Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3148330.3148335acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgroupConference Proceedingsconference-collections
note

Growth in Social Network Connectedness among Different Roles in Organizational Crowdfunding

Published: 07 January 2018 Publication History

Abstract

When employees participate in organizational crowdfunding, they seek partial funding from their existing social networks. Among proposers of projects, teams with larger social networks tend to be more successful in reaching their funding goals. However, little is known about the consequences of participation on employees' social networks, during and after the crowdfunding campaign. In a study of activity logs and social networks from a very large scale organizational crowdfunding campaign, we found that people in different crowdfunding roles experienced different degrees of growth in their social networks, during and after the crowdfunding campaign, as compared with baseline nonparticipants. These findings contribute to previous work on the strongly social nature of crowdfunding. Organizations can use these results to increase the density of their internal social networks. Employees can use these results to strategize their participation in workplace social networks and in organizational innovation.

References

[1]
Ajay Agrawal, Christian Catalini, and Avi Goldfarb. 2015. Crowdfunding: Geography, social networks, and the timing of investment decisions. J. Econ. & Mgmt. Strategy 24(2), 253--274.
[2]
Mohammad Y. Allaho, and Wang-Chien Lee. 2013. Analyzing the social ties and structure of contributors in open source software community. Proc. ASONAM 2013, 56--60.
[3]
Ana P. Appel, Victor F. Cavalcante, Marcos R. Viera, Vagner F. de Santana, Rogerio A. de Paula, and Steven K. Tsukamoto. 2014. Building socially connected teams to accomplish complex tasks. Proc. SNAKDD 2014, Article 8.
[4]
Joan DiMicco, David R. Millen, Werner Geyer, Casey Dugan, Beth Brownholtz, and Michael Muller. 2008. Motivations for social networking at work. Proc. CSCW 2008, 711--720.
[5]
Elizabeth M. Gerber, Michael Muller, Rick Wash, Elizabeth F. Churchill, Lilly Irani, and Amanda Williams. 2014. Crowdfunding: An emerging field of research. CHI 2014 Extended Abstracts, 1093--1098.
[6]
Michael D. Greenberg, Julie Hui, and Elizabeth M. Gerber. 2013. Crowdfunding: A resource exchange perspective. CHI 2013 Extended Abstracts, 883--888.
[7]
Junghil Hahn, Jae Yun Moon, and Chen Zhang. 2008. Emergence of new project teams from open source software developer networks: Impact of prior collaboration ties. Info Sys. Rsrch. 19(3), 369--391.
[8]
Mary Helander, Rick Lawrence, Yan Liu, Claudia Perlich, Chandan Reddy, and Saharan Rosset. 2007. Looking for great ideas: Analyzing the innovation jam. Proc. WebKDD/SNA-KDA 2007, 66--73.
[9]
Lester Holtzblatt, Jill Drury, Daniel Weiss, Laurie Damianos, and Donna Cuomo. 2012. Evaluation of the uses and benefits of a social business platform. CHI EA 2012, 721--736.
[10]
Julie Hui, Elizabeth M. Gerber, and Darren Gergle. 2014a. Understanding and leveraging social networks for crowdfunding: Opportunities and challenges. Proc. DIS 2014, 677--680.
[11]
Julie Hui, Michael D. Greenberg, and Elizabeth M. Gerber. 2014b. Understanding the role of community in crowdfunding work. Proc CSCW 2014, 62--74.
[12]
Julia Kotlarsky, and Ilan Oshri. 2005. Social ties, knowledge sharing and successful collaboration in globally distributed development projects. European J. Info Sys. 14, 37--48.
[13]
Franz Lehner and Nora Fteimi. 2013. Organize, socialize, benefit: How social media applications impact enterprise success and performance. Proc. I-Know 2013, art. 26.
[14]
Chun-Ta Lu, Sihong Xie, Xiangnan Kong, and Philip A. Yu. 2014. Inferring the impacts of social media on crowdfunding. Proc. WSDM 2014, 573--582.
[15]
Suzanne P. Mikawa, Sharon K. Cunnington, and Scott A. Gaskins. 2009. Removing barriers to trust in distributed teams: Understanding cultural differences and strengthening social ties. Proc IWIC 2009, 273--276.
[16]
Tanushree Mitra and Eric Gilbert. 2014. The language that gets people to give: Phrases that predict success in Kickstarter. Proc. CSCW 2014, 49--61.
[17]
Alexey Moisseyev. 2013. Effect of social media on crowdfunding project results. M.A. thesis, University of Nebraska, Lincoln NB USA.
[18]
Ethan R. Mollick. 2012. The dynamics of crowd-funding: Determinants of success and failure. Social Science Research Network Working Paper Series, 2012.
[19]
Michael Muller, Werner Geyer, Todd Soule, Steven Daniels, and Li-Te Cheng. 2013. Crowdfunding inside the enterprise: Employee-initiatives for innovation and collaboration. Proc. CHI 2013, 503--512.
[20]
Michael Muller, Werner Geyer, Todd Soule, and John Wafer. 2014. Geographical and organizational distances in enterprise crowdfunding. Proc. CSCW 2014, 778--789.
[21]
Michael Muller, Mary Keough, John Wafer, Werner Geyer, Alberto Alvarez Saez, David Leip, and Cara Viktorov. 2016. Social ties in organizational crowdfunding: Benefits of team-authored proposals. Proc. CSCW 2016, 1246--1259.
[22]
Mizuki Sakamoto and Tatsuo Nakajima. 2013. Micro-crowdfunding: Achieving a sustainable society through economic and social incentives in micro-level crowdfunding. Proc. MUM 2013, Article 29.
[23]
Leif Singer, Norbert Seyff, and Samuel A. Fricker. 2011. Online social networks as a catalyst for software and IT innovation. Proc. SSE 2011, 1--5.
[24]
Chuan-Hoo Tan, Juliana Sutanto, and Bernard C.Y. Tan. 2015. Empirical investigation of relational social capital in a virtual community for website programming. ACM SIGMIS Database 46(2), 43--60.
[25]
Anbang Xu, Xiao Yang, Rao Huaming, Wai-Tat Fu, Shih-Wen Huang, and Brian P. Bailey. 2014. Show me the money! An analysis of project updates during crowdfunding campaigns. Proc CHI 2014, 591--600.
[26]
Haichao Zheng, Dahui Li, Jing Wu, and Yun Xu. 2014. The role of multidimensional social capital in crowdfunding: A comparative study in China and US. Info. & Mgmt. 51(4), 488--496.

Cited By

View all
  • (2021)A Study on the Millennials Usage Behavior of Social Network Services: Effects of Motivation, Density, and Centrality on Continuous Intention to UseSustainability10.3390/su1305268013:5(2680)Online publication date: 2-Mar-2021
  • (2018)Enterprise Crowdfunding: Foundations, Applications, and Research FindingsBusiness & Information Systems Engineering10.1007/s12599-018-0568-761:1(113-121)Online publication date: 4-Dec-2018

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
GROUP '18: Proceedings of the 2018 ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work
January 2018
422 pages
ISBN:9781450355629
DOI:10.1145/3148330
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 07 January 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. crowdfunding
  2. cscw
  3. degree centrality.
  4. social network

Qualifiers

  • Note

Conference

GROUP '18
Sponsor:
GROUP '18: 2018 ACM Conference on Supporting Groupwork
January 7 - 10, 2018
Florida, Sanibel Island, USA

Acceptance Rates

GROUP '18 Paper Acceptance Rate 22 of 94 submissions, 23%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 125 of 405 submissions, 31%

Upcoming Conference

GROUP '25
The 2025 ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work
January 12 - 15, 2025
Hilton Head , SC , USA

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)7
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 20 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2021)A Study on the Millennials Usage Behavior of Social Network Services: Effects of Motivation, Density, and Centrality on Continuous Intention to UseSustainability10.3390/su1305268013:5(2680)Online publication date: 2-Mar-2021
  • (2018)Enterprise Crowdfunding: Foundations, Applications, and Research FindingsBusiness & Information Systems Engineering10.1007/s12599-018-0568-761:1(113-121)Online publication date: 4-Dec-2018

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media