Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.3115/976909.979635dlproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesaclConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free access

Integrating symbolic and statistical representations: the lexicon pragmatics interface

Published: 07 July 1997 Publication History

Abstract

We describe a formal framework for interpretation of words and compounds in a discourse context which integrates a symbolic lexicon/grammar, word-sense probabilities, and a pragmatic component. The approach is motivated by the need to handle productive word use. In this paper, we concentrate on compound nominals. We discuss the inadequacies of approaches which consider compund interpretation as either wholly lexico-grammatical or wholly pragmatic, and provide an alternative integrated account.

References

[1]
Asher, N. (1993) Reference to Abstract Objects in Discourse, Kluwer Academic Publishers.
[2]
Asher, N. and A. Lascarides (1995) 'Lexical Disambiguation in a Discourse Context', Journal of Semantics, vol. 12.1, 69--108.
[3]
Asher, N. and A. Lascarides (1996) Bridging, Proceedings of the International Workshop on Semantic Underspecification, Berlin, October 1996, available from the Max Plank Institute.
[4]
Bauer, L. (1983) English word-formation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.
[5]
Briscoe, E. J. and A. Copestake (1996) 'Controlling the application of lexical rules', Proceedings of the ACL SIGLEX Workshop on Breadth and Depth of Semantic Lexicons, Santa Cruz, CA.
[6]
Downing, P. (1977) 'On the Creation and Use of English Compound Nouns', Language, vol. 53(4), 810--842.
[7]
Dowty, D. (1979) Word meaning in Montague Grammar, Reidel, Dordrecht.
[8]
Hobbs, J. (1979) 'Coherence and Coreference', Cognitive Science, vol. 3, 67--90.
[9]
Hobbs, J. (1985) On the Coherence and Structure of Discourse, Report No. CSLI-85-37, Center for the Study of Language and Information.
[10]
Hobbs, J. R., M. Stickel, D. Appelt and P. Martin (1993) 'Interpretation as Abduction', Artificial Intelligence, vol. 63.1, 69--142.
[11]
Johnston, M., B. Boguraev and J. Pustejovsky (1995) 'The acquisition and interpretation of complex nominals', Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symposium on representation and acquisition of lexical knowledge, Stanford, CA.
[12]
Johnston, M. and F. Busa (1996) 'Qualia structure and the compositional interpretation of compounds', Proceedings of the ACL SIGLEX workshop on breadth and depth of semantic lexicons, Santa Cruz, CA.
[13]
Jones, B. (1995) 'Predicting nominal compounds', Proceedings of the 17th Annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Pittsburgh, PA.
[14]
Kamp, H. and U. Reyle (1993) From Discourse to Logic: an introduction to modeltheoretic semantics, formal logic and Discourse Representation Theory, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Germany.
[15]
Lascarides, A. and N. Asher (1993) 'Temporal Interpretation, Discourse Relations and Commonsense Entailment', Linguistics and Philosophy, vol. 16.5, 437--493.
[16]
Lascarides, A., E. J. Briscoe, N. Asher and A. Copestake (1996) 'Persistent and Order Independent Typed Default Unification', Linguistics and Philosophy, vol. 19:1, 1--89.
[17]
Lascarides, A. and A. Copestake (in press) 'Pragmatics and Word Meaning', Journal of Linguistics,
[18]
Lascarides, A., A. Copestake and E. J. Briscoe (1996) 'Ambiguity and Coherence', Journal of Semantics, vol. 13.1, 41--65.
[19]
Levi, J. (1978) The syntax and semantics of complex nominals, Academic Press, New York.
[20]
Liberman, M. and R. Sproat (1992) 'The stress and structure of modified noun phrases in English' in I. A. Sag and A. Szabolsci (eds.), Lexical matters, CSLI Publications, pp. 131--182.
[21]
Link, G. (1983) 'The logical analysis of plurals and mass terms: a lattice-theoretical approach' in Bäuerle, Schwarze and von Stechow (eds.), Meaning, use and interpretation of language, de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 302--323.
[22]
Polanyi, L. (1985) 'A Theory of Discourse Structure and Discourse Coherence', Proceedings of the Papers from the General Session at the Twenty-First Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society, Chicago, pp. 25--27.
[23]
Pustejovsky, J. (1995) The Generative Lexicon, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
[24]
Resnik, P. (1992) 'Probabilistic Lexicalised Tree Adjoining Grammar', Proceedings of the Coling92, Nantes, France.
[25]
van der Sandt, R. (1992) 'Presupposition Projection as Anaphora Resolution', Journal of Semantics, vol. 19.4,
[26]
Sparck Jones, K. (1983) 'So what about parsing compound nouns?' in K. Sparck Jones and Y. Wilks (eds.), Automatic natural language parsing, Ellis Horwood, Chichester, England, pp. 164--168.
[27]
Webber, B. (1991) 'Structure and Ostension in the Interpretation of Discourse Deixis', Language and Cognitive Processes, vol. 6.2, 107--135.

Cited By

View all
  • (2013)Word sense and semantic relations in noun compoundsACM Transactions on Speech and Language Processing 10.1145/2483969.248397110:3(1-17)Online publication date: 11-Jul-2013
  • (2006)Automatic identification of English verb particle constructions using linguistic featuresProceedings of the Third ACL-SIGSEM Workshop on Prepositions10.5555/1621431.1621441(65-72)Online publication date: 3-Apr-2006
  • (2003)Noun-noun compound machine translationProceedings of the ACL 2003 workshop on Multiword expressions: analysis, acquisition and treatment - Volume 1810.3115/1119282.1119285(17-24)Online publication date: 12-Jul-2003
  • Show More Cited By
  1. Integrating symbolic and statistical representations: the lexicon pragmatics interface

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image DL Hosted proceedings
      ACL '98/EACL '98: Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and Eighth Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics
      July 1997
      543 pages

      Sponsors

      • Directorate General XIII (European Commission)
      • Universidad Complutense de Madrid
      • Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
      • Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia
      • Universidad Politécnica de Madrid

      Publisher

      Association for Computational Linguistics

      United States

      Publication History

      Published: 07 July 1997

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate 85 of 443 submissions, 19%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)37
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)6
      Reflects downloads up to 01 Oct 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2013)Word sense and semantic relations in noun compoundsACM Transactions on Speech and Language Processing 10.1145/2483969.248397110:3(1-17)Online publication date: 11-Jul-2013
      • (2006)Automatic identification of English verb particle constructions using linguistic featuresProceedings of the Third ACL-SIGSEM Workshop on Prepositions10.5555/1621431.1621441(65-72)Online publication date: 3-Apr-2006
      • (2003)Noun-noun compound machine translationProceedings of the ACL 2003 workshop on Multiword expressions: analysis, acquisition and treatment - Volume 1810.3115/1119282.1119285(17-24)Online publication date: 12-Jul-2003
      • (2003)Detecting novel compoundsProceedings of the tenth conference on European chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics - Volume 110.3115/1067807.1067839(235-242)Online publication date: 12-Apr-2003

      View Options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Get Access

      Login options

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media