Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Jump to content

User talk:Juliancolton

Page contents not supported in other languages.
This user has administrator privileges on the English Wikipedia.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Permethius (talk | contribs) at 23:21, 3 June 2009 (Admin Coaching: comment). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Please click here to leave me a new message.
Welcome to Wikipedia. Make it better; edit an article. (already have?)
Archive
Juliancolton's Archives

March 2008 Archive
April 2008 Archive
May 2008 Archive
June 2008 Archive
July 2008 Archive
August 2008 Archive
September 2008 Archive
October 2008 Archive
November 2008 Archive
December 2008 Archive
January 2009 Archive
February 2009 Archive
March 2009 Archive
April 2009 Archive
May 2009 Archive
June 2009 Archive

Tropical storms

Please see my talk page for a reply. I'm not sure I understand the reasoning here. Dekimasuよ! 04:43, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD

Which sources passed WP:GNG? --Jimbo[online] 08:11, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

To me it looks like concensus was delete. The arguments for keep were flawed. Anyways, I'll take it up at DRV later. --Jimbo[online] 13:42, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Bias or not, when I explained why the references fail WP:N, with no decent counter argument except "References look good to me". --Jimbo[online] 15:17, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
That's just a statement of the hierarchy of notability criteria. They didn't say what part of the article passed WP:N, just the fact that it overrides WP:ATHLETE. --Jimbo[online] 17:56, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tropical cyclone FA

I figure a lot of it must be your work :D so congrats. And when I said "nice collage", i didn't mean "stick it on the fraking main page" nice >_< [j/k] Benders Game 14:27, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Usenet flood

Would you userfy Usenet flood for me? It was on my todo list but with that other stuff going on I wasn't able to finish even half of the draft I had going. Thanks! Tothwolf (talk) 16:55, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for coming out!

I would like to thank you for coming out and participating in my Request for Adminship, which closed unsuccessfully at (48/8/6) based on my withdrawal. I withdrew because in my opinion I need to focus on problems with my content contributions before I can proceed with expanding my responsibilities. I completely understand your justification for switching from support to oppose. Overall I feel that the RfA has improved me as an editor and in turn some articles which in my eyes is successful. Thank you again for your support/opposition. Cheers and happy editing. --kelapstick (talk) 17:44, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA Sweeps June update

Thanks to everyone's dedicated efforts to the GA Sweeps process, a total of 396 articles were swept in May! That more than doubles our most successful month of 163 swept articles in September 2007 (and the 2 articles swept in April)! I plan to be sending out updates at the beginning of each month detailing any changes, updates, or other news until Sweeps are completed. So if you get sick of me, keep reviewing articles so we can be done (and then maybe you'll just occasionally bump into me). We are currently over 60% done with Sweeps, with just over a 1,000 articles left to review. With over 40 members, that averages out to about 24 articles per person. If each member reviews an article a day this month (or several!), we'll be completely finished. I know that may be asking for a lot, but it would allow us to complete Sweeps and allow you to spend more time writing GAs, reviewing GANs, or focusing on other GARs (or whatever else it is you do to improve Wikipedia) as well as finish ahead of the two-year mark coming up in August. I recognize that this can be a difficult process at times and appreciate your tenacity in spending time in ensuring the quality of the older GAs. Feel free to recruit other editors who have reviewed GANs in the past and might be interested in the process. The more editors, the less the workload, and hopefully the faster this will be completed. If you have any questions about reviews or the process let me know and I'll be happy to get back to you. Again, thank you for taking the time to help with the process, I appreciate your efforts! --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talkcontrib) 18:07, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion review for Samuel Galindo

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Samuel Galindo. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. --Jimbo[online] 20:13, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I do appreciate your work

...and I understand where you're coming from concerning the updating of current articles, like the 2009 Atlantic hurricane season. But, isn't that the point of current class, to point out current articles which need constant updates? I do appreciate some of the older articles you've worked on such as the 1941 Florida hurricane article and ones I started but never completed such as the 1994 Christmas Nor'easter article. My comments are not reflective of what I think of your work, merely how I read the wikipedia standards, and how they seem to apply to the TC project. And yes, I'm very frustrated at how little attention most of the older season articles and older storms appear to get. Thegreatdr (talk) 21:05, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have no strong opinions regarding articles on fish storm Alfalfa or fish spinner Ollie. If people want to create them, fine. But I do think our focus as a project should lie on the retirees before we address even the most efficient SST-dropping/ocean-blending cyclone. However, our attempts at working on Camille together didn't last all that long, did they? It's interesting how we all collaborated quite well on the tropical cyclone article, but Camille remains chicken liver. Thegreatdr (talk) 21:19, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

How Can I Put In Pictures?

It's me, Typingwestern 015. I need your help again. I know how to add in userboxes. I even created some of my own. Here's the problem: What about pictures? How do I create new ones for Wikipedia? Tell me, please. Typingwestern015 (talk) 22:06, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 1 June 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 22:34, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Outlines at Wikicup?

Julian,

I've been asking lots of mentors over at WP:ADOPT for advice, and User:Garden replied with this one: "include some kind of reward at next year's WikiCup"

You're in Wikicup, right?

How would we go about what Garden has suggested?

(I've also asked Thehelpfulone, because I think he's in it too).

The Transhumanist    03:24, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What would we have to do to get them included? The Transhumanist    03:31, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey!

I see you just updated the admin coaching page with space for one more is that correct. OtisJimmyOne 03:29, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That's great, I asked Academic Challenger to Coach me earlier but s/he doesn't look as active as you are. Thanks OtisJimmyOne 03:39, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hey Julian i've created User:Otisjimmy1/Coaching and added what you requested. Best, OtisJimmyOne 23:17, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

I have made a request for New Page Watcher here. Could you please check it and approve me if i am eligible. -SubashChandran007 ׀ sign! 09:06, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Big Thank You!

It's me, Typingwestern015. I finally posted my own picture! Come and see! You must also see my science fiction novel, the concept of a nuclear volcanic meltdown, and these userboxes I made. You'll love it! Seriously, you will. Typingwestern015 (talk) 18:01, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Admin Coach

Hi there before putting in an application I was wondering if you could if you have time look through my contribs and see if I would be able to apply to be an admin. I have the minimum basics like participating in XFDs and closing/helping with requests on the help desk. Corruptcopper (talk) 20:19, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just thought I'd butt in since I'm not sure if JC is here -- a lot of people will oppose if you almost only use Huggle and other automated tools (which is what I see). Audited content work is pretty much a must, or it is highly unlikely that you would pass. I disagree that content work is the be all and end all of adminship, but it seems a lot of people disagree with me, too. — neuro(talk) 20:21, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for that we will continue the discussion on my talkpage if you want as I woul like to know what you mean 'Audited work' Corruptcopper (talk) 20:24, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
In accordance with point six of Julian's editnotice I'd rather keep messages here. By 'audited content work', I mean GA/FA/FL/DYK, etc. Your unfamiliarity with these processes would be your downfall in an RfA -- I don't agree with it, but it is true. — neuro(talk) 20:26, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Ok cool thanks I will start to look into those areas. Corruptcopper (talk) 20:28, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thank you for granting my rollback request (: Arteyu ? Blame it on me ! 23:11, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Another requested move

Serbia-Venezuela relations needs an en dash. Thanks! Dabomb87 (talk) 23:57, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Algeria–Greek relations-->Algeria–Greece relations per [1]. Stay tuned! Dabomb87 (talk) 00:02, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Algerian–Turkish relations-->Algeria–Turkey relations. Dabomb87 (talk) 00:03, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
If there is anything you ever need, please holler. You don't know how much I appreciate having an admin around right when I want one. Dabomb87 (talk) 00:06, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete request. Dabomb87 (talk) 02:35, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bilateral AfD closure

what do you think of this closure? Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Austria–Georgia relations. the discussion only yielded one source which was a primary source. and the article only has 1 reference. LibStar (talk) 00:13, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As I said on Cirt's talk page as well. If we go by strength of arguments, it was a no consensus. Best, --A NobodyMy talk 00:19, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I would have closed it the same way personally. A Nobody is correct. –Juliancolton | Talk 00:20, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"No edits"

[2] - That's because its only edit was stopped by the abuse filter. Mr.Z-man 00:55, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

pigface welcome to mexico

trent reznor does NOT sing on this LIVE cd OGRE of skinny puppy sings SUCK on this one ... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.183.204.139 (talk) 01:19, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That would be a violation of the second bullet point at the top of this page. ceranthor 01:38, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Protection of WP:BLPN

Whilst vandalism of this talk page is bad, it should not be protected from IP editors, who should be able to raise BLP concerns on this noticeboard. I think protecting this page is wrong. Martin451 (talk) 02:27, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Capital District compilation image

You input would be appreciated. wadester16 04:03, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of My user page

Could i please have a copy of my userpage that you deleted without letting me know. Id like to see the Vandalism on it. Avatar 06349 (talk) 11:51, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's really not worth it. It just contained "F you". — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 12:22, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats!

Ask and you shall receive, congrats! Ruhrfisch ><>°° 14:03, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Greater Manchester June Newsletter, Issue XVI

Delivered on 3 June 2009 by Nev1. If you do not wish to receive future newsletters, please add two *s by your username on the Project Mainpage.

Nev1 (talk) 14:19, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Greater Manchester June Newsletter, Issue XVI

Delivered on 3 June 2009 by Nev1. If you do not wish to receive future newsletters, please add two *s by your username on the Project Mainpage.

Nev1 (talk) 14:20, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion to be completed

Hi, you have done a good job in deleting the pages "Michele Trimarchi" and his personal interpretation' of "Neuropsychophysiology". But in the present page of Neuropsychophysiology (that is much more correct, indeed!) there are still two links to ISN (the site of Michele Trimarchi!!) that, in its turn, is a completely non-notable institute. As a matter of fact, it is a self-referential, blatant private organization whose founder (M.Trimarchi) is nor a doctor neither a psychologist, but someone looking for legitimation and visibility. The scientific discipline of neuropsychophysiology is something apart! Please, delete these two links and only then it will be possible to widen the article in a science-based objective manner. Thank you ---- PernillaPthor —Preceding unsigned comment added by PernillaPthor (talkcontribs) 17:42, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blatant COI

This article in its entirety has been created and edited by PeterSymonds (talk · contribs). This and the Julian Koltun article are clear demonstrations of the barefaced greed of some cabals (which I shall not name here). It is obvious that wikipedia is worlds biggest force for libel and burying the truth for jimbo's insidious personal profit and to forward NewWorldOrder's agenda. WAKE UP SHEEPLE!! RESIST THE SHADOW GOVERNMENT! VOTE RON PAUL! OBAMA IS A HALF HUMAN HALF CLOTH! MOVE TO LIBERTARIAN PARADISE: SOMALIA!! Benders Game 17:47, 3 June 2009 (UTC) (Decided against posting it on the article talk page :P )[reply]

Admin Coaching

I have answered your questions at User:Permethius/Admin coaching.Cheers!--Þέŗṃέłḥìμŝ LifeDeath 19:15, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry, it was wrong. I realize that. Is there anyway I can redo those plagued questions?Again, I am really sorry and that is not a way an admin acts. Truthfully ,very sorry--Þέŗṃέłḥìμŝ LifeDeath 23:05, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks man. These answers will be from me. Cheers!--Þέŗṃέłḥìμŝ LifeDeath 23:08, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I have done it. All me. Cheers!--Þέŗṃέłḥìμŝ LifeDeath 23:21, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

First word (video-game name) needs to be italicized. Thanks, as always, Dabomb87 (talk) 19:35, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and in case you weren't aware, Wikipedia:Today's featured article/June 9, 2009. Congrats! Dabomb87 (talk) 19:40, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for rollback

Self-explanatory.:) I promise to use it effectively and for its intended purpose. just a little insignificant 21:29, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]