research-article

A comparison of approaches to large-scale data analysis

Authors:

Alexander Rasin,

Daniel J. Abadi,

David J. DeWitt,

Michael StonebrakerAuthors Info & Claims

SIGMOD '09: Proceedings of the 2009 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of data

Pages 165 - 178

https://doi.org/10.1145/1559845.1559865

Published: 29 June 2009 Publication History

Abstract

There is currently considerable enthusiasm around the MapReduce (MR) paradigm for large-scale data analysis [17]. Although the basic control flow of this framework has existed in parallel SQL database management systems (DBMS) for over 20 years, some have called MR a dramatically new computing model [8, 17]. In this paper, we describe and compare both paradigms. Furthermore, we evaluate both kinds of systems in terms of performance and development complexity. To this end, we define a benchmark consisting of a collection of tasks that we have run on an open source version of MR as well as on two parallel DBMSs. For each task, we measure each system's performance for various degrees of parallelism on a cluster of 100 nodes. Our results reveal some interesting trade-offs. Although the process to load data into and tune the execution of parallel DBMSs took much longer than the MR system, the observed performance of these DBMSs was strikingly better. We speculate about the causes of the dramatic performance difference and consider implementation concepts that future systems should take from both kinds of architectures.

References

[1]

Hadoop. http://hadoop.apache.org/.

[2]

Hive. http://hadoop.apache.org/hive/.

[3]

Vertica. http://www.vertica.com/.

[4]

Y. Amir and J. Stanton. The Spread Wide Area Group Communication System. Technical report, 1998.

[5]

R. Chaiken, B. Jenkins, P.-A. Larson, B. Ramsey, D. Shakib, S. Weaver, and J. Zhou. Scope: easy and efficient parallel processing of massive data sets. Proc. VLDB Endow., 1(2):1265--1276, 2008.

Digital Library

[6]

Cisco Systems. Cisco Catalyst 3750-E Series Switches Data Sheet, June 2008.

[7]

J. Cohen, B. Dolan, M. Dunlap, J. M. Hellerstein, and C. Welton. MAD Skills: New Analysis Practices for Big Data. Under Submission, March 2009.

Digital Library

[8]

J. Dean and S. Ghemawat. MapReduce: Simplified Data Processing on Large Clusters. In OSDI '04, pages 10--10, 2004.

Digital Library

[9]

D. J. DeWitt and R. H. Gerber. Multiprocessor Hash-based Join Algorithms. In VLDB '85, pages 151--164, 1985.

Digital Library

[10]

D. J. DeWitt, R. H. Gerber, G. Graefe, M. L. Heytens, K. B. Kumar, and M. Muralikrishna. GAMMA - A High Performance Dataflow Database Machine. In VLDB '86, pages 228--237, 1986.

Digital Library

[11]

S. Fushimi, M. Kitsuregawa, and H. Tanaka. An Overview of The System Software of A Parallel Relational Database Machine. In VLDB '86, pages 209--219, 1986.

Digital Library

[12]

S. Ghemawat, H. Gobioff, and S.-T. Leung. The Google File System. SIGOPS Oper. Syst. Rev., 37(5):29--43, 2003.

Digital Library

[13]

M. Isard, M. Budiu, Y. Yu, A. Birrell, and D. Fetterly. Dryad: Distributed Data-parallel Programs from Sequential Building Blocks. In EuroSys '07, pages 59--72, 2007.

Digital Library

[14]

E. Meijer, B. Beckman, and G. Bierman. LINQ: reconciling object, relations and XML in the .NET framework. In SIGMOD '06, pages 706--706, 2006.

Digital Library

[15]

C. Olston, B. Reed, U. Srivastava, R. Kumar, and A. Tomkins. Pig Latin: A Not-So-Foreign Language for Data Processing. In SIGMOD '08, pages 1099--1110, 2008.

Digital Library

[16]

J. Ong, D. Fogg, and M. Stonebraker. Implementation of data abstraction in the relational database system ingres. SIGMOD Rec., 14(1):1--14, 1983.

Digital Library

[17]

D. A. Patterson. Technical Perspective: The Data Center is the Computer. Commun. ACM, 51(1):105--105, 2008.

Digital Library

[18]

R. Rustin, editor. ACM--SIGMOD Workshop on Data Description, Access and Control, May 1974.

[19]

M. Stonebraker. The Case for Shared Nothing. Database Engineering, 9:4--9, 1986.

[20]

M. Stonebraker and J. Hellerstein. What Goes Around Comes Around. In Readings in Database Systems, pages 2--41. The MIT Press, 4th edition, 2005.

[21]

D. Thomas, D. Hansson, L. Breedt, M. Clark, J. D. Davidson, J. Gehtland, and A. Schwarz. Agile Web Development with Rails. Pragmatic Bookshelf, 2006.

Digital Library

Cited By

Cesario ELindia P(2024)Towards a Hierarchical Exascale Framework for Iterative Parallel Data Analysis Algorithms2024 32nd Euromicro International Conference on Parallel, Distributed and Network-Based Processing (PDP)10.1109/PDP62718.2024.00049(293-296)Online publication date: 20-Mar-2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/PDP62718.2024.00049
Yanagiya KHara JHigashi HTanaka YOrtega A(2024)Lossy Compression of Adjacency Matrices by Graph Filter BanksICASSP 2024 - 2024 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP)10.1109/ICASSP48485.2024.10448045(9386-9390)Online publication date: 14-Apr-2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASSP48485.2024.10448045
Yang YWang LZhan J(2024)A Linear Combination-Based Method to Construct Proxy Benchmarks for Big Data WorkloadsBenchmarking, Measuring, and Optimizing10.1007/978-981-97-0316-6_8(120-136)Online publication date: 14-Feb-2024
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-0316-6_8
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

A comparison of approaches to large-scale data analysis
1. Information systems
  1. Data management systems
    1. Database management system engines
      1. Parallel and distributed DBMSs

Recommendations

Performance characteristics of hybrid MPI/OpenMP implementations of NAS parallel benchmarks SP and BT on large-scale multicore supercomputers
Special issue on the 1st international workshop on performance modeling, benchmarking and simulation of high performance computing systems (PMBS 10)

The NAS Parallel Benchmarks (NPB) are well-known applications with the fixed algorithms for evaluating parallel systems and tools. Multicore supercomputers provide a natural programming paradigm for hybrid programs, whereby OpenMP can be used with the ...
HadoopDB in action: building real world applications
SIGMOD '10: Proceedings of the 2010 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of data

HadoopDB is a hybrid of MapReduce and DBMS technologies, designed to meet the growing demand of analyzing massive datasets on very large clusters of machines. Our previous work has shown that HadoopDB approaches parallel databases in performance and ...
MapReduce in MPI for Large-scale graph algorithms

We describe a parallel library written with message-passing (MPI) calls that allows algorithms to be expressed in the MapReduce paradigm. This means the calling program does not need to include explicit parallel code, but instead provides ''map'' and ''...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

SIGMOD '09: Proceedings of the 2009 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of data

June 2009

1168 pages

ISBN:9781605585512

DOI:10.1145/1559845

Editors:
Carsten Binnig,
Benoit Dageville,
General Chairs:
Uğur Çetintemel
Brown University, USA
,
Stan Zdonik
Brown University, USA
,
Program Chair:
Donald Kossmann
ETH Zurich, Switzerland

Copyright © 2009 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 29 June 2009

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Badges

Results Reproduced / v1.1

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Conference

SIGMOD/PODS '09

Sponsor:

SIGMOD/PODS '09: International Conference on Management of Data

June 29 - July 2, 2009

Rhode Island, Providence, USA

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 785 of 4,003 submissions, 20%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

686
Total Citations
View Citations
9,027
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)321
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)30

Reflects downloads up to 29 Sep 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Cesario ELindia P(2024)Towards a Hierarchical Exascale Framework for Iterative Parallel Data Analysis Algorithms2024 32nd Euromicro International Conference on Parallel, Distributed and Network-Based Processing (PDP)10.1109/PDP62718.2024.00049(293-296)Online publication date: 20-Mar-2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/PDP62718.2024.00049
Yanagiya KHara JHigashi HTanaka YOrtega A(2024)Lossy Compression of Adjacency Matrices by Graph Filter BanksICASSP 2024 - 2024 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP)10.1109/ICASSP48485.2024.10448045(9386-9390)Online publication date: 14-Apr-2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASSP48485.2024.10448045
Yang YWang LZhan J(2024)A Linear Combination-Based Method to Construct Proxy Benchmarks for Big Data WorkloadsBenchmarking, Measuring, and Optimizing10.1007/978-981-97-0316-6_8(120-136)Online publication date: 14-Feb-2024
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-0316-6_8
Elzein NMajid MHashem IIbrahim AAbulfaraj ABinzagr F(2023)JQPro:Join Query Processing in a Distributed System for Big RDF Data Using the Hash-Merge Join TechniqueMathematics10.3390/math1105127511:5(1275)Online publication date: 6-Mar-2023
https://doi.org/10.3390/math11051275
Lin YHe YChaudhuri S(2023)Auto-BI: Automatically Build BI-Models Leveraging Local Join Prediction and Global Schema GraphProceedings of the VLDB Endowment10.14778/3603581.360359616:10(2578-2590)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.14778/3603581.3603596
Song MZhang LYuan MLi ZSong QLiu YZheng G(2023)CoTel: Ontology-Neural Co-Enhanced Text LabelingProceedings of the ACM Web Conference 202310.1145/3543507.3583533(1897-1906)Online publication date: 30-Apr-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3543507.3583533
de Oliveira TCosta FFoulds LLongo H(2023)Scheduling distributed multiway spatial join queries: optimization models and algorithmsInternational Journal of Geographical Information Science10.1080/13658816.2023.217038037:6(1388-1419)Online publication date: 6-Feb-2023
https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2023.2170380
Saini MSengupta ESingh H(2023)Artificial intelligence inspired IoT-fog based framework for generating early alerts while train passengers traveling in dangerous states using surveillance videosMultimedia Tools and Applications10.1007/s11042-023-16107-083:5(13613-13635)Online publication date: 7-Jul-2023
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-023-16107-0
Chen FZhou LSu JZhang X(2023)Pattern-Preserved Normalization Enabled User ProfilingSmart Grid and Innovative Frontiers in Telecommunications10.1007/978-3-031-31733-0_28(331-341)Online publication date: 26-May-2023
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-31733-0_28
Jain RDhand GSheoran KAggarwal N(2023)Importance of Data Wrangling in Industry 4.0Data Wrangling10.1002/9781119879862.ch6(109-121)Online publication date: 14-Jun-2023
https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119879862.ch6
Show More Cited By

View Options

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents