research-article

Deterrence of Intelligent DDoS via Multi-Hop Traffic Divergence

Authors:

Jianping WuAuthors Info & Claims

CCS '21: Proceedings of the 2021 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security

Pages 923 - 939

https://doi.org/10.1145/3460120.3484737

Published: 13 November 2021 Publication History

Abstract

We devise a simple, provably effective, and readily usable deterrence against intelligent, unknown DDoS threats: Demotivate adversaries to launch attacks via multi-hop traffic divergence. This new strategy is motivated by the fact that existing defenses almost always lag behind numerous emerging DDoS threats and evolving intelligent attack strategies. The root cause is if adversaries are smart and adaptive, no single-hop defenses (including optimal ones) can perfectly differentiate unknown DDoS and legitimate traffic. Instead, we formulate intelligent DDoS as a game between attackers and defenders, and prove how multi-hop traffic divergence helps bypass this dilemma by reversing the asymmetry between attackers and defenders. This insight results in EID, an Economical Intelligent DDoS Demotivation protocol. EID combines local weak (yet divergent) filters to provably null attack gains without knowing exploited vulnerabilities or attack strategies. It incentivizes multi-hop defenders to cooperate with boosted local service availability. EID is resilient to traffic dynamics and manipulations. It is readily deployable with random-drop filters in real networks today. Our experiments over a 49.8 TB dataset from a department at the Tsinghua campus network validate EID's viability against rational and irrational DDoS with negligible costs.

References

[1]

Frank Li and Vern Paxson. A large-scale empirical study of security patches. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security (CCS), pages 2201--2215, 2017.

Digital Library

[2]

Frederico Araujo, Kevin W Hamlen, Sebastian Biedermann, and Stefan Katzenbeisser. From patches to honey-patches: Lightweight attacker misdirection, deception, and disinformation. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM SIGSAC conference on computer and communications security (CCS), pages 942--953, 2014.

Digital Library

[3]

Cloudflare. The largest DDoS attacks of all time. https://www.cloudflare.com/learning/ddos/famous-ddos-attacks/, 2020.

[4]

WIRED. A 1.3-Tbs DDoS Hit GitHub, the Largest Yet Recorded. https://www.wired.com/story/github-ddos-memcached, 2018.

[5]

A10. Five Most Famous DDoS Attacks and Then Some. https://www.a10networks.com/blog/5-most-famous-ddos-attacks/, 2020.

[6]

Cloudflare. DDoS attack trends for Q4 2020. https://blog.cloudflare.com/network-layer-ddos-attack-trends-for-q4--2020/, Jan 2021.

[7]

Cloudflare. DDoS attack trends for Q3 2020. https://blog.cloudflare.com/network-layer-ddos-attack-trends-for-q3--2020/, Nov 2020.

[8]

China Telecom. DDoS Attack Landscape in 2019. https://www.nsfocus.com.cn/index.php?m=content&c=index&a=show&catid=222&id=162&template=download, 2020.

[9]

MSSP Alert. Kaspersky Lab Study: Average Cost of Enterprise DDoS Totals $2M. https://www.msspalert.com/cybersecurity-research/kaspersky-lab-study-average-cost-of-enterprise-ddos-attack-totals-2m/, 2018.

[10]

Paul Ferguson and Daniel Senie. rfc2827: network ingress filtering: defeating denial of service attacks which employ ip source address spoofing, 2000.

Digital Library

[11]

Abraham Yaar, Adrian Perrig, and Dawn Song. Stackpi: New packet marking and filtering mechanisms for ddos and ip spoofing defense. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 24(10):1853--1863, 2006.

Digital Library

[12]

Abraham Yaar, Adrian Perrig, and Dawn Song. Siff: A stateless internet flow filter to mitigate ddos flooding attacks. In IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, 2004. Proceedings. 2004, pages 130--143. IEEE, 2004.

[13]

Xin Liu, Xiaowei Yang, and Yong Xia. Netfence: preventing internet denial of service from inside out. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 40(4):255--266, 2010.

Digital Library

[14]

Jianping Wu, Jun Bi, Marcelo Bagnulo, Fred Baker, and Christian Vogt. Source address validation improvement (savi) framework. RFC7039, 2013.

[15]

Xin Liu Ang Li Xiaowei Yang and David Wetherall. Passport: Secure and adoptable source authentication. In USENIX NSDI, 2008.

[16]

Fernando Silveira, Christophe Diot, Nina Taft, and Ramesh Govindan. Astute: Detecting a different class of traffic anomalies. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 40(4):267--278, 2010.

Digital Library

[17]

Anukool Lakhina, Mark Crovella, and Christophe Diot. Diagnosing network-wide traffic anomalies. ACM SIGCOMM computer communication review, 34(4):219--230, 2004.

[18]

Mohiuddin Ahmed, Abdun Naser Mahmood, and Jiankun Hu. A survey of network anomaly detection techniques. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 60:19--31, 2016.

Digital Library

[19]

Giovane CM Moura, Ricardo de O Schmidt, John Heidemann, Wouter B de Vries, Moritz Muller, Lan Wei, and Cristian Hesselman. Anycast vs. ddos: Evaluating the november 2015 root dns event. In Proceedings of the 2016 Internet Measurement Conference, pages 255--270, 2016.

Digital Library

[20]

Cloudflare. How Anycast mitigates DDoS attacks. https://www.cloudflare.com/learning/cdn/glossary/anycast-network/, 2021.

[21]

Shui Yu, Wanlei Zhou, Robin Doss, and Weijia Jia. Traceback of ddos attacks using entropy variations. IEEE transactions on parallel and distributed systems, 22(3):412--425, 2010.

[22]

Jun Li, Minho Sung, Jun Xu, and Li Li. Large-scale ip traceback in high-speed internet: Practical techniques and theoretical foundation. In IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, 2004. Proceedings. 2004, pages 115--129. IEEE, 2004.

[23]

David Barrera, Laurent Chuat, Adrian Perrig, Raphael M Reischuk, and Pawel Szalachowski. The scion internet architecture. Communications of the ACM, 60(6):56--65, 2017.

Digital Library

[24]

Andersen, David G and Balakrishnan, Hari and Feamster, Nick and Koponen, Teemu and Moon, Daekyeong and Shenker, Scott. Accountable Internet Protocol (AIP). In ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, volume 38, pages 339--350. ACM, 2008.

[25]

David Naylor, Matthew K Mukerjee, and Peter Steenkiste. Balancing Accountability and Privacy in the Network. In ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, volume 44, pages 75--86. ACM, 2014.

Digital Library

[26]

Xiaowei Yang, David Wetherall, and Thomas Anderson. A DoS-limiting network architecture. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 35(4):241--252, 2005.

Digital Library

[27]

Akamai Cloud Security for DDoS Protection. https://www.akamai.com/us/en/products/security/ddos-protection-service.jsp, 2021.

[28]

Amazon AWS Shield. https://aws.amazon.com/shield/, 2021.

[29]

CPO. IoT-based DDoS attacks are growing and making use of common vulnerabilities. https://www.cpomagazine.com/cyber-security/iot-based-ddos-attacks-are-growing-and-making-use-of-common-vulnerabilities/, 2020.

[30]

Alibaba Cloud. Pricing for DDoS protection. https://cn.aliyun.com/price/detail/ddos, 2021.

[31]

Networkworld. The rise of artificial intelligence DDoS attacks. https://www.networkworld.com/article/3289108/the-rise-of-artificial-intelligence-ddos-attacks.html.

[32]

Ian J Goodfellow, Jean Pouget-Abadie, Mehdi Mirza, Bing Xu, David Warde-Farley, Sherjil Ozair, Aaron Courville, and Yoshua Bengio. Generative adversarial networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1406.2661, 2014.

[33]

Martin Arjovsky, Soumith Chintala, and Léon Bottou. Wasserstein generative adversarial networks. In International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), pages 214--223. PMLR, 2017.

Digital Library

[34]

Yebo Feng, Jun Li, and Thanh Nguyen. Application-layer ddos defense with reinforcement learning. In 2020 IEEE/ACM 28th International Symposium on Quality of Service (IWQoS), pages 1--10. IEEE, 2020.

[35]

Michael Walfish, Mythili Vutukuru, Hari Balakrishnan, David Karger, and Scott Shenker. DDoS Defense by Offense. In Proceedings of the 2006 conference on Applications, technologies, architectures, and protocols for computer communications, pages 303--314, 2006.

Digital Library

[36]

Wikipedia. f-divergence. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F-divergence, 2021.

[37]

Jörgen W Weibull. Evolutionary game theory. MIT press, 1997.

[38]

Herbert Gintis. Game theory evolving. Princeton university press, 2009.

[39]

CNCERT. DDoS Attack Trend Report in China: 2020 Q1. https://www.cert.org.cn/publish/main/upload/File/DDoS2020--1.pdf, 2020.

[40]

Alibaba Cloud and FreeBuf. DDoS Trend Report in 2020 Q1 and Q2. https://www.calder-systems.com/articles/paper/249963.html, 2020.

[41]

Armor. Cybercrime-as-a-Service: Selling DDoS on the Dark Web. https://www.armor.com/resources/blog/cybercrime-as-a-service-selling-ddos-dark-web/, 2018.

[42]

Radware. Malware and Botnet Attack Services Found on the Darknet. https://blog.radware.com/security/2016/07/malware-and-botnet-attack-services-found-on-the-darknet/, 2016.

[43]

Mission Critical. The Dark Web: DDoS Attacks Sell for as Low as $10 per Hour. https://www.missioncriticalmagazine.com/articles/93185-the-dark-web-ddos-attacks-sell-for-as-low-as-10-per-hour, 2020.

[44]

Mohammad Karami and Damon McCoy. Understanding the emerging threat of ddos-as-a-service. In 6th USENIX Workshop on Large-Scale Exploits and Emergent Threats), 2013.

Digital Library

[45]

José Jair Santanna and Anna Sperotto. Characterizing and mitigating the ddos-as-a-service phenomenon. In IFIP International Conference on Autonomous Infrastructure, Management and Security, pages 74--78. Springer, 2014.

[46]

José Jair Santanna, Roland van Rijswijk-Deij, Rick Hofstede, Anna Sperotto, Mark Wierbosch, Lisandro Zambenedetti Granville, and Aiko Pras. Booters: An analysis of ddos-as-a-service attacks. In 2015 IFIP/IEEE International Symposium on Integrated Network Management (IM), pages 243--251. IEEE, 2015.

[47]

Christian Rossow. Amplification hell: Revisiting network protocols for ddos abuse. In NDSS, 2014.

[48]

Kührer, Marc and Hupperich, Thomas and Rossow, Christian and Holz, Thorsten. Exit from Hell: Reducing the Impact of Amplification DDoS Attacks. In 23rd USENIX Security Symposium, pages 111--125, 2014.

[49]

Aleksandar Kuzmanovic and Edward W Knightly. Low-rate tcp-targeted denial of service attacks and counter strategies. IEEE/acm transactions on networking, 14(4):683--696, 2006.

Digital Library

[50]

Mina Guirguis, Azer Bestavros, Ibrahim Matta, and Yuting Zhang. Reduction of quality (roq) attacks on internet end-systems. In Proceedings IEEE 24th Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies., volume 2, pages 1362--1372. IEEE, 2005.

[51]

Soo-Jin Moon, Yucheng Yin, Rahul Anand Sharma, Yifei Yuan, Jonathan M Spring, and Vyas Sekar. Accurately measuring global risk of amplification attacks using ampmap. In 30th $$USENIX$$ Security Symposium ($$USENIX$$ Security 21), 2021.

[52]

Vern Paxson. An analysis of using reflectors for distributed denial-of-service attacks. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 31(3):38--47, 2001.

Digital Library

[53]

Marianne Shaw. Leveraging good intentions to reduce unwanted network traffic. In Proc. USENIX Steps to Reduce Unwanted Traffic on the Internet workshop, page 8, 2006.

Digital Library

[54]

Sebastian Nowozin, Botond Cseke, and Ryota Tomioka. f-GAN: Training Generative Neural Samplers using Variational Divergence Minimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.00709, 2016.

[55]

Wikipedia. Deepfake. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deepfake, 2021.

[56]

Eric Osterweil, Angelos Stavrou, and Lixia Zhang. 21 years of distributed denial-of service: Current state of affairs. Computer, 53(7):88--92, 2020.

Digital Library

[57]

Eric Osterweil, Angelos Stavrou, and Lixia Zhang. 21 years of distributed denial-of-service: A call to action. Computer, 53(8):94--99, 2020.

Digital Library

[58]

Ian J Goodfellow, Jonathon Shlens, and Christian Szegedy. Explaining and harnessing adversarial examples. In ICLR, 2015.

[59]

Nicholas Carlini and David Wagner. Towards evaluating the robustness of neural networks. In 2017 ieee symposium on security and privacy (S&P), pages 39--57. IEEE, 2017.

[60]

Mattijs Jonker, Alistair King, Johannes Krupp, Christian Rossow, Anna Sperotto, and Alberto Dainotti. Millions of targets under attack: a macroscopic characterization of the dos ecosystem. In Proceedings of the 2017 Internet Measurement Conference (IMC), pages 100--113, 2017.

Digital Library

[61]

NVIDIA Mellanox BlueField-2 Data Processing Unit (DPU). https://www.mellanox.com/files/doc-2020/pb-bluefield-2-dpu.pdf, 2020.

[62]

Pensando DSC-25 Distributed Services Card. https://pensando.io/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Pensando-DSC-25-Product-Brief.pdf, 2020.

[63]

Cisco. Configuring Weighted Random Early Detection. https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios-xml/ios/qos_conavd/configuration/xe-16/qos-conavd-xe-16-book/qos-conavd-cfg-wred.html, 2018.

[64]

Juniper. Managing Congestion Using RED Drop Profiles and Packet Loss Priorities. https://www.juniper.net/documentation/us/en/software/junos/cos/topics/concept/red-drop-profile-overview-cos-config-guide.html, 2021.

[65]

Palo Alto Networks (PAN) OS Administrator's Guide (v8.1). https://docs.paloaltonetworks.com/pan-os/8--1/pan-os-admin.html, 2021.

[66]

Palo Alto Networks. PA-7000 Series Datasheet. https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/resources/datasheets/pa-7000-series, 2021.

[67]

Alibaba cloud HoneyPot. https://help.aliyun.com/document_detail/196044.html, 2021.

[68]

CISA. TA14-017A: UDP-Based Amplification Attacks. https://us-cert.cisa.gov/ncas/alerts/TA14-017A, 2014.

[69]

Kaspersky. Criminal Benefits: Profit Margin of a DDoS Attack Can Reach 95%. https://www.kaspersky.com/about/press-releases/2017_criminal-benefits, 2017.

[70]

Sourcelist. The cost of launching a DDoS attack. https://securelist.com/the-cost-of-launching-a-ddos-attack/77784/, 2017.

[71]

Avi Yaar, Adrian Perrig, and Dawn Song. An endhost capability mechanism to mitigate ddos flooding attacks. In Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, 2004.

[72]

Saman Taghavi Zargar, James Joshi, and David Tipper. A survey of defense mechanisms against distributed denial of service (ddos) flooding attacks. IEEE communications surveys & tutorials, 15(4):2046--2069, 2013.

[73]

Jelena Mirkovic and Peter Reiher. A taxonomy of ddos attack and ddos defense mechanisms. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 34(2):39--53, 2004.

Digital Library

[74]

Mattijs Jonker, Anna Sperotto, Roland van Rijswijk-Deij, Ramin Sadre, and Aiko Pras. Measuring the Adoption of DDoS Protection Services. In Proceedings of the 2016 Internet Measurement Conference (IMC), pages 279--285, 2016.

[75]

Xinzhe Fu and Eytan Modiano. Fundamental limits of volume-based network dos attacks. Proceedings of the ACM on Measurement and Analysis of Computing Systems, 3(3):1--36, 2019.

Digital Library

[76]

Ratul Mahajan, Steven M Bellovin, Sally Floyd, John Ioannidis, Vern Paxson, and Scott Shenker. Controlling high bandwidth aggregates in the network. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 32(3):62--73, 2002.

Digital Library

[77]

Cristina Basescu, Raphael M Reischuk, Pawel Szalachowski, Adrian Perrig, Yao Zhang, Hsu-Chun Hsiao, Ayumu Kubota, and Jumpei Urakawa. SIBRA: Scalable Internet Bandwidth Reservation Architecture. In NDSS, 2016.

[78]

Abraham Yaar, Adrian Perrig, and Dawn Song. Pi: A path identification mechanism to defend against ddos attacks. In 2003 Symposium on Security and Privacy, 2003., pages 93--107. IEEE, 2003.

[79]

Minho Sung and Jun Xu. Ip traceback-based intelligent packet filtering: A novel technique for defending against internet ddos attacks. IEEE Transactions on parallel and Distributed Systems, 14(9):861--872, 2003.

Digital Library

[80]

Zhuotao Liu, Hao Jin, Yih-Chun Hu, and Michael Bailey. Middlepolice: Toward enforcing destination-defined policies in the middle of the internet. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, pages 1268--1279, 2016.

Digital Library

[81]

Vasileios Giotsas, Georgios Smaragdakis, Christoph Dietzel, Philipp Richter, Anja Feldmann, and Arthur Berger. Inferring BGP Blackholing Activity in the Internet. In Proceedings of the 2017 Internet Measurement Conference (IMC), pages 1--14, 2017.

[82]

Xin Zhang, Hsu-Chun Hsiao, Geoffrey Hasker, Haowen Chan, Adrian Perrig, and David G Andersen. Scion: Scalability, control, and isolation on next-generation networks. In 2011 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, pages 212--227. IEEE, 2011.

Digital Library

[83]

Van Jacobson, Diana K Smetters, James D Thornton, Michael F Plass, Nicholas H Briggs, and Rebecca L Braynard. Networking named content. In Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Emerging networking experiments and technologies, pages 1--12, 2009.

Digital Library

[84]

Paolo Gasti, Gene Tsudik, Ersin Uzun, and Lixia Zhang. DoS and DDoS in Named Data Networking. In Proceedings of 22nd International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks (ICCCN), July/August 2013.

[85]

Dongsu Han, Ashok Anand, Fahad Dogar, Boyan Li, Hyeontaek Lim, Michel Machado, Arvind Mukundan, Wenfei Wu, Aditya Akella, David G Andersen, et al. XIA: Efficient Support for Evolvable Internetworking. In 9th USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI'12), pages 309--322, 2012.

[86]

Sajjad Arshad, Maghsoud Abbaspour, Mehdi Kharrazi, and Hooman Sanatkar. An anomaly-based botnet detection approach for identifying stealthy botnets. In 2011 IEEE International Conference on Computer Applications and Industrial Electronics (ICCAIE), pages 564--569. IEEE, 2011.

[87]

Aleksandar Lazarevic, Levent Ertoz, Vipin Kumar, Aysel Ozgur, and Jaideep Srivastava. A comparative study of anomaly detection schemes in network intrusion detection. In Proceedings of the 2003 SIAM international conference on data mining, pages 25--36. SIAM, 2003.

[88]

Monowar H Bhuyan, Dhruba Kumar Bhattacharyya, and Jugal K Kalita. Network anomaly detection: methods, systems and tools. Ieee communications surveys & tutorials, 16(1):303--336, 2013.

[89]

Eric Liang, Hang Zhu, Xin Jin, and Ion Stoica. Neural packet classification. In Proceedings of the ACM Special Interest Group on Data Communication, pages 256--269. 2019.

Digital Library

[90]

Rohan Doshi, Noah Apthorpe, and Nick Feamster. Machine learning ddos detection for consumer internet of things devices. In 2018 IEEE Security and Privacy Workshops (SPW), pages 29--35. IEEE, 2018.

[91]

Sankardas Roy, Charles Ellis, Sajjan Shiva, Dipankar Dasgupta, Vivek Shandilya, and Qishi Wu. A survey of game theory as applied to network security. In 2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pages 1--10. IEEE, 2010.

[92]

Sivaramakrishnan Ramanathan, Jelena Mirkovic, Minlan Yu, and Ying Zhang. SENSS Against Volumetric DDoS Attacks. In Proceedings of the 34th Annual Computer Security Applications Conference (ACSAC), pages 266--277, 2018.

[93]

Benjamin Johnson, Aron Laszka, Jens Grossklags, Marie Vasek, and Tyler Moore. Game-theoretic analysis of ddos attacks against bitcoin mining pools. In International Conference on Financial Cryptography and Data Security, pages 72--86. Springer, 2014.

[94]

Theodoros Spyridopoulos, G Karanikas, Theodore Tryfonas, and Georgios Oikonomou. A game theoretic defence framework against dos/ddos cyber attacks. Computers & Security, 38:39--50, 2013.

Digital Library

[95]

Wikipedia. Karush-Kuhn-Tucker (KKT) conditions. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karush-Kuhn-Tucker_conditions, 2021.

Cited By

Duan HKim JWyss MPerrig AWitchel EArpaci-Dusseau ARossbach CKeeton K(2024)DNS Congestion Control in Adversarial SettingsProceedings of the ACM SIGOPS 30th Symposium on Operating Systems Principles10.1145/3694715.3695982(726-747)Online publication date: 4-Nov-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3694715.3695982
Li JSisodia DFeng YShi LZhang MEarly CReiher P(2023)Toward Adaptive DDoS-Filtering Rule Generation2023 IEEE Conference on Communications and Network Security (CNS)10.1109/CNS59707.2023.10288699(1-9)Online publication date: 2-Oct-2023
https://doi.org/10.1109/CNS59707.2023.10288699
Li QHuang HLi RLv JYuan ZMa LHan YJiang Y(2023)A comprehensive survey on DDoS defense systemsComputer Networks: The International Journal of Computer and Telecommunications Networking10.1016/j.comnet.2023.109895233:COnline publication date: 1-Sep-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1016/j.comnet.2023.109895
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Deterrence of Intelligent DDoS via Multi-Hop Traffic Divergence
1. Security and privacy
  1. Human and societal aspects of security and privacy
    1. Economics of security and privacy
  2. Network security
    1. Denial-of-service attacks
    2. Security protocols
2. Theory of computation
  1. Design and analysis of algorithms
    1. Online algorithms
      1. Adversary models
  2. Theory and algorithms for application domains
    1. Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design

Recommendations

Towards a bayesian network game framework for evaluating DDoS attacks and defense
CCS '12: Proceedings of the 2012 ACM conference on Computer and communications security

With a long history of compromising Internet security, Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) attacks have been intensively investigated and numerous countermeasures have been proposed to defend against them. In this work, we propose a non-standard game-...
Game Theoretic Defense Scheme for DDoS Attacks Based on Finite Rationality Analysis
HP3C '23: Proceedings of the 2023 7th International Conference on High Performance Compilation, Computing and Communications

Distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks continue to pose a significant threat to network security today and represent a constant and critical concern for network administrators and researchers. Unprotected systems are highly vulnerable to ...
Taxonomy and Recent Advance of Game Theoretical Approaches in Adversarial Machine Learning: A Survey
Carefully perturbing adversarial inputs degrades the performance of traditional machine learning (ML) models. Adversarial machine learning (AML) that takes adversaries into account during training and learning emerges as a valid technique to defend ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

CCS '21: Proceedings of the 2021 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security

November 2021

3558 pages

ISBN:9781450384544

DOI:10.1145/3460120

General Chairs:
Yongdae Kim
KAIST, Republic of Korea
,
Jong Kim
POSTECH, Republic of Korea
,
Program Chairs:
Giovanni Vigna
University of California, Santa Barbara / VMware, USA
,
Elaine Shi
Carnegie Mellon University, USA

Copyright © 2021 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

SIGSAC: ACM Special Interest Group on Security, Audit, and Control

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 13 November 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Funding Sources

National Natural Science Foundation of China
National Key Research and Development Plan of China

Conference

CCS '21

Sponsor:

SIGSAC

CCS '21: 2021 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security

November 15 - 19, 2021

Virtual Event, Republic of Korea

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 1,261 of 6,999 submissions, 18%

Upcoming Conference

CCS '25

Sponsor:
sigsac

ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security

October 13 - 17, 2025

Taipei , Taiwan

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

7
Total Citations
View Citations
757
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)165
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)23

Reflects downloads up to 13 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Duan HKim JWyss MPerrig AWitchel EArpaci-Dusseau ARossbach CKeeton K(2024)DNS Congestion Control in Adversarial SettingsProceedings of the ACM SIGOPS 30th Symposium on Operating Systems Principles10.1145/3694715.3695982(726-747)Online publication date: 4-Nov-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3694715.3695982
Li JSisodia DFeng YShi LZhang MEarly CReiher P(2023)Toward Adaptive DDoS-Filtering Rule Generation2023 IEEE Conference on Communications and Network Security (CNS)10.1109/CNS59707.2023.10288699(1-9)Online publication date: 2-Oct-2023
https://doi.org/10.1109/CNS59707.2023.10288699
Li QHuang HLi RLv JYuan ZMa LHan YJiang Y(2023)A comprehensive survey on DDoS defense systemsComputer Networks: The International Journal of Computer and Telecommunications Networking10.1016/j.comnet.2023.109895233:COnline publication date: 1-Sep-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1016/j.comnet.2023.109895
Li HZhao YYao WXu KLi Q(2023)Towards real-time ML-based DDoS detection via cost-efficient window-based feature extractionScience China Information Sciences10.1007/s11432-021-3545-066:5Online publication date: 17-Apr-2023
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-021-3545-0
Kawazoe TFukuta N(2023)On Implementing a Simulation Environment for a Cooperative Multi-agent Learning Approach to Mitigate DRDoS AttacksRecent Advances in Agent-Based Negotiation: Applications and Competition Challenges10.1007/978-981-99-0561-4_2(15-29)Online publication date: 21-Mar-2023
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-0561-4_2
Zhang YWang YHu YLin ZZhai YWang LZhao QWen KKang L(2022)Security Performance Analysis of LEO Satellite Constellation Networks under DDoS AttackSensors10.3390/s2219728622:19(7286)Online publication date: 26-Sep-2022
https://doi.org/10.3390/s22197286
Yu BLi PLiu JZhou ZHan YLi Z(2022)Advanced Analysis of Email Sender Spoofing Attack and Related Security Problems2022 IEEE 9th International Conference on Cyber Security and Cloud Computing (CSCloud)/2022 IEEE 8th International Conference on Edge Computing and Scalable Cloud (EdgeCom)10.1109/CSCloud-EdgeCom54986.2022.00023(80-85)Online publication date: Jun-2022
https://doi.org/10.1109/CSCloud-EdgeCom54986.2022.00023

View Options

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents