Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
research-article

Based on reputation consistent strategy times promotes cooperation in spatial prisoner’s dilemma game

Published: 01 May 2023 Publication History

Highlights

A novel evolutionary mechanism for based on reputation consistent strategy times is proposed, in which the reputation income of each player is positive or negative related to its consistent strategy times for cooperation or defection at the initial moment of the current time step.
The reward or punishment scheme of the proposed evolutionary mechanism is relatively consistent with the real world understanding of reputation. It’s especially worth pointing out that, when the player’s strategy state changes, the player can get reasonable and timely reward or punishment, which can better promote cooperation compared to existing reputation-based evolutionary mechanisms.
The proposed evolutionary mechanism has the following two advantages in the evolutionary systems. First, the player who has insisted on cooperation for a long time is not inclined to adopt defection. In addition, the player who has long insisted on defection tends to adopt cooperation.
Based on prisoner’s dilemma game (PDG) model, simulation and analysis show that the proposed evolutionary mechanism can better promote cooperation compared to the traditional evolutionary mechanism, and can also speed up the evolutionary process, especially when the reputation factor is large. Furthermore, we also find that the cooperation level enhances when consistent strategy times upper bound becomes larger.

Abstract

As we all know, the reputation has important influence on individual’s decision-making. How to effectively and objectively measure reputation is very important in based-reputation evolutionary game theory. In this paper, a novel evolutionary mechanism for based on reputation consistent strategy times is proposed, in which the reputation income of each player is positive or negative related to its consistent strategy times for cooperation or defection at the initial moment of the current time step. The reward or punishment scheme of the proposed evolutionary mechanism is relatively consistent with the real world understanding of reputation. It’s especially worth pointing out that, when the player’s strategy state changes, the player can get reasonable and timely reward or punishment, which can better promote cooperation compared to existing reputation-based evolutionary mechanisms. Specifically, the proposed evolutionary mechanism has the following two advantages in the evolutionary systems. First, the player who has insisted on cooperation for a long time is not inclined to adopt defection, mainly because the cost of reputation is too high. In addition, the player who has long insisted on defection tends to adopt cooperation. This is mainly because the reputation of the player is easily restored from notoriety to general. Obviously, the above two points can effectively promote cooperation. Based on prisoner’s dilemma game (PDG) model, simulation and analysis also show that the proposed evolutionary mechanism can better promote cooperation compared to the traditional evolutionary mechanism, and can also speed up the evolutionary process, especially when the reputation factor is large. Furthermore, we also find that the cooperation level enhances when consistent strategy times upper bound becomes larger.

References

[1]
C. Darwin, The Origin of Species, Cambridge University Press, 1988.
[2]
B. Zhang, X. An, Y. Dong, Conditional cooperator enhances institutional punishment in public goods game, Appl. Math. Comput. 390 (2021) 125600.
[3]
C. Hauert, S. De Monte, J. Hofbauer, K. Sigmund, Volunteering as red queen mechanism for cooperation in public goods games, Science 296 (2002) 1129–1132.
[4]
F. Santos, M. Santos, J. Pacheco, Social diversity promotes the emergence of cooperation in public goods games, Nature 454 (2008) 213–217.
[5]
A. Hamlin, R. Sugden, The economics of rights, co-operation and welfare, Econ. J. 97 (1987) 387.
[6]
C. Hauert, M. Doebeli, Spatial structure often inhibits the evolution of cooperation in the snowdrift game, Nature 428 (2004) 643–646.
[7]
M. Souza, J. Pacheco, F. Santos, Evolution of cooperation under n-person snowdrift games, J. Theor. Biol. 260 (2009) 581–588.
[8]
J. McNamara, Z. Barta, A. Houston, Variation in behaviour promotes cooperation in the prisoner’s dilemma game, Nature 428 (2004) 745–748.
[9]
A. Pusch, S. Weber, M. Porto, Impact of topology on the dynamical organization of cooperation in the prisoner’s dilemma game, Phys. Rev. E 77 (2008) 036120.
[10]
M. Perc, Z. Wang, Heterogeneous aspirations promote cooperation in the prisoner’s dilemma game, PLoS One 5 (2010) 15117.
[11]
K. Miyaji, J. Tanimoto, A co-evolutionary model combined mixed-strategy and network adaptation by severing disassortative neighbors promotes cooperation in prisoner’s dilemma games, Chaos, Solitons Fractals 143 (2021) 110603.
[12]
Y. Liu, C. Huang, Q. Dai, Preferential section based on strategy persistence and memory promotes cooperation in evolutionary prisoner’s dilemma games, Physica A 499 (2018) 481–489.
[13]
L. Gao, Q. Pan, M. He, Environmental-based defensive promotes cooperation in the prisoner’s dilemma game, Appl. Math. Comput. 401 (2021) 126074.
[14]
A. Szolnoki, Z. Wang, J. Wang, X. Zhu, Dynamically generated cyclic dominance in spatial prisoner’s dilemma games, Phys. Rev. E 82 (2010) 036110.
[15]
M. Nowak, Five rules for the evolution of cooperation, Science 314 (2006) 1560–1563.
[16]
A. Szolnoki, X. Chen, Alliance formation with exclusion in the spatial public goods game, Phys. Rev. E 95 (2017) 052316.
[17]
L. Liu, X. Chen, A. Szolnoki, Competitions between prosocial exclusions and punishments in finite populations, Sci. Rep. 7 (2017) 46634.
[18]
L. Liu, S. Wang, X. Chen, M. Perc, Evolutionary dynamics in the public goods games with switching between punishment and exclusion, Chaos 28 (2018) 103105.
[19]
X. Sui, B. Wu, L. Wang, Rationality alters the rank between peer punishment and social exclusion, EPL 121 (2018) 38003.
[20]
J. Quan, Z. Pu, X. Wang, Comparison of social exclusion and punishment in promoting cooperation: who should play the leading role?, Chaos, Solitons Fractals 151 (2021) 111229.
[21]
D. Helbing, A. Szolnoki, M. Perc, G. Szabo, Defector-accelerated cooperativeness and punishment in public goods games with mutations, Phys. Rev. E 81 (2010) 057104.
[22]
H. Yang, Z. Wu, Z. Rong, Y. Lai, Peer pressure: enhancement of cooperation through multual punishment, Phys. Rev. E 91 (2015) 022121.
[23]
T. Ohdaira, Evolution of cooperation by the introduction of the probabilistic peer-punishment based on the difference of payoff, Sci. Rep. 6 (2016) 25413.
[24]
J. Quan, W. Liu, Y. Chu, X. Wang, Stochastic evolutionary voluntary public goods game with punishment in a quasi-birth-and-death process, Sci. Rep. 7 (2017) 16110.
[25]
Y. Geng, C. Shen, K. Hu, L. Shi, Impact of punishment on the evolution of cooperation in spatial prisoner’s dilemma game, Physica A 503 (2018) 540–545.
[26]
H. Yang, X. Chen, Promoting cooperation by punishing minority, Appl. Math. Comput. 316 (2018) 460–466.
[27]
L. Liu, X. Chen, A. Szolnoki, Evolutionary dynamics of cooperation in a population with probabilistic corrupt enforcers and violators, Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 29 (2019) 2127–2149.
[28]
L. Liu, Z. Xiao, X. Chen, A. Szolnoki, Early exclusion leads to cyclical cooperation in repeated group interactions, J. R. Soc. Interface 19 (2022) 20210755.
[29]
X. Wang, S. Nie, L. Jiang, B. Wang, S. Chen, Role of delay-based reward in the spatial cooperation, Physica A 465 (2017) 153–158.
[30]
Y. Wu, S. Chang, Z. Zhang, Z. Deng, Impact of social reward on the evolution of the cooperation behavior in complex networks, Sci. Rep. 7 (2017) 41076.
[31]
Y. Li, S. Chen, B. Niu, Reward depending on public funds stimulates cooperation in spatial prisoner’s dilemma games, Chaos, Solitions Fractals 114 (2018) 38–45.
[32]
S. Wang, L. Liu, X. Chen, Tax-based pure punishment and reward in the public goods game, Phys. Lett. A 386 (2021) 126965.
[33]
L. Zhang, C. Huang, H. Li, Q. Dai, Aspiration-dependent strategy persistence promotes cooperation in spatial prisoner’s dilemma game, EPL 126 (2019) 18001.
[34]
X. Chen, L. Wang, Promotion of cooperation induced by appropriate payoff aspirations in small-world networked game, Phys. Rev. E 77 (2008) 017103.
[35]
W. Lu, J. Wang, C. Xia, Role of memory effect in the evolution of cooperation based on spatial prisoner’s dilemma game, Phys. Lett. A 382 (2018) 3058–3063.
[36]
J. Zhao, C. Luo, The effect of preferential teaching and memory on cooperation clusters in interdependent networks, Appl. Math. Comput. 363 (2019) 124575.
[37]
J. Wang, R. Wang, F. Yu, Z. Wang, Q. Li, Learning continuous and consistent strategy promotes cooperation in prisoner’s dilemma game with mixed strategy, Appl. Math. Comput. 370 (2020) 124887.
[38]
Y. Gong, S. Liu, Y. Bai, Reputation-based co-evolutionary model promotes cooperation in prisoner’s dilemma game, Phys. Lett. A 384 (2020) 126233.
[39]
Q. Pan, L. Wang, M. He, Social dilemma based on reputation and successive behavior, Appl. Math. Comput. 384 (2020) 125358.
[40]
J. Wang, J. He, F. Yu, Heterogeneity of reputation increment driven by individual influence promotes cooperation in spatial social dilemma, Chaos, Solitons Fractals 146 (2021) 110887.
[41]
H. Zhu, H. Ding, Q. Zhao, Y. Xu, X. Jin, Z. Wang, Reputation-based adjustment of fitness promotes the cooperation under heterogeneous strategy updating rules, Phys. Lett. A 384 (2020) 126882.
[42]
J. He, J. Wang, F. Yu, L. Zheng, Reputation-based strategy persistence promotes cooperation in spatial social dilemma, Phys. Lett. A 384 (2020) 126703.
[43]
Y. Chen, H. Yang, W. Guo, G. Liu, Prisoner’s dilemma game on reputation-based weighted network, Chaos, Solitons Fractals 110 (2018) 64–68.

Index Terms

  1. Based on reputation consistent strategy times promotes cooperation in spatial prisoner’s dilemma game
        Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

        Information & Contributors

        Information

        Published In

        cover image Applied Mathematics and Computation
        Applied Mathematics and Computation  Volume 444, Issue C
        May 2023
        346 pages

        Publisher

        Elsevier Science Inc.

        United States

        Publication History

        Published: 01 May 2023

        Author Tags

        1. Evolutionary mechanism
        2. Reputation
        3. Cooperation
        4. Consistent strategy times
        5. PDG

        Qualifiers

        • Research-article

        Contributors

        Other Metrics

        Bibliometrics & Citations

        Bibliometrics

        Article Metrics

        • 0
          Total Citations
        • 0
          Total Downloads
        • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
        Reflects downloads up to 17 Feb 2025

        Other Metrics

        Citations

        View Options

        View options

        Figures

        Tables

        Media

        Share

        Share

        Share this Publication link

        Share on social media