Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3319008.3319357acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageseaseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Experiences of studying Attention through EEG in the Context of Review Tasks

Published: 15 April 2019 Publication History

Abstract

Context: Electroencephalograms (EEG) have been used in a few cases in the context of software engineering (SE). EEGs allow capturing emotions and cognitive functioning. Such human factors have already shown to be important to understand software engineering tasks. Therefore, it is essential to gain experience in the community to utilize EEG as a research tool. Objective: To report experiences of using EEG in the context of a software engineering education (review of master theses proposals). We provide our reflections and lessons learned of (1) how to plan an EEG study, (2) how to conduct and execute (e.g., tools), (3) how to analyze. Method: We carried out an experiment using an EEG headset to measure the participants' attention rate. The experiment task includes reviewing three master thesis project plans. Results: We describe how we evolved our understanding of experimentation practices to collect and analyze psychological and cognitive data. We also provide a set of lessons learned regarding the application of EEG technology for research. Conclusions: We believe that that EEG could benefit software engineering research to collect cognitive information under certain conditions. The lessons learned reported here should be used as inputs for future experiments in software engineering, where human aspects are of interest.

References

[1]
Per Lenberg, Robert Feldt, and Lars Göran Wallgren. Behavioral software engineering: A definition and systematic literature review. Journal of Systems and software, 107:15--37, 2015.
[2]
Daniel Graziotin, Xiaofeng Wang, and Pekka Abrahamsson. Understanding the affect of developers: theoretical background and guidelines for psychoempirical software engineering. In Proceedings of the 7th International Workshop on Social Software Engineering, pages 25--32. ACM, 2015.
[3]
Timothy A Judge, Daniel Heller, and Michael K Mount. Five-factor model of personality and job satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of applied psychology, 87(3):530, 2002.
[4]
Daniel Graziotin, Xiaofeng Wang, and Pekka Abrahamsson. Do feelings matter? on the correlation of affects and the self-assessed productivity in software engineering. Journal of Software: Evolution and Process, 27(7):467--487, 2015.
[5]
Ning-Han Liu, Cheng-Yu Chiang, and Hsuan-Chin Chu. Recognizing the degree of human attention using eeg signals from mobile sensors. Sensors, 13(8):10273--10286, 2013.
[6]
Thomas Fritz, Andrew Begel, Sebastian C Müller, Serap Yigit-Elliott, and Manuela Züger. Using psycho-physiological measures to assess task difficulty in software development. In Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Software Engineering, pages 402--413. ACM, 2014.
[7]
Xiyuan Hou, Fitri Trapsilawati, Yisi Liu, Olga Sourina, Chun-Hsien Chen, Wolfgang Mueller-Wittig, and Wei Tech Ang. Eeg-based human factors evaluation of conflict resolution aid and tactile user interface in future air traffic control systems. In Advances in Human Aspects of Transportation, pages 885--897. Springer, 2017.
[8]
Makrina Viola Kosti, Kostas Georgiadis, Dimitrios A Adamos, Nikos Laskaris, Diomidis Spinellis, and Lefteris Angelis. Towards an affordable brain computer interface for the assessment of programmersâĂŹ mental workload. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 115:52--66, 2018.
[9]
Janet Siegmund, Christian Kästner, Sven Apel, Chris Parnin, Anja Bethmann, Thomas Leich, Gunter Saake, and André Brechmann. Understanding understanding source code with functional magnetic resonance imaging. In Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Software Engineering, pages 378--389. ACM, 2014.
[10]
Oliver Karras, Alexandra Risch, and Kurt Schneider. Interrelating use cases and associated requirements by links: An eye tracking study on the impact of different linking variants on the reading behavior. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering 2018, pages 2--12. ACM, 2018.
[11]
Luis Fernández-Sanz and Sanjay Misra. Influence of human factors in software quality and productivity. In International Conference on Computational Science and Its Applications, pages 257--269. Springer, 2011.
[12]
Kazuhiro Esaki, Shigeru Yamada, Muneo Takahashi, and Keisuke Hihara. A quality engineering approach to human factors affecting software reliability in design process. Electronics and Communications in Japan (Part III: Fundamental Electronic Science), 85(3):33--42, 2002.
[13]
Robert Feldt, Richard Torkar, Lefteris Angelis, and Maria Samuelsson. Towards individualized software engineering: empirical studies should collect psychometrics. In Proceedings of the 2008 international workshop on Cooperative and human aspects of software engineering, pages 49--52. ACM, 2008.
[14]
Agata Kołakowska, Agnieszka Landowska, Mariusz Szwoch, Wioleta Szwoch, and Michał R Wróbel. Emotion recognition and its application in software engineering. In Human System Interaction (HSI), 2013 The 6th International Conference on, pages 532--539. IEEE, 2013.
[15]
Iftikhar Ahmed Khan, Willem-Paul Brinkman, and Robert M Hierons. Do moods affect programmers' debug performance? Cognition, Technology & Work, 13(4): 245--258, 2011.
[16]
Kia Nobre. The Oxford handbook of attention. Oxford University Press, 2014.
[17]
Vanessa Hill. Attention wars: Season 1, 2018. URL https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLQwg0PxpUPlqyRdl_93W4oLLfCW4GAGB-.
[18]
Alexandra Fountaine and Bonita Sharif. Emotional awareness in software development: Theory and measurement. In 2017 IEEE/ACM 2nd International Workshop on Emotion Awareness in Software Engineering (SEmotion), pages 28--31. IEEE, 2017.
[19]
Claes Wohlin, Per Runeson, Martin Höst, Magnus C Ohlsson, Björn Regnell, and Anders Wesslén. Experimentation in software engineering. Springer Science & Business Media, 2012.
[20]
Joshua I Ekandem, Timothy A Davis, Ignacio Alvarez, Melva T James, and Juan E Gilbert. Evaluating the ergonomics of bci devices for research and experimentation. Ergonomics, 55(5):592--598, 2012.
[21]
Robert Lievesley, Martin Wozencroft, and David Ewins. The emotiv epoc neuroheadset: an inexpensive method of controlling assistive technologies using facial expressions and thoughts? Journal of Assistive Technologies, 5(2):67--82, 2011.
[22]
NeuroSky Inc. Mindwave user guide. Technical report, 2011.
[23]
R Robbins and M Stonehill. Investigating the neurosky mindwaveâĎć eeg headset. Transport Research Foundation, 1(28), 2014.
[24]
Daniel Graziotin. Towards a theory of affect and software developers' performance. arXiv preprint arXiv:1601.05330, 2016.
[25]
Adam R Clarke, Robert J Barry, Rory McCarthy, and Mark Selikowitz. Eeg analysis of children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and comorbid reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35(3):276--285, 2002.
[26]
Troy Janzen, Ken Graap, Stephan Stephanson, Wilma Marshall, and George Fitzsimmons. Differences in baseline eeg measures for add and normally achieving preadolescent males. Biofeedback and self-regulation, 20(1):65--82, 1995.
[27]
Pavlo Antonenko, Fred Paas, Roland Grabner, and Tamara Van Gog. Using electroencephalography to measure cognitive load. Educational Psychology Review, 22(4):425--438, 2010.
[28]
Risto Näätänen. Attention and brain function. Psychology Press, 1992.
[29]
Nilli Lavie, Aleksandra Hirst, Jan W De Fockert, and Essi Viding. Load theory of selective attention and cognitive control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133(3):339, 2004.
[30]
Alan Gevins, Michael E Smith, Linda McEvoy, and Daphne Yu. High-resolution eeg mapping of cortical activation related to working memory: effects of task difficulty, type of processing, and practice. Cerebral cortex, 7(4):374--385, 1997.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Measuring User Experience of Adaptive User Interfaces using EEG: A Replication StudyProceedings of the 27th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering10.1145/3593434.3593452(52-61)Online publication date: 14-Jun-2023
  • (2022)Intelligent Biofeedback Comprehension Assessment: Theory, Research, and Tools2022 IEEE 21st Mediterranean Electrotechnical Conference (MELECON)10.1109/MELECON53508.2022.9843030(414-419)Online publication date: 14-Jun-2022

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
EASE '19: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering
April 2019
345 pages
ISBN:9781450371452
DOI:10.1145/3319008
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

In-Cooperation

  • IT University of Copenhagen

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 15 April 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Electroencephalogram
  2. attention
  3. experiment
  4. human subjects

Qualifiers

  • Short-paper
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

EASE '19

Acceptance Rates

EASE '19 Paper Acceptance Rate 20 of 73 submissions, 27%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 71 of 232 submissions, 31%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)17
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4
Reflects downloads up to 13 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Measuring User Experience of Adaptive User Interfaces using EEG: A Replication StudyProceedings of the 27th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering10.1145/3593434.3593452(52-61)Online publication date: 14-Jun-2023
  • (2022)Intelligent Biofeedback Comprehension Assessment: Theory, Research, and Tools2022 IEEE 21st Mediterranean Electrotechnical Conference (MELECON)10.1109/MELECON53508.2022.9843030(414-419)Online publication date: 14-Jun-2022

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media