User contributions for CharlesShirley

29 May 2021

• 20:4220:42, 29 May 2021 diff hist +697 User talk:CharlesShirley ty Tag: Reverted

14 January 2021

• 20:4620:46, 14 January 2021 diff hist +4 Talk:Chris Jacobs (politician) →Removal of Capitol information: fix
• 20:4520:45, 14 January 2021 diff hist +475 Talk:Chris Jacobs (politician) →Removal of Capitol information: We need a reliable source, not a headline from a left-wing website--which contradicts itself.
• 20:3520:35, 14 January 2021 diff hist +4 Talk:Chris Jacobs (politician) →Removal of Capitol information: We need a reliable source, not a headline from a left-wing website--which contradicts itself.
• 20:3320:33, 14 January 2021 diff hist +567 Talk:Chris Jacobs (politician) →Removal of Capitol information: We need a reliable source, not a headline from a left-wing website--which contradicts itself.
• 20:2520:25, 14 January 2021 diff hist −376 Chris Jacobs (politician) →U.S. House of Representatives: removed a NY Times quote that did not mention Jacobs once. The quote was completely about Trump's speech and it had nothing to do with Jacobs. Off topic.
• 20:2220:22, 14 January 2021 diff hist +1 m Talk:Chris Jacobs (politician) →Removal of Capitol information: + '
• 20:1820:18, 14 January 2021 diff hist +3 Talk:Chris Jacobs (politician) →Removal of Capitol information: fix
• 20:1620:16, 14 January 2021 diff hist +953 Talk:Chris Jacobs (politician) →Removal of Capitol information: We need a reliable source, not a headline from a left-wing website.
• 20:0920:09, 14 January 2021 diff hist −108 Chris Jacobs (politician) →U.S. House of Representatives: Removed the Synthesis information again. You did comment on the talk page but you just made a claim again, without providing evidenc. You did not provide a reliable source to support your addition. The Verge's headline is only thing close that is just one source and it is not a reliable source. The NY Times articles does not say it and the WIVB article does not say it. You have not provided a reliable source to support your claim. See: Wikipedia:SYNTHESIS.
• 18:4118:41, 14 January 2021 diff hist −616 Chris Jacobs (politician) Undid revision 1000319376 by Praxidicae (talk) Jacobs vote did not happen until after the attack on the capitol. This is synthesis. The article you cite does not support the comment you are putting in the article. You need to go to talk page and discuss it. Your good faith edit has been reverted and now you need to get consensus to re-insert it. Tags: Undo Reverted
• 17:0117:01, 14 January 2021 diff hist +31 Aaron Coleman No edit summary
• 16:5816:58, 14 January 2021 diff hist −36 Aaron Coleman No edit summary
• 16:4316:43, 14 January 2021 diff hist +3,047 Aaron Coleman reverted good faith edits of redlink editor. many reliable sources were removed. Valid, important information was deleted from article. Editor needs to discuss these changes on article's talk page. Tag: Manual revert
• 00:0900:09, 14 January 2021 diff hist −376 Chris Jacobs (politician) →U.S. House of Representatives: removed a quote that did not mention Jacobs one time. It was not about him in any way whatsoever.
• 00:0800:08, 14 January 2021 diff hist −108 Chris Jacobs (politician) →U.S. House of Representatives: This article is about Jacobs, not about the Capitol Hill riots. This is a classic case of Wikipedia:SYNTHESIS There is no connection between Jacobs vote and the storming of the capitol and the Reliable Sources do not support that. Did Jacobs attack the capitol? No.

13 January 2021

• 23:2223:22, 13 January 2021 diff hist +99 Talk:Lauren Boebert →Mention of support for storming of the capitol: No reliable source supports PBP89's suggestion.
• 23:0423:04, 13 January 2021 diff hist +1,546 Talk:Lauren Boebert →Mention of support for storming of the capitol: No reliable source says Boebert supported the storming of the capitol.
• 22:4522:45, 13 January 2021 diff hist −449 Lauren Boebert →Tenure: Unbelievable. Are we going to post every single, little thing that happens to this woman? Her Twitter account status, her bag check, Democrats wanting her to resign. What in that list is really encyclopedic. It is just normal every day things that do not get posted to other people's accounts. Wikipedia is not a newspaper. See: Wikipedia:NOTNEWS. Tags: Manual revert Reverted
• 22:3922:39, 13 January 2021 diff hist −4 David Valadao past tense.
• 22:3822:38, 13 January 2021 diff hist −33 David Valadao He took his seat on Jan 12, 2021. He voted to impeach Trump on Jan 13, 2021.
• 22:3322:33, 13 January 2021 diff hist −642 Jody Hice Undid revision 1000165425 by Paintspot (talk) both of the those facts belong in the body of the article, but not in the lead.removed sentence from the lead. The sentence is a classic example of Wikipedia:SYNTHESIS. There is no connection between Stefanik's vote and the storming of the capitol and the Reliable Sources do not support that POV edit Tag: Undo
• 17:4717:47, 13 January 2021 diff hist −88 Lauren Boebert →Tenure: We don't know how the metal detectors situation was resolved. Is this situation really important enough to meet inclusion? Not really.
• 16:5416:54, 13 January 2021 diff hist +158 User talk:Drmies →User:CharlesShirley: I am an editor.
• 16:3916:39, 13 January 2021 diff hist −15 Lauren Boebert →Tenure: removed "one week later. Not needed. Readers can count the days.
• 16:3816:38, 13 January 2021 diff hist −45 Lauren Boebert →Tenure: removed the second reference to the metal detectors being new. We get it, they were new. It already said that. removed redundancy. The article is about metal detectors or those particular metal detectors.
• 16:3616:36, 13 January 2021 diff hist −43 Lauren Boebert →Tenure: removed unnecessary reference to "storming the capitol again" This article is not about metal detectors or storming of the capitol.
• 16:2416:24, 13 January 2021 diff hist −1,284 Elise Stefanik removed sentence from the lead. The sentence is a classic example of Wikipedia:SYNTHESIS. There is no connection between Stefanik's vote and the storming of the capitol and the Reliable Sources do not support that POV edit.
• 16:1816:18, 13 January 2021 diff hist +363 Talk:Lauren Boebert →Mention of support for storming of the capitol: No reliable source supports PBP89's suggestion.
• 15:4015:40, 13 January 2021 diff hist −108 Chris Jacobs (politician) Undid revision 1000097426 by Rider1819 (talk) The discussion on the Ted Cruz talk page does not lend support to this edit here. They have nothing to do with each other. There is no connection between Jacobs vote and the storming of the capitol and the Reliable Sources do not support that. Wikipedia:SYNTHESIS Tag: Undo
• 15:3415:34, 13 January 2021 diff hist +540 User talk:107.13.227.173 First writing warning.
• 15:2715:27, 13 January 2021 diff hist +1 m Chris Jacobs (politician) →U.S. House of Representatives: removed space
• 15:2015:20, 13 January 2021 diff hist +133 User talk:CharlesShirley →January 2021: fixes. Tag: Reverted
• 15:1515:15, 13 January 2021 diff hist +659 User talk:CharlesShirley →January 2021: funny comments, but not in an intentional way. Tag: Reverted
• 15:1015:10, 13 January 2021 diff hist −12 Colorado's 3rd congressional district Undid revision 1000090658 by 2601:281:C200:ACF0:3836:A401:B98F:D379 (talk) removed vandalism. Tag: Undo

12 January 2021

• 22:1822:18, 12 January 2021 diff hist −236 Elise Stefanik moved info into the body of the article. does not belong in the opening section.
• 22:1422:14, 12 January 2021 diff hist −20 Lauren Boebert →Tenure: the article supporting this info does not say she was tweeting to QAnon supporters. That is false info. removed.
• 22:1222:12, 12 January 2021 diff hist +257 Lauren Boebert →Tenure: corrected information. The politicians were Democrats. And the articles called the protestors "Pueblo residents" not Colorado citizens.
• 22:0122:01, 12 January 2021 diff hist 0 Lauren Boebert moved info into tenure section. Tag: Manual revert
• 21:5921:59, 12 January 2021 diff hist −18 Lauren Boebert removed weasel word. also, separate section was unnecessary. Tag: Reverted
• 14:2114:21, 12 January 2021 diff hist −37 Lauren Boebert →Tenure: removed unnecessary section

11 January 2021

• 23:5123:51, 11 January 2021 diff hist +277 User talk:73.53.31.249 spam editing is inappropriate. current
• 23:4823:48, 11 January 2021 diff hist +183 Talk:Elise Stefanik →How to present Stefanik's vote to challenge Pennsylvania electors: her one vote should not be in the opening section
• 23:4623:46, 11 January 2021 diff hist −191 Elise Stefanik That information does not belong in the opening section. Tag: Reverted
• 20:5420:54, 11 January 2021 diff hist −156 Lauren Boebert Should not be in the opening section.
• 13:5813:58, 11 January 2021 diff hist +766 Lauren Boebert Undid revision 999633317 by Drmies (talk) Reverted removal of opposition to socialism. It has been in article for a long time and there has not been a convincing argument to remove it and the one given here isn't either. Tags: Undo Reverted
• 13:5113:51, 11 January 2021 diff hist −795 Lee Zeldin →Trump administration: removed a comment that was not supported by a reliable source. The Hill article did not mention Zeldin one time. This article is about Zeldin.
• 12:5812:58, 11 January 2021 diff hist +293 Talk:Andrew C. McCarthy →McCarthy's change of opinion about Trump: "reversal" wording.
• 03:5903:59, 11 January 2021 diff hist −55 Lauren Boebert Undid revision 999616433 by Tataral (talk) No. Information is not correct and does not belong in opening section. Tag: Undo
• 03:5803:58, 11 January 2021 diff hist −1,508 Lee Zeldin The election objection info doesn't belong in the opening section and I removed info that is not about Zeldin. The article is about Zeldin.
• 02:5502:55, 11 January 2021 diff hist −644 Buddy Carter Undid revision 999614452 by 73.53.31.249 (talk) reverted spam edit. not worthy of opening paragraph. Tag: Undo
• 02:5402:54, 11 January 2021 diff hist −643 Andrew Clyde Undid revision 999614508 by 73.53.31.249 (talk) reverted spam edit. not worthy of opening paragraph. Tag: Undo
• 02:5402:54, 11 January 2021 diff hist −640 Barry Loudermilk Undid revision 999614668 by 73.53.31.249 (talk) reverted spam edit. not worthy of opening paragraph. Tag: Undo
• 02:5302:53, 11 January 2021 diff hist −640 Russ Fulcher Undid revision 999614710 by 73.53.31.249 (talk) reverted spam edit. not worthy of opening paragraph. Tag: Undo
• 02:5302:53, 11 January 2021 diff hist −640 Mike Bost Undid revision 999614782 by 73.53.31.249 (talk) reverted spam edit. not worthy of opening paragraph. Tag: Undo
• 02:5202:52, 11 January 2021 diff hist −642 Jody Hice Undid revision 999614607 by 73.53.31.249 (talk) reverted spam edit. Tag: Undo
• 02:5002:50, 11 January 2021 diff hist −17 Andrew C. McCarthy Undid revision 999618064 by Yopienso (talk) "about face" seems to be a commentary not supported by reliable source. Tag: Undo
• 01:4201:42, 11 January 2021 diff hist −3 Talk:Lauren Boebert →Neutrality is disputed: + spelling.
• 01:4101:41, 11 January 2021 diff hist +538 Talk:Lauren Boebert →Neutrality is disputed: QAnon stuff does not belong in the opening section--only in the body of the article.
• 01:3801:38, 11 January 2021 diff hist +7 Dan Crenshaw →Donald Trump: past tense.
• 01:3101:31, 11 January 2021 diff hist −105 Stephanie Grisham Why are the two events conflated? Did she storm the capitol?
• 01:2901:29, 11 January 2021 diff hist 0 Elise Stefanik →Tenure: + space
• 01:2901:29, 11 January 2021 diff hist −556 Elise Stefanik moved the recent events into the Tenure section.
• 01:2101:21, 11 January 2021 diff hist +1,172 Talk:Lauren Boebert →Neutrality is disputed: QAnon stuff does not belong in the opening section--only in the body of the article.
• 01:0401:04, 11 January 2021 diff hist +3 Dan Bishop moved info from opening section--where it did not belong--to Tenure section.
• 00:5400:54, 11 January 2021 diff hist −402 Elise Stefanik removed GWB comments.
• 00:5200:52, 11 January 2021 diff hist −104 Lee Zeldin Undid revision 999243862 by Rider1819 (talk) removed conflating two very separate events. See Wikipedia:SYNTHESIS Tag: Undo

10 January 2021

• 23:2323:23, 10 January 2021 diff hist +140 Aaron Coleman Undid revision 999398723 by Orange1861 (talk) restored what she claimed against him which is reliable sources. Also, he was NOT found not guilty. It never went to trial and he agreed to leave her alone. Maybe we should add that fact, he agreed to leave her alone. Tag: Undo
• 23:2123:21, 10 January 2021 diff hist +15 Aaron Coleman Undid revision 999398517 by Orange1861 (talk) This the wording that he used and it does not violate neutrality. Tag: Undo
• 23:2023:20, 10 January 2021 diff hist 0 Lauren Boebert →Tenure: moved the info about contesting the 2020 election results to the second paragraph in tenure. The information should follow a chronological pattern where older things first then down to newer things.
• 23:1023:10, 10 January 2021 diff hist −82 Nicole Malliotakis moved the 2020 election contest info into the new section, Tenure, and removed it from opening section. It does not belong in the opening section. One vote should not get placed in opening. It does not reach that level. Also, do not revert until you talk about it on the talk page.
• 22:5722:57, 10 January 2021 diff hist −535 Kevin Brady removed commentary. We don't use Twitter as a reliable source. Tag: Manual revert

9 January 2021

• 15:4915:49, 9 January 2021 diff hist −5 Mary Miller (politician) "inaugurated" is correct wording. Her term started. She isn't President or Vice-President.
• 15:4615:46, 9 January 2021 diff hist −15 Mary Miller (politician) Undid revision 999309296 by Smuckola (talk) I again with Free's edit. The point has been made that she was condemned. Tag: Undo
• 10:5410:54, 9 January 2021 diff hist 0 Nicole Malliotakis moved objection to body of the article. Nothing belongs in the lead section that is not covered in the body.
• 10:5210:52, 9 January 2021 diff hist +11 Nicole Malliotakis →U.S. House of Representatives: + tenure section
• 10:5010:50, 9 January 2021 diff hist −750 Elise Stefanik moved 2020 election contest info to body of article, does not belong in the lead section. Also, removed all of the detail of radical Trump supporters, Stefanik was not part of that group, off-topic. This article is about Stefanik, not the radical Trump supporters. Also, the moves by Stefanik were to "contest" the election, the wording from the lawsuit, not overturn the election results.
• 10:4110:41, 9 January 2021 diff hist −544 Nicole Malliotakis Undid revision 999243579 by Rider1819 (talk) Her objection and the capitol attack are not one and the same. She did not attack the capitol. It is off topic. Tag: Undo
• 10:2810:28, 9 January 2021 diff hist −1 Aaron Coleman →Abuse allegations: removed unnecessary space.
• 00:4200:42, 9 January 2021 diff hist +109 Aaron Coleman →Abuse allegations: restored the actual wording from the reliable source about what she claimed against him during the 2020 campaign.
• 00:4100:41, 9 January 2021 diff hist −11 Aaron Coleman Undid revision 999174000 by Orange1861 (talk) restored actual words of Coleman and actual words in RS. Tag: Undo
• 00:3400:34, 9 January 2021 diff hist +463 Talk:Ted Cruz →Lead: Not in the lead.

8 January 2021

• 18:5818:58, 8 January 2021 diff hist −190 Ted Cruz Undid revision 999127609 by Somedifferentstuff (talk) That is not the way that it works. If you want to add something to the article. fine. But if someone, like me, objects, then you need to build consensus to get it in the article. You haven't done that. There are several problems with this addition. 1. Recentism, 2. Undue Weight, 3. Not neutral wording (POV), 4. Wikipedia not a newspaper, etc. Please discuss. Tags: Undo Reverted
• 18:2818:28, 8 January 2021 diff hist +7 María Elvira Salazar changed "is" to "serves as"
• 15:1615:16, 8 January 2021 diff hist −190 Ted Cruz not appropriate for the lead section. Tag: Reverted

7 January 2021

• 20:0620:06, 7 January 2021 diff hist +304 Lauren Boebert →Tenure: restored 12/24/2020 announcement. Tag: Reverted
• 19:4719:47, 7 January 2021 diff hist −85 Lauren Boebert Undid revision 998932542 by Hmdwgf (talk) removed addition to a sentence. The addition was not quite true and of course not supported by reliable source. Tag: Undo
• 19:4619:46, 7 January 2021 diff hist +766 Lauren Boebert Undid revision 998883499 by Philip Cross (talk) This passage has been discussed many times. Join the conversation. Tag: Undo

6 January 2021

• 18:2418:24, 6 January 2021 diff hist −4 Nancy Mace →2017 election: removed redlink.
• 02:5102:51, 6 January 2021 diff hist +216 Stephanie Bice →Elections: + cite.
• 02:4602:46, 6 January 2021 diff hist −4 Stephanie Bice →Elections: + cite.
• 02:4502:45, 6 January 2021 diff hist +26 Stephanie Bice →2018 Oklahoma Senate election: + cite name.

5 January 2021

• 20:4920:49, 5 January 2021 diff hist 0 Trump wall changed 2020 to 2021
• 20:4820:48, 5 January 2021 diff hist −1 Trump wall →Funding granted, setbacks, and progress (2019–2020): update number wall mileage.
• 20:4720:47, 5 January 2021 diff hist −1 Trump wall updated number of wall miles.
• 20:3420:34, 5 January 2021 diff hist +269 Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/NazariyKaminski →Comments by other users
• 16:1716:17, 5 January 2021 diff hist −420 Ted Cruz removed info that was placed in the opening section, that does not merit that inclusion. Take it to the talk page.
• 15:5515:55, 5 January 2021 diff hist −399 Ted Cruz →U.S. Supreme Court: removed off-topic info. This article is not about Trump.
• 15:5215:52, 5 January 2021 diff hist −426 117th United States Congress →Iowa: There is no such thing as "provisionally". Removed. Where is the R.S. to support such hogwash? There is none. The R.S. specifically states that the Dems made that claim, but were immediately told there is no such thing. She is a member. Period. Removed POV editing. Tag: Manual revert
• 15:5015:50, 5 January 2021 diff hist −14 Mariannette Miller-Meeks Undid revision 998445099 by Rogl94 (talk) There is no such thing as "provisionally". Removed. Where is the R.S. to support such hogwash? There is none. The R.S. specifically states that the Dems made that claim, but were immediately told there is no such thing. She is a member. Period. Removed POV editing. Tag: Undo
• 15:4615:46, 5 January 2021 diff hist +27 Lauren Boebert →Gun rights advocate: restored Reliable source.
• 02:3302:33, 5 January 2021 diff hist +27 Marjorie Taylor Greene →Personal life: What is the big deal about Floyd of Paulding, they are both in the 14th. It does not matter. She lives in the district.

4 January 2021

• 23:5323:53, 4 January 2021 diff hist +5 Lauren Boebert →Personal life: Miranda should be italicized because it is the name of a famous U.S. Supreme Court case.
• 23:5123:51, 4 January 2021 diff hist +58 Lauren Boebert →Personal life: replaced "prosecutor with "Mesa County district attorney" with actual group in the article.
• 22:5422:54, 4 January 2021 diff hist −1 m Lauren Boebert →Personal life: sp
• 22:5122:51, 4 January 2021 diff hist −65 Lauren Boebert →Personal life: She was never charged with harassment. Removed non-neutral description of situation.
• 22:4622:46, 4 January 2021 diff hist 0 Mariannette Miller-Meeks →2020 general election: past tense.
• 22:4422:44, 4 January 2021 diff hist −1 Mariannette Miller-Meeks →U.S. House of Representatives: moved previous campaigns to another section, not the 2020 section, They did not belong there.
• 22:4222:42, 4 January 2021 diff hist −19 Mariannette Miller-Meeks not important enough to be in opening section.
• 22:4122:41, 4 January 2021 diff hist +14 Mariannette Miller-Meeks →2020 general election: calmed down the title.
• 22:4122:41, 4 January 2021 diff hist +1 Mariannette Miller-Meeks →2020 general election: + semi-colon
• 22:4022:40, 4 January 2021 diff hist −201 Mariannette Miller-Meeks moved contested election stuff to body of article; created a political positions section.
• 22:3022:30, 4 January 2021 diff hist +55 Mariannette Miller-Meeks →2020 general election: restored factual information.
• 21:0621:06, 4 January 2021 diff hist −397 Marjorie Taylor Greene removed all of the wacky redundant citations in the opening paragraph. They don't provide any new information that the first citation already provided. And, no one cares what someone in the UK is watching of TV, that is not a valid R.S., just irrelevant.
• 20:5820:58, 4 January 2021 diff hist −56 Marjorie Taylor Greene No those r.s. do not say the word "international". You did. We can't quote you. Besides, it is irrelevant if it national or international A
• 18:4918:49, 4 January 2021 diff hist +15 Aaron Coleman split affirmed things from alleged things.
• 18:4618:46, 4 January 2021 diff hist +5 Lauren Boebert →2020: wording updated.
• 18:4418:44, 4 January 2021 diff hist +14 Lauren Boebert →2020: Mitsch Bush instead of Bush.
• 18:4318:43, 4 January 2021 diff hist +17 m Lauren Boebert →2020: sp
• 18:4118:41, 4 January 2021 diff hist +75 Lauren Boebert →2020: The September poll was a partisan poll paid for by a org, controlled and owned by Michael Bloomberg, a Democratic Presidential candidate.
• 18:3918:39, 4 January 2021 diff hist −6 Lauren Boebert →2020: removed weasel word.
• 18:1618:16, 4 January 2021 diff hist +19 Kimberly Klacik →Political career: removed non-neutral wording.
• 17:5217:52, 4 January 2021 diff hist −13 Kimberly Klacik →Biography: Removed "In a report" which gives false legit to statement, which may or may be true. Removed non-neutral wording.
• 17:5017:50, 4 January 2021 diff hist −82 Kimberly Klacik →Biography: removed the redundant statement.
• 17:4717:47, 4 January 2021 diff hist +1 Kimberly Klacik →Biography: We, wikipedia, do not know that what the report says is true. So Wikipedia cannot say the word "found" as if it was correct. We can say "state" because that is neutral.
• 17:4517:45, 4 January 2021 diff hist −3 Kimberly Klacik →Biography: "concluded" is putting words in Wikipedia's mouth. Stated is more neutral.
• 17:4317:43, 4 January 2021 diff hist +2 Kimberly Klacik →Political career: the word tweeting should not be capitalized unless at beginning of sentence. Poor grammar.
• 17:4217:42, 4 January 2021 diff hist −56 Kimberly Klacik →Political career: removed information about Cummings. This article is not about Cummings. And the actions of Cummings have nothing to do with Klacik, who is the focus of the article. Removed for being off-topic.
• 17:4117:41, 4 January 2021 diff hist −60 Kimberly Klacik →Political career: removed speculation. It was clearly marked as 'speculation' in the article.
• 17:3617:36, 4 January 2021 diff hist +9 David Valadao Undid revision 998283279 by CharlesShirley (talk) Tag: Undo
• 17:3617:36, 4 January 2021 diff hist −9 David Valadao he is, not will be. Tag: Reverted
• 17:3417:34, 4 January 2021 diff hist +22 Lauren Boebert →Personal life: + wikilink.
• 17:3217:32, 4 January 2021 diff hist +23 Lauren Boebert →Personal life: + wikilink.
• 17:3117:31, 4 January 2021 diff hist +146 Lauren Boebert →Personal life: + cites.
• 17:2817:28, 4 January 2021 diff hist +30 Lauren Boebert →Personal life: fixed wording again.
• 17:2717:27, 4 January 2021 diff hist +2 m Lauren Boebert →Personal life: the to their
• 17:2617:26, 4 January 2021 diff hist −43 Lauren Boebert →Personal life: fixed wording.
• 17:2317:23, 4 January 2021 diff hist +139 Lauren Boebert →Personal life: She never said her arrest was unconstitutional. She said the teenagers arrest was unconstitutional because of no Miranda warnings.
• 17:1717:17, 4 January 2021 diff hist +8 Lauren Boebert →Personal life: it was a Misdemeanor and the prosecutor flat out stated that he did not think any jury would convict her. Please don't remove these facts again. Three time I have had to restore valid information.
• 17:1317:13, 4 January 2021 diff hist +261 Lauren Boebert →Personal life: + quote from article.
• 17:1117:11, 4 January 2021 diff hist +295 Lauren Boebert →Personal life: + cite.
• 17:0917:09, 4 January 2021 diff hist +34 Lauren Boebert Undid revision 998265504 by 208.95.17.152 (talk) Restored information that is clearly true, that was removed by an anon IP editor. Tag: Undo
• 02:3302:33, 4 January 2021 diff hist +97 Aaron Coleman + to list of allegations.
• 02:2402:24, 4 January 2021 diff hist −5 Marjorie Taylor Greene Undid revision 998153124 by Guyb123321 (talk) reverted edit. There is no wording whatsoever in that R.S. that says that. It is the self-confirmed opinion of a Wikipedia editor that claims to be from UK. Maybe that editor is from UK, maybe not. We need a R.S. source not the opinion of a Wikipedia editor. Tag: Undo
• 02:2102:21, 4 January 2021 diff hist −4 Mariannette Miller-Meeks No weasel word.

3 January 2021

• 22:2422:24, 3 January 2021 diff hist +169 Christina Hale + 2020 election
• 22:2022:20, 3 January 2021 diff hist +15 Victoria Spartz fixed grammar.
• 22:1922:19, 3 January 2021 diff hist +33 Victoria Spartz fixed title in first sentence.
• 17:3317:33, 3 January 2021 diff hist +25 Rifle, Colorado →Notable people: fixed description for Boebert
• 17:3217:32, 3 January 2021 diff hist +27 Altamonte Springs, Florida →Notable people: fixed description for Boebert
• 17:3017:30, 3 January 2021 diff hist −10 Beth Van Duyne No edit summary
• 17:2617:26, 3 January 2021 diff hist +16 Lauren Boebert fixed
• 17:2117:21, 3 January 2021 diff hist −57 Colorado's 3rd congressional district removed unnecessary, outdated info.
• 17:1317:13, 3 January 2021 diff hist +3 m Lauren Boebert →Tenure: sp
• 17:1217:12, 3 January 2021 diff hist +2 Lauren Boebert →Gun rights advocate: past tense.
• 17:1117:11, 3 January 2021 diff hist −5 Lauren Boebert updated second sentence.
• 17:1117:11, 3 January 2021 diff hist −5 Lauren Boebert updated first sentence, no longer member elect.
• 17:0717:07, 3 January 2021 diff hist 0 2020 Texas Senate election →General election: fixed the final numbers for the senate district #4. Don't know where last editor got those numbers, but numbers I got were from Texas SOS:https://results.texas-election.com/contestdetails?officeID=2077&officeName=STATE%20SENATOR,%20DISTRICT%204&officeType=DISTRICT%20OFFICES&from=race
• 17:0017:00, 3 January 2021 diff hist +1,167 Brandon Creighton →Election results: + 2020 election results.
• 15:3315:33, 3 January 2021 diff hist −3 Lauren Boebert →Tenure: removed redundant mention of "82".
• 15:3215:32, 3 January 2021 diff hist +4 Lauren Boebert →Tenure: + wikilinks.
• 15:3115:31, 3 January 2021 diff hist +64 Lauren Boebert →Tenure: + wikilinks.
• 15:3015:30, 3 January 2021 diff hist +58 Lauren Boebert →Tenure: + wikilinks.
• 15:2915:29, 3 January 2021 diff hist +1 m Lauren Boebert →Tenure: sp
• 15:2815:28, 3 January 2021 diff hist +563 Lauren Boebert →Tenure: + cite.
• 15:1915:19, 3 January 2021 diff hist 0 m Lauren Boebert →Tenure: sp
• 15:1715:17, 3 January 2021 diff hist +1 m Lauren Boebert →Tenure: sp
• 15:1615:16, 3 January 2021 diff hist +729 Lauren Boebert →Tenure: updated tenure section with gun ban exempt win.
• 15:0015:00, 3 January 2021 diff hist 0 David Perdue →Senate career: sp and grammar fix.
• 14:5814:58, 3 January 2021 diff hist 0 m David Perdue sp
• 01:4701:47, 3 January 2021 diff hist 0 Lauren Boebert →2020: past tense.
• 01:4201:42, 3 January 2021 diff hist +4 David Perdue + missing word.
• 01:4201:42, 3 January 2021 diff hist −7 David Perdue removed unnecessary word.
• 01:4101:41, 3 January 2021 diff hist +58 David Perdue The stock investigation conclusion covered more ground than just criminal. + criminal, Senate rules and Senate standards of conduct.
• 01:3601:36, 3 January 2021 diff hist +37 David Perdue →Senate career: + no interaction with FINRA official.
• 01:3401:34, 3 January 2021 diff hist +160 David Perdue →Senate career: I corrected the false claim in the Wikipedia article that all of the agents claimed it was $140K above market. It was ONE agent. they talked to five agents and said: 1) 8% above, 2) 2% above, 3) Slightly above, 4) Slightly below, and 5) right on market.
• 01:2201:22, 3 January 2021 diff hist +125 David Perdue →Senate career: inserted MORE factual information about the Washington house sell that calmed down the non-neutral description of the situation. More facts that were left out of the original addition of the story.
• 01:2001:20, 3 January 2021 diff hist +54 David Perdue →Senate career: clarified what the buyer said about the Washington house sale, info that was left out of the original addition of this topic.
• 01:0701:07, 3 January 2021 diff hist +179 David Perdue →Senate career: inserted factual information about the Washington house sell that calmed down the non-neutral description of the sitation.
• 01:0201:02, 3 January 2021 diff hist +1,100 David Perdue →Business career: restored the Sonny & David Purdue information in the Business Career section so there is no redundancy.
• 01:0101:01, 3 January 2021 diff hist −1,117 David Perdue →2014 U.S. Senate campaign: removed redundant info, this exact info is listed in the previous section of the article. His Sonny Purdue/David Purdue work.
• 00:5700:57, 3 January 2021 diff hist −145 David Perdue →Business career: Once again, removed info that was not about Purdue whatsoever. He was not a company at time and it is off-topic because the article is not about the history of NC job losses.
• 00:5400:54, 3 January 2021 diff hist −132 David Perdue →Business career: Once again, removed information that was not about Purdue.
• 00:5300:53, 3 January 2021 diff hist −171 David Perdue →Business career: removed information that is off-topic. The information removed is not about Purdue.

2 January 2021

• 21:5321:53, 2 January 2021 diff hist +338 Ted Cruz Editor removed valid, reliably sourced information without discussion and without giving a valid reason or rationale. Information restored and editor must take to talk to form consensus to remove the reliably sourced, valid information Tags: Manual revert Reverted
• 20:0820:08, 2 January 2021 diff hist +258 Aaron Coleman →Abuse allegations: + cite for date change.
• 20:0520:05, 2 January 2021 diff hist 0 Aaron Coleman →Abuse allegations: fixed date of judge's order.
• 02:0902:09, 2 January 2021 diff hist +12 Victoria Spartz →Elections: cleared up sentence.
• 02:0702:07, 2 January 2021 diff hist +16 Victoria Spartz →Elections: noted size of defeat of Democrat.
• 02:0502:05, 2 January 2021 diff hist +197 Victoria Spartz "representative-elect should be in the first sentence" Also, she no longer holds state senator position so it should not be the first sentence.
• 01:5801:58, 2 January 2021 diff hist +109 Victoria Spartz →Early life and education: + cite details.
• 01:5401:54, 2 January 2021 diff hist +30 Victoria Spartz →Personal life: + cite.
• 01:5401:54, 2 January 2021 diff hist +24 Victoria Spartz →Early life and education: + cite name.
• 01:5301:53, 2 January 2021 diff hist −160 Victoria Spartz →Early life and education: removed dead link Republican Party website.
• 01:4901:49, 2 January 2021 diff hist 0 Lauren Boebert Undid revision 997731399 by 2001:5B0:4FC4:C958:105A:F72F:7CC5:7C9F (talk) 19th might actually be the birthday, but anon IP editor did not provide any evidence of that date. Just an unsupported claim that voter records say that. Also, even if voter records are provided they are NOT useable as a R.S. See: Wikipedia:PRIMARY Tag: Undo

1 January 2021

• 23:1823:18, 1 January 2021 diff hist −9 Kimberly Klacik →November 2020 election: all of the candidates there were not defeated. removed falsehood.
• 23:1523:15, 1 January 2021 diff hist −8 Kimberly Klacik →Biography: removed another weasel word.
• 23:1423:14, 1 January 2021 diff hist −9 Kimberly Klacik →November 2020 election: removed weasel word.
• 23:0723:07, 1 January 2021 diff hist +72 Noblesville, Indiana /* Notable people + Congresswoman Spartz.
• 23:0523:05, 1 January 2021 diff hist +39 Victoria Spartz →Personal life: + residence city.
• 23:0423:04, 1 January 2021 diff hist +97 Indiana University–Purdue University Indianapolis →Notable alumni: + new congresswoman.
• 22:5922:59, 1 January 2021 diff hist +150 Victoria Spartz →Early life and education: + cite details.
• 22:5722:57, 1 January 2021 diff hist +232 Victoria Spartz →Early life and education: + quote
• 22:5622:56, 1 January 2021 diff hist +232 Victoria Spartz →Early life and education: + cite
• 22:5522:55, 1 January 2021 diff hist −37 Victoria Spartz →Early life and education: removed unnecessary warning.
• 22:4822:48, 1 January 2021 diff hist +168 Victoria Spartz →Early career: + cite
• 22:4622:46, 1 January 2021 diff hist +166 Victoria Spartz →Early career: restored info that should have never been removed.

30 December 2020

• 03:2703:27, 30 December 2020 diff hist +165 Aaron Coleman →Abuse allegations: + details of 2015 plead on criminal charge.
• 03:2403:24, 30 December 2020 diff hist +28 Aaron Coleman →Abuse allegations: + cite 4 arrest month.
• 03:2403:24, 30 December 2020 diff hist +4 Aaron Coleman →Abuse allegations: + month of arrest.
• 03:2103:21, 30 December 2020 diff hist +378 Aaron Coleman →Abuse allegations: + cite.

29 December 2020

• 22:1622:16, 29 December 2020 diff hist +348 Talk:Ted Cruz →What exactly is the issue with Heidi Cruz, his spouse, being in the last sentence of the lead?: r
• 15:3615:36, 29 December 2020 diff hist −4 Aaron Coleman →Sexual extortion bill: - wikilink.
• 15:3515:35, 29 December 2020 diff hist +26 Aaron Coleman →Sexual extortion bill: + wikilink.
• 15:3315:33, 29 December 2020 diff hist +15 Aaron Coleman →Sexual extortion bill: + wikilink.
• 15:3215:32, 29 December 2020 diff hist 0 Aaron Coleman →Sexual estortion bill: fixed typo
• 15:3115:31, 29 December 2020 diff hist +700 Aaron Coleman →Conflict with the Kansas Democratic Party: + sexual extortion bill
• 03:4003:40, 29 December 2020 diff hist +333 Talk:Ted Cruz →What exactly is the issue with Heidi Cruz, his spouse, being in the last sentence of the lead?: r

28 December 2020

• 20:3220:32, 28 December 2020 diff hist −454 Victoria Spartz →U.S. House of Representatives: removed off topic personal essay of editor, without supporting citations, of any sort whatsoever.
• 20:1720:17, 28 December 2020 diff hist +407 Victoria Spartz →Early life and education: divided info into chronological order.
• 20:1020:10, 28 December 2020 diff hist +12 Victoria Spartz →Career: re-ordered the early career info.
• 02:4802:48, 28 December 2020 diff hist +676 Aaron Coleman →Abuse allegations: + letter from KS Democratic women legislators.
• 02:3302:33, 28 December 2020 diff hist +26 Aaron Coleman + cite.
• 02:3202:32, 28 December 2020 diff hist +138 Aaron Coleman →Conflict with the Kansas Democratic Party: + more Ryckman comments.
• 02:2702:27, 28 December 2020 diff hist +620 Aaron Coleman →Abuse allegations: + December 2020 court allegations.

27 December 2020

• 22:3922:39, 27 December 2020 diff hist +25 Aaron Coleman + date
• 22:3822:38, 27 December 2020 diff hist −56 Lauren Boebert removed unnecessary comment.
• 22:3722:37, 27 December 2020 diff hist +211 Aaron Coleman Undid revision 996606462 by Orange1861 (talk) No. Discuss these changes on the talk page. Tag: Undo
• 18:2518:25, 27 December 2020 diff hist +208 Talk:Maria Bartiromo →Body should cover her Trump advocacy and conspiracy theories: r
• 17:4117:41, 27 December 2020 diff hist +236 Talk:Maria Bartiromo →Body should cover her Trump advocacy and conspiracy theories: r
• 17:4017:40, 27 December 2020 diff hist +27 Maria Bartiromo + POV warning.
• 17:3817:38, 27 December 2020 diff hist −47 Maria Bartiromo revert Tag: Manual revert
• 17:3717:37, 27 December 2020 diff hist +47 Maria Bartiromo + POV warning. Tag: Reverted
• 17:3517:35, 27 December 2020 diff hist +409 Talk:Maria Bartiromo →Body should cover her Trump advocacy and conspiracy theories: r
• 17:1717:17, 27 December 2020 diff hist +1 m Form 4473 + space

26 December 2020

• 15:0615:06, 26 December 2020 diff hist +444 Lauren Boebert →Tenure: + Biden electors

23 December 2020

• 16:0716:07, 23 December 2020 diff hist +475 Talk:Dan Bishop →This Whole Article is More Like a Democrat Attack Than an Article: TX v PA
• 16:0316:03, 23 December 2020 diff hist −4,860 Dan Bishop Undid revision 995572943 by HouseBlaster (talk) The information attacks anyone and everyone that signed the letter. This article is about Bishop. This article is not about that particular motion. A mention of one or two sentences is sufficient. But as is it is undue weight. It is not presented in a neutral manner. Tag: Undo

18 December 2020

• 03:0103:01, 18 December 2020 diff hist −8 Lauren Boebert →Environment: removed weasel word "although".
• 02:5502:55, 18 December 2020 diff hist +28 Lauren Boebert →Budget: updated sentence so that it will outlast the 2020 election cycle.
• 02:5302:53, 18 December 2020 diff hist +13 Lauren Boebert →2020: updated wording on pledge.

16 December 2020

• 21:4021:40, 16 December 2020 diff hist −4 Kevin Brady →Elections: redundant.
• 21:0521:05, 16 December 2020 diff hist +153 Kevin Brady →Elections: + Brady's percentage of vote in Nov 2020 Gen election.
• 21:0121:01, 16 December 2020 diff hist +32 Kevin Brady →Elections: + cite.
• 21:0021:00, 16 December 2020 diff hist +105 Kevin Brady →Elections: + Nov 2020 win
• 20:5720:57, 16 December 2020 diff hist +14 Kevin Brady →Texas House of Representatives: added district 15 to state rep work.
• 20:5320:53, 16 December 2020 diff hist +89 Kevin Brady →Early life, education, and early political career: restored info that is true, added reliable source to support fact.
• 20:4720:47, 16 December 2020 diff hist +64 Kevin Brady →Tenure: + cite
• 20:4620:46, 16 December 2020 diff hist +49 Kevin Brady →Tenure: + wikilinks.
• 20:4420:44, 16 December 2020 diff hist +280 Kevin Brady →Tenure: + focus and + negotiator work.
• 20:3820:38, 16 December 2020 diff hist −868 Kevin Brady →Tenure: This article is about Kevin Brady. It is not about any particular resolution. And it not for long, extensive quotes by Democrats lecturing on other topics. I left in Pelosi's strike at the bill's authors, Brady was just one. This article is not about that resolution.
• 20:3120:31, 16 December 2020 diff hist +53 Kevin Brady →Early life, education, and early political career: added date of Woodlands arrival.
• 20:2620:26, 16 December 2020 diff hist +389 Kevin Brady →Early life, education, and early political career: + mom age.

15 December 2020

• 14:2914:29, 15 December 2020 diff hist +468 Talk:Kimberly Klacik →2020 election results: r
• 03:0103:01, 15 December 2020 diff hist −1 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →Editor calling Omarosa Manigault Newman and Kimberly Klacik "tokens" and discussing their "look": fix
• 02:5902:59, 15 December 2020 diff hist +2,720 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →Editor calling Omarosa Manigault Newman and Kimberly Klacik "tokens" and discussing their "look": new section
• 02:4102:41, 15 December 2020 diff hist +395 User talk:Space4Time3Continuum2x →ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message: warning template
• 02:4002:40, 15 December 2020 diff hist +778 User talk:Praxidicae →ACC reservations: warning template. Tag: Reverted
• 02:3402:34, 15 December 2020 diff hist +696 User talk:CharlesShirley →Warning: An admin is choosing to ignore horrible, unacceptable comments Tag: Reverted
• 02:2902:29, 15 December 2020 diff hist +791 Talk:Kimberly Klacik →2020 election results: r
• 02:1402:14, 15 December 2020 diff hist +2,687 Talk:Kimberly Klacik →2020 election results: r

14 December 2020

• 23:2923:29, 14 December 2020 diff hist +138 Talk:Kimberly Klacik →2020 election results: restored info accidently deleted.
• 23:2723:27, 14 December 2020 diff hist +1,675 Talk:Kimberly Klacik →2020 election results: r
• 23:0223:02, 14 December 2020 diff hist +311 Talk:Kimberly Klacik →2020 election results: r
• 21:5521:55, 14 December 2020 diff hist +30 Talk:Kimberly Klacik →2020 election results: + % totals.
• 21:5321:53, 14 December 2020 diff hist 0 Talk:Kimberly Klacik →2020 election results: fix
• 21:5321:53, 14 December 2020 diff hist +1,427 Talk:Kimberly Klacik →2020 election results: r
• 21:3721:37, 14 December 2020 diff hist +2 m Talk:Kimberly Klacik →2020 election results: sp
• 21:3621:36, 14 December 2020 diff hist +1,603 Talk:Kimberly Klacik →2020 election results: r
• 21:1221:12, 14 December 2020 diff hist −1 Talk:Kimberly Klacik →2020 election results: fix
• 21:1121:11, 14 December 2020 diff hist +305 Talk:Kimberly Klacik →2020 election results: r
• 21:0521:05, 14 December 2020 diff hist +2,451 Talk:Kimberly Klacik →2020 election results: r
• 20:4720:47, 14 December 2020 diff hist +1 m Talk:Kimberly Klacik →2020 election results: sp
• 20:4620:46, 14 December 2020 diff hist +1,153 Talk:Kimberly Klacik →2020 election results: 14,000 votes is not 92,000 votes. Rodericks did not tell the truth and Wikipedia should not repeat false information. Hundreds of reliable source websites know she got over 92,000 votes and outvoted Davis by 38.000 votes.
• 20:3120:31, 14 December 2020 diff hist +27 Kimberly Klacik →November 2020 election: Restored fact that Mfume refused to debate on six different times. Tag: Reverted
• 20:2920:29, 14 December 2020 diff hist −192 Kimberly Klacik →November 2020 election: removed a new addition that is simply another attack on Klacik. Klacik was present at the rally but the sentences added merely attack the participates and then state she was present. How is this encyclopedic? It isn't. It is just another personal attack. What does it add to the bio that has not already been said? Take it to talk. Tag: Reverted
• 20:2420:24, 14 December 2020 diff hist +632 Talk:Kimberly Klacik →2020 election results: r

13 December 2020

• 00:0600:06, 13 December 2020 diff hist −1 Kimberly Klacik →Biography Tag: Reverted
• 00:0500:05, 13 December 2020 diff hist −25 Kimberly Klacik No edit summary Tag: Reverted
• 00:0200:02, 13 December 2020 diff hist −675 Kimberly Klacik →Biography: removed hit piece information from a unreliable source. Tag: Reverted

12 December 2020

• 20:0120:01, 12 December 2020 diff hist −1 m Talk:Kimberly Klacik →2020 election results
• 19:5919:59, 12 December 2020 diff hist +751 Talk:Kimberly Klacik →2020 election results: r
• 19:5419:54, 12 December 2020 diff hist −494 Kimberly Klacik →November 2020 election: The article is not about Benny Johnson and calmed down more POV editing.
• 19:5219:52, 12 December 2020 diff hist −80 Kimberly Klacik →November 2020 election: calmed down more POV pushing editing. The article sounded like it was written by Mfume.
• 19:4919:49, 12 December 2020 diff hist −2,079 Kimberly Klacik →November 2020 election: Removed all claims from the Griffiths commentary and the Rodricks commentary. Opinion pieces should not be used for providing facts or support of a Wikipedia article. Also, many of the claims by Griffiths and Rodricks were simply not true. Rodericks claimed falsely that Klacik only got 12,000 move votes that Davis the last Republican nominee. That is demonstrably false. Klacik got 36,559 more votes than Davis.
• 19:3519:35, 12 December 2020 diff hist −7 Kimberly Klacik →November 2020 election: removed comment of a Wikipedia editor.
• 19:3419:34, 12 December 2020 diff hist −14 Kimberly Klacik →November 2020 election: calmed down more POV editing.
• 19:3219:32, 12 December 2020 diff hist −42 Kimberly Klacik →November 2020 election: Calmed down the POV editing.
• 19:3019:30, 12 December 2020 diff hist +105 Kimberly Klacik →November 2020 election: + Klacik response.

11 December 2020

• 22:5722:57, 11 December 2020 diff hist −171 Steve Toth Undid revision 993683202 by 107.13.227.173 (talk) Reverted edit by anon IP editor who apparently doesn't have the ability to figure out the basic rules of Wikipedia. "empty vessels make the most sound" Tag: Undo
• 22:4422:44, 11 December 2020 diff hist +423 Burgess Owens →2020: restored more of his comments about socialists. Once again, a good reason was not given for its removal.
• 22:4222:42, 11 December 2020 diff hist +124 Burgess Owens →2020: restored factual statement that Owens did say. No good reason was given for its removal.
• 22:3422:34, 11 December 2020 diff hist −126 Mariannette Miller-Meeks removed commentary of brand new Wikipedia editor, who can't seem to understand we don't want personal opinions. Tags: Manual revert Reverted
• 16:2716:27, 11 December 2020 diff hist +189 Ken Paxton →Challenge to 2020 presidential election results: + Paxton response
• 02:1202:12, 11 December 2020 diff hist −421 Elise Stefanik Doesn't really need to be in the opening section.

9 December 2020

• 14:5614:56, 9 December 2020 diff hist +255 Talk:Ted Cruz →What exactly is the issue with Heidi Cruz, his spouse, being in the last sentence of the lead?: r
• 14:4514:45, 9 December 2020 diff hist +458 Talk:Ted Cruz →What exactly is the issue with Heidi Cruz, his spouse, being in the last sentence of the lead?: r

8 December 2020

• 21:1321:13, 8 December 2020 diff hist +57 Ken Paxton fixed opening paragraph.
• 21:1121:11, 8 December 2020 diff hist +395 Larry Schweikart Undid revision 993086682 by 99.47.199.71 (talk) Anon IP editor removed info without discussion or rationale or consensus. Restored. Tag: Undo
• 21:0421:04, 8 December 2020 diff hist −1 Trump wall Undid revision 993102438 by 213.31.251.51 (talk) It is still being built. So your edit is factually incorrect. Also, you did not provide a reliable source to support your edit. Why? because it was incorrect. Tag: Undo
• 14:5514:55, 8 December 2020 diff hist +14 Talk:Ted Cruz →What exactly is the issue with Heidi Cruz, his spouse, being in the last sentence of the lead?: clean up.
• 14:5114:51, 8 December 2020 diff hist +2 Stephanie Bice →Early life, education, and early career: a new paragraph required there.
• 04:3504:35, 8 December 2020 diff hist +48 Talk:Ted Cruz →What exactly is the issue with Heidi Cruz, his spouse, being in the last sentence of the lead?: fix.
• 04:2704:27, 8 December 2020 diff hist +131 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tasha Williamson (2nd nomination) Candidate does not meet basic requirements for an article. Delete.
• 04:2504:25, 8 December 2020 diff hist −111 Ted Cruz Undid revision 992953205 by Trillfendi (talk)The article is about Ted Cruz, not Heidi Cruz or his children. Ted Cruz is not know for his wife or his children. Sorry. You have not gathered the appropriate consensus to make this edit. Try to follow the rules. Tag: Undo
• 04:2304:23, 8 December 2020 diff hist +984 Talk:Ted Cruz →What exactly is the issue with Heidi Cruz, his spouse, being in the last sentence of the lead?: r

7 December 2020

• 21:4721:47, 7 December 2020 diff hist +245 Talk:Ted Cruz →What exactly is the issue with Heidi Cruz, his spouse, being in the last sentence of the lead?: + wikilink.
• 21:0721:07, 7 December 2020 diff hist +42 David Valadao Garcia. Tag: Manual revert
• 21:0521:05, 7 December 2020 diff hist +1 Shane Jett →Oklahoma State Senate: fix
• 21:0421:04, 7 December 2020 diff hist +4 Shane Jett →Oklahoma State Senate: fix
• 21:0221:02, 7 December 2020 diff hist −2 Mariannette Miller-Meeks No edit summary
• 21:0121:01, 7 December 2020 diff hist −5 Mariannette Miller-Meeks No edit summary
• 20:5920:59, 7 December 2020 diff hist +460 Talk:Ted Cruz →What exactly is the issue with Heidi Cruz, his spouse, being in the last sentence of the lead?: tweaks.
• 20:4120:41, 7 December 2020 diff hist −1 Trump wall →Funding granted, setbacks, and progress (2019–2020): updated body of article with new progress number: 423 miles, not 415 miles.
• 20:4020:40, 7 December 2020 diff hist 0 Trump wall updated the 415 miles in opening section with 423 miles.

6 December 2020

• 23:4623:46, 6 December 2020 diff hist +233 Young Kim Undid revision 992762987 by Oclajos62 (talk) Tag: Undo
• 19:0819:08, 6 December 2020 diff hist +262 Talk:Ted Cruz →What exactly is the issue with Heidi Cruz, his spouse, being in the last sentence of the lead?: + HC delete discussion.
• 19:0219:02, 6 December 2020 diff hist +4 Talk:Ted Cruz →What exactly is the issue with Heidi Cruz, his spouse, being in the last sentence of the lead?: + space.
• 19:0119:01, 6 December 2020 diff hist +72 Talk:Ted Cruz →What exactly is the issue with Heidi Cruz, his spouse, being in the last sentence of the lead?: + wikilinks.
• 18:5618:56, 6 December 2020 diff hist −9 Talk:Ted Cruz →What exactly is the issue with Heidi Cruz, his spouse, being in the last sentence of the lead?: correct
• 18:5218:52, 6 December 2020 diff hist +2,413 Talk:Ted Cruz →What exactly is the issue with Heidi Cruz, his spouse, being in the last sentence of the lead?: + r4
• 18:2218:22, 6 December 2020 diff hist +109 Talk:Ted Cruz →What exactly is the issue with Heidi Cruz, his spouse, being in the last sentence of the lead?: sign
• 18:2218:22, 6 December 2020 diff hist +904 Talk:Ted Cruz →What exactly is the issue with Heidi Cruz, his spouse, being in the last sentence of the lead?: + r3.
• 18:1618:16, 6 December 2020 diff hist +1,534 Talk:Ted Cruz →What exactly is the issue with Heidi Cruz, his spouse, being in the last sentence of the lead?: r2
• 17:3417:34, 6 December 2020 diff hist +174 Mariannette Miller-Meeks →2020 general election: Yeah, added in more fact about that appeal. It is a political appeal, not a judicial appeal and it rarely works, just one time in 100 tries, since 1969.
• 17:2317:23, 6 December 2020 diff hist +4 Talk:Ted Cruz →What exactly is the issue with Heidi Cruz, his spouse, being in the last sentence of the lead?: + Ms, to split her from Ted
• 17:2117:21, 6 December 2020 diff hist +1,930 Talk:Ted Cruz →What exactly is the issue with Heidi Cruz, his spouse, being in the last sentence of the lead?: r
• 17:0917:09, 6 December 2020 diff hist −123 Ted Cruz There fixed it.
• 14:3514:35, 6 December 2020 diff hist +291 Talk:Maria Bartiromo →Body should cover her Trump advocacy and conspiracy theories: r
• 13:2213:22, 6 December 2020 diff hist +86 Dana Loesch update.
• 13:1313:13, 6 December 2020 diff hist −279 Dan Patrick (politician) Undid revision 992609879 by Snooganssnoogans (talk) Editor removed reliably sourced information which has been in the article for years without discussion or rationale provided. Restored. Tag: Undo
• 13:1113:11, 6 December 2020 diff hist +374 Mariannette Miller-Meeks Undid revision 992609197 by 2605:E000:1309:C461:5980:C602:83E5:ACC3 (talk) There fixed that. Tag: Undo
• 00:5300:53, 6 December 2020 diff hist +13 Dan Crenshaw →Military service: restored ten years, not eight years. Anon IP editor just pulled a number out of ars. . . Houston Chronicle, reliable source, says "10 years". The math of an anon IP editors holds zero weight or validity. Just gibberish. reverted.
• 00:4500:45, 6 December 2020 diff hist −4 Aberdeen International Youth Festival →Some notable people that have appeared at the festival: removed another redlink.

5 December 2020

• 23:5223:52, 5 December 2020 diff hist −18 Dana Loesch →Media career: removed unnecessary redlinks and italics.
• 23:4823:48, 5 December 2020 diff hist +434 Dana Loesch →Books: + 3rd book.
• 23:2423:24, 5 December 2020 diff hist −8 Maria Bartiromo →Early life: There is no C.W. Post College. There is a Long Island University with a two campuses and one campus is named C.W. Post campus.
• 21:0321:03, 5 December 2020 diff hist −112 Ted Cruz Undid revision 992544427 by Trillfendi (talk) Please nicely take your attempts to put information in the lede to the talk page. You have the burden to get consensus and I have expressed my objection. And yes I have a firm grip on the rules of Wikipedia. I would suggest you get a firm grip on those rules also. Tag: Undo
• 21:0121:01, 5 December 2020 diff hist +2,375 User talk:Trillfendi →Juno (fllm): + Edit warring template.
• 20:4820:48, 5 December 2020 diff hist +9 Maria Bartiromo →Early life: fixed the redirect. No. You had it wrong earlier. It pointed to the C.W. Post, the breakfast cereal guy. You didn't even click through the link you posted to see it was not the campus.
• 20:4420:44, 5 December 2020 diff hist −112 Ted Cruz Undid revision 992539877 by Trillfendi (talk) The article is not about her. Tags: Undo Reverted
• 19:4219:42, 5 December 2020 diff hist −67 Kimberly Klacik →November 2020 election: fixed poor word choice.
• 19:4119:41, 5 December 2020 diff hist −31 Kimberly Klacik →November 2020 election: "despite" weasel word removed.
• 19:4019:40, 5 December 2020 diff hist −21 Kimberly Klacik →November 2020 election: Unnecessary and not supported by rs.
• 19:3219:32, 5 December 2020 diff hist −140 Kimberly Klacik →November 2020 election: removed a whole bunch of POV comments. Not necessary.
• 19:2519:25, 5 December 2020 diff hist +1 Template:Oklahoma State Senators updated seat 17.
• 19:2419:24, 5 December 2020 diff hist +27 Shane Jett added Oklahoma State Senate.
• 19:2219:22, 5 December 2020 diff hist +3 Shane Jett updated website.
• 19:0519:05, 5 December 2020 diff hist −2 Maria Bartiromo Undid revision 992525569 by 68.199.42.28 (talk)Have you click through on that link. It is a link to an article about CW Post, the human being. It is a biography article, not an article about a college campus. CW Post is also the name of on ONE of Long Island University's campus's. Please pay closer attention. Know what you are linking to. Tag: Undo
• 19:0219:02, 5 December 2020 diff hist +380 María Elvira Salazar →2020 general election: 19 Republican freshman women is the correct number, not 13.
• 19:0019:00, 5 December 2020 diff hist +25 María Elvira Salazar →2020 general election: better link.
• 18:5818:58, 5 December 2020 diff hist +1 2020 United States elections →House of Representatives elections: They have already lost 10 seats, so "9" is simply wrong.
• 18:5618:56, 5 December 2020 diff hist +55 María Elvira Salazar →2020 general election: wikilink.
• 18:5418:54, 5 December 2020 diff hist −26 María Elvira Salazar →2020 general election: "as of" wording not necessary.
• 18:5118:51, 5 December 2020 diff hist 0 Maria Bartiromo →Early life: no caps needed.
• 18:5118:51, 5 December 2020 diff hist −4 Maria Bartiromo →Early life: cleaned up college section some.
• 18:4818:48, 5 December 2020 diff hist −20 Maria Bartiromo →Early life: removed wikilink.
• 18:4818:48, 5 December 2020 diff hist +32 Maria Bartiromo →Early life: fixed the names of the universities she attended.
• 18:4618:46, 5 December 2020 diff hist −88 Maria Bartiromo →CNBC: removed gibberish.
• 18:4218:42, 5 December 2020 diff hist −4 María Elvira Salazar →2020 general election: removed unnecessary word.
• 18:4218:42, 5 December 2020 diff hist +2 María Elvira Salazar →2020 general election: And the GOP that Shalala was referring to was Salazar, her opponent.
• 18:4118:41, 5 December 2020 diff hist −8 María Elvira Salazar →2020 general election: restored the correct wording from the Politico article that the anon IP editor incorrectly changed. Clearly Politico was talking about what Shalala said, not Salazar. So either anon IP editor either did not understand the Politico article or simply chose to misrepresent the facts. Also the polling was clearly "incorrect".
• 18:3618:36, 5 December 2020 diff hist +12 María Elvira Salazar →2020 general election: restored wording that anon IP removed.
• 13:5113:51, 5 December 2020 diff hist −4 Maria Bartiromo →Awards and honors: removed redlink.
• 13:4913:49, 5 December 2020 diff hist 0 Maria Bartiromo →Awards and honors: sp
• 13:4813:48, 5 December 2020 diff hist −4 Maria Bartiromo →Awards and honors: removed redlink.
• 13:4613:46, 5 December 2020 diff hist −4 Maria Bartiromo →Awards and honors: removed redlink.
• 13:4513:45, 5 December 2020 diff hist −7 Maria Bartiromo →Fox Business and Fox News: removed unnecessary words.
• 13:4413:44, 5 December 2020 diff hist −4 Maria Bartiromo →Fox Business and Fox News: link and full words.
• 13:4313:43, 5 December 2020 diff hist −7 Maria Bartiromo →CNN: no need for first name.
• 13:4313:43, 5 December 2020 diff hist +10 Maria Bartiromo →Awards and honors: full sentence.
• 01:3001:30, 5 December 2020 diff hist −112 Ted Cruz Undid revision 992385854 by Trillfendi (talk) This is already in the article. Removed redundancy. Tags: Undo Reverted

4 December 2020

• 23:3423:34, 4 December 2020 diff hist −8 2020 United States House of Representatives elections reword.
• 23:3323:33, 4 December 2020 diff hist +535 2020 United States House of Representatives elections + 19 freshmen Republian women.
• 22:4622:46, 4 December 2020 diff hist +65 Greg Abbott + wikilink.
• 22:4322:43, 4 December 2020 diff hist +204 Greg Abbott + cite.
• 22:4122:41, 4 December 2020 diff hist +269 Greg Abbott restored info to the lede that should have never been removed.
• 20:5720:57, 4 December 2020 diff hist −175 Greg Abbott Yes. Removed information that is completely inappropriate for lede.
• 20:5520:55, 4 December 2020 diff hist +1 Angela Stanton-King Undid revision 992354333 by 2603:6080:9406:3CBF:746A:8934:B17D:3DF7 (talk) Tags: Undo Reverted
• 20:1520:15, 4 December 2020 diff hist +422 Mike Garcia (politician) →2020: + campaign finance numbers
• 19:4319:43, 4 December 2020 diff hist +380 Young Kim →2020 general election: + cite
• 19:3919:39, 4 December 2020 diff hist +439 Michelle Steel →2020 general election: + campaign financing for 2020.
• 17:3817:38, 4 December 2020 diff hist 0 Talk:117th United States Congress →Survey: fixed more grammar.
• 17:3717:37, 4 December 2020 diff hist −4 Talk:117th United States Congress →Survey: removed grammar mistake.
• 17:3617:36, 4 December 2020 diff hist +1,223 Talk:117th United States Congress →Survey: *'''Yes''': Iowa has certified the result. The Hart, the Democratic candidate, is not pursuing judicial avenues.
• 17:2317:23, 4 December 2020 diff hist +144 2020 United States House of Representatives elections →Open seats that changed parties: correct spot.
• 17:2117:21, 4 December 2020 diff hist −71 2020 United States House of Representatives elections →Democrats: wrong spot. Tag: Manual revert
• 17:1917:19, 4 December 2020 diff hist +71 2020 United States House of Representatives elections →Democrats: updated list. Tag: Reverted
• 17:1717:17, 4 December 2020 diff hist −99 2020 United States House of Representatives elections →Races undecided: Not true. Iowa #2 is decided. Hart is going to pursue political options, but not judicial options. So, for right now it is over.
• 15:0015:00, 4 December 2020 diff hist −36 Darrell Issa We don't use that word, "currently".
• 14:0514:05, 4 December 2020 diff hist +23 2020 United States House of Representatives elections →New York: fix NY #1. It is NOT too close to call. It was called weeks ago. Tag: Reverted
• 14:0214:02, 4 December 2020 diff hist −1 2020 United States House of Representatives elections →New York: fixed NY #1, clearly wrong. Tag: Reverted
• 12:4312:43, 4 December 2020 diff hist −4 Lauren Boebert Undid revision 992214227 by 98.245.152.133 (talk) Tag: Undo
• 12:4212:42, 4 December 2020 diff hist −1 Cenk Uygur Undid revision 992239119 by 98.156.140.8 (talk) Tag: Undo
• 12:4012:40, 4 December 2020 diff hist +66 Amy Coney Barrett the 5th woman part is redundant. but the youngest woman part is significant.
• 04:3104:31, 4 December 2020 diff hist 0 m Mariannette Miller-Meeks sp
• 00:0000:00, 4 December 2020 diff hist +23 Ruth Bader Ginsburg Undid revision 992185527 by Abbyjjjj96 (talk) Tags: Undo Reverted

3 December 2020

• 23:5823:58, 3 December 2020 diff hist −1 Angela Stanton-King Undid revision 992177644 by 2601:448:100:CE40:DCA4:5DE2:F1B4:F7DD (talk) Tags: Undo Reverted
• 21:1121:11, 3 December 2020 diff hist +28 Victoria Spartz →Early life and education
• 20:4820:48, 3 December 2020 diff hist +59 Kat Cammack + cat
• 20:4520:45, 3 December 2020 diff hist +262 Victoria Spartz →Career: + cite
• 20:3820:38, 3 December 2020 diff hist +130 Kat Cammack + cite that actually gave her birthdate.
• 20:3220:32, 3 December 2020 diff hist +165 Lauren Boebert + cite.
• 04:5104:51, 3 December 2020 diff hist −25 Anthony Hensley Undid revision 992032139 by AlSmith28 (talk)transition has not happened yet. Tag: Undo
• 04:0604:06, 3 December 2020 diff hist −390 Mariannette Miller-Meeks Twitter cannot be used as a reliable source. See Wikipedia:TWITTER
• 04:0304:03, 3 December 2020 diff hist −2 Young Kim do not know what sceduled means. Tag: Manual revert
• 01:2201:22, 3 December 2020 diff hist −1 Trump wall Undid revision 991968850 by Lawrence 979 (talk)There is absolutely no reliable source to back up this claim. because it isn't true. the project is still on going. Tag: Undo
• 01:1501:15, 3 December 2020 diff hist +40 Maria Bartiromo →Fox News and Fox Business: + wikilink

2 December 2020

• 17:4917:49, 2 December 2020 diff hist −11 Young Kim Undid revision 991932239 by 2605:E000:878A:B500:291E:80CF:4274:9A5B (talk) Tag: Undo
• 14:2914:29, 2 December 2020 diff hist +8 2020 United States Senate election in Texas Hegar was defeated by 9.6%.
• 14:2014:20, 2 December 2020 diff hist −1,508 Talk:Maria Bartiromo →Fox Business News or Fox Business Talk: soapboxing
• 13:5713:57, 2 December 2020 diff hist +21 Maria Bartiromo OOOPS! anon IP is simply making things up. reverted. Tag: Undo
• 13:5113:51, 2 December 2020 diff hist 0 Trump wall →Funding granted, setbacks, and progress (2019–2020): updated the border mileage.
• 13:4813:48, 2 December 2020 diff hist 0 Trump wall updated mileage of the wall.