Effect of Context on Smartphone Users’ Typing Performance in the Wild
Article No.: 36, Pages 1 - 44
Abstract
Smartphones play a crucial role in daily activities, however, situationally-induced impairments and disabilities (SIIDs) can easily be experienced depending on the context. Previous studies explored the effect of context but mainly done in controlled environments with limited research done in the wild. In this article, we present an in-situ remote user study with 48 participants’ keyboard interaction on smartphones including the performance and context details. We first propose an automated approach for error detection by combining approaches introduced in the literature and with a follow-up study, show that the accuracy of error detection is improved. We then investigate the effect of context on the typing performance based on five dimensions: environment, mobility, social, multitasking, and distraction, and reveal that the context affects participants’ error rate significantly but with individual differences. Our main contribution is providing empirical evidence with an in-situ study showing the effect of context on error rate.
References
[1]
Md Sabbir Ahmed, Rahat Jahangir Rony, and Nova Ahmed. 2021. Identifying high and low academic result holders through smartphone usage data. In Proceedings of the Asian CHI Symposium 2021. ACM, New York, NY, 114–121. DOI:
[2]
Elgin Akpinar, Yeliz Yeşilada, and Selim Temizer. 2020. The effect of context on small screen and wearable device users’ performance - a systematic review. ACM Computing Surveys 53, 3, Article 52 (May 2020), 44 pages.
[3]
Ahmet Afşın Akın and Mehmet Dündar Akın. 2007. Zemberek, an open source NLP framework for Turkic Languages. Structure 10, 2007 (2007), 1–5.
[4]
Ahmed Sabbir Arif and Wolfgang Stuerzlinger. 2010. Predicting the cost of error correction in character-based text entry technologies. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, 5–14.
[5]
Ahmet Arslan. 2016. DeASCIIfication approach to handle diacritics in Turkish information retrieval. Information Processing and Management: An International Journal 52, 2 (March 2016), 326–339.
[6]
Leon Barnard, Ji Soo Yi, Julie A. Jacko, and Andrew Sears. 2005. An empirical comparison of use-in-motion evaluation scenarios for mobile computing devices. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 62, 4 (April 2005), 487–520.
[7]
Leon Barnard, Ji Soo Yi, Julie A. Jacko, and Andrew Sears. 2007. Capturing the effects of context on human performance in mobile computing systems. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 11, 2 (Jan. 2007), 81–96.
[8]
Agathe Battestini, Vidya Setlur, and Timothy Sohn. 2010. A large scale study of text-messaging use. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services. ACM, New York, NY, 229–238.
[9]
P. Biswas, P. M. Langdon, J. Umadikar, S. Kittusami, and S. Prashant. 2014. How interface adaptation for physical impairment can help able bodied users in situational impairment. In Inclusive Designing. P. M. Langdon, J. Lazar, A. Heylighen, and H. Dong (Eds.), Springer International Publishing, Cham, 49–58.
[10]
Matthias Böhmer, Brent Hecht, Johannes Schöning, Antonio Krüger, and Gernot Bauer. 2011. Falling asleep with Angry Birds, Facebook and Kindle: A large scale study on mobile application usage. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services. ACM, New York, NY, 47–56.
[11]
Peter Bruce, Andrew Bruce, and Peter Gedeck. 2020. Practical Statistics for Data Scientists: 50+ Essential Concepts Using R and Python. O’Reilly Media, Incorporated, Sebastopol, CA, 11–11.
[12]
Sau Kwan Chan, Ben He, and Iadh Ounis. 2005. An in-depth study of the automatic detection and correction of spelling mistakes. In Proceedings of the 5th Dutch-Belgian Information Retrieval Workshop. Utrecht University, Utrecht, 71–81.
[13]
Tianyi Chen, Yeliz Yesilada, and Simon Harper. 2010. What input errors do you experience? Typing and pointing errors of mobile Web users. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 68, 3 (2010), 138–157.
[14]
M. Choudhury, Rahul Saraf, Vijit Jain, Animesh Mukherjee, Sudeshna Sarkar, and Anupam Basu. 2007. Investigation and modeling of the structure of texting language. International Journal on Document Analysis and Recognition 10, 3–4 (2007), 157–174.
[15]
James Clawson, Thad Starner, Daniel Kohlsdorf, David P. Quigley, and Scott Gilliland. 2014. Texting while walking: An evaluation of mini-qwerty text input while on-the-go. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices & Services. ACM, New York, NY, 339–348.
[16]
Murray Crease, Jo Lumsden, and Bob Longworth. 2007. A technique for incorporating dynamic paths in lab-based mobile evaluations. In Proceedings of the 21st British HCI Group Annual Conference on People and Computers: HCI…But Not As We Know It. Vol. 1, British Computer Society, Swinton, 99–108.
[17]
Liwei Dai, Andrew Sears, and Rich Goldman. 2009. Shifting the focus from accuracy to recallability: A study of informal note-taking on mobile information technologies. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 16, 1, Article 4 (April 2009), 46 pages.
[18]
Anind K. Dey, Gregory D. Abowd, and Daniel Salber. 2001. A conceptual framework and a toolkit for supporting the rapid prototyping of context-aware applications. Human–Computer Interaction 16, 2 (Dec. 2001), 97–166.
[19]
Ivor Durham, David A. Lamb, and James B. Saxe. 1983. Spelling correction in user interfaces. Communications of the ACM 26, 10 (Oct. 1983), 764–773.
[20]
Gülşen Eryiğit and Dilara Torunoğlu-Selamet. 2017. Social media text normalization for Turkish. Natural Language Engineering 23, 6 (2017), 835–875.
[21]
Abigail Evans and Jacob Wobbrock. 2012. Taming wild behavior: The input observer for obtaining text entry and mouse pointing measures from everyday computer use. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, 1947–1956.
[22]
Jody A. Feld and Prudence Plummer. 2019. Visual scanning behavior during distracted walking in healthy young adults. Gait & Posture 67 (2019), 219–223. https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/gait-and-posture/vol/67/suppl/C.
[23]
Denzil Ferreira, Vassilis Kostakos, and Anind K. Dey. 2015. AWARE: Mobile context instrumentation framework. Frontiers in ICT 2 (2015), 6. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/ict/volumes.
[24]
Daniel Fitton, I. Scott MacKenzie, Janet C. Read, and Matthew Horton. 2013. Exploring tilt-based text input for mobile devices with teenagers. In Proceedings of the 27th International BCS Human Computer Interaction Conference. British Computer Society, Swinton, Article 25, 6 pages.
[25]
Flora-Jean Forbes and E. Buchanan. 2019. “Textisms”: The comfort of the recipient. Psychology of Popular Media Culture 8, 4 (2019), 358–364.
[26]
Mayank Goel, Leah Findlater, and Jacob Wobbrock. 2012. WalkType: Using accelerometer data to accomodate situational impairments in mobile touch screen text entry. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, 2687–2696.
[27]
Mayank Goel, Alex Jansen, Travis Mandel, Shwetak N. Patel, and Jacob O. Wobbrock. 2013. ContextType: Using hand posture information to improve mobile touch screen text entry. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, 2795–2798.
[28]
Jorge Goncalves, Zhanna Sarsenbayeva, Niels van Berkel, Chu Luo, Simo Hosio, Sirkka Risanen, Hannu Rintamäki, and Vassilis Kostakos. 2017. Tapping task performance on smartphones in cold temperature. Interacting with Computers 29, 3 (2017), 355–367.
[29]
Kristen K. Greene, Melissa A. Gallagher, Brian C. Stanton, and Paul Y. Lee. 2014. I Can’t type that! P@$$w0rd entry on mobile devices. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Human Aspects of Information Security, Privacy, and Trust. Vol. 8533, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 160–171.
[30]
GSMArena. 2000. GSMArena.com - Mobile Phone Reviews, News, Specifications and More…Retrieved from https://www.gsmarena.com/. Accessed 29 June 2022.
[31]
Bo Han and Timothy Baldwin. 2011. Lexical normalisation of short text messages: Makn sens a #twitter. In Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. Vol. 1, Association for Computational Linguistics, 368–378.
[32]
James Head, Paul N. Russell, Martin J. Dorahy, Ewald Neumann, and William S. Helton. 2012. Text-speak processing and the sustained attention to response task. Experimental Brain Research 216, 1 (01 Jan 2012), 103–111. DOI:
[33]
Eve Hoggan, Stephen A. Brewster, and Jody Johnston. 2008. Investigating the effectiveness of tactile feedback for mobile touchscreens. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, 1573–1582.
[34]
Sara H. Hsieh and Timmy H. Tseng. 2017. Playfulness in mobile instant messaging: Examining the influence of emoticons and text messaging on social interaction. Computers in Human Behavior 69, C (2017), 405–414.
[35]
Mohit Jain and Ravin Balakrishnan. 2012. User learning and performance with bezel menus. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, 2221–2230.
[36]
Shaun K. Kane, Jacob O. Wobbrock, and Ian E. Smith. 2008. Getting off the treadmill: Evaluating walking user interfaces for mobile devices in public spaces. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services. ACM, New York, NY, 109–118.
[37]
Asiye Tuba Koksal, Ozge Bozal, Emre Yürekli, and Gizem Gezici. 2020. #Turki$hTweets: A benchmark dataset for Turkish text correction. In Findings of the ACL: (EMNLP’20), Trevor Cohn, Yulan He, and Yang Liu (Eds.). ACL, Online, 4190–4198. https://aclanthology.org/volumes/2020.findings-emnlp/.
[38]
Andreas Komninos, Mark Dunlop, Kyriakos Katsaris, and John Garofalakis. 2018. A glimpse of mobile text entry errors and corrective behaviour in the wild. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services Adjunct. ACM, New York, NY, 221–228.
[39]
Reed Larson and Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi. 2014. The Experience Sampling Method. Springer, Dordrecht, 21–34. DOI:
[40]
Min Lin, Rich Goldman, Kathleen J. Price, Andrew Sears, and Julie Jacko. 2007. How do people tap when walking? An empirical investigation of nomadic data entry. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 65, 9 (Sept. 2007), 759–769.
[41]
Fiona Lyddy, Francesca Farina, James Hanney, Lynn Farrell, and Niamh Kelly O’Neill. 2014. An analysis of language in university students’ text messages. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 19, 3 (2014), 546–561.
[42]
Sachi Mizobuchi, Mark Chignell, and David Newton. 2005. Mobile text entry: Relationship between walking speed and text input task difficulty. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices & Services. ACM, New York, NY, 122–128.
[43]
Matthew A. Napierala. 2012. What is the Bonferroni Correction? AAOS Now - American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Retrieved from https://www.aaos.org/aaosnow/2012/apr/research/research7/. Accessed 29 June 2022.
[44]
László Németh. 2016. Hunspell. Retrieved October 2, 2021 from http://hunspell.github.io/.
[45]
Alexander Ng, Stephen Brewster, and Andrew Crossan. 2011. The Effects of Encumbrance on Mobile Gesture Interactions. MobileHCI'11.
[46]
Alexander Ng, Stephen A. Brewster, and John Williamson. 2013. The impact of encumbrance on mobile interactions. In Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2013. Paula Kotzé, Gary Marsden, Gitte Lindgaard, Janet Wesson, and Marco Winckler (Eds.), Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, 92–109.
[47]
Alexander Ng, Stephen A. Brewster, and John H. Williamson. 2014. Investigating the effects of encumbrance on one- and two- handed interactions with mobile devices. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, 1981–1990.
[48]
Alexander Ng, John H. Williamson, and Stephen A. Brewster. 2014. Comparing evaluation methods for encumbrance and walking on interaction with touchscreen mobile devices. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices & Services. ACM, New York, NY, 23–32.
[49]
Hugo Nicolau, Tiago Guerreiro, David Lucas, and Joaquim Jorge. 2014. Mobile text-entry and visual demands: Reusing and optimizing current solutions. Universal Access in the Information Society 13, 3 (01 Aug 2014), 291–301.
[50]
Hugo Nicolau and Joaquim Jorge. 2012. Touch typing using thumbs: Understanding the effect of mobility and hand posture. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, 2683–2686.
[51]
Hugo Nicolau, Kyle Montague, Tiago Guerreiro, André Rodrigues, and Vicki L. Hanson. 2017. Investigating laboratory and everyday typing performance of blind users. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing 10, 1, Article 4 (March 2017), 26 pages.
[52]
Antti Oulasvirta, Sakari Tamminen, Virpi Roto, and Jaana Kuorelahti. 2005. Interaction in 4-second bursts: The fragmented nature of attentional resources in mobile HCI. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, 919–928.
[53]
Kseniia Palin, Anna Maria Feit, Sunjun Kim, Per Ola Kristensson, and Antti Oulasvirta. 2019. How do people type on mobile devices? Observations from a study with 37,000 volunteers. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services. ACM, New York, NY, Article 9, 12 pages.
[54]
Prudence Plummer, Sarah Apple, Colleen Dowd, and Eliza Keith. 2015. Texting and walking: Effect of environmental setting and task prioritization on dual-task interference in healthy young adults. Gait & Posture 41, 1 (2015), 46–51.
[55]
Shyam Reyal, Shumin Zhai, and Per Ola Kristensson. 2015. Performance and user experience of touchscreen and gesture keyboards in a lab setting and in the wild. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, 679–688.
[56]
André Rodrigues, Hugo Nicolau, André Santos, Diogo Branco, Jay Rainey, David Verweij, Jan David Smeddinck, Kyle Montague, and Tiago Guerreiro. 2022. Investigating the tradeoffs of everyday text-entry collection methods. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, Article 378, 15 pages. DOI:
[57]
Larry D. Rosen, Jennifer Chang, Lynne Erwin, L. Mark Carrier, and Nancy A. Cheever. 2010. The relationship between “Textisms” and formal and informal writing among young adults. Communication Research 37, 3 (2010), 420–440.
[58]
Zhanna Sarsenbayeva, Jorge Goncalves, Juan García, Simon Klakegg, Sirkka Rissanen, Hannu Rintamäki, Jari Hannu, and Vassilis Kostakos. 2016. Situational impairments to mobile interaction in cold environments. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing. ACM, New York, NY, 85–96.
[59]
Zhanna Sarsenbayeva, Niels van Berkel, Danula Hettiachchi, Weiwei Jiang, Tilman Dingler, Eduardo Velloso, Vassilis Kostakos, and Jorge Goncalves. 2019. Measuring the effects of stress on mobile interaction. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 3, 1, Article 24 (March 2019), 18 pages.
[60]
Zhanna Sarsenbayeva, Niels van Berkel, Weiwei Jiang, Danula Hettiachchi, Vassilis Kostakos, and Jorge Goncalves. 2019. Effect of ambient light on mobile interaction. In Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2019. David Lamas, Fernando Loizides, Lennart Nacke, Helen Petrie, Marco Winckler, and Panayiotis Zaphiris (Eds.), Springer International Publishing, Cham, 465–475.
[61]
Zhanna Sarsenbayeva, Niels van Berkel, Eduardo Velloso, Vassilis Kostakos, and Jorge Goncalves. 2018. Effect of distinct ambient noise types on mobile interaction. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 2, 2, Article 82 (July 2018), 23 pages.
[62]
Zhanna Sarsenbayeva, Niels van Berkel, Aku Visuri, Sirkka Rissanen, Hannu Rintamaki, Vassilis Kostakos, and Jorge Goncalves. 2017. Sensing cold-induced situational impairments in mobile interaction using battery temperature. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 1, 3, Article 98 (Sept. 2017), 9 pages.
[63]
Bilge Say, Deniz Zeyrek, Kemal Oflazer, and Umut özge. 2004. Development of a corpus and a treebank for present-day written Turkish, (proceedings of the eleventh international conference of turkish linguistics, August, 2002). In Current Research in Turkish Lingustics. Kamile İmer and Gürkan Doğan (Eds.), Eastern Mediterranean University Press, Famagusta, North Cyprus, 183–192.
[64]
Richard Schlögl, Christoph Wimmer, and Thomas Grechenig. 2019. Hyper typer: A serious game for measuring mobile text entry performance in the wild. In Proceedings of the Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, 1–6.
[65]
A. Sears, M. Lin, J. Jacko, and Y Xiao. 2003. When computers fade … pervasive computing and situationally-induced impairments and disabilities. In Proceedings of the HCII 2003. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, 1298–1302.
[66]
Andrew Sears and Mark Young. 2003. Physical disabilities and computing technologies: An analysis of impairments. In The Human-Computer Interaction Handbook. Julie A. Jacko and Andrew Sears (Eds.), L. Erlbaum Associates Inc., Hillsdale, NJ, 482–503.
[67]
R. William Soukoreff and I. Scott MacKenzie. 2003. Metrics for text entry research: An evaluation of MSD and KSPC, and a new unified error metric. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, 113–120.
[68]
L. Venkata Subramaniam, Shourya Roy, Tanveer A. Faruquie, and Sumit Negi. 2009. A survey of types of text noise and techniques to handle noisy text. In Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Analytics for Noisy Unstructured Text Data. ACM, New York, NY, 115–122.
[69]
Garreth W. Tigwell, David R. Flatla, and Rachel Menzies. 2018. It’s not just the light: Understanding the factors causing situational visual impairments during mobile interaction. In Proceedings of the 10th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. ACM, New York, NY, 338–351. DOI:
[70]
Dilara Torunoǧlu and Gülşen Eryiǧit. 2014. A cascaded approach for social media text normalization of Turkish. In Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Language Analysis for Social Media. ACL, Gothenburg, 62–70.
[71]
Eve Sarah Troll, Malte Friese, and David D. Loschelder. 2021. How students’ self-control and smartphone-use explain their academic performance. Computers in Human Behavior 117 (2021), 106624. https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/computers-in-human-behavior/vol/117/suppl/C.
[72]
Alaettin Ucan, Behzad Naderalvojoud, Ebru Akcapinar Sezer, and Hayri Sever. 2016. SentiWordNet for new language: Automatic translation approach. In Proceedings of the 2016 12th International Conference on Signal-Image Technology Internet-Based Systems. IEEE, Washington, DC, 308–315. DOI:
[73]
Niels van Berkel, Denzil Ferreira, and Vassilis Kostakos. 2017. The experience sampling method on mobile devices. ACM Computing Surveys 50, 6, Article 93 (Dec. 2017), 40 pages. DOI:
[74]
Connie Varnhagen, G. Peggy McFall, Nicole Pugh, Lisa Zederayko(Routledge), Heather Sumida-MacDonald, and Trudy Kwong. 2010. Lol: New language and spelling in instant messaging. Reading and Writing 23, 6 (07 2010), 719–733.
[75]
Steven R. Wilson, Walid Magdy, Barbara McGillivray, and Gareth Tyson. 2020. Analyzing temporal relationships between trending terms on Twitter and urban dictionary activity. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM Conference on Web Science. ACM, New York, NY, 155–163. DOI:
[76]
Christoph Wimmer, Richard Schlögl, Karin Kappel, and Thomas Grechenig. 2019. Measuring mobile text entry performance and behaviour in the wild with a serious game. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia. ACM, New York, NY, Article 8, 11 pages.
[77]
Jacob Wobbrock. 2007. Measures of text entry performance. In Text Entry Systems. Kumiko Tanaka-Ishii and I. Scott MacKenzie (Eds.), Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, Chapter 3, 47–74.
[78]
Jacob O. Wobbrock. 2019. Situationally aware mobile devices for overcoming situational impairments. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Symposium on Engineering Interactive Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, Article 1, 18 pages.
[79]
Jacob O. Wobbrock, Shaun K. Kane, Krzysztof Z. Gajos, Susumu Harada, and Jon Froehlich. 2011. Ability-based design: Concept, principles and examples. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing 3, 3, Article 9 (April 2011), 27 pages.
[80]
Jacob O. Wobbrock and Brad A. Myers. 2006. Analyzing the input stream for character- level errors in unconstrained text entry evaluations. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 13, 4 (dec 2006), 458–489. DOI:
[81]
Wilson Wong, Wei Liu, and Mohammed Bennamoun. 2006. Integrated scoring for spelling error correction, abbreviation expansion and case restoration in dirty text. In Proceedings of the 5th Australasian Conference on Data Mining and Analystics. Vol. 61. Australian Computer Society, Inc., AUS, 83–89.
[82]
Yeliz Yesilada, Simon Harper, Tianyi Chen, and Shari Trewin. 2010. Small-device users situationally impaired by input. Computers in Human Behavior 26, 3 (2010), 427–435.
[83]
Savas Yildirim and T. Yildiz. 2015. An unsupervised text normalization architecture for Turkish language. Research in Computing Science 90, 1 (2015), 183–194.
[84]
Mingrui Ray Zhang, He Wen, and Jacob O. Wobbrock. 2019. Type, then correct: Intelligent text correction techniques for mobile text entry using neural networks. In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. ACM, New York, NY, 843–855.
[85]
Mingrui Ray Zhang and Jacob O. Wobbrock. 2019. Beyond the input stream: Making text entry evaluations more flexible with transcription sequences. In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. ACM, New York, NY, 831–842. DOI:
[86]
Gökhan Şeker and Gülşen Eryiğit. 2017. Extending a CRF-based named entity recognition model for Turkish well formed text and user generated content1. Semantic Web 8, 5 (01 2017), 1–18.
Index Terms
- Effect of Context on Smartphone Users’ Typing Performance in the Wild
Recommendations
Smartphone Energy Drain in the Wild: Analysis and Implications
SIGMETRICS '15: Proceedings of the 2015 ACM SIGMETRICS International Conference on Measurement and Modeling of Computer SystemsThe limited battery life of modern smartphones remains a leading factor adversely affecting the mobile experience of millions of smartphone users. In order to extend battery life, it is critical to understand where and how is energy drain happening on ...
Detecting repackaged smartphone applications in third-party android marketplaces
CODASPY '12: Proceedings of the second ACM conference on Data and Application Security and PrivacyRecent years have witnessed incredible popularity and adoption of smartphones and mobile devices, which is accompanied by large amount and wide variety of feature-rich smartphone applications. These smartphone applications (or apps), typically organized ...
Smartphone Notifications in Context: a Case Study on Receptivity by the Example of an Advertising Service
CHI EA '16: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing SystemsNotifications on smartphones are ubiquitous; they are providing a broad range of information, from rather technical (e.g. app updates) to interpersonal (e.g. a message from a friend). The disruptive nature poses the challenge of finding opportune ...
Comments
Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
June 2023
544 pages
ISSN:1073-0516
EISSN:1557-7325
DOI:10.1145/3604411
- Editors:
- Kristina Höök,
- Kasper Hornbæk
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 10 June 2023
Online AM: 20 December 2022
Accepted: 21 November 2022
Revised: 01 November 2022
Received: 25 January 2022
Published in TOCHI Volume 30, Issue 3
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 2,974Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)1,059
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)133
Reflects downloads up to 30 Dec 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
Cited By
View allView Options
View options
View or Download as a PDF file.
PDFeReader
View online with eReader.
eReaderFull Text
View this article in Full Text.
Full TextLogin options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in