Draft:Altenar

Review waiting, please be patient. This may take 3 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 2,689 pending submissions waiting for review. If the submission is accepted, then this page will be moved into the article space. If the submission is declined, then the reason will be posted here. In the meantime, you can continue to improve this submission by editing normally. Where to get help If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews. If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed. How to improve a draft Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia. Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Add tags to your draft Editor resources Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs Reviewer tools Instructions · What links here · Altenar (talk: + · bio) · (log) · Copyvios report · reFill · Citation Bot · (Search: Google, Bing, Wikipedia) · Submitted 6 days ago by Kateryna Holovchenko (talk: D · +) · Last edited 6 days ago by Kateryna Holovchenko

Submission declined on 22 July 2024 by SafariScribe (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject. If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted. If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted. Where to get help If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews. If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed. How to improve a draft Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia. Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Add tags to your draft Editor resources Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs Declined by SafariScribe 8 days ago. Last edited by Kateryna Holovchenko 6 days ago. Reviewer: Inform author. This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review.

Submission declined on 19 July 2024 by MaxnaCarta (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. Declined by MaxnaCarta 12 days ago.

Submission declined on 3 July 2024 by Greenman (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. Declined by Greenman 27 days ago.

Submission declined on 1 July 2024 by Vanderwaalforces (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements) reliable secondary strictly independent of the subject Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Vanderwaalforces 29 days ago.

Submission declined on 15 April 2024 by DoubleGrazing (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements) reliable secondary strictly independent of the subject Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by DoubleGrazing 3 months ago.

Submission declined on 11 April 2024 by Hey man im josh (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements) reliable secondary strictly independent of the subject Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject. Declined by Hey man im josh 3 months ago.

Submission declined on 5 April 2024 by Qcne (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. Declined by Qcne 3 months ago.

• Comment: still appears to be a company website rather than wikipedia article — MaxnaCarta  ( 💬 • 📝 ) 01:56, 19 July 2024 (UTC)

• Comment: Please address WP:COI. Greenman (talk) 20:15, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

• Comment: Please make the suggested improvements before resubmitting for review, thanks. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 17:10, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

• Comment: Zero evidence of notability, sources are a mix of routine business reporting, churnalism, and primary sources, none of which contribute towards WP:NCORP. DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:51, 15 April 2024 (UTC)

• Comment: Please also format your references by following the tutorial at WP:INTREFVE. Qcne (talk) 17:02, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

This article may have been created or edited in return for undisclosed payments, a violation of Wikipedia's terms of use. It may require cleanup to comply with Wikipedia's content policies, particularly neutral point of view. (April 2024)

Altenar

Founded	2011
Headquarters	Douglas, Isle of Man
Industry	iGaming
Products	Online sports betting and associated services
Services	Fully managed sports betting solutions
Employees	500+
URL	altenar.com

Altenar Software Limited is a B2B provider of sports betting solutions and associated services to licensed B2C gambling operators.^[1]. ounded in 2011, the company specializes in providing front-end design and integrations for online and retail betting operators, including data feeds, odds compilation, real-time data analytics, player account management, content management, risk management, licensing, and compliance. Altenar operates from its headquarters in the Isle of Man and has regional offices in Greece and Uruguay. The company is privately owned and ISO 27001-certified.^[2]

Altenar was established in 2011 by John Spiteri, Antonis Karakousis, and Dinos Stranomitis. The founders aimed to develop a platform that catered to the diverse needs of iGaming operators globally. In 2012, the company launched its first sportsbook platform with real-time data integration and odds management capabilities, forming initial partnerships with several gambling operators.

By 2016, Altenar expanded^[3]its partnerships with larger operators and enhanced its platform capabilities, launching live betting features in 2017 and integrating AI-driven features in 2019. The company also established new offices to support its growing client base, including a major hub in Colombia to enter the Latin American market^[4].

During the COVID-19 pandemic, Altenar saw a significant increase in its client base, reaching over 100 global clients by 2021.^[5] This growth continued with further developments in live betting options and virtual sports betting in 2023. Altenar expanded into Asian and African markets by forming partnerships with local operators and relocated its headquarters to the Isle of Man.^[6]

Key historical milestones

• 2011: Altenar Technologies Ltd is established
• 2012: Launch of first sportsbook platform
• 2017: Introduces advanced live betting capabilities
• 2019: Integration of AI and data analytics
• 2021: Reaches a client base of over 100 operators
• 2022: Expansion into African markets
• 2023: Opening of corporate headquarters in the Isle of Man
• 2024: Partnership with esports betting provider DATA.BET

Altenar employs over 500 staff globally^[7] to support international operators in Europe, the Americas, Asia, and Africa. The company provides software-only and fully managed sports betting products for online and land-based gambling operations. Clients for its turnkey^[8] and white-label betting solutions include Betsson^[9], Lottoland^[10], Soft2Bet, Apuesta Total,^[11] Vegas.hu,^[12] and Star Casino.^[13]

The company's software supports various betting services, such as odds compilation, real-time data analytics, integrated PAM and CRM, API solutions, and risk management. Altenar aims to enhance operational efficiency for B2C gaming companies and ensure regulatory compliance in their operating jurisdictions.

In recent years, Altenar formed strategic partnerships with various technology and data providers, including Betradar, IMG, Stats Perform, Betgenius, and Pragmatic Solutions. These collaborations have allowed Altenar to integrate advanced features into its platform and expand its market presence.

Altenar has established partnerships and alliances with other iGaming companies, data providers, and regulatory bodies to expand its range of products and services in response to market demands. Integration with official data suppliers, including Betradar, IMG, Stats Perform, and Betgenius, secures real-time data feeds, odds, and live betting options.

In August 2015, Genii agreed to supply its portfolio of over 130 games with Altenar.^[14]

In June 2021, Altenar integrated a new esports odds feed from Oddin.^[15]

In July 2023, Altenar announced a strategic partnership with the micro-betting technology platform nVenue.^[16]

Later in the same year, Altenar secured a collaboration deal with Pragmatic Solutions to integrate its smart Player Account Management (PAM) platform.^[17]

Collaborations with technology providers such as Fast Track^[18] and Simplify have brought advanced marketing automation and customer engagement tools to Altenar’s platform.

In June 2024, Altenar partnered with DATA.BET to enhance its eSports offering in 30 disciplines and over 2000 markets.^[19]

Altenar adheres to global technical compliance standards, including ISO 27001, and is a member of the International Betting Integrity Association (IBIA). The company's software is tested and certified by independent labs such as Gaming Laboratories and BMM Testlabs. Altenar holds licenses in several jurisdictions, including the UK (UKGC), Malta (MGA), Canada (Ontario - AGCO), Sweden (SGA), Romania (ONJN), and Greece (HGC).

• United Kingdom (UKGC) - Remote Licence^[20]
• Malta (MGA) - B2B - Critical Supply Licence^[21]
• Romania (ONJN) - CLASS II Licence^[22]
• Ontario (AGCO) - Manufacturer’s Licence^[23][24]
• Sweden ( SGA) - Game Software Licence

Leadership

• Stanislav Silin (CEO)
• Dinos Stranomitis (COO & Co-founder)
• John Quaye (CFO)
• Sam Hill (Sales Director)

2024

• Sigma Africa: Best Workplace Award^[25]

2023

• SBC Awards: Sportsbook Supplier of the Year
• SIGMA Americas: Best Sports Betting Provider of the Year
• MIGEA Awards: Best Online Sports Betting Supplier of the Year

2022

• SIGMA Americas: Online Sportsbook of the Year Award^[26]
• MiGEA: Best Gaming Online Betting Platform of the Year & Best Gaming Mark of Excellence^[27]
• EGR Italy: Sports Betting Supplier of the Year
• CEEGC: Best Sports Betting Provider in Central and Eastern Europe, Award for Best Overall Sports Betting Software^[28]

2021

• SBC Awards Latinoamerica: Industry Innovation of the Year^[29]
• SAGSE LatAm: Best Online Sportsbook Provider of the Year
• MiGEA: Best Online Sports Betting Supplier^[30]

2019

• SEG Awards: Rising Star in Sports Betting Technology^[31]
• BSG Awards: Rising Star in Nordic Sports Betting Technology

2018

• Mare Balticum BSG Awards (Baltic and Scandinavian Gaming Awards): Best Sports Betting Innovation