research-article

Design of the Central LISP Management System for the Software-Defined Wireless Network (SDWN)

Authors:

Vyacheslav Zalyubovskiy,

Tai-Myoung ChungAuthors Info & Claims

MobiWac '17: Proceedings of the 15th ACM International Symposium on Mobility Management and Wireless Access

Pages 93 - 100

https://doi.org/10.1145/3132062.3132063

Published: 21 November 2017 Publication History

Abstract

The Software-Defined Wireless Network (SDWN) has been considered as a feasible solution in order to make a fast deployment of new solutions and services; however, there is a performance degradation problem when SDWN is designed with the current IP address scheme requiring an extra operation cost to maintain a location management system. In order to improve mobility management in a SDWN, we realize the centralized LISP (Locator/ID Separation Protocol) management system with the following features: 1) the LISP/OpenFlow centralized control entity and 2) interoperability with standard LISP systems. It is named LISP-SDWN and it is a double separation solution based on Control/Data decomposition and Locator/ID separation. The operation cost might decrease because ID of the Mobile Node (MN) does not change during handover across heterogeneous Radio Access Networks (RANs) in a SDWN. The major contributions of our research are that there will be no modification requirement of the LISP functions during LISP deployment in a SDWN and there will be a capability for inter-networking with external LISP sites operated by other service providers. Performance evaluation of LISP-SDWN is carried out with LISP, LISP Controller, MIPv6 and HMIPv6. Result shows that the proposed LISP-SDWN is a feasible and practical solution for a SDWN provider.

References

[1]

3GPP TS 23.261. 2012. IP Flow Mobility and Seamless Wireless Local Area Network (WLAN) Offload. Tech. Spec Release 10 (Mar 2012).

[2]

R. Atkinso and S. Bhatti. 2012. Identifier-Locator Network Protocol (ILNP) Architectural Description. RFC 6740 (2012).

[3]

R. Atkinson, S. Bhatti, and S. Hailes. 2009. ILNP: Mobility, Multi-Homing, Localised Addressing and Security through Naming. Telecommunication Systems 42, 3--4 (Dec 2009), 273--291.

Digital Library

[4]

C. Bernardos et al. 2014. An Architecture for Software Defined Wireless Net- working. IEEE Wireless Commun 21, 3 (2014), 52--61.

[5]

H. A. Chan. 2012. Distributed Mobility Management with Mobile IP6. IEEE ICC 2012 Workshop on Telecommunications: from Research to Standards (June 2012).

[6]

W. Chen et al. 2015. Routing in the Centralized Identifier Network. 10th International Conference on Communications and Networking (2015), 73--78.

[7]

D. Farinacci D. Meyer, D. Lewis. 2017. LISP Mobile Node. Internet Engineering Task Force draft-meyer-lisp-mn-15 (Jan 2017).

[8]

D. Farinacci, V. Fuller, D. Meyer, and D. Lewis. 2013. Locator/ID Separation Protocol (LISP). Internet Engineering Task Force RFC 6830 (2013).

[9]

A. Feldmann, L. Cittadini, W. Muhlbauer, R. Bush, and O. Maennel. 2009. HAIR: Hierarchical Architecture for Internet Routing. in Proceedings of the 2009 Work- shop on Re-Architecting the Internet. ACM (2009), 43--48.

[10]

Open Network Foundation. 2012. Software-Defined Networking: The New Norm for Networks. (2012).

[11]

V. Fuller and D. Farinacci. 2013. Locator/ID Separation Protocol (LISP) Map-Server Interface. Internet Engineering Task Force RFC 6833 (2013).

[12]

V. Fuller, D. Farinacci, D. Meyer, and D. Lewis. 2013. LISP Alternate Topology (LISP+ALT). Internet Engineering Task Force RFC 6836 (2013).

[13]

A. Gudipati, D. Perry, L. E. Li, and S. Katti. 2013. SoftRAN: Software defined radio access network. ACM SIGCOMM HotSDN Workshop (Aug 2013).

[14]

S. Gundavelli, K. Leung, V. Devarapalli, K. Chowdhury, and B. Patil. 2008. Proxy Mobile IPv6. Internet Engineering Task Force (2008).

[15]

M. HadZialic, B. Dosenovic, M. Dzaferagic, and J. Musovic. 2013. Cloud-RAN: Innovative radio access network architecture. In ELMAR, 2013 55th International Symposium (Sept 2013), 115--120.

[16]

W. Herrin. 2008. Tunneling Route Reduction Protocol (TRRP). Internet Engineering Task Force (2008).

[17]

J.Andersson and E.Bizouran. 2013. Architectural EPC extensions for supporting heterogeneous mobility schemes. MEVICO project report (Jan. 2013).

[18]

D. Jen, M. Meisel, D. Massey, L. Wang, B. Zhang, and L. Zhang. 2007. APT: A Practical Transit Mapping Service. Internet Engineering Task Force draft-jen-apt-01 (Nov 2007).

[19]

T. Jeong et al. 2015. Lisp controller: a centralized lisp management system for isp networks. International Journal of Network Management 25, 6 (2015), 507--525.

[20]

X. Jin, LE. Li, L. Vanbever, and J. Rexford. 2013. SoftCell: Scalable and flexible cellular core network architecture. Proc. 9th Int. Conf. Emerging Netw. Exp. Technol (2013), 163--174.

[21]

D. Johnson, C. Perkinsand, and J. Arkko. 2004. Mobility Support in IPv6. Internet Engineering Task Force RFC 3775 (2004).

[22]

L.Bokor, Z.Faigl, and S.Imre. 2010. A Delegation-based HIP Signaling Scheme for the Ultra Flat Architecture. in Proc. of IWSCN Release 10 (May 2010).

[23]

C. Lee et al. 2015. A network-based host identifier locator separating protocol in software-defined networks. 2015 Seventh International Conference on. IEEE (2015).

[24]

M. Maternia et al. 2015. METIS D4.3 v1 - Final Report on Network-Level Solutions. (2015). https://www.metis2020.com/

[25]

N. McKeown et al. 2008. OpenFlow: Enabling innovation in campus networks. SIGCOMM Comput 38, 2 (Mar 2008), 69--74.

Digital Library

[26]

M. Menth, M. Hartmann, and D. Klein. 2010. Global Locator, Local Locator, and Identifier Split (GLI-Split). University of Wurzburg Technical Report, 470 (Apr 2010).

[27]

R. Moskowitz. 2006. Host Identity Protocol (HIP) Architecture. Internet Engineer- ing Task Force RFC 4423 (2006).

[28]

E. Nordmark. 2009. Shim6: Level 3 Multihoming Shim Protocol for IPv6. Internet Engineering Task Force RFC 5533 (2009).

[29]

B. Nunes, M. Mendonca, X. Nguyen, K. Obraczka, and T. Turletti. 2014. A Survey of Software-Defined Networking: Past Present and Future of Programmable Networks. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 16, 3 (Aug 2014), 1617--1634.

[30]

R. Riggio, K.M. Gomez, T. Rasheed, J. Schulz-Zander, S. Kuklinski, and M.K. Marina. [n. d.]. Programming abstractions for software-defined wireless networks. Network and Service Management (CNSM) 2014 10th International Conference on ([n. d.]).

[31]

R. Riggio, M. Marina, J. Schulz-Zander, S. Kuklinski, and T. Rasheed. 2015. Pro- gramming abstractions for software-defined wireless networks. Network and Service Management IEEE Transactions on 12, 2 (Juen 2015), 146--162.

[32]

H. Soliman et al. 2005. Hierarchical Mobile IPv6 mobility management. Internet Engineering Task Force RFC 4140 (August 2005).

[33]

G. Sun, G. Liu, H. Zhang, and W. Tan. 2013. Architecture on mobility man- agement in openflow-based radio access networks. in Proceedings of 2013 IEEE Global High Tech Congress on Electronics (GHTCE). IEEE (2013), 88--92.

[34]

F. Templin. 2011. The Internet Routing Overlay Network (IRON). Internet Engineering Task Force RFC6179, 470 (Mar 2011).

[35]

J. Ubillos, M. Xu, Z. Ming, and C. Vogt. 2010. Name-Based Sockets Architecture. Internet Engineering Task Force draft-ubillos-name-based-sockets-03 (September 2010).

[36]

C. Vogt. 2008. Six/One Router: A Scalable and Backwards Compatible Solution for Provider-Independent Addressing. in Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Mobility in the Evolving Internet Architecture. ACM (2008), 13--18.

[37]

M. Wang et al. 2015. OpenISMA: An Approach of Achieving a Scalable OpenFlow Network by Identifiers Separating and Mapping. Parallel Architectures, Algorithms and Programming (PAAP), 2015 Seventh International Symposium on. IEEE (2015).

Digital Library

[38]

X. Xu. 2010. Routing Architecture for the Next Generation Internet (RANGI). Internet Engineering Task Force raft-xu-rangi-04 (August 2010).

[39]

Y. Yang et al. 2016. IDOpenFlow: An OpenFlow switch to support identifier- locator split communication. Industrial Electronics and Applications (ICIEA), IEEE 11th Conference on. IEEE (2016)

Cited By

Bellavista PDolci AGiannelli CPadalino Montenero D(2020)SDN-Based Traffic Management Middleware for Spontaneous WMNsJournal of Network and Systems Management10.1007/s10922-020-09551-yOnline publication date: 10-Jul-2020
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10922-020-09551-y
AlJeri NBoukerche AIgartua MBarba CMezher A(2018)An Efficient Movement-Based Handover Prediction Scheme for Hierarchical Mobile IPv6 in VANETsProceedings of the 15th ACM International Symposium on Performance Evaluation of Wireless Ad Hoc, Sensor, & Ubiquitous Networks10.1145/3243046.3243053(47-54)Online publication date: 25-Oct-2018
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3243046.3243053
Seo ESarang Wi SZalyubovskiy VChung T(2018)The Scalable LISP-Deployed Software-Defined Wireless Network (LISP-SDWN) for a Next Generation Wireless NetworkIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2018.28791676(66305-66321)Online publication date: 2018
https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2879167

Index Terms

Design of the Central LISP Management System for the Software-Defined Wireless Network (SDWN)
1. Networks

Recommendations

Mininet-WiFi: A Platform for Hybrid Physical-Virtual Software-Defined Wireless Networking Research
SIGCOMM '16: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGCOMM Conference

Software-Defined Wireless Networking (SDWN) is being considered an appealing paradigm to design and operate wireless networks through higher-level abstractions and programmatic interfaces such as the OpenFlow protocol. Identified benefits include cost ...
Mobility management across hybrid wireless networks: Trends and challenges

Future generation wireless networks are envisioned to be a combination of diverse but complementary access technologies. Internetworking these types of networks will provide mobile users with ubiquitous connectivity across a wide range of networking ...
Radio Hardware Virtualization for Software-Defined Wireless Networks

Software-Defined Network (SDN) is a promising architecture for next generation Internet. SDN can achieve Network Function Virtualization much more efficiently than conventional architectures by splitting the data and control planes. Though SDN emerged ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

MobiWac '17: Proceedings of the 15th ACM International Symposium on Mobility Management and Wireless Access

November 2017

166 pages

ISBN:9781450351638

DOI:10.1145/3132062

General Chair:
Ángel Cuevas
Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Spain
,
Program Chairs:
Robson De Grande
Brock University, Canada
,
Amir Darehshoorzadeh
CISCO, Canada

Copyright © 2017 ACM.

© 2017 Association for Computing Machinery. ACM acknowledges that this contribution was authored or co-authored by an employee, contractor or affiliate of a national government. As such, the Government retains a nonexclusive, royalty-free right to publish or reproduce this article, or to allow others to do so, for Government purposes only.

Sponsors

SIGSIM: ACM Special Interest Group on Simulation and Modeling

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 21 November 2017

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Funding Sources

National Research Foundation of Korea
Institute for Information & Communications Technology Promotion (IITP)

Conference

MSWiM '17

Sponsor:

SIGSIM

MSWiM '17: 20th ACM Int'l Conference on Modelling, Analysis and Simulation of Wireless and Mobile Systems

November 21 - 25, 2017

Florida, Miami, USA

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 83 of 272 submissions, 31%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

3
Total Citations
View Citations
96
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)2
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

Reflects downloads up to 16 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Bellavista PDolci AGiannelli CPadalino Montenero D(2020)SDN-Based Traffic Management Middleware for Spontaneous WMNsJournal of Network and Systems Management10.1007/s10922-020-09551-yOnline publication date: 10-Jul-2020
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10922-020-09551-y
AlJeri NBoukerche AIgartua MBarba CMezher A(2018)An Efficient Movement-Based Handover Prediction Scheme for Hierarchical Mobile IPv6 in VANETsProceedings of the 15th ACM International Symposium on Performance Evaluation of Wireless Ad Hoc, Sensor, & Ubiquitous Networks10.1145/3243046.3243053(47-54)Online publication date: 25-Oct-2018
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3243046.3243053
Seo ESarang Wi SZalyubovskiy VChung T(2018)The Scalable LISP-Deployed Software-Defined Wireless Network (LISP-SDWN) for a Next Generation Wireless NetworkIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2018.28791676(66305-66321)Online publication date: 2018
https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2879167

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents