Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/1842993.1843104acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesaviConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Evaluating the utilization of clustering methods connected with multivariate visualizations

Published: 26 May 2010 Publication History

Abstract

Visualization software in all fields becomes increasingly interactive with more and more elements to support users. Elements that help an observer to interpret given data sets by computing certain properties of the data to enrich their visualization we call "visual scouts".
Many visualization programs implement visual scouts, but few is known about how users apply them in a real setting. In order to learn more about how users work with interactive visualization software we provide them with clustering methods (k-mean and hierarchical clustering), as one possibility to manipulate the data. Subsequently we evaluate how natural science students use these clustering methods as provided by an interactive comparative visualization software for high dimensional data (VisuLab®). The students are introduced to four different visualization methods (figure 1) and given the possibility to apply four clustering methods to help them when interpreting two sample datasets (table 1 first two rows). This is part of a guided instruction after which they independently interpret two new but related real data sets (table 1 last two rows). In total they work for about six hours.
During our evaluation we were able to record the clustering activities of ~250 students, by directly logging the user's activities within the software. Based on this data we computed how many times the data was clustered and with which visualization methods the results were visualized. In total we registered over 57'000 clustering activities of which 30% where recorded during the instruction period and the remaining 70% during the time they worked independently.
Based on the data gained we investigate relationships between clustering methods, the type of data analyzed and the visualization method chosen. This is shown in figure 2, where the number of clustering in regard to the visualization method is presented in a boxplot.

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
AVI '10: Proceedings of the International Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces
May 2010
427 pages
ISBN:9781450300766
DOI:10.1145/1842993
  • Editor:
  • Giuseppe Santucci
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

  • Consulta Umbria SRL

In-Cooperation

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 26 May 2010

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

AVI '10
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 128 of 490 submissions, 26%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 104
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)1
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 19 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media