Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/1599470.1599494acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesscaConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

ClearPath: highly parallel collision avoidance for multi-agent simulation

Published: 01 August 2009 Publication History

Abstract

We present a new local collision avoidance algorithm between multiple agents for real-time simulations. Our approach extends the notion of velocity obstacles from robotics and formulates the conditions for collision free navigation as a quadratic optimization problem. We use a discrete optimization method to efficiently compute the motion of each agent. This resulting algorithm can be parallelized by exploiting data-parallelism and thread-level parallelism. The overall approach, ClearPath, is general and can robustly handle dense scenarios with tens or hundreds of thousands of heterogeneous agents in a few milli-seconds. As compared to prior collision avoidance algorithms, we observe more than an order of magnitude performance improvement.

References

[1]
{BGLM09} Berg J., Guy S. J., Lin M., Manocha D.: Reciprocal n-body collision avoidance. In International Symposium on Robotics Research (To Appear) (2009), Springer.
[2]
{Ble09} Bleiweiss A.: Multi agent navigation on gpu. http://developer.download.nvidia.com/presentations/2009/GDC/MultiAgentGPU.pdf, 2009.
[3]
{BLM08} Berg J., Lin M., Manocha D.: Reciprocal velocity obstacles for realtime multi-agent navigation. Proc. of IEEE Conference on Robotics and Automation (2008), 1928--1935.
[4]
{BPS*08} Berg J., Patil S., Sewall J., Manocha D., Lin M.: Interactive navigation of individual agents in crowded environments. Proc. of ACM Symposium on I3D (2008), 139--147.
[5]
{Cam97} Cameron S.: Enhancing GJK: Computing minimum and penetration distance between convex polyhedra. IEEE International Conf. on Robotics and Automation (1997), 3112--3117.
[6]
{CM04} Courty N., Musse S.: FastCrowd: Real-Time Simulation and Interaction with Large Crowds based on Graphics Hardware. Tech. rep., INRIA, March 2004.
[7]
{Eri04} Ericson C.: Real-Time Collision Detection. Morgan Kaufmann, 2004.
[8]
{FN06} Foudil C., Noureddine D.: Collision avoidance in crowd simulation with priority rules. European Journal of Scientific Research 15, 1 (2006).
[9]
{FS98} Fiorini P., Shiller Z.: Motion planning in dynamic environments using velocity obstacles. International Journal on Robotics Research 17, 7 (1998), 760--772.
[10]
{FSL07} Fulgenzi C., Spalanzani A., Laugier C.: Dynamic obstacle avoidance in uncertain environment combining PVOs and occupancy grid. In ICRA (2007), pp. 1610--1616.
[11]
{FT87} Faverjon B., Tournassoud P.: A local based approach for path planning of manipulators with a high number of degrees of freedom. ICRA (1987), 1152--1159.
[12]
{HBJW05} Helbing D., Buzna L., Johansson A., Werner T.: Self-organized pedestrian crowd dynamics and design solutions: Experiments, simulations and design solutions. Transportation Science 39, 1 (2005), 1--24.
[13]
{Kan00} Kann V.: Maximum quadratic prog. www.nada.kth.se/~viggo/wwwcompendium/node203.html, 2000.
[14]
{KLK*08} Kanehiro F., Lamiraun F., Kanoun O., Yoshida E., Laumond H.: A local collision avoidance method for non-strictly convex polyhedral. In Robotics: Science and Systems (2008).
[15]
{KP07} Kluge B., Prassler E.: Reflective navigation: Individual behaviors and group behaviors. In Proc. of International Conf. on Robotics and Automation (2007), pp. 4172--4177.
[16]
{KSHF09} Kapadia M., Singh S., Hewlett W., Faloutsos P.: Egocentric affordance fields in pedestrian steering. In I3D '09 (2009), ACM, pp. 215--223.
[17]
{LaV06} LaValle S. M.: Planning Algorithms. Cambridge University Press (also at http://msl.cs.uiuc.edu/planning/), 2006.
[18]
{LD04} Lamarche F., Donikian S.: Crowd of virtual humans: a new approach for real-time navigation in complex and structured environments. CG Forum 23, 3 (2004), 509--518.
[19]
{Lin93} Lin M.: Efficient Collision Detection for Animation and Robotics. PhD thesis, U.C. Berkeley, December 1993.
[20]
{MKH90} Mohr E., Kranz D. A., Halstead Jr. R. H.: Lazy task creation: a technique for increasing the granularity of parallel programs. In Proc. of the ACM conference on LISP and functional programming (1990).
[21]
{MT97} Musse S. R., Thalmann D.: A model of human crowd behavior: Group inter-relationship and collision detection analysis. Computer Animation and Simulation (1997), 39--51.
[22]
{PAB08} Pelechano N., Allbeck J., Badler N.: Virtual Crowds: Methods, Simulation, and Control. M.C. Publ., 2008.
[23]
{PPD07} Paris S., Pettre J., Donikian S.: Pedestrian reactive navigation for crowd simulation: a predictive approac. Computer Graphics Forum 26 (2007), 665--674.
[24]
{QMHz03} Quinn M. J., Metoyer R. A., Hunterzaworski K.: Parallel implementation of the social forces model. In in Proceedings of the Second International Conference in Pedestrian and Evacuation Dynamics (2003), pp. 63--74.
[25]
{Rey87} Reynolds C. W.: Flocks, herds and schools: A distributed behavioral model. ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics 21 (1987), 25--34.
[26]
{Rey99} Reynolds C. W.: Steering behaviors for autonomous characters. Game Developers Conference (1999).
[27]
{Rey06} Reynolds C.: Big fast crowds on ps3. In Sandbox '06: Proceedings of the 2006 ACM SIGGRAPH symposium on Videogames (2006), ACM, pp. 113--121.
[28]
{SAC*07} Sud A., Andersen E., Curtis S., Lin M., Manocha D.: Real-time path planning for virtual agents in dynamic environments. Proc. of IEEE VR (2007), 91--98.
[29]
{SCS*08} Seiler L., Carmean D., Sprangle E., Forsyth T., et al.: Larrabee: A Many-Core x86 Architecture for Visual Computing. ACM Trans. Graph. 27, 3 (2008), 1--15.
[30]
{SGA*07} Sud A., Gayle R., Andersen E., Guy S., Lin M., Manocha D.: Real-time navigation of independent agents using adaptive roadmaps. Proc. of ACM VRST (2007), 99--106.
[31]
{SLS01} Shiller Z., Large F., Sekhavat S.: Motion planning in dynamic environments: obstacles moving along arbitrary trajectories. In ICRA (2001), vol. 4, pp. 3716--3721.
[32]
{SNH01} Sugiyama Y., Nakayama A., Hasebe K.: 2-dimensional optimal velocity models for granular flows. In Pedestrian and Evacuation Dynamics (2001), pp. 155--160.
[33]
{TCP06} Treuille A., Cooper S., Popovic Z.: Continuum crowds. Proc. of ACM SIGGRAPH (2006), 1160--1168.
[34]
{TOCD06} Thalmann D., O'Sullivan C., Ciechomski P., Dobbyn S.: Populating Virtual Environments with Crowds. Eurographics Tutorial Notes, 2006.
[35]
{vdBLM08} van den Berg J., Lin M., Manocha D.: Reciprocal velocity obstacles for realtime multi-agent navigation. Proc. of IEEE Conference on Robotics and Automation (2008).
[36]
{YMMT08} Yersin B., Maïm J., Morini F., Thalmann D.: Real-time crowd motion planning. The Visual Computer 24 (Oct 2008), 859--870.
[37]
{YT07} Yu Q., Terzopoulos D.: A decision network framework for the behavioral animation of virtual humans. In Proc. of the Symposium on Computer Animation (2007), pp. 119--128.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Learning Crowd Motion Dynamics with CrowdsProceedings of the ACM on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques10.1145/36513027:1(1-17)Online publication date: 13-May-2024
  • (2024)Consideration of Human Vision in Crowd SimulationsIEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems10.1109/TITS.2024.340177425:10(13364-13374)Online publication date: Oct-2024
  • (2024)Decentralized Multi-Robot Navigation for Autonomous Surface Vehicles with Distributional Reinforcement Learning2024 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)10.1109/ICRA57147.2024.10611668(8327-8333)Online publication date: 13-May-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
SCA '09: Proceedings of the 2009 ACM SIGGRAPH/Eurographics Symposium on Computer Animation
August 2009
258 pages
ISBN:9781605586106
DOI:10.1145/1599470
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 01 August 2009

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Funding Sources

Conference

SCA '09
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 183 of 487 submissions, 38%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)92
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)14
Reflects downloads up to 13 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Learning Crowd Motion Dynamics with CrowdsProceedings of the ACM on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques10.1145/36513027:1(1-17)Online publication date: 13-May-2024
  • (2024)Consideration of Human Vision in Crowd SimulationsIEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems10.1109/TITS.2024.340177425:10(13364-13374)Online publication date: Oct-2024
  • (2024)Decentralized Multi-Robot Navigation for Autonomous Surface Vehicles with Distributional Reinforcement Learning2024 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)10.1109/ICRA57147.2024.10611668(8327-8333)Online publication date: 13-May-2024
  • (2024)A literature review of dense crowd simulationSimulation Modelling Practice and Theory10.1016/j.simpat.2024.102955134(102955)Online publication date: Jul-2024
  • (2024)A survey on Velocity Obstacle paradigmRobotics and Autonomous Systems10.1016/j.robot.2024.104645174(104645)Online publication date: Apr-2024
  • (2023)MPC Based Motion Planning For Mobile Robots Using Velocity Obstacle Paradigm2023 European Control Conference (ECC)10.23919/ECC57647.2023.10178219(1-6)Online publication date: 13-Jun-2023
  • (2023)Fast Position-based Multi-Agent Group DynamicsProceedings of the ACM on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques10.1145/35855076:1(1-15)Online publication date: 16-May-2023
  • (2023)Core Challenges of Social Robot Navigation: A SurveyACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/358374112:3(1-39)Online publication date: 24-Apr-2023
  • (2023)A Personality-based Model of Emotional Contagion and Control in Crowd Queuing SimulationsACM Transactions on Modeling and Computer Simulation10.1145/357758933:1-2(1-23)Online publication date: 28-Feb-2023
  • (2023)Sketching Vocabulary for Crowd MotionComputer Graphics Forum10.1111/cgf.1462941:8(119-130)Online publication date: 20-Mar-2023
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media