Talk:Dwarkadhish Temple: Difference between revisions

This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Architecture High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Hinduism: Krishnaism High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hinduism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HinduismWikipedia:WikiProject HinduismTemplate:WikiProject HinduismHinduism articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Krishnaism (assessed as High-importance). India: Gujarat High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Gujarat (assessed as Top-importance).

The Dwarkadhish temple page is not yet edited fully. The defects can be changed as and when informed. I request all to be patient and help this article meet Wikipedia standards. Scalebelow (talk) 16:40, 18 January 2009 (UTC)Scalebelow[reply]

This temple and the surrounding site was recently nominated as a UNESCO world heritage site and hence I decided to create the page which I found didn't exist in Wikipedia Scalebelow (talk) 16:52, 18 January 2009 (UTC)Scalebelow[reply]

• I'll remove the speedy deletion template for now since you've cleaned up most of the travel article-like stuff that I had issue with. I suggest you find a reliable source that backs up the UNESCO recognition as soon as you can so that the article's main claim of notability is supported. TheLetterM (talk) 19:26, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Some editors are repeatedly adding information that the "temple is 2500 years old". But, most of the sources given are not credible. Some are mirrors of other sources. For example, a source given is a travel guide which cannot be credible to determine the age of construction. Most of the sources are travel guides and just claim that it is 2500 years old. We need more authentic sources to add such critical information to the article. Hope other editors would understand. Rayabhari (talk) 16:21, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. We need archaeological reports, not just claims with no evidence. There's no doubt that the main structure is relatively new, just a few centuries old. I saw something that suggested there were ruins dating to around the 2nd century CE but it was just a snippet of something, not useful. Dougweller (talk) 18:04, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Why it is not indicated that there was the Dwarka if gold, which has been sunk down in the sea after the curse of gandhari to krishna with the real story? Kush Marvi (talk) 05:56, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to add section with reference for it --Kartik Mistry ^talk 06:25, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Kush Marvi: Please read your talk page. You are adding unsourced dubious material and changing sourced dates, and you haven't explained the latter. Doug Weller talk 15:49, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:

• Badrinath Temple Winter.jpg
• Dwarkadhish Temple (Saptapuri).jpg
• Puri Jagannath.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:08, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[1] p.23 The Archaeology of Sacred Spaces The Temple in Western India, 2nd Century BCE–8th Century CE By Susan Verma Mishra, Himanshu Prabha Ray "\Excavations at the site of the Dwarkadheesh temple revealed an occupational layer belonging to fourteenth-thirteenth centuries bce with lustrous red ware and Harappan ware.6 The site seems to have been re-occupied in 900 bce and continued up to 500 bce.7 The third occupational layer corresponds to the second century bce.8 In the period between 320 bce and the first century ce, excavations brought to light red slipped ware, black ware, terracotta balls, and stoppers shell bangles, and iron." Doug Weller talk 15:40, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]