User talk:HeliosX

Notify me accurately in what sources did you find the Aromanian conjugations and what sources you found for the IPA phonology you submitted. Alright :-)

Hanno the Navigator (talk) 02:14, 10 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hello,

for instance, I found the form lucredzã in this song mix by Steaua di Vreari, more precisely in this line "Va s-lucredzã dauã sãptãmãni". Their song mix has been uploaded on January 21, 2010. But, along with a different orthography, I also found the form elsewhere and I didn't cope with all the content of the songs by Steua di Vreari. Prior to this, I've made conclusions from the possible vowel and semivowel extensions of the other inflections and tried to research those. As the second person plural suffix "-ats" can be extended into "-atsã", I opined that the second person singular suffix could be prolonged similarly and I discovered the form already given as example.

There is this Romanian article about grammar, orthography and phonology of the Aromanian language, encompassing also other information, and it has got more content than the associated English article. HeliosX (talk) 16:38, 28 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

I actually in fact possess actually grammatical conjugations from two politically biased Greek linguists that were actually in fact most ridiculously rambling about political matters in their linguistically based grammar Aromanian book and not hypothetically insested conjugation, and I can provide it to you in .pdf form however it's all in Greek and Aromanian with some Latin words thrown around and there is potentially no English translation out there. Beyond their politically-ethnic deranged propaganda they are actually quite accurate in their Aromanian grammar conjugations it sounds however they always ridiculously claim the most Romance authentic forms are "romanian propaganda" which is literally in fact pure their neurotic paranoia such as the Romance-based Aromanian words for "first", "second" and "third" and try to undermine their 100% actually accurate authenticity by most infinitely illogically claiming the Greek loans are "better" or "original", a very absurd nonsense on their part. But besides that it doesn't seem to be that bad of a pdf.

Hanno the Navigator (talk) 11:26, 2 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Sorry to butt in, I highly recommend this online dictionary if you want to look up words in Aromanian. --Robbie SWE (talk) 18:47, 28 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

I've asked you to provide sources that can corroborate the changes you've been making – that is the reason why I reverted and will keep reverting your edits. The way you have edited gives me reason to doubt the validity of your contributions which in itself is a pity because you seem knowledgeable. Wiktionary is not an authority on etymology and shouldn't be a forum for original research regardless of how plausible it seems. --Robbie SWE (talk) 19:08, 30 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Cease and desist – if you continue to revert edits without providing reliable sources, I will be forced to place a short-term block on you in order to avoid edit warring. --Robbie SWE (talk) 19:52, 30 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

@Robbie SWE That's just not true, as it's long-standing practice to add plausible seeming derivations even if not sourced from books. Nobody is an authority on etymology; etymologies are discovered, not mandatd. 109.41.1.116 21:07, 13 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Could you be so kind and explain why you delted content - without giving any explanation or arguments? SKA-KSI (talk) 06:20, 25 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

The discussion about the issue can be found on this userpage. HeliosX (talk) 13:12, 25 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Isn't the template you made, {{sat-noun}}, supposed to be named {{sat-decl-noun}}? -- Apisite (talk) 23:07, 7 December 2023 (UTC)Reply