Talk:Mining in Cornwall and Devon

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Cornwall Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cornwall, an attempt to improve and expand Wikipedia coverage of Cornwall and all things Cornish. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project member page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.CornwallWikipedia:WikiProject CornwallTemplate:WikiProject CornwallCornwall-related articles Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. See drop-down box for suggested article edit guidelines: Be bold - if you know something about Cornwall then put it in! We value your contributions and don't be afraid if your spelling isn't great as there are plenty of spelling and grammar experts on clean-up duty! Articles on settlements in Cornwall should be written using the standard set of headings approved by the UK geography WikiProject's guideline How to write about settlements. At WikiProject Cornwall we subscribe to the policies laid down by Wikipedia - particularly civility and consensus building. We are aware that the wording on Cornish entries can sometimes be a contentious topic, especially those concerning geography. You don't have to agree with everything but there is no excuse for rudeness and these things are best solved through consensus building and compromise. For more information see WP:CornwallGuideline. These pages are not platforms for political discussion. Issues relating to Cornish politics should be restricted to those pages that directly deal with these issues (such as Constitutional status of Cornwall, Cornish nationalism, etc) and should not overflow into other articles. Most of all have fun editing - that's the reason we all do this, right?! Devon High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Devon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Devon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DevonWikipedia:WikiProject DevonTemplate:WikiProject DevonDevon articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Mining Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mining, a collaborative project to organize and improve articles related to mining and mineral industries. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, or visit the project page, where you can see a list of open tasks, join in the discussion, or join the project.MiningWikipedia:WikiProject MiningTemplate:WikiProject MiningMining articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

The article states that mining in Cornwall started in the "stone age" in 1000BC, and then says 2000BC to 1000BC. The neolithic in Britain finished about 2150BC. By definition Tin is added to copper to make (bronze). So should the article state that Tin mining started at the beginning of the Bronze Age, circa 2150BC. --Dumbo1 13:02, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There have been recent developments at South Crofty mine, so I think the article needs a bit of an update. EdJogg (talk) 01:26, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I hope someone can help here. I rescently heard some information on the 'Staners' of Plymstock. Apparantly they were a powerful consortium of miners of particular prestige in the Middle Ages, with probable roots in the cultures of the distant past. I heard they even were able to keep their own army. There is yet no information I can find on the internet. This is surely a case for a wikipedia article. This article here is the closest thing I can find in topicality. Can anyone help?

WikieWikieWikie (talk) 12:30, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You may be thinking of the Stannators - they had certain special privileges, and were able to make law and administer justice relating to tin-mining. DuncanHill (talk) 18:43, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't there a naming convention somewhere that states different places on the same subject should have their own article? I'm still not happy with using "Devon and Cornwall" in article titles, there is no such place as "Devon and Cornwall". It'd be like writing an article called "Transport in France and Spain". --Joowwww (talk) 22:59, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Would anyone have any objections if I split this into separate articles for Cornwall and Devon? --Joowwww (talk) 10:59, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article was developed by collecting together existing information in other articles including Dartmoor tin-mining (only a summary of that is included here so there is an imbalance between the coverage of Cornwall and Devon within the article; I have also recently added a little about quarrying which could in theory be made into another article if it was made more comprehensive). The geology of Devon and Cornwall is closely related so the minerals found in those counties are often the same minerals. The medieval history of the mines is also similar and the Tamar Valley also formed a distinct mining district. It would be possible to convert this content into two separate articles but many of the studies cover both counties. A similar situation exists at Cuisine of Devon and Cornwall which would be much easier to deal with. The analogy of France and Spain does not apply because of the Pyrenees; Transport in the Iberian Peninsula would have some validity.--Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 07:51, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

" A possible official stamp has been identified on the Carnington tin ingot.^[1] "Full citation is needed instead of Warner 1967; if Carnington is a place it needs to be explained properly.--Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 07:39, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

«he extraction of china clay continues to be of considerable importance: the larger works are in the St Austell district. The amount of waste in proportion to kaolin is so great that huge waste mounds were created whose whiteness in the early years means that they can be seen from afar. The Eden Project has been developed on the site of a former china clay quarry. » Updating is needed here I believe due to the multinational Imerys / Imetal going somewhere else to get kaolin.--Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 08:24, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Later Modern Period -below center picture- gives closure date as 1836. Stannary Courts and Parliaments #Stannary Courts has 1855 and 1896. Benjamin Trovato (talk) 03:47, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

== imprecise ++ "in its heyday, 150 years ago." This phrase was obviously copied from the source with no thought whatsoever. Change it to give an approximate date. 108.18.136.147 (talk) 01:04, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

See [1], [2], [3]. Doug Weller (talk) 16:06, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is in the Early Modern Period section. "A second tin boom came around the 16th century when open cast mining was used. German miners came in who had knowledge of the new techniques. In 1689, Thomas Epsley, a Somerset man, developed a method using gunpowder to blast the very hard granite rock loose, using gunpowder with quill fuses. It revolutionised hard rock mining. Six days work, with a pick, could be accomplished with one blast.[35] A third boom occurred in the 18th century when shafts were dug to extract the ore."
Were there only two booms after the first one?

• The second came around the 16th century with open cast mining.
  
• Then Epsley started to use gunpowder in the 17th century.
  
• Then there was a boom in the 18th century because of shaft mining.
  

This is a serious question unrelated to the sound of the explosions.
Didn't the use of gunpowder cause a boom? That would make the 18th century boom at least the fourth. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.66.32.8 (talk) 07:48, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Mining in Cornwall and Devon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081209080238/http://www.cornish-mining.org.uk:80/story/schools.htm to http://www.cornish-mining.org.uk/story/schools.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 10:22, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Would you like to win up to £250 in Amazon vouchers for participating in The West Country Challenge?

The The West Country Challenge will take place from 8 to 28 August 2016. The idea is to create and improve articles about Bristol, Somerset, Devon, Cornwall and the Isles of Scilly, Dorset, Wiltshire and Gloucestershire, like this one.

The format will be based on Wales's successful Awaken the Dragon which saw over 1000 article improvements and creations and 65 GAs/FAs. As with the Dragon contest, the focus is more on improving core articles and breathing new life into those older stale articles and stubs which might otherwise not get edited in years. All contributions, including new articles, are welcome though.

Work on any of the items at:

• Core articles
• Missing article hotlist
• Missing photograph hotlist

or other articles relating to the area.

There will be sub contests focusing on particular areas:

• Bristol (Day 1-3)
• Cornwall and Scilly (Day 4-6)
• Devon (Day 7-9)
• Dorset (Day 10-12)
• Gloucestershire (Day 13-15)
• Somerset (Day 16-18)
• Wiltshire (Day 19-21)

To sign up or get more information visit the contest pages at Wikipedia:WikiProject England/The West Country Challenge.— Rod ^talk 16:33, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The following paragraph in the "Prehistoric Age" section makes no sense:

Cornwall was traditionally thought to have been exclusively conducted by Phoenician metal traders from the eastern Mediterranean.[7][8] However, it is likely that the first century BC tin trade with the Mediterranean was later controlled by the Veneti of Brittany.[8][9] Britain is one of the places proposed for the Cassiterides, that is Tin Islands, first mentioned by Herodotus.

I don't know what point this Graf is trying to make..perhaps another editor inadvertently left out a word? Matuko 22:46, 19 November 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Matuko (talk • contribs)

I've tweaked the wording to re-include some of the text from before this edit.  —SMALLJIM  09:51, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've added a quote from Champion. I don't think the Veneti belong there, they are mentioned later. But Champion doesn't seem to mention them in his interesting article. @Matuko and Smalljim: if you want a copy email me. Doug Weller talk 17:57, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that, Doug. I don't think the Veneti belong there either. But looking further at the sub-sections of the "Prehistoric period" section, they are all badly organised. We have the mention, as you point out, of 1st-century BC trade by the Veneti in the "Stone Age and early Bronze Age" section. Much of the content of that section is duplicated in the "Expansion of trade" section (which, I assume, is really intended to deal with the later Bronze Age). Then after a couple of sections discussing Ictis and Jesus, we have "Iron Age archaeology", which appears to be talking about very ancient methods again (antler picks etc.) – only its last sentence deals directly with the Iron Age. It all needs rewriting. On top of that we have a mixture of {{cite}} and {{harvp}} referencing formats, which should be tidied too. Ugh...  —SMALLJIM  23:57, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you both. I'm not an expert on the subject, and can't help re-write it; I expect the popularity of "Poldark" might drive traffic to this page! Matuko 02:54, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Mining in Cornwall and Devon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080412224350/http://en.erih.net/index.php?pageId=3 to http://en.erih.net/index.php?pageId=3
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120318164537/http://www.weblo.com/music/song/Tinners_Dance/video/734024/3/ to http://www.weblo.com/music/song/Tinners_Dance/video/734024/3/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:53, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]