Commons:Deletion requests/Uploads by User:Naveen Ramanathan

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
  • Add {{delete|reason=Fill in reason for deletion here!|subpage=Uploads by User:Naveen Ramanathan|year=2024|month=November|day=01}} to the description page of each file.
  • Notify the uploader(s) with {{subst:idw||Uploads by User:Naveen Ramanathan|plural}} ~~~~
  • Add {{Commons:Deletion requests/Uploads by User:Naveen Ramanathan}} at the end of today's log.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploads by User:Naveen Ramanathan

[edit]
Probable copyright violations. The initial upload has what appears to be a government or a tourist office watermark and is widely available online.[1] The current image is in a Facebook post that is dated before the upload here.[2]
Probable copyright violation. Adobe stock image.[3] Widely available online. In a tweet dated before the upload to Commons.[4]
Probable copyright violation. In a news report dated before the upload here.https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/nation-world/worlds-tallest-idol-of-goddess-durga-built-in-kolkata/deshapriya-park/slideshow/49503385.cms]
Probable copyright violation, very small image without camera metadata, probably from a webpage.
Probable copyright violation, in a Facebook profile image posted before the upload here.[5] Crop of a Flickr photo.[6]
Copyright violation. Has 'amritsartemplaes.in' warermark at the lower right. There is a crop on the amritsartemples.in website.[7] Widely available online.
Copyright violation.On TripAdvisor attributed to a different photographer (photo 4 of 91).[8]
Copyright violation. Includes watermark '©www.IndiTales.com' at bottom right. On their website dated before the upload here.[9]
Probable copyright violation. Has Facebook metadata, in a Facebook post that is dated before the upload here.[10]
Risk of copyright violation. Small images without camera metadata.
Probable copyright violation, in a Tweet dated before the upload here.[11]
Probable copyright violation, widely available online, in blog postings dated before the upload to Commons.[12][13]
Copyright violation. On Flickr attributed to a different photographer.[14]
Probable copyright violation, posted to Facebook before upload to Commons.[15]
Probable copyright violation, in webpage archived before the upload here.[16]
Probable copyright violation. Already nominated in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Glenview Illinois Hanumanji Moorti.jpg. No freedom of panorama in the USA. Small image without camera metadata. Appears to be one of only two US photos by an uploader whose other photos are mostly of locations in India.
Copyright violation. Watermark at lower right of the touchmeworld website, where this image appeared, dated before the upload here.[17] Widely available online, TinEye shows multiple earlier examples.
Scaled-down duplicate of File:Saraswati Sarasvati Swan Sculpture.jpg. Redundant and incorrect attribution.
Probable copyright violation, already nominated for FoP issue. Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hanuman Statue of Hockessin.jpg In a news report dated before the upload to Commons.[18]
Probable copyright violation, in a blog post dated before the upload to Commons.[19]
Possible copyright violation. May be a still from a YouTube video.[20]
Scaled-down duplicate of File:SHRI BHAKTHA ANJANEYAR.jpg (and I suspect that may also be a copyright violation). Redundant and incorrect attribution.
Probable copyright violation, crop of a photo on Flickr (note the bird to the left of the statue).[21]
Probable copyright violation, posted to Facebook before upload to Commons.[22]
Probable copyright violation, in a webpage archived before the upload to Commons.[23]
Risk of copyright violation. Small image without camera metadata. Black bands at the side suggest this is from a website.
Risk of copyright violation. In a website, where it appears to be dated before the upload to Commons.[24][25]
Scaled-down duplicate of File:Largest HanumanJi at Phillaur.JPG. Redundant and incorrect attribution.
Probable copyright violation, on Tripadvisor where it is attributed to a different photographer and was uploaded before its upload to Commons.[26]
Probable copyright violation, in a news report dated before the upload to Commons.[27]
Already nominated for FoP issue in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ardhaniswara Statue South Africa.jpg. Probable copyright violation, in a blog posted before the upload to Commons.[28]
Already nominated for FoP issue in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Chatsworth Hanuman Statue.jpg. Probable copyright violation, in a blog posted before the upload to Commons.[29]
Probable copyright violation. In a tweet dated before the upload to Commons.[30]
Copyright violation. Shuttstock watermark at bottom. On Shutterstock attributed to a different photographer.[31]
Probable copyright violation. In a tweet dated before the upload to Commons.[32]
Scaled-down duplicate of File:Hanuman Idol at Tapkeshwar Temple..jpg. Redundant and incorrect attribution.
Copyright violation. Stock photo on Adobe, Alamy and Shutterstock, attributed to a different photographer.[33][34][35]
Risk of copyright violation, on government website.[36]
Probable copyright violation. Watermark at bottom right corner. In an archive of a website made before the upload to Commons.[37]
Copyright violation. Published in a newspaper report before upload to Commons, attributed to a different photographer.[38]
Probable copyright violation. Widely available online (compare the heads at the bottom). TinEye identifies this as a re-upload of the deleted file File:God shankar.jpg.
Copyright violation, watermark at lower middle with a copyright declaration.
Probable copyright violation. In an archive of a website made before the upload to Commons.[39]
Copyright violation, on Flickr attributed to a different photographer and uploaded before the upload to Commons.[40]
Probable copyright violation. Watermark at top of image (although this is a partial match to the uploader's username). Uploaded to Instagram before upload to Commons.[41] In a Facebook post dated before the upload to Comons.[42]
Copyright violation, still from a YouTube video.[43]
Copyright violation, stock image on Adobe and Alamy.[44][45] Widely used online.
Copyright violation. santabanta.com watermarks at upper and lower right.[46] Widely available online.
Probable copyright violation, copy of large image widely available online.[47][48]
Copyright violation, crop of an image posted to Flickr before upload here, attributed to a different photographer.[49]
Probable copyright violation, widely available online, in blog postings dated before the upload to Commons.[50][51]
Probable copyright violation. In a news report and a tweet dated before the upload to Commons.[52][53] TinEye indicates multiple older versions online.
Probable copyright violation, map posted to Reddit before upload to Commons.[54]
Probable copyright violation. Widely available online. TinEye indicates multiple older versions online. Used in album cover dated 2018.[55] In blogs dated before the upload to Commons.[56][57]
Probable copyright violation. In a news report dated before the upload to Commons.[58] Widey available online.
Probable copyright violation, posted to Facebook before upload to Commons.[59]
Copyright violation, stock image with Adobe and Alamy, attributed to a different photographer.[60][61] TinEye shows multiple earlier versions online. In a news report dated before the upload to Commons.[62]

I have nominated all of the photographs uploaded by this user, and one map. For most of the files I have identified positive evidence of a copyright violation – this reinforces the case for the deletion of the other files. I have not nominated a few files that only have text or simple diagrams, although these may have issues of project scope. --Verbcatcher (talk) 21:35, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 08:55, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]