research-article

Computational thinking as an emergent learning trajectory of mathematics

Authors:

Tiina Partanen,

Petri IhantolaAuthors Info & Claims

Koli Calling '17: Proceedings of the 17th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research

Pages 70 - 79

https://doi.org/10.1145/3141880.3141885

Published: 16 November 2017 Publication History

Abstract

In the 21st century, the skills of computational thinking complement those of traditional math teaching. In order to gain the knowledge required to teach these skills, a cohort of math teachers participated in an in-service training scheme conducted as a massive open online course (MOOC). This paper analyses the success of this training scheme and uses the results of the study to focus on the skills of computational thinking, and to explore how math teachers expect to integrate computing into the K-12 math syllabus. The coursework and feedback from the MOOC course indicate that they readily associate computational thinking with problem solving in math. In addition, some of the teachers are inspired by the new opportunities to be creative in their teaching. However, the set of programming concepts they refer to in their essays is insubstantial and unfocused, so these concepts are consolidated here to form a hypothetical learning trajectory for computational thinking.

References

[1]

ACM&IEEE. 2013. Computer Science Curricula 2013: Curriculum Guidelines for Undergraduate Degree Programs in Computer Science, December 20, 2013. Technical Report. http://www.acm.org/education/CS2013-final-report.pdf

[2]

Fernando Alegre and Juana Moreno. 2015. Haskell in Middle and High School Mathematics, Vol. 1.

[3]

A. Balanskat and K. Engelhart. 2014. Computing our future: Computer programming and coding-Priorities, school curricula and initiatives across Europe. (2014).

[4]

Paul B. Baltes. 1987. Theoretical propositions of life-span developmental psychology: On the dynamics between growth and decline. Developmental psychology 23, 5 (1987), 611.

[5]

Valerie Barr and Chris Stephenson. 2011. Bringing computational thinking to K-12: what is involved and what is the role of the computer science education community? ACM Inroads 2, 1 (2011), 48--54.

Digital Library

[6]

Jeanne M. Baugh. 2016. Beginning programming - why teach it and how to teach it? Issues in Information Systems 17, 3 (2016).

[7]

T. Berger and C. Frey. 2016. Digitalization, Jobs, and convergence in Europe: strategies for closing the skills gap. (2016).

[8]

Douglas H. Clements, Michael T. Battista, and Julie Sarama. 2001. Logo and geometry. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 10 (2001), i--177.

[9]

CSTA. 2016. Computer science standards. https://www.csteachers.org/resource/resmgr/Docs/Standards/2016StandardsRevision/INTERIM_StandardsFINAL_07222.pdf. (2016).

[10]

J Cuny, L Snyder, and J Wing. 2010. Computational Thinking: A Definition.(in press). (2010).

[11]

M. Felleisen, R. Findler, M. Flatt, and S. Krishnamurthi. 2014. How to Design Programs, Second Edition. MIT-Press. http://www.ccs.neu.edu/home/matthias/HtDP2e/

[12]

Matthias Felleisen and Shriram Krishnamurthi. 2009. Viewpoint Why computer science doesn't matter. Commun. ACM 52, 7 (2009), 37--40.

Digital Library

[13]

Finnish National Board of Education. 2014. Finnish National Curriculum 2014. (2014). http://www.oph.fi/download/163777_perusopetuksen_opetussuunnitelman_perusteet_2014.pdf

[14]

Gerald Futschek. 2006. Algorithmic thinking: the key for understanding computer science. In International Conference on Informatics in Secondary Schools-Evolution and Perspectives. Springer, 159--168.

Digital Library

[15]

Maarit Harsu. 2005. Programming Languages: principles, concepts, selection criteria (in Finnish). http://www.cs.tut.fi/-popl/nykyinen/Ohjelmointikielet-harsu.pdf. (2005).

[16]

Fredrik Heintz, Linda Mannila, and Tommy Färnqvist. 2016. A Review of Models for Introducing Computational Thinking, Computer Science and Computing in K-12 Education. Frontiers in Education (2016).

[17]

David Hemmendinger. 2010. A plea for modesty. ACM Inroads 1, 2 (2010), 4--7.

Digital Library

[18]

House of Commons. 2016. Oral evidence: Digital skills gap. (2016).

[19]

Incheon Declaration. 2015. Education 2030: Towards inclusive and equitable quality education and lifelong learning for all. In World Education Forum.

[20]

R Burke Johnson and Anthony J Onwuegbuzie. 2004. Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational researcher 33, 7 (2004), 14--26.

[21]

Jeremy Kilpatrick. 2012. The new math as an international phenomenon. Zdm 44, 4 (2012), 563--571.

[22]

Simon C Kitto, Janice Chesters, and Carol Grbich. 2008. Quality in qualitative research. Medical journal of Australia 188, 4 (2008), 243.

[23]

James A. Kulik. 1994. Meta-analytic studies of findings on computer-based instruction. Technology assessment in education and training, Vol. 1. Psychology Press, 9--34.

[24]

Irene Lee, Fred Martin, Jill Denner, Bob Coulter, Walter Allan, Jeri Erickson, Joyce Malyn-Smith, and Linda Werner. 2011. Computational thinking for youth in practice. ACM Inroads 2, 1 (2011), 32--37.

Digital Library

[25]

Jane Margolis and Joanna Goode. 2016. Ten Lessons for Computer Science for All. ACM Inroads 7, 4 (2016), 52--56.

Digital Library

[26]

OECD. 2015. Students, Computers and Learning. (2015).

[27]

OECD. 2016. Skills for a Digital World. (Jun 02 2016).

[28]

Seymour Papert. 1980. Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas.

Digital Library

[29]

Seymour Papert. 1996. An exploration in the space of mathematics educations. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning 1, 1 (1996), 95--123.

[30]

T. Partanen, P. Niemelä, L. Mannila, and T. Poranen. 2017. Educating Computer Science Educators Online: A Racket MOOC for Elementary Math Teachers of Finland. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Computer Supported Education, Vol. 1.

[31]

Jean Piaget. 2000. Piaget's theory of cognitive development. Childhood cognitive development: The essential readings (2000), 33--47.

[32]

Peter J. Rich, Keith R. Leatham, and Geoffrey A. Wright. 2013. Convergent cognition. Instructional Science 41, 2 (2013), 431--453.

[33]

J. Sarama and D.H. Clements. 2009. Early Childhood Mathematics Education Research: Learning Trajectories for Young Children. Taylor & Francis.

[34]

Emmanuel Schanzer, Kathi Fisler, Shriram Krishnamurthi, and Matthias Felleisen. 2015. Transferring skills at solving word problems from computing to algebra through Bootstrap. In Proceedings of the 46th ACM Technical symposium on computer science education. ACM, 616--621.

Digital Library

[35]

Emmanuel Tanenbaum Schanzer. 2015. Algebraic Functions, Computer Programming, and the Challenge of Transfer (2015).

[36]

Deborah Seehorn, Stephen Carey, Brian Fuschetto, Irene Lee, Daniel Moix, Dianne O'Grady-Cunniff, Barbara Boucher Owens, Chris Stephenson, and Anita Verno. 2011. CSTA K-12 Computer Science Standards: Revised 2011. (2011).

[37]

Matti Tedre and Peter J. Denning. 2016. The long quest for computational thinking. In Proceedings of the 16th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research. ACM, 120--129.

[38]

Jeannette M. Wing. 2006. Computational thinking. Commun. ACM 49, 3 (2006), 33--35.

Digital Library

[39]

Jeannette M Wing. 2010. Computational Thinking: What and Why? Link Magazine. (2010).

Cited By

Urhan S(2024)The evaluation of computational modelling performance within the context of rationality theory: finding the area between two curvesResearch in Mathematics Education10.1080/14794802.2024.2382459(1-23)Online publication date: 2-Aug-2024
https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2024.2382459
McGill MThigpen LMabie A(2023)Emerging Practices for Integrating Computer Science into Existing K-5 Subjects in the United StatesProceedings of the 18th WiPSCE Conference on Primary and Secondary Computing Education Research10.1145/3605468.3609759(1-10)Online publication date: 27-Sep-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3605468.3609759
Anđić BMumcu FTejera MSchmidthaler ELavicza Z(2023)Unplugging Math: Integrating Computational Thinking into Mathematics Education Through Poly-UniverseSmart Learning Ecosystems as Engines of the Green and Digital Transition10.1007/978-981-99-5540-4_15(247-263)Online publication date: 27-Sep-2023
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-5540-4_15
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Computational thinking as an emergent learning trajectory of mathematics
1. Social and professional topics
  1. Professional topics
    1. Computing and business
      1. Employment issues
    2. Computing education
      1. Computational thinking

Recommendations

Computational thinking in high school courses
SIGCSE '10: Proceedings of the 41st ACM technical symposium on Computer science education

The number of undergraduates entering computer science has declined in recent years. This is paralleled by a drop in the number of high school students taking the CS AP exam and the number of high schools offering computer science courses. The declines ...
Teaching how to teach computational thinking
ITiCSE 2018: Proceedings of the 23rd Annual ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education

Computational Thinking is argued to be an essential skill for the workforce of the 21st century. As a skill, Computational Thinking should be taught in all schools, employing computational ideas integrated into other disciplines. Up until now, questions ...
Computational Thinking in Teacher Education
SIGCSE '20: Proceedings of the 51st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education

Teacher education programs are beginning to acknowledge the important role they play in preparing teachers to support students in the area of STEM, coding, Computational Thinking and robotics. As a result, new courses are being developed that connect ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences

Koli Calling '17: Proceedings of the 17th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research

November 2017

215 pages

ISBN:9781450353014

DOI:10.1145/3141880

Conference Chairs:
Calkin Suero Montero
University of Eastern Finland, Finland
,
Mike Joy
University of Warwick, United Kingdom

Copyright © 2017 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Univ. Eastern Finland: University of Eastern Finland
University of Warwick: University of Warwick
Joensuu University Foundation: Joensuu University Foundation

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 16 November 2017

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Funding Sources

Academy of Finland

Conference

Koli Calling 2017

Sponsor:

Univ. Eastern Finland
University of Warwick
Joensuu University Foundation

Koli Calling 2017: 17th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research

November 16 - 19, 2017

Koli, Finland

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 80 of 182 submissions, 44%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

10
Total Citations
View Citations
432
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)26
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3

Reflects downloads up to 14 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Urhan S(2024)The evaluation of computational modelling performance within the context of rationality theory: finding the area between two curvesResearch in Mathematics Education10.1080/14794802.2024.2382459(1-23)Online publication date: 2-Aug-2024
https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2024.2382459
McGill MThigpen LMabie A(2023)Emerging Practices for Integrating Computer Science into Existing K-5 Subjects in the United StatesProceedings of the 18th WiPSCE Conference on Primary and Secondary Computing Education Research10.1145/3605468.3609759(1-10)Online publication date: 27-Sep-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3605468.3609759
Anđić BMumcu FTejera MSchmidthaler ELavicza Z(2023)Unplugging Math: Integrating Computational Thinking into Mathematics Education Through Poly-UniverseSmart Learning Ecosystems as Engines of the Green and Digital Transition10.1007/978-981-99-5540-4_15(247-263)Online publication date: 27-Sep-2023
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-5540-4_15
Santos JAndrade WBrunet JMelo M(2022)A Systematic Literature Review on Predictive Cognitive Skills in Novice Programming2022 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)10.1109/FIE56618.2022.9962582(1-9)Online publication date: 8-Oct-2022
https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE56618.2022.9962582
Luo TReynolds JMuljana P(2022)Elementary Students Learning Computer Programming: an investigation of their knowledge Retention, Motivation, and perceptionsEducational technology research and development10.1007/s11423-022-10112-0Online publication date: 6-Jul-2022
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-022-10112-0
Urhan S(2022)Using Habermas’ construct of rationality to analyze students’ computational thinking: The case of series and vectorEducation and Information Technologies10.1007/s10639-022-11002-x27:8(10869-10948)Online publication date: 25-Apr-2022
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11002-x
Kite VPark SWiebe E(2021)The Code-Centric Nature of Computational Thinking Education: A Review of Trends and Issues in Computational Thinking Education ResearchSage Open10.1177/2158244021101641811:2Online publication date: 21-May-2021
https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211016418
Kallia Mvan Borkulo SDrijvers PBarendsen ETolboom J(2021)Characterising computational thinking in mathematics education: a literature-informed Delphi studyResearch in Mathematics Education10.1080/14794802.2020.185210423:2(159-187)Online publication date: 28-Jan-2021
https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2020.1852104
Veerasamy ALarsson PApiola MD’Souza DLaakso M(2021)Pedagogical Approaches in Computational Thinking-Integrated STEAM Learning Settings: A Literature ReviewIntelligent Computing10.1007/978-3-030-80129-8_27(369-389)Online publication date: 6-Jul-2021
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80129-8_27
Ng OCui Z(2020)Examining primary students’ mathematical problem-solving in a programming context: towards computationally enhanced mathematics educationZDM10.1007/s11858-020-01200-7Online publication date: 4-Nov-2020
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01200-7

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents