Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.3233/978-1-61499-672-9-37guideproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesConference Proceedingsacm-pubtype
Article
Free access

Finite unary relations and qualitative constraint satisfaction

Published: 29 August 2016 Publication History

Abstract

Extending qualitative CSPs with the ability of restricting selected variables to finite sets of possible values has been proposed as an important research direction with important applications. Complexity results for this kind of formalisms have appeared in the literature but they focus on concrete examples and not on general principles. We propose three general methods. The first two methods are based on analysing the given CSP from a model-theoretical perspective, while the third method is based on directly analysing the growth of the representation of solutions. We exemplify our methods on temporal and spatial formalisms including Allen's algebra and RCC5.

References

[1]
Libor Barto. The dichotomy for conservative constraint satisfaction problems revisited. In Proc. 26th Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science (LICS-2011), pages 301-310, 2011.
[2]
Libor Barto and Marcin Kozik. Constraint satisfaction problems solvable by local consistency methods. J. ACM, 61(1):3:1-3:19, 2014.
[3]
Manuel Bodirsky and M. Grohe. Non-dichotomies in constraint satisfaction complexity. In Proceedings of the 35th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages and Programming (ICALP-2008), pages 184-196, 2008.
[4]
Manuel Bodirsky and Jan Kára. The complexity of temporal constraint satisfaction problems. J. ACM, 57(2), 2010.
[5]
Manuel Bodirsky. Cores of countably categorical structures. Logical Methods in Computer Science, 3(1):1-16, 2007.
[6]
Manuel Bodirsky and Hubie Chen. Qualitative temporal and spatial reasoning revisited. J. Log. Comput., 19(6):1359-1383, 2009.
[7]
Manuel Bodirsky and Martin Hils. Tractable set constraints. J. Artif. Intell. Res. (JAIR), 45:731-759, 2012.
[8]
Manuel Bodirsky, Michael Pinsker, and Todor Tsankov. Decidability of definability. J. Symb. Log., 78(4):1036-1054, 2013.
[9]
Manuel Bodirsky and Stefan Wölfl. RCC8 is polynomial on networks of bounded treewidth. In Proc. 22nd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-2011), pages 756-761, 2011.
[10]
Andrei Bulatov. Tractable conservative constraint satisfaction problems. In Proceedings of the 18th annual IEEE symposium on logic in computer science, pages 321-???, 2003.
[11]
Andrei Bulatov. Conservative constraint satisfaction re-revisited. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 82(2):347-356, 2016.
[12]
Andrei Bulatov, Peter Jeavons, and Andrei Krokhin. Classifying the computational complexity of constraints using finte algebras. SIAM J. Comput., 34(3):720-742, 2005.
[13]
Andrei A. Bulatov, Andrei A. Krokhin, and Peter G. Jeavons. Classifying the complexity of constraints using finite algebras. SIAM Journal on Computing, 34:720-742, 2005.
[14]
Peter J. Cameron. Oligomorphic permutation groups. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1990.
[15]
Georg Cantor. Über unendliche, lineare Punktmannigfaltigkeiten. Mathematische Annalen, 23:453-488, 1884.
[16]
David Cohen, Peter Jeavons, Peter Jonsson, and Manolis Koubarakis. Building tractable disjunctive constraints. Journal of the ACM, 47(5):826-853, 2000.
[17]
Anthony G. Cohn and Jochen Renz. Qualitative spatial representation and reasoning. In Handbook of Knowledge Representation, pages 551-596. Elsevier, 2008.
[18]
Daniel de Leng and Fredrik Heintz. Qualitative spatio-temporal stream reasoning with unobservable intertemporal spatial relations using landmarks. In Proc. 30th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-2016), pages ...-..., 2016.
[19]
Rina Dechter, Itay Meiri, and Judea Pearl. Temporal constraint networks. Artif. Intell., 49:61-95, 1991.
[20]
Thomas Drakengren and Peter Jonsson. Reasoning about set constraints applied to tractable inference in intuitionistic logic. Journal of Logic and Computation, 8(6):855-875, 1998.
[21]
Ivo Düntsch, Hui Wang, and Stephen McCloskey. A relation-algebraic approach to the region connection calculus. Theor. Comput. Sci., 255(1-2):63-83, 2001.
[22]
Stella Giannakopoulou, Charalampos Nikolaou, and Manolis Koubarakis. A reasoner for the RCC-5 and RCC-8 calculi extended with constants. In Proc. 28th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-2014), pages 2659-2665, 2014.
[23]
Pavol Hell and Jaroslav Nešetřil. Graphs and Homomorphisms. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2004.
[24]
Robin Hirsch. Expressive power and complexity in algebraic logic. Journal of Logic and Computation, 7(3):309-351, 1997.
[25]
Wilfrid Hodges. Model theory. Cambridge University Press, 1993.
[26]
Jinbo Huang. Compactness and its implications for qualitative spatial and temporal reasoning. In Proc. 13th International Conference on Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR-2012), 2012.
[27]
Peter Jeavons. On the algebraic structure of combinatorial problems. Theoretical Computer Science, 200:185-204, 1998.
[28]
Peter Jonsson and Christer Bäckström. A unifying approach to temporal constraint reasoning. Artif. Intell., 102(1):143-155, 1998.
[29]
Peter Jonsson and Thomas Drakengren. A complete classification of tractability in RCC-5. J. Artif. Intell. Res., 6:211-221, 1997.
[30]
Peter Jonsson and Victor Lagerkvist. Upper and lower bounds on the time complexity of infinite-domain CSPs. In Proc. 21st International Conference on Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming (CP-2015), pages 183-199, 2015.
[31]
Markus Junker and Martin Ziegler. The 116 reducts of (ℚ, <, a). J. Symb. Log., 73(3):861-884, 2008.
[32]
Arne Kreutzmann and Diedrich Wolter. Qualitative spatial and temporal reasoning with AND/OR linear programming. In Proc. 21st European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI-2014, pages 495-500, 2014.
[33]
C. Langford. Some theorems on deducibility. Annals of Mathematics, 28:16-40, 1927.
[34]
Sanjiang Li. On topological consistency and realization. Constraints, 11(1):31-51, 2006.
[35]
Sanjiang Li, Weiming Liu, and Sheng-sheng Wang. Qualitative constraint satisfaction problems: An extended framework with landmarks. Artif. Intell., 201:32-58, 2013.
[36]
Sanjiang Li and Mingsheng Ying. Extensionality of the RCC8 composition table. Fundam. Inform., 55(3-4):363-385, 2003.
[37]
Gérard Ligozat and Jochen Renz. What is a qualitative calculus? A general framework. In Proceedings of PRICAI, pages 53-64, 2004.
[38]
Carsten Lutz and Maja Milicic. A tableau algorithm for description logics with concrete domains and general tboxes. J. Autom. Reasoning, 38(1-3):227-259, 2007.
[39]
Dugald Macpherson. A survey of homogeneous structures. Discrete Mathematics, 311(15):1599-1634, 2011.
[40]
Bernhard Nebel and Hans-Jürgen Bürckert. Reasoning about temporal relations: A maximal tractable subclass of Allen's interval algebra. J. ACM, 42(1):43-66, 1995.
[41]
Christos Papadimitriou. On the complexity of integer programming. J. ACM, 28(4):765-768, 1981.
[42]
David A. Randell, Zhan Cui, and Anthony G. Cohn. A spatial logic based on regions and connection. In KR, pages 165-176, 1992.
[43]
Jochen Renz and Bernhard Nebel. On the complexity of qualitative spatial reasoning: A maximal tractable fragment of the region connection calculus. Artif. Intell., 108(1-2):69-123, 1999.
[44]
Michael Sioutis and Manolis Koubarakis. Consistency of chordal RCC-8 networks. In Proc. 24th International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI-2012), pages 436-443, 2012.
[45]
Frank Wolter and Michael Zakharyaschev. Spatio-temporal representation and reasoning based on RCC-8. In A. G. Cohn, F. Giunchiglia, and B. Selman, editors, Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, pages 3-14. Morgan Kaufmann, 2000.

Index Terms

  1. Finite unary relations and qualitative constraint satisfaction

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image Guide Proceedings
    ECAI'16: Proceedings of the Twenty-second European Conference on Artificial Intelligence
    August 2016
    1860 pages
    ISBN:9781614996712

    Sponsors

    • ETINN: Essence ITN Network
    • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam: Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Netherlands
    • PricewaterhouseCoopers: PricewaterhouseCoopers
    • TANDFGROUP: Taylor & Francis Group

    Publisher

    IOS Press

    Netherlands

    Publication History

    Published: 29 August 2016

    Qualifiers

    • Article

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • 0
      Total Citations
    • 36
      Total Downloads
    • Downloads (Last 12 months)15
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
    Reflects downloads up to 21 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Login options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media