Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3615886.3627743acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Signal Separation in Global, Temporal Gravity Data

Published: 20 November 2023 Publication History

Abstract

Satellite gravity data such as provided by the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) and its follow-up mission contain valuable information on all geophysical processes that involve a mass redistribution in the Earth system. However, as gravity is an integral quantity, only the sum of all signal components can be measured. In order to exploit gravity data for improving the geophysical understanding of the underlying mass redistribution processes, an algorithm to separate the superimposed signals is needed. We present two methods that solve the signal separation problem in global, spatial-temporal gravity data based on prior knowledge on the characteristic behavior of the individual signal components: A principal component analysis-based method is compared to a conditional generative adversarial network that has been originally developed for image-to-image translation tasks. Both methods are tested on synthetic model data in a closed-loop setup, and are shown to successfully accomplish the task of separating gravity signals related to atmospheric and oceanic processes from signals caused by processes in the continental hydrosphere. The two methods show a comparable level of prediction errors. For both methods, the preprocessing of the gravity signals before the signal separation step, more precisely, the choice of the gravity field functional, has a considerable impact on the predictive performance. All in all, we emphasize the potential of neural network algorithms for signal separation in spatial-temporal geodetic data, and suggest a more specific tuning of the algorithm to the task of interest.

References

[1]
Eva Boergens, Elena Rangelova, Michael G. Sideris, and Juergen Kusche. 2014. Assessment of the capabilities of the temporal and spatiotemporal ICA method for geophysical signal separation in GRACE data. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 119, 5 (2014), 4429--4447. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JB010452
[2]
Jianli Chen, Anny Cazenave, Christoph Dahle, William Llovel, Isabelle Panet, Julia Pfeffer, and Lorena Moreira. 2022. Applications and Challenges of GRACE and GRACE Follow-On Satellite Gravimetry. Surveys in Geophysics 43, 1 (2022), 305--345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-021-09685-x
[3]
Henryk Dobslaw, Inga Bergmann-Wolf, Robert Dill, Ehsan Forootan, Volker Klemann, Jürgen Kusche, and Ingo Sasgen. 2015. The updated ESA Earth System Model for future gravity mission simulation studies. Journal of Geodesy 89, 5 (2015), 505--513. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-014-0787-8
[4]
Frank Flechtner, Frank Webb, Michael Watkins, Felix Landerer, Christoph Dahle, and Srinivas Bettadpur. 2017. Current status of the GRACE follow-on mission. Geophysical Research Abstracts 19, EGU 2017--4566 (2017).
[5]
E. Forootan and J. Kusche. 2011. Separation of global time-variable gravity signals into maximally independent components. Journal of Geodesy 86, 7 (2011), 477--497. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-011-0532-5
[6]
E. Forootan, R. Rietbroek, J. Kusche, M.A. Sharifi, J.L. Awange, M. Schmidt, P. Omondi, and J. Famiglietti. 2014. Separation of large scale water storage patterns over Iran using GRACE, altimetry and hydrological data. Remote Sensing of Environment 140 (2014), 580--595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2013.09.025
[7]
Betty Heller-Kaikov, Roland Pail, and Ilias Daras. 2023. Mission design aspects for the mass change and geoscience international constellation (MAGIC). Geophysical Journal International 235, 1 (2023), 718--735. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggad266
[8]
B. Hofmann-Wellenhof and Helmut Moritz. 2005. Physical Geodesy. Springer. 403 pages.
[9]
Phillip Isola, Jun-Yan Zhu, Tinghui Zhou, and Alexei A. Efros. 2016. Image-to-Image Translation with Conditional Adversarial Networks. (2016). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1611.07004
[10]
Richard P. Kornfeld, Bradford W. Arnold, Michael A. Gross, Neil T. Dahya, William M. Klipstein, Peter F. Gath, and Srinivas Bettadpur. 2019. GRACE-FO: The Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment Follow-On Mission. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets 56, 3 (2019), 931--951. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.A34326
[11]
Luca Massotti, Christian Siemes, Günther March, Roger Haagmans, and Pierluigi Silvestrin. 2021. Next Generation Gravity Mission Elements of the Mass Change and Geoscience International Constellation: From Orbit Selection to Instrument and Mission Design. Remote Sensing 13, 19 (2021), 3935. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13193935
[12]
Gabriel Meseguer-Brocal and Geoffroy Peeters. 2019. Conditioned-U-Net: Introducing a Control Mechanism in the U-Net for Multiple Source Separations. (2019). https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.1907.01277
[13]
Rudolph W. Preisendorfer and Curtis D. Mobley. 1988. Principal Component Analysis in Meteorology and Oceanography. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:122456032
[14]
Matthew Rodell and James S. Famiglietti. 1999. Detectability of variations in continental water storage from satellite observations of the time dependent gravity field. Water Resources Research 35, 9 (1999), 2705--2723. https://doi.org/10.1029/1999WR900141
[15]
Martin Schmeer, Michael Schmidt, Wolfgang Bosch, and Florian Seitz. 2012. Separation of mass signals within GRACE monthly gravity field models by means of empirical orthogonal functions. Journal of Geodynamics 59-60 (2012), 124--132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jog.2012.03.001
[16]
Tianyan Shi, Yoichi Fukuda, Koichiro Doi, and Jun'ichi Okuno. 2022. Extraction of GRACE/GRACE-FO observed mass change patterns across Antarctica via independent component analysis (ICA). Geophysical Journal International 229, 3 (2022), 1914--1926. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggac033
[17]
Xiao Sun, Jindong Xu, Yongli Ma, Tianyu Zhao, Shifeng Ou, and Lizhi Peng. 2020. Blind image separation based on attentional generative adversarial network. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing 13, 3 (2020), 1397--1404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-020-02637-0
[18]
B. D. Tapley, S. Bettadpur, M. Watkins, and C. Reigber. 2004. The gravity recovery and climate experiment: Mission overview and early results. Geophysical Research Letters 31, L09607 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1029/2004gl019920
[19]
I. Velicogna and J. Wahr. 2013. Time-variable gravity observations of ice sheet mass balance: Precision and limitations of the GRACE satellite data. Geophysical Research Letters 40, 12 (2013), 3055--3063. https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50527
[20]
Bramha Dutt Vishwakarma, Yann Ziegler, Jonathan L Bamber, and Sam Royston. 2022. Separating GIA signal from surface mass change using GPS and GRACE data. Geophysical Journal International 232, 1 (2022), 537--547. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggac336
[21]
John Wahr, Mery Molenaar, and Frank Bryan. 1998. Time variability of the Earth's gravity field: Hydrological and oceanic effects and their possible detection using GRACE. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 103, B12(1998), 30205--30229. https://doi.org/10.1029/98jb02844
[22]
DeLiang Wang and Jitong Chen. 2018. Supervised Speech Separation Based on Deep Learning: An Overview. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing 26, 10 (2018), 1702--1726. https://doi.org/10.1109/TASLP.2018.2842159
[23]
Carl Wunsch and Detlef Stammer. 1997. Atmospheric loading and the oceanic "inverted barometer" effect. Reviews of Geophysics 35, 1 (1997), 79--107. https://doi.org/10.1029/96rg03037
[24]
Yann Ziegler, Bramha Dutt Vishwakarma, Aoibheann Brady, Stephen Chuter, Sam Royston, Richard M Westaway, and Jonathan L Bamber. 2022. Can GPS and GRACE data be used to separate past and present-day surface loading in a data-driven approach? Geophysical Journal International 232, 2 (2022), 884--901. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggac365

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
GeoAI '23: Proceedings of the 6th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Workshop on AI for Geographic Knowledge Discovery
November 2023
135 pages
ISBN:9798400703485
DOI:10.1145/3615886
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 20 November 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. neural networks
  2. satellite gravimetry
  3. signal separation
  4. spatial-temporal data

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Funding Sources

Conference

SIGSPATIAL '23
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 17 of 25 submissions, 68%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 41
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)41
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 18 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media