Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
research-article

Impartial Peer Selection: An Annotated Reading List

Published: 08 October 2024 Publication History

Abstract

The study of peer selection mechanisms presents a unique opportunity to understand and improve the practice of a group selecting its best members, despite each member of that group wanting to be selected. A prime example of such a setting is academic peer review, for which peer selection offers a variety of improvement directions. We present an annotated reading list covering the foundations of peer selection as well as recent and emerging work within the field.

References

[1]
Ardabili, P. N. and Liu, M. 2013. Incentives, quality, and risks: A look into the NSF proposal review pilot. CoRR abs/1307.6528.
[2]
Bousquet, N., Norin, S., and Vetta, A. 2014. A near-optimal mechanism for impartial selection. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Web and Internet Economics (WINE). Beijing, China, 133--146.
[3]
Cole, S., Cole, J., and Simon, G. 1981. Chance and consensus in peer review. Science 214, 4523, 881--886.
[4]
Fischer, F. and Klimm, M. 2015. Optimal impartial selection. SIAM Journal on Computing 44, 5, 1263--1285.
[5]
Goldberg, A., Stelmakh, I., Cho, K., Oh, A. H., Agarwal, A., Belgrave, D., and Shah, N. B. 2023. Peer reviews of peer reviews: A randomized controlled trial and other experiments. CoRR abs/2311.09497.
[6]
Holzman, R. and Moulin, H. 2013. Impartial nominations for a prize. Econometrica 81, 1 (January), 173--196.
[7]
McNutt, R. A., Evans, A. T., Fletcher, R. H., and Fletcher, S. W. 1990. The effects of blinding on the quality of peer review: A randomized trial. The Journal of the American Medical Association 263, 10, 1371--1376.
[8]
Olckers, M. and Walsh, T. 2022. Manipulation and peer mechanisms: A survey. CoRR abs/2210.01984.
[9]
Shah, N. B. 2022. Challenges, experiments, and computational solutions in peer review. Commun. ACM 65, 6, 76--87.
[10]
Wenneras, C. and Wold, A. 1997. Nepotism and sexism in peer-review. Nature 387, 341--343.

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM SIGecom Exchanges
ACM SIGecom Exchanges  Volume 22, Issue 1
June 2024
180 pages
EISSN:1551-9031
DOI:10.1145/3699824
Issue’s Table of Contents
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 08 October 2024
Published in SIGECOM Volume 22, Issue 1

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. computational social choice
  2. mechanism design
  3. strategic agents

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 10
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)10
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3
Reflects downloads up to 08 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media