Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

  EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Small firms and patenting revisited

Suma Athreye, Claudio Fassio and Stephen Roper ()
Additional contact information
Stephen Roper: Warwick Business School, Postal: UK

No 2020/2, Papers in Innovation Studies from Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research

Abstract: In order to observe a patent application at the firm level two conditions need to be met: new products need to be of patentable quality, which depends both on the degree of novelty of innovations and on the total number (portfolio) of innovations; and the benefits of patents need to be higher than the costs of owning them. Analyzing the patent propensity of small and large UK firms using a novel innovation-level survey (the SIPU survey) linked to Community Innovation Survey data we find that when we consider the whole innovation portfolio smaller firms do patent less than larger firms. However, using data on individual innovations, we find that smaller firms are no less likely to patent any specific innovation than larger firms. We argue that size differences in the probability to patent relate primarily to the ‘portfolio effect’, i.e. larger firms generate more innovations than smaller firms and therefore are more likely to create one or more which are patentable. As for the decision to patent a patentable innovation, we find that cost barriers, more than issues of innovation quality or enforceability, deter small firms from patenting specific innovations. Measures to address the costs of patenting for smaller firms – perhaps by considering patents as eligible costs for R&D tax credits – and/or subsidizing SMEs’ participation in IP litigation schemes may both encourage patent use by smaller firms.

Keywords: Patenting; SME; small firms; UK (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O32 O34 O38 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 37 pages
Date: 2020-02-26
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-acc, nep-bec, nep-cse, nep-ent, nep-ind, nep-ino, nep-ipr, nep-ore, nep-sbm and nep-tid
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
http://wp.circle.lu.se/upload/CIRCLE/workingpapers/202002_athreye.pdf Full text (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Small firms and patenting revisited (2021) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hhs:lucirc:2020_002

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Papers in Innovation Studies from Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research, Lund University, PO Box 117, SE-22100 Lund, Sweden. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Torben Schubert ().

 
Page updated 2025-01-24
Handle: RePEc:hhs:lucirc:2020_002