Template talk:bg-conj

(Notifying Atitarev, Bogorm, Bezimenen, Nauka, Ted Masters, Kiril kovachev): I went ahead and moved my module to the mainspace and created {{bg-conj}}. There was previously a {{bg-conj}}, which is now moved to {{bg-conj-old}}. See User:Benwing2/bg-conj-conversion for instructions on how to convert the old conjugations to the new ones. Note that some types of imperfective verbs need to have the source of the verbal noun indicated as it varies unpredictably from verb to verb; the instructions indicate how to figure this out. Benwing2 (talk) 03:54, 29 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

@Benwing2: I saw what you're doing and started converting ску́бя (skúbja) before I saw message. Fantastic! Keep up the good work. It seems to make sense but please document when you have a chance. --Anatoli T. ^{(обсудить}/^вклад) 04:17, 29 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

@Benwing2: I think we'll have to come with some standard for reflexive verbs, such as къ́пя се (kǎ́pja se). I have added the definition and conjugation at къ́пя (kǎ́pja). What is missing is the particle "се", which should be displayed somewhere at the definition line. Maybe something like this:

(reflexive, intransitive) (се ~) to bathe, to have a bath

I would support this for other languages as well where the reflexive particle is written separately from the verb - French, German, etc. Thoughts? --Anatoli T. ^{(обсудить}/^вклад) 04:32, 29 April 2020 (UTC)Reply