Understanding Visual, Integrated, and Flexible Workspace for Comprehensive Literature Reviews with SketchingRelatedWork
Article No.: 348, Pages 1 - 7
Abstract
Writing an academic paper requires significant time and effort to find, read, and organize many related papers, which are complex knowledge tasks. We present a novel interactive system that allows users to perform these tasks quickly and easily on the 2D canvas with pen and multitouch inputs, turning users’ sketches and handwriting into node-link diagrams of papers and citations that users can iteratively expand in situ toward constructing a coherent narrative when writing Related Work sections. Through a pilot study involving researchers experienced in publishing academic papers, we show that our system can serve as a visual, integrated, and flexible workspace for conducting comprehensive literature reviews.
Supplemental Material
- Download
- 38.53 MB
- Transcript
- Download
- 178.14 MB
- Transcript
- Download
- 178.14 MB
- Transcript
References
[1]
AAAS. 2024. Science | AAAS. Retrieved Jan 25, 2024 from https://www.science.org/
[2]
Selvas AI. 2024. Selvy Pen SDK - Handwriting Recognition Solution | Developers. Retrieved Jan 25, 2024 from https://handwriting.selvasai.com/
[3]
arXiv. 2024. arXiv.org e-Print archive. Retrieved Jan 25, 2024 from https://arxiv.org/
[4]
bioRxiv. 2024. bioRxiv.org - the preprint server for Biology. Retrieved Jan 25, 2024 from https://www.biorxiv.org/
[5]
Duen Horng Chau, Aniket Kittur, Jason I. Hong, and Christos Faloutsos. 2011. Apolo: making sense of large network data by combining rich user interaction and machine learning. In Proc CHI ’11. 167–176. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1978967
[6]
Kiroong Choe, Seokweon Jung, Seokhyeon Park, Hwajung Hong, and Jinwook Seo. 2021. Papers101: supporting the discovery process in the literature review workflow for novice researchers. In Proc PacificVis ’21. 176–180. https://doi.org/10.1109/PacificVis52677.2021.00037
[7]
Clarivate. 2024. EndNote | The best reference management tool. Retrieved Jan 25, 2024 from https://endnote.com/
[8]
Niklas Elmqvist and Philippas Tsigas. 2007. CiteWiz: a tool for the visualization of scientific citation networks. Information Visualization 6, 3 (2007), 215–232. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ivs.9500156
[9]
Google. 2024. About Google Scholar. Retrieved Jan 25, 2024 from https://scholar.google.com/intl/en/scholar/about.html
[10]
Google. 2024. Google Sheets: Online Spreadsheet Editor | Google Workspace. Retrieved Jan 25, 2024 from https://www.google.com/intl/en/sheets/about/
[11]
Google. 2024. Google Slides: Online Slideshow Maker | Google Workspace. Retrieved Jan 25, 2024 from https://www.google.com/intl/en/slides/about/
[12]
Florian Haag, Steffen Lohmann, Stephan Siek, and Thomas Ertl. 2015. QueryVOWL: visual composition of SPARQL queries. In The Semantic Web: ESWC 2015 Satellite Events (2015), 62–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25639-9_12
[13]
Sandra G. Hart and Lowell E. Staveland. 1988. Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): results of empirical and theoretical research. In Advances in psychology. Vol. 52. 139–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62386-9
[14]
Florian Heimerl, Qi Han, Steffen Koch, and Thomas Ertl. 2016. CiteRivers: visual analytics of citation patterns. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 22, 1 (2016), 190–199. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2015.2467621
[15]
Notion Labs Inc.2024. Your connected workspace for wiki, docs & projects | Notion. Retrieved Jan 25, 2024 from https://www.notion.so/
[16]
Hyunmo Kang, Catherine Plaisant, Bongshin Lee, and Benjamin B. Bederson. 2006. NetLens: iterative exploration of content-actor network data. In Proc VAST ’06. 91–98. https://doi.org/10.1109/VAST.2006.261426
[17]
Rodney Michael Kinney, Chloe Anastasiades, Russell Authur, Iz Beltagy, Jonathan Bragg, Alexandra Buraczynski, Isabel Cachola, Stefan Candra, Yoganand Chandrasekhar, Arman Cohan, Miles Crawford, Doug Downey, Jason Dunkelberger, Oren Etzioni, Rob Evans, Sergey Feldman, Joseph Gorney, David W. Graham, F.Q. Hu, Regan Huff, Daniel King, Sebastian Kohlmeier, Bailey Kuehl, Michael Langan, Daniel Lin, Haokun Liu, Kyle Lo, Jaron Lochner, Kelsey MacMillan, Tyler Murray, Christopher Newell, Smita R Rao, Shaurya Rohatgi, Paul Sayre, Zejiang Shen, Amanpreet Singh, Luca Soldaini, Shivashankar Subramanian, A. Tanaka, Alex D Wade, Linda M. Wagner, Lucy Lu Wang, Christopher Wilhelm, Caroline Wu, Jiangjiang Yang, Angele Zamarron, Madeleine van Zuylen, and Daniel S. Weld. 2023. The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.10140 (2023).
[18]
Jill H. Larkin and Herbert A. Simon. 1987. Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words. Cognitive science 11, 1 (1987), 65–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6708.1987.tb00863.x
[19]
Springer Nature Limited. 2024. Nature. Retrieved Jan 25, 2024 from https://www.nature.com/
[20]
Pengkai Liu, Xin Wang, Qiang Fu, Yajun Yang, Yuan-Fang Li, and Qingpeng Zhang. 1987. KGVQL: a knowledge graph visual query language with bidirectional transformations. Knowledge-Based Systems 250, 108870 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2022.108870
[21]
Donghyeok Ma, Joon Hyub Lee, Junwoo Yoon, Taegyu Jin, and Seok-Hyung Bae. 2023. SketchingRelatedWork: finding and organizing papers through inking a node-link diagram. In Proc UIST ’23 Adjunct. Article 20, 3 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3586182.3616685
[22]
Justin Matejka, Tovi Grossman, and George Fitzmaurice. 2012. Citeology: visualizing paper genealogy. In Proc CHI ’12 Extended Abstracts. 181–190. https://doi.org/10.1145/2212776.2212796
[23]
Justin Matejka, Tovi Grossman, and George Fitzmaurice. 2021. Paper forager: Supporting the rapid exploration of research document collections. In Graphics Interface ’21. 237–245. https://doi.org/10.20380/GI2021.27
[24]
Mendeley. 2024. Mendeley - Reference Management Software. Retrieved Jan 25, 2024 from https://www.mendeley.com/
[25]
Kenton O’Hara, Fiona Smith, William Newman, and Abigail Sellen. 1998. Student readers’ use of library documents: implications for library technologies. In Proc CHI ’98. 233–240. https://doi.org/10.1145/274644.274678
[26]
Connected Papers. 2024. Connected Papers | Find and explore academic papers. Retrieved Jan 25, 2024 from https://www.connectedpapers.com/
[27]
Robert Pienta, Acar Tamersoy, Alex Endert, Shamkant Navathe, Hanghang Tong, and Duen Horng Chau. 2016. VISAGE: interactive visual graph querying. In Proc AVI ’16. 272–279. https://doi.org/10.1145/2909132.2909246
[28]
Research Rabbit. 2024. ResearchRabbit. Retrieved Jan 25, 2024 from https://www.researchrabbit.ai/
[29]
George Robertson, Mary Czerwinski, Kevin Larson, Daniel C. Robbins, David Thiel, and Maarten van Dantzich. 1998. Data Mountain: using spatial memory for document management. In Proc UIST ’98. 153–162. https://doi.org/10.1145/288392.288596
[30]
scite Inc. 2024. scite: see how research has been cited. Retrieved Jan 25, 2024 from https://scite.ai/
[31]
SerpApi. 2024. SerpApi: Google Search API. Retrieved Jan 25, 2024 from https://serpapi.com/
[32]
Zeqian Shen, Michael Ogawa, Soon Tee Teoh, and Kwan-Liu Ma. 2006. BiblioViz: a system for visualizing bibliography information. In Proc APVIS ’06. 93–102.
[33]
Hariharan Subramonyam, Colleen Seifert, Priti Shah, and Eytan Adar. 2020. texSketch: active diagramming through pen-and-ink annotations. In Proc CHI ’20. 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376155
[34]
Nicole Sultanum, Christine Murad, and Daniel Wigdor. 2020. Understanding and supporting academic literature review workflows with litSense. In Proc AVI ’20. https://doi.org/10.1145/3399715.3399830
[35]
William Wright, David Schroh, Pascale Proulx, Alex Skaburskis, and Brian Cort. 2006. The sandbox for analysis: concepts and methods. In Proc CHI ’06. 801–810. https://doi.org/10.1145/1124772.1124890
[36]
Haijun Xia, Ken Hinckley, Michel Pahud, Xiao Tu, and Bill Buxton. 2017. WritLarge: ink unleashed by unified scope, action, & zoom. In Proc CHI ’17. 3227–3240. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025664
Index Terms
- Understanding Visual, Integrated, and Flexible Workspace for Comprehensive Literature Reviews with SketchingRelatedWork
Recommendations
SketchingRelatedWork: Finding and Organizing Papers through Inking a Node-Link Diagram
UIST '23 Adjunct: Adjunct Proceedings of the 36th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and TechnologyWriting an academic paper requires significant time and effort to find, read, and organize many related papers, which is a complex knowledge task. We present a novel interactive system that allows users to perform these tasks quickly and easily on the ...
A Guided Tour of Literature Review: Facilitating Academic Paper Reading with Narrative Visualization
VINCI '16: Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Visual Information Communication and InteractionReading academic paper is a daily task for researchers and graduate students. However, reading effectively can be challenging, particularly for novices in scientific research. For example, when readers are reading the related work section that cites a ...
Cluster analysis of scientific citation context
iiWAS '17: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Information Integration and Web-based Applications & ServicesInvestigation of related research is a very important task for researchers. In recent years, databases of academic papers have been developed, and researchers can search for related research using keywords and so on. However, it is a very time-consuming ...
Comments
Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
May 2024
4761 pages
ISBN:9798400703317
DOI:10.1145/3613905
Copyright © 2024 Owner/Author.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.
Sponsors
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 11 May 2024
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Work in progress
- Research
- Refereed limited
Conference
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 6,164 of 23,696 submissions, 26%
Upcoming Conference
CHI '25
- Sponsor:
- sigchi
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 107Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)107
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)19
Reflects downloads up to 25 Nov 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign inFull Access
View options
View or Download as a PDF file.
PDFeReader
View online with eReader.
eReaderFull Text
View this article in Full Text.
Full TextHTML Format
View this article in HTML Format.
HTML Format