Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
Jump to content

SN 2002cx

Coordinates: Sky map 13h 13m 49.72s, +6° 57′ 31.9″
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
SN 2002cx
Event typeSupernova Edit this on Wikidata
Peculiar Ia[1]
Date2002 May 12.21 UT
ConstellationVirgo Edit this on Wikidata
Right ascension13h 13m 49.72s[2]
Declination+6° 57′ 31.9″[1][2]
EpochJ2000
DistanceZ of 0.024[3]
Redshift0.0236, 0.0244, 0.0241, 0.0242, 0.0243, 0.0249 Edit this on Wikidata
HostCGCG 044-035[1]
Colour (B-V)0.04±0.05[4]
Peak apparent magnitude+17.57±0.15[5]
Other designationsSN 2002cx
  Related media on Commons
[edit on Wikidata]

SN 2002cx is a peculiar type Ia supernova.[6][7][8] It was discovered in May 2002 by a team of researchers from LBL.[2] It behaved differently from normal type Ia supernovae, and differently from several other previously observed peculiar type Ia supernovae including SN 1991T and SN 1991bg.[4][9]

SN 2002cx is now classified as type Iax supernova, which are subluminal and do not result in complete destruction of the progenitor white dwarf.[10]

Discovery

[edit]

SN 2002cx was discovered on 2002 May 12.21 UT by W. M. Wood-Vasey, G. Aldering, and P. Nugent of LBL with the Oschin 1.2-m telescope at Palomar.[1][2] On 2002 May 17.2 a spectrum taken by T. Matheson, S. Jha, P. Challis, and R. Kirshner of the CfA with the 1.5-m telescope at FLWO suggested it was a peculiar SN 1991T like type Ia.[1][11] SN 2002cx had photometric follow up taken at Lick using KAIT and the Nickel telescope, and further spectra were taken at FLWO and Keck.[1]

Features

[edit]

Light curve

[edit]
The light curve of SN 2002cx

SN 2002cx hit maximum light in the B-band at 2452415.2 JD (2002 May 20.7) at 17.68, and in the V-band on 2452417.5 JD (2002 May 23) at 17.57.[12] The B-band light curve of SN 2002cx before 15 days after maximum evolves in a similar manner to SN 1999ac, brightening faster than SN 1991T but slower than SN 1994D or SN 2000cx.[9] SN 2002cx declines in brightness faster than SN 1991T and SN 2000cx in the B-band.[9] In the V-band SN 2002cx is similar to SN 1999ac until 30 days after max.[9] Again SN 2002cx declines faster in the V-band than SN 1991T, but slower than is typical for a type Ia.[9]

SN 2002cx is peculiar in the R-band, as it brightens very fast in a manner wholly different from SN 1999ac.[13] It has no secondary maximum in R-band as expected if it were similar to SN 1991T, but instead has a plateau after max.[13] The R-band also declines more slowly than normal.[13] The I-band behaves similarly to the R-band, with a quick brightening, a plateau and slow decline.[13] While a plateau in the I-band is expected for sub-luminous supernovae, the following slow decline is not.[13]

Spectra

[edit]
Four spectra of SN 2002cx

The first spectrum of SN 2002cx was obtained with FLWO on 2002 May 17, 4 days before B-band max.[14] At this point SN 2002cx is similar to SN 1997br as both have a blue continuum, with absorption lines from Fe III λ4404 and Fe III λ5129.[14] Si II λ6355 though is not apparent in SN 2002cx at this point, and it has very weak Ca II H & K lines suggesting that SN 2002cx is similar to SN 1991T which also lacked such lines.[14] This spectrum for SN 2002cx has a low expansion velocity measuring only ~6400 km s−1.[14] This marked one way in which it was different from SN 1997br, as SN 1997br's expansion velocity was ~10,400 km s−1 at the same point relative to its own B-band maximum.[14] At the time of measurement SN 2002cx's expansion velocity was the lowest measured for an early time type Ia,[14] Another spectrum taken on 2002 May 20, 1 day before B-band maximum light, showed little evolution from the one taken on 2002 May 17.[15]

Four later spectra were taken on June 2, June 6, June 12, and June 16 at FLWO.[16] The spectrum of SN 2002cx has evolved by this point to have a redder continuum.[16] It has also lost the Fe III absorption lines and its Fe II lines have gained prominence at λ4555 and λ5129.[16] The Ca II H & K lines continue to remain weak, a further departure from SN 1997br.[16] Unlike another type of sub-luminous type Ia, SN 1991bg, SN 2002cx does not show Ti II lines around 4100–4400 Å.[16]

Spectra were taken at Keck corresponding to 20, 25, and 26 days after maximum light in the B-band.[17] So little evolution was observed between these spectra that they were all combined in order to increase the signal-to-noise ratio and study less pronounced features.[17] Fe II still dominates the spectrum.[17] The Ca II infrared triplet is weak in SN 2002cx as compared to other type Ia supernovae, as expected since the Ca II H & K line is also weak in SN 2002cx.[17] Unlike other type Ia supernova, SN 2002cx has double-peaked emission lines which may be due to jet-like emissions or rotating ejecta, or may simply only be seen in SN 2002cx because its low expansion velocity does not wash them out.[17] The emission or ejecta hypothesis is considered less likely because if it were the case all the peaks should share equal separation, which they do not.[17][18] SN 2002cx has absorption and emission lines between 6400 Å and 7000 Å that are unique among previously discovered type Ia supernovae.[18]

A final spectrum of SN 2002cx was taken on July 16, 56 days after B-band maximum.[19] SN 2002cx was by then in the nebular phase, with emission lines dominating over absorption lines.[19] The lines were far narrower than previously observed type Ia supernovae and are less pronounced as well.[19] SN 2002cx most clearly differs from other type Ia supernovae in the region between 6500 Å and 8500 Å where it has a primarily flat continuum and weak Ca II infrared triplet absorption.[19] Because this is the region covered by the R and I-bands, it may explain the odd color evolution of SN 2002cx in these bands.[19]

SN 2002cx did not evolve much between 4 days and 1 day before max, nor did it evolve much from 12 days after max to 27 days after max,[16] However, it underwent dramatic evolution during the two weeks after maximum light in the B-band.[16]

Based on the odd behavior of SN 2002cx's spectrum there are some questions as to whether it is a type Ia supernova or not.[20] Although it does not show Si II lines neat 6150 Å as is required of a type Ia, SN 2002cx's evolution is explainable using the paradigm of other type Ia observations and so Li et al. consider their classification as a type Ia as secure.[20]

Color

[edit]

SN 2002cx does not suffer from much host related reddening, as evidenced by its very blue spectra.[4] It is extinct in B−V color by 0.034 magnitudes from dust in Milky Way.[4]

SN 2002cx is similar to SN 1999ac in B−V at max, but also at times as late as 50 days after max which is unexpected as the two supernovae evolve differently at late times.[4] SN 2002cx has a B−V color of −0.04±0.04 at 4 days before max, and 0.04±0.05 at the time of max in the B-band which is bluer than SN 1991bg at the same time.[4] The color of SN 2002cx is consistent with Lira-Phillips law at late times.[21]

The V−R color of SN 2002cx evolves similar to other type Ia supernovae before 5 days after max, although it is somewhat redder.[21] After 5 days after max SN 2002cx gets progressively redder, although still slightly bluer than SN 1991bg.[4] At 25 days after max SN 2002cx continues to redden, while SN 1991bg starts to get bluer.[4]

SN 2002cx's V−I color is red for all times, only slightly bluer than SN 1991bg before 25 days after max, and redder after 25 days after max.[4]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b c d e f Li et al., 2003 p. 5
  2. ^ a b c d e Wood-Vasey et al., 2002
  3. ^ Li et al., 2003 p. 14
  4. ^ a b c d e f g h i Li et al., 2003 p. 12
  5. ^ Li et al., 2003 p. 58
  6. ^ Li et al., 2003 p. 1
  7. ^ Branch et al., 2004
  8. ^ Jha et al., 2006
  9. ^ a b c d e Li et al., 2003 p. 10
  10. ^ Jha, Saurabh W. (2017). Type Iax Supernovae. pp. 375–401. arXiv:1707.01110. Bibcode:2017hsn..book..375J. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-21846-5_42. ISBN 978-3-319-21845-8. {{cite book}}: |journal= ignored (help)
  11. ^ Matheson et al., 2002
  12. ^ Li et al., 2003 p. 9
  13. ^ a b c d e Li et al., 2003 p. 11
  14. ^ a b c d e f Li et al., 2003 p. 15
  15. ^ Li et al., 2003 p. 16
  16. ^ a b c d e f g Li et al., 2003 p. 17
  17. ^ a b c d e f Li et al., 2003 p. 18
  18. ^ a b Li et al., 2003 p. 19
  19. ^ a b c d e Li et al., 2003 p. 20
  20. ^ a b Li et al., 2003 p. 24
  21. ^ a b Li et al., 2003 p. 13

Bibliography

[edit]
[edit]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=SN_2002cx&oldid=1257673625"