research-article

CrystalBLEU: Precisely and Efficiently Measuring the Similarity of Code

Authors:

Michael PradelAuthors Info & Claims

ASE '22: Proceedings of the 37th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering

Article No.: 28, Pages 1 - 12

https://doi.org/10.1145/3551349.3556903

Published: 05 January 2023 Publication History

Abstract

Recent years have brought a surge of work on predicting pieces of source code, e.g., for code completion, code migration, program repair, or translating natural language into code. All this work faces the challenge of evaluating the quality of a prediction w.r.t. some oracle, typically in the form of a reference solution. A common evaluation metric is the BLEU score, an n-gram-based metric originally proposed for evaluating natural language translation, but adopted in software engineering because it can be easily computed on any programming language and enables automated evaluation at scale. However, a key difference between natural and programming languages is that in the latter, completely unrelated pieces of code may have many common n-grams simply because of the syntactic verbosity and coding conventions of programming languages. We observe that these trivially shared n-grams hamper the ability of the metric to distinguish between truly similar code examples and code examples that are merely written in the same language. This paper presents CrystalBLEU, an evaluation metric based on BLEU, that allows for precisely and efficiently measuring the similarity of code. Our metric preserves the desirable properties of BLEU, such as being language-agnostic, able to handle incomplete or partially incorrect code, and efficient, while reducing the noise caused by trivially shared n-grams. We evaluate CrystalBLEU on two datasets from prior work and on a new, labeled dataset of semantically equivalent programs. Our results show that CrystalBLEU can distinguish similar from dissimilar code examples 1.9–4.5 times more effectively, when compared to the original BLEU score and a previously proposed variant of BLEU for code.

References

[1]

Miltiadis Allamanis, Earl T Barr, Premkumar Devanbu, and Charles Sutton. 2018. A survey of machine learning for big code and naturalness. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) 51, 4 (2018), 81.

Digital Library

[2]

Uri Alon, Shaked Brody, Omer Levy, and Eran Yahav. 2019. code2seq: Generating Sequences from Structured Representations of Code. In 7th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2019, New Orleans, LA, USA, May 6-9, 2019. https://openreview.net/forum?id=H1gKYo09tX

[3]

Uri Alon, Meital Zilberstein, Omer Levy, and Eran Yahav. 2018. A General Path-Based Representation for Predicting Program Properties. In PLDI.

[4]

Gareth Ari Aye and Gail E. Kaiser. 2020. Sequence Model Design for Code Completion in the Modern IDE. CoRR abs/2004.05249(2020). arxiv:2004.05249https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.05249

[5]

Bogdan Babych and Tony Hartley. 2004. Extending the BLEU MT evaluation method with frequency weightings. In Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL-04). 621–628.

Digital Library

[6]

Patrick Bareiß, Beatriz Souza, Marcelo d’Amorim, and Michael Pradel. 2022. Code Generation Tools (Almost) for Free? A Study of Few-Shot, Pre-Trained Language Models on Code. CoRR abs/2206.01335(2022). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2206.01335 arXiv:2206.01335

[7]

Chris Callison-Burch, Miles Osborne, and Philipp Koehn. 2006. Re-evaluation the Role of Bleu in Machine Translation Research. In EACL 2006, 11st Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Proceedings of the Conference, April 3-7, 2006, Trento, Italy, Diana McCarthy and Shuly Wintner (Eds.). The Association for Computer Linguistics. https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/E06-1032/

[8]

Saikat Chakraborty, Miltiadis Allamanis, and Baishakhi Ray. 2018. Tree2Tree Neural Translation Model for Learning Source Code Changes. CoRR abs/1810.00314(2018). arxiv:1810.00314http://arxiv.org/abs/1810.00314

[9]

Boxing Chen and Colin Cherry. 2014. A systematic comparison of smoothing techniques for sentence-level bleu. In Proceedings of the Ninth Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation. 362–367.

[10]

Chunyang Chen, Ting Su, Guozhu Meng, Zhenchang Xing, and Yang Liu. 2018. From ui design image to gui skeleton: a neural machine translator to bootstrap mobile gui implementation. In Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Software Engineering. 665–676.

Digital Library

[11]

Zimin Chen, Steve Kommrusch, Michele Tufano, Louis-Noël Pouchet, Denys Poshyvanyk, and Martin Monperrus. 2019. SequenceR: Sequence-to-Sequence Learning for End-to-End Program Repair. IEEE TSE (2019).

[12]

Elizabeth Dinella, Hanjun Dai, Ziyang Li, Mayur Naik, Le Song, and Ke Wang. 2020. Hoppity: Learning Graph Transformations to Detect and Fix Bugs in Programs. In 8th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2020, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, April 26-30, 2020. OpenReview.net. https://openreview.net/forum?id=SJeqs6EFvB

[13]

Yangruibo Ding, Baishakhi Ray, Premkumar Devanbu, and Vincent J Hellendoorn. 2020. Patching as Translation: the Data and the Metaphor. arXiv preprint arXiv:2008.10707(2020).

[14]

Yvette Graham. 2015. Re-evaluating automatic summarization with BLEU and 192 shades of ROUGE. In Proceedings of the 2015 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing. 128–137.

[15]

Xiaodong Gu, Hongyu Zhang, Dongmei Zhang, and Sunghun Kim. 2016. Deep API learning. In FSE. 631–642. https://doi.org/10.1145/2950290.2950334

Digital Library

[16]

Rahul Gupta, Soham Pal, Aditya Kanade, and Shirish K. Shevade. 2017. DeepFix: Fixing Common C Language Errors by Deep Learning. In Proceedings of the Thirty-First AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, February 4-9, 2017, San Francisco, California, USA, Satinder P. Singh and Shaul Markovitch (Eds.). AAAI Press, 1345–1351. http://aaai.org/ocs/index.php/AAAI/AAAI17/paper/view/14603

[17]

Jacob Harer, Onur Ozdemir, Tomo Lazovich, Christopher P. Reale, Rebecca L. Russell, Louis Y. Kim, and Sang Peter Chin. 2018. Learning to Repair Software Vulnerabilities with Generative Adversarial Networks. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 31: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2018, NeurIPS 2018, 3-8 December 2018, Montréal, Canada.7944–7954. http://papers.nips.cc/paper/8018-learning-to-repair-software-vulnerabilities-with-generative-adversarial-networks

[18]

Abram Hindle, Earl T. Barr, Zhendong Su, Mark Gabel, and Premkumar T. Devanbu. 2012. On the naturalness of software. In 34th International Conference on Software Engineering, ICSE 2012, June 2-9, 2012, Zurich, Switzerland. 837–847.

[19]

Thong Hoang, Hong Jin Kang, David Lo, and Julia Lawall. 2020. CC2Vec: Distributed Representations of Code Changes. In ICSE.

[20]

Xing Hu, Ge Li, Xin Xia, David Lo, and Zhi Jin. 2018. Deep code comment generation. In Proceedings of the 26th Conference on Program Comprehension, ICPC 2018, Gothenburg, Sweden, May 27-28, 2018, Foutse Khomh, Chanchal K. Roy, and Janet Siegmund (Eds.). ACM, 200–210. https://doi.org/10.1145/3196321.3196334

Digital Library

[21]

Srinivasan Iyer, Ioannis Konstas, Alvin Cheung, and Luke Zettlemoyer. 2018. Mapping Language to Code in Programmatic Context. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Brussels, Belgium, October 31 - November 4, 2018. 1643–1652. https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/D18-1192/

[22]

Rafael-Michael Karampatsis, Hlib Babii, Romain Robbes, Charles Sutton, and Andrea Janes. 2020. Big code != big vocabulary: open-vocabulary models for source code. In ICSE ’20: 42nd International Conference on Software Engineering, Seoul, South Korea, 27 June - 19 July, 2020, Gregg Rothermel and Doo-Hwan Bae (Eds.). ACM, 1073–1085. https://doi.org/10.1145/3377811.3380342

Digital Library

[23]

Seohyun Kim, Jinman Zhao, Yuchi Tian, and Satish Chandra. 2021. Code Prediction by Feeding Trees to Transformers. In IEEE/ACM International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE).

Digital Library

[24]

Claire Le Goues, Michael Pradel, and Abhik Roychoudhury. 2019. Automated program repair. Commun. ACM 62, 12 (2019), 56–65. https://doi.org/10.1145/3318162

Digital Library

[25]

Jaeseong Lee, Pengyu Nie, Junyi Jessy Li, and Milos Gligoric. 2020. On the Naturalness of Hardware Descriptions. In Joint Meeting on European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering. 530–542.

[26]

Jian Li, Yue Wang, Michael R. Lyu, and Irwin King. 2018. Code Completion with Neural Attention and Pointer Networks. In Proceedings of the 27th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (Stockholm, Sweden) (IJCAI’18). AAAI Press, 4159–25.

Digital Library

[27]

Xiaochen Li, He Jiang, Yasutaka Kamei, and Xin Chen. 2018. Bridging semantic gaps between natural languages and APIs with word embedding. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering(2018).

[28]

Chin-Yew Lin and Eduard Hovy. 2003. Automatic evaluation of summaries using n-gram co-occurrence statistics. In Proceedings of the 2003 human language technology conference of the North American chapter of the association for computational linguistics. 150–157.

Digital Library

[29]

Hui Liu, Mingzhu Shen, Jiaqi Zhu, Nan Niu, Ge Li, and Lu Zhang. 2020. Deep Learning Based Program Generation from Requirements Text: Are We There Yet?IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering(2020).

[30]

Xinyue Liu, Xiangnan Kong, Lei Liu, and Kuorong Chiang. 2018. TreeGAN: Syntax-Aware Sequence Generation with Generative Adversarial Networks. ArXiv e-prints (2018). arXiv:1808.07582

[31]

Ali Mesbah, Andrew Rice, Emily Johnston, Nick Glorioso, and Edward Aftandilian. 2019. DeepDelta: learning to repair compilation errors. In Proceedings of the 2019 27th ACM Joint Meeting on European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering. 925–936.

Digital Library

[32]

Anh Tuan Nguyen, Trong Duc Nguyen, Hung Dang Phan, and Tien N. Nguyen. 2018. A Deep Neural Network Language Model with Contexts for Source Code. In SANER.

[33]

Anh Tuan Nguyen, Tung Thanh Nguyen, and Tien N Nguyen. 2015. Divide-and-conquer approach for multi-phase statistical migration for source code (t). In 2015 30th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE). IEEE, 585–596.

Digital Library

[34]

Yu Nong, Yuzhe Ou, Michael Pradel, Feng Chen, and Haipeng Cai. 2022. Generating Realistic Vulnerabilities via Neural Code Editing: An Empirical Study. In ACM Joint Meeting on European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering (ESEC/FSE).

Digital Library

[35]

Yusuke Oda, Hiroyuki Fudaba, Graham Neubig, Hideaki Hata, Sakriani Sakti, Tomoki Toda, and Satoshi Nakamura. 2015. Learning to Generate Pseudo-Code from Source Code Using Statistical Machine Translation (T). In 30th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering, ASE 2015, Lincoln, NE, USA, November 9-13, 2015. 574–584.

Digital Library

[36]

Kishore Papineni, Salim Roukos, Todd Ward, and Wei-Jing Zhu. 2002. BLEU: a method for automatic evaluation of machine translation. In Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL). 311–318.

[37]

Jibesh Patra and Michael Pradel. 2021. Semantic bug seeding: a learning-based approach for creating realistic bugs. In ESEC/FSE ’21: 29th ACM Joint European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering, Athens, Greece, August 23-28, 2021, Diomidis Spinellis, Georgios Gousios, Marsha Chechik, and Massimiliano Di Penta (Eds.). ACM, 906–918. https://doi.org/10.1145/3468264.3468623

Digital Library

[38]

Matt Post. 2018. A Call for Clarity in Reporting BLEU Scores. In Proceedings of the Third Conference on Machine Translation: Research Papers. 186–191.

[39]

Michael Pradel and Satish Chandra. 2022. Neural software analysis. Commun. ACM 65, 1 (2022), 86–96. https://doi.org/10.1145/3460348

Digital Library

[40]

Ehud Reiter. 2018. A Structured Review of the Validity of BLEU. Computational Linguistics 44, 3 (2018), 393–401.

Digital Library

[41]

Shuo Ren, Daya Guo, Shuai Lu, Long Zhou, Shujie Liu, Duyu Tang, Ming Zhou, Ambrosio Blanco, and Shuai Ma. 2020. CodeBLEU: a Method for Automatic Evaluation of Code Synthesis. arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.10297(2020).

[42]

Stefan Riezler and John T Maxwell III. 2005. On some pitfalls in automatic evaluation and significance testing for MT. In Proceedings of the ACL workshop on intrinsic and extrinsic evaluation measures for machine translation and/or summarization. 57–64.

[43]

Baptiste Rozière, Marie-Anne Lachaux, Lowik Chanussot, and Guillaume Lample. 2020. Unsupervised Translation of Programming Languages. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 33: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2020, NeurIPS 2020, December 6-12, 2020, virtual, Hugo Larochelle, Marc’Aurelio Ranzato, Raia Hadsell, Maria-Florina Balcan, and Hsuan-Tien Lin (Eds.). https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2020/hash/ed23fbf18c2cd35f8c7f8de44f85c08d-Abstract.html

[44]

Zeyu Sun, Qihao Zhu, Lili Mou, Yingfei Xiong, Ge Li, and Lu Zhang. 2019. A Grammar-Based Structural CNN Decoder for Code Generation. In The Thirty-Third AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 2019, The Thirty-First Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence Conference, IAAI 2019, The Ninth AAAI Symposium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence, EAAI 2019, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, January 27 - February 1, 2019. 7055–7062. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33017055

Digital Library

[45]

Jeffrey Svajlenko, Judith F Islam, Iman Keivanloo, Chanchal K Roy, and Mohammad Mamun Mia. 2014. Towards a big data curated benchmark of inter-project code clones. In 2014 IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance and Evolution. IEEE, 476–480.

Digital Library

[46]

Alexey Svyatkovskiy, Shao Kun Deng, Shengyu Fu, and Neel Sundaresan. 2020. IntelliCode compose: code generation using transformer. In ESEC/FSE ’20: 28th ACM Joint European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering, Virtual Event, USA, November 8-13, 2020, Prem Devanbu, Myra B. Cohen, and Thomas Zimmermann (Eds.). ACM, 1433–1443. https://doi.org/10.1145/3368089.3417058

Digital Library

[47]

Yanfei Tian, Xu Wang, Hailong Sun, Yi Zhao, Chunbo Guo, and Xudong Liu. 2018. Automatically Generating API Usage Patterns from Natural Language Queries. In 2018 25th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC). IEEE, 59–68.

[48]

Ngoc M. Tran, Hieu Tran, Son Nguyen, Hoan Nguyen, and Tien N. Nguyen. 2019. Does BLEU score work for code migration?. In Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Program Comprehension, ICPC 2019, Montreal, QC, Canada, May 25-31, 2019, Yann-Gaël Guéhéneuc, Foutse Khomh, and Federica Sarro (Eds.). IEEE / ACM, 165–176. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPC.2019.00034

Digital Library

[49]

Michele Tufano, Jevgenija Pantiuchina, Cody Watson, Gabriele Bavota, and Denys Poshyvanyk. 2019. On learning meaningful code changes via neural machine translation. In Proceedings of the 41st International Conference on Software Engineering, ICSE 2019, Montreal, QC, Canada, May 25-31, 2019. 25–36. https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=3339509

Digital Library

[50]

Yao Wan, Zhou Zhao, Min Yang, Guandong Xu, Haochao Ying, Jian Wu, and Philip S. Yu. 2018. Improving automatic source code summarization via deep reinforcement learning. In Proceedings of the 33rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Automated Software Engineering, ASE 2018, Montpellier, France, September 3-7, 2018, Marianne Huchard, Christian Kästner, and Gordon Fraser (Eds.). ACM, 397–407. https://doi.org/10.1145/3238147.3238206

Digital Library

[51]

Wenhan Wang, Ge Li, Bo Ma, Xin Xia, and Zhi Jin. 2020. Detecting Code Clones with Graph Neural Network and Flow-Augmented Abstract Syntax Tree. In 2020 IEEE 27th International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution and Reengineering (SANER). IEEE, 261–271.

[52]

Cody Watson, Michele Tufano, Kevin Moran, Gabriele Bavota, and Denys Poshyvanyk. 2020. On Learning Meaningful Assert Statements for Unit Test Cases. In ICSE.

[53]

Jian Zhang, Xu Wang, Hongyu Zhang, Hailong Sun, and Xudong Liu. 2020. Retrieval-based Neural Source Code Summarization. In ICSE.

[54]

Jian Zhang, Xu Wang, Hongyu Zhang, Hailong Sun, Yanjun Pu, and Xudong Liu. 2020. Learning to Handle Exceptions. In IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE).

Digital Library

Cited By

Mastropaolo ANardone VBavota GDi Penta M(2024)How the Training Procedure Impacts the Performance of Deep Learning-based Vulnerability PatchingProceedings of the 28th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering10.1145/3661167.3661200(150-159)Online publication date: 18-Jun-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3661167.3661200
Hu QGuo YXie XCordy MMa LPapadakis MTraon Y(2024)Active Code Learning: Benchmarking Sample-Efficient Training of Code ModelsIEEE Transactions on Software Engineering10.1109/TSE.2024.337696450:5(1080-1095)Online publication date: 13-Mar-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1109/TSE.2024.3376964
Aggarwal PChatterjee ODai TMohapatra PPaulovicks BBlancett BDe Magalhaes A(2024)CodeSift: An LLM-Based Reference-Less Framework for Automatic Code Validation2024 IEEE 17th International Conference on Cloud Computing (CLOUD)10.1109/CLOUD62652.2024.00052(404-410)Online publication date: 7-Jul-2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/CLOUD62652.2024.00052
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

CrystalBLEU: Precisely and Efficiently Measuring the Similarity of Code

Recommendations

Evaluation of English to Arabic Machine Translation Systems using BLEU and GTM
ICETC '17: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Education Technology and Computers

The aim of this research study is to compare the effectiveness of three systems: Google Translator, Bing Translator and Golden Alwafi that are used to translate the corpus sentences from English language to Arabic language and then evaluate these ...
Metrics for MT evaluation: evaluating reordering

Translating between dissimilar languages requires an account of the use of divergent word orders when expressing the same semantic content. Reordering poses a serious problem for statistical machine translation systems and has generated a considerable ...
Evaluation metrics for consistent translation of japanese legal sentences
Semantic Processing of Legal Texts

We propose new translation evaluation metrics for legal sentences. Since most previous metrics, that have been proposed to evaluate machine translation systems, prepare human reference translations and assume that several correct translations exist for ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences

ASE '22: Proceedings of the 37th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering

October 2022

2006 pages

ISBN:9781450394758

DOI:10.1145/3551349

Copyright © 2022 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 05 January 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Badges

Artifacts Evaluated & Reusable / v1.1
Distinguished Paper

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article
Research
Refereed limited

Funding Sources

European Research Council

Conference

ASE '22

ASE '22: 37th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering

October 10 - 14, 2022

MI, Rochester, USA

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 82 of 337 submissions, 24%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

7
Total Citations
View Citations
427
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)219
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)41

Reflects downloads up to 23 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Mastropaolo ANardone VBavota GDi Penta M(2024)How the Training Procedure Impacts the Performance of Deep Learning-based Vulnerability PatchingProceedings of the 28th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering10.1145/3661167.3661200(150-159)Online publication date: 18-Jun-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3661167.3661200
Hu QGuo YXie XCordy MMa LPapadakis MTraon Y(2024)Active Code Learning: Benchmarking Sample-Efficient Training of Code ModelsIEEE Transactions on Software Engineering10.1109/TSE.2024.337696450:5(1080-1095)Online publication date: 13-Mar-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1109/TSE.2024.3376964
Aggarwal PChatterjee ODai TMohapatra PPaulovicks BBlancett BDe Magalhaes A(2024)CodeSift: An LLM-Based Reference-Less Framework for Automatic Code Validation2024 IEEE 17th International Conference on Cloud Computing (CLOUD)10.1109/CLOUD62652.2024.00052(404-410)Online publication date: 7-Jul-2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/CLOUD62652.2024.00052
Xing CHu TLiao NZhang MDu DWu YGao Q(2024)Active Learning for Low-Resource Project-Specific Code SummarizationKnowledge Science, Engineering and Management10.1007/978-981-97-5489-2_5(48-57)Online publication date: 16-Aug-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/978-981-97-5489-2_5
Su CMcMillan C(2024)Semantic similarity loss for neural source code summarizationJournal of Software: Evolution and Process10.1002/smr.2706Online publication date: 7-Jul-2024
https://doi.org/10.1002/smr.2706
Wang SLin BSun ZWen MLiu YLei YMao X(2023)Two Birds with One Stone: Boosting Code Generation and Code Search via a Generative Adversarial NetworkProceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages10.1145/36228157:OOPSLA2(486-515)Online publication date: 16-Oct-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3622815
Li JLi GLi ZJin ZHu XZhang KFu Z(2023)CodeEditor: Learning to Edit Source Code with Pre-trained ModelsACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology10.1145/359720732:6(1-22)Online publication date: 30-Sep-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3597207

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents