Terror (politics)
 |
 | This article appears to be a dictionary definition. |
Terror, from the Latin verb terrere meaning "to frighten".[1] The goal of terror is to inspire dread and to paralyze the will to resist the objectives of the perpetrator. In English common law, the term "in terrorem" relates to provisions in contracts that are designed to compel compliance to the terms by fear of serious financial consequence of a breach. "In terrorem populi" was a criminal offence in common law of moving about armed despite the absence of violence or riot.[2]
David Forte states that the primary difference between terror and terrorism is that while illegitimate terror can be neutrally evil, i.e. random violence committed by robbers, rapists and even soldiers, terrorism has the additional political or moral dimension, being the systemised use of randomly focused violence by organised groups against civilian targets to effect a political objective.[2]
According to Tilly, the term "terror" spans across a wide range of human cruelties, from Stalin's use of executions to clandestine attacks by groups like the Basque separatists and the IRA and even ethnic cleansing and genocide[3]
See also
References
- ^ Kim Campbell (September 27, 2001). "When is 'terrorist' a subjective term?". Christian Science Monitor. Retrieved 2010-01-11.
New York Times columnist William Safire wrote that the word "terrorist" has its roots in the Latin terrere, which means "to frighten."
- ^ a b Forte, David F. (1986). "Terror and Terrorism: There Is a Difference". Ohio Northern University Law Review. 13. Ohio Northern University Pettit College of Law: 39–52.
- ^ Tilly, p9
 | This vocabulary-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |