqa Ban' Violates Muslim Women's Rights |url=https://www.huffpost.com/entry/france-muslim-burqa-ban-united-nations_n_5bcf2280e4b055bc9484d703 |work=HuffPost|accessdate=8 October 2019 |language=en |date=23 October 2018}}</ref> The UN committee disagreed with this reasoning. Further, the UN committee believed that the ban would strip away the rights of veiled women by ostracizing them from French community. Following the UN statement, France has 180 days to respond with what steps they are taking to change their law.<ref>{{cite web |title=France: Banning the niqab violated two Muslim women’s freedom of religion - UN experts |url=https://www.ohchr.org/EN/NewsEvents/Pages/DisplayNews.aspx?NewsID=23750&LangID=E |website=ohchr.org |publisher=United Nations Human Rights Committee |accessdate=8 October 2019}}</ref> However, it appears little has been done in reparation. Since then, the French Senate has proposed a ban on mothers wearing headscarves when accompanying their children on school field trips. Jean-Michel Blanquer came out in staunch opposition to a pamphlet produced by a French parents association for including the photo of a mother wearing a headscarf.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Chrisafis |first1=Angelique |title=French education minister reignites row over Muslim headscarf |url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/sep/25/french-education-minister-reignites-row-over-muslim-headscarf |work=The Guardian |accessdate=8 October 2019 |date=25 September 2019}}</ref> Blanquer has also expressed that the heads of schools should discourage the inclusion of mothers who choose to wear the headscarf, invoking the argument of France's strong secularism. The ban was approved by French parliament's upper house but rejected in the lower house in May 2019.<ref>{{cite web |title=French Senate votes to ban mothers who wear headscarves from accompanying children on school trips |url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/france-burqa-ban-niqab-school-senate-vote-islam-children-republicans-a8918741.html |work=The Independent |accessdate=8 October 2019 |language=en |date=17 May 2019}}</ref> ==News coverage== According to a paper by Friedman and Merle published in ''Feminist Media Studies'', the French news coverage was overall unifying in presenting a narrative of France's identity as a secular nation that respects religious freedom but controls its public expression. Coverage invoked republican values, legacy societal principles, and legislative approval. Very few newspapers offered perspectives that criticized the law. Women who would be directly impacted by the ban were rarely quoted as sources in news coverage.<ref name="Friedman" /> == Bans on face covering in other states worldwide == Legal bans on face covering in public exist also in different other states worldwide: === Africa === * [[Cameroon]] * [[Central Africa]] * [[Chad]] * [[Gabon]]<ref>[http://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-33553041 BBC: Cameroon bans Islamic face veil after suicide bombings], 2015</ref> * [[Senegal]] === Asia === * [[Sri Lanka]]<ref>{{cite web|title=Sri Lanka erlässt nach Anschlägen Verschleierungsverbot|url=https://www.augsburger-allgemeine.de/politik/Sri-Lanka-erlaesst-nach-Anschlaegen-Verschleierungsverbot-id54175516.html|url-status=|last=Augsburger Allgemeine|language=de}}</ref> * [[Turkey]] in universities === Europe === * see: ''[[Islamic dress in Europe]]'' * [[Austria]]<ref>[http://www.sueddeutsche.de/news/panorama/religion-verbot-der-gesichtsverhuellung-tritt-in-oesterreich-in-kraft-dpa.urn-newsml-dpa-com-20090101-170930-99-275598 sueddeutsche.de]</ref> * [[Belgium]]<ref>spiegel.de 11. Juli 2017: [http://www.spiegel.de/politik/ausland/europaeischer-gerichtshof-fuer-menschenrechte-verschleierungsverbot-in-belgien-ist-rechtens-a-1157175.html ''Verschleierungsverbot in Belgien ist rechtens'']</ref> * [[Bulgaria]] * [[Denmark]]<ref>{{cite web|title=Burka-Verbot jetzt auch in Dänemark|periodical=Basler Zeitung|url=https://bazonline.ch/ausland/europa/burkaverbot-jetzt-auch-in-daenemark/story/25830190|url-status=|access-date=2018-05-31|date=2018-05-31}}</ref> * [[Italy]] * [[Latvia]]<ref>[http://www.independent.co.uk/news/islamic-muslim-face-veil-niqab-burqa-banned-latvia-despite-being-worn-by-just-three-women-entire-a6993991.html Independent.co.uk: Islamic face veil to be banned in Latvia despite being worn by just three women in entire country]</ref> * [[Netherlands]]<ref name="Merkur">Merkur.de:[https://www.merkur.de/politik/burkaverbot-in-holland-in-kraft-streit-um-gesetz-dauerte-14-jahre-zr-12878139.html Nach 14 Jahren Streit: Holland setzt Burkaverbot in Kraft - Wilders bejubelt „Anti-Islam-Maßnahme“], abgerufen am 1. August 2019</ref> * [[Luxembourg]]<ref>[https://www.wort.lu/de/politik/parlament-verabschiedet-burka-gesetz-5ae209ccc1097cee25b883ac Wort.lu: ] Parlament verabschiedet Burka-Gesetz], 2018</ref> * [[Norway]] in schools, universities and nurseries<ref>[http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-40251760 BBC.com:Norway to ban full-face veil in nurseries, schools and universities]</ref> * [[Russia]] * [[Spain]]<ref>[http://www.spiegel.de/politik/ausland/0,1518,702396,00.html Spiegel.de: Spanischer Senat votiert für Vollverschleierung]</ref> * some regions of [[Switzerland]]<ref>{{cite web|title=Tessin sagt Ja zum Verhüllungsverbot|periodical=Tages-Anzeiger|url=http://www.tagesanzeiger.ch/schweiz/standard/Tessin-sagt-Ja-zum-Verhuellungsverbot/story/10631780|url-status=|access-date=2016-08-12|date=2013-09-22}}</ref> * a partial law for state workers, judges, solicitors and soldiers and also for car drivers exist in [[Germany]] ==See also== {{Portal|France|Islam|Law}} *[[Anti-mask laws]] *[[Freedom of religion in France]] *[[French law on secularity and conspicuous religious symbols in schools]] *[[France debate over veils]] *[[Parliamentary Commission on Cults in France]] *[[Human rights in France]] *[[Swiss ban on minarets]] *[[Christianity in Saudi Arabia#Churches|Saudi ban on churches]] *[[Hijab by country]] *[[Islamic dress in Europe]] *[[Quebec ban on face covering]] ==External links== *[http://www.assemblee-nationale.fr/13/ta/ta0524.asp Full text of the law] {{in lang|fr}} ==References== {{Reflist|colwidth=30em|refs= <ref name=point130720>{{cite news | url = http://www.lepoint.fr/societe/trappes-le-mari-de-la-femme-voilee-a-tente-d-etrangler-un-policier-20-07-2013-1706691_23.php | title = Trappes : le mari de la femme voilée a tenté d'étrangler un policier | language = French | trans-title = Trappes: The husband of a veiled woman attempted to stranger a police officer | work = [[Le Point]] | date = 20 July 2013 | access-date = 20 July 2013 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20130723075239/http://www.lepoint.fr/societe/trappes-le-mari-de-la-femme-voilee-a-tente-d-etrangler-un-policier-20-07-2013-1706691_23.php | archive-date = 23 July 2013 | url-status = live}}</ref> <ref name=reuters130720>{{cite news | url = https://www.reuters.com/article/2013/07/20/us-france-disturbance-idUSBRE96J04O20130720 | title = Six held over violence in France after police check veiled woman | agency = [[Reuters]] | date = 20 July 2013 | access-date = 1 July 2017 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20150610184132/http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/07/20/us-france-disturbance-idUSBRE96J04O20130720 | archive-date = 10 June 2015 | url-status = live}}</ref> <ref name=bbc130721>{{cite news | url = https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-23395770 | title = France veil row sparks Trappes unrest | work = [[BBC News]] | date = 21 July 2013 | access-date = 20 June 2018 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20170530072815/http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-23395770 | archive-date = 30 May 2017 | url-status = live}}</ref> <ref name=yahoo130721>{{cite news | url = https://news.yahoo.com/french-police-youths-clash-veil-incident-103343579.html | title = French police, youths clash after veil incidentj | first = Angela | last = Charlton | first2 = Nicolas | last2 = Garriga | agency = [[Associated Press]] | publisher = Yahoo News | date = 21 July 2013 | access-date = 14 January 2017 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20160305044500/http://news.yahoo.com/french-police-youths-clash-veil-incident-103343579.html | archive-date = 5 March 2016 | url-status = live}}</ref> <ref name=point130724>{{cite news | url = http://www.lepoint.fr/societe/exclusif-trappes-les-policiers-se-sentent-stigmatises-24-07-2013-1708003_23.php | title = EXCLUSIF. Trappes : "Les policiers se sentent stigmatisés" | language = French | trans-title = Trappes: "Police officers feel stigmatized" | first = Jean-Michel | last = Décugis | first2 = Aziz | last2 = Zemouri | work = [[Le Point]] | date = 24 July 2013 | access-date = 25 July 2013 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20130726141345/http://www.lepoint.fr/societe/exclusif-trappes-les-policiers-se-sentent-stigmatises-24-07-2013-1708003_23.php | archive-date = 26 July 2013 | url-status = live}}</ref> <ref name=lef130724>{{cite news | url = http://www.lefigaro.fr/actualite-france/2013/07/24/01016-20130724ARTFIG00514-trappes-le-policier-blesse-et-mis-en-cause-se-porte-partie-civile.php | title = Trappes : le policier blessé et mis en cause se porte partie civile | language = French | trans-title = Trappes: The Police officer who was injured and blamed files a civil case | work = Le Figaro | date = 24 July 2013 | access-date = 25 July 2013 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20130725115030/http://www.lefigaro.fr/actualite-france/2013/07/24/01016-20130724ARTFIG00514-trappes-le-policier-blesse-et-mis-en-cause-se-porte-partie-civile.php | archive-date = 25 July 2013 | url-status = live}}</ref> }} {{Laïcité|state=autocollapse}} {{DEFAULTSORT:French Ban on Full Length Islamic Veils}} [[Category:French law]] [[Category:Islamic clothing controversy in France]] [[Category:Islam-related controversies]] [[Category:2010s in France]] [[Category:2010 in law]] [[Category:Law about religion in France]] [[Category:Masks in Europe]] [[Category:Masks in law]]'