Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1609/aaai.v37i12.26710guideproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesConference Proceedingsacm-pubtype
research-article

Future aware pricing and matching for sustainable on-demand ride pooling

Published: 07 February 2023 Publication History

Abstract

The popularity of on-demand ride pooling is owing to the benefits offered to customers (lower prices), taxi drivers (higher revenue), environment (lower carbon footprint due to fewer vehicles) and aggregation companies like Uber (higher revenue). To achieve these benefits, two key interlinked challenges have to be solved effectively: (a) pricing - setting prices to customer requests for taxis; and (b) matching - assignment of customers (that accepted the prices) to taxis/cars. Traditionally, both these challenges have been studied individually and using myopic approaches (considering only current requests), without considering the impact of current matching on addressing future requests. In this paper, we develop a novel framework that handles the pricing and matching problems together, while also considering the future impact of the pricing and matching decisions. In our experimental results on a real-world taxi dataset, we demonstrate that our framework can significantly improve revenue (up to 17% and on average 6.4%) in a sustainable manner by reducing the number of vehicles (up to 14% and on average 10.6%) required to obtain a given fixed revenue and the overall distance travelled by vehicles (up to 11.1% and on average 3.7%). That is to say, we are able to provide an ideal win-win scenario for all stakeholders (customers, drivers, aggregator, environment) involved by obtaining higher revenue for customers, drivers, aggregator (ride pooling company) while being good for the environment (due to fewer number of vehicles on the road and lesser fuel consumed).

References

[1]
Alonso-Mora, J.; Samaranayake, S.; Wallar, A.; Frazzoli, E.; and Rus, D. 2017. On-demand high-capacity ride-sharing via dynamic trip-vehicle assignment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(3): 462-467.
[2]
Banerjee, S.; Johari, R.; and Riquelme, C. 2015. Pricing in Ride-Sharing Platforms: A Queueing-Theoretic Approach. In Proceedings of the Sixteenth ACM Conference on Economics and Computation, EC '15, 639. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery. ISBN 9781450334105.
[3]
Banerjee, S.; Johari, R.; and Riquelme, C. 2016. Dynamic pricing in ridesharing platforms. ACM SIGecom Exchanges, 15(1): 65-70.
[4]
Banerjee, S.; Riquelme, C.; and Johari, R. 2015. Pricing in ride-share platforms: A queueing-theoretic approach. Available at SSRN 2568258.
[5]
Bimpikis, K.; Candogan, O.; and Saban, D. 2019. Spatial pricing in ride-sharing networks. Operations Research, 67(3): 744-769.
[6]
Boeing, G. 2017. OSMnx: New methods for acquiring, constructing, analyzing, and visualizing complex street networks. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 65: 126-139.
[7]
Chen, H.; Jiao, Y.; Qin, Z.; Tang, X.; Li, H.; An, B.; Zhu, H.; and Ye, J. 2019a. InBEDE: Integrating Contextual Bandit with TD Learning for Joint Pricing and Dispatch of Ride-Hailing Platforms. In 2019 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM), 61-70. IEEE.
[8]
Chen, M.; Shen, W.; Tang, P.; and Zuo, S. 2019b. Dispatching through pricing: modeling ride-sharing and designing dynamic prices. In Proceedings of the 28th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 165-171. AAAI Press.
[9]
Lesmana, N. S.; Zhang, X.; and Bei, X. 2019. Balancing efficiency and fairness in on-demand ridesourcing. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 5309-5319.
[10]
Lowalekar, M.; Varakantham, P.; and Jaillet, P. 2018. Online spatio-temporal matching in stochastic and dynamic domains. Artificial Intelligence, 261: 71-112.
[11]
Lowalekar, M.; Varakantham, P.; and Jaillet, P. 2019. ZAC: A Zone Path Construction Approach for Effective RealTime Ridesharing. In ICAPS.
[12]
Ma, H.; Fang, F.; and Parkes, D. C. 2019. Spatio-temporal pricing for ridesharing platforms. In Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Conference on Economics and Computation, 583-583.
[13]
Ma, S.; Zheng, Y.; and Wolfson, O. 2013. T-share: A large-scale dynamic taxi ridesharing service. In Data Engineering (ICDE), 2013 IEEE 29th International Conference on, 410-421. IEEE.
[14]
NYYellowTaxi. 2016. New York Yellow Taxi DataSet. http://www.nyc.gov/html/tlc/html/about/trip_record_data.shtml. Accessed: 2021-12-04.
[15]
Özkan, E. 2020. Joint pricing and matching in ride-sharing systems. European Journal of Operational Research.
[16]
Powell, W. B. 2007. Approximate Dynamic Programming: Solving the curses of dimensionality, volume 703. John Wiley & Sons.
[17]
Santi, P.; Resta, G.; Szell, M.; Sobolevsky, S.; Strogatz, S. H.; and Ratti, C. 2014. Quantifying the benefits of vehicle pooling with shareability networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(37): 13290-13294.
[18]
Shah, S.; Lowalekar, M.; and Varakantham, P. 2020. Neural Approximate Dynamic Programming for On-Demand Ride-Pooling. In The Thirty-Fourth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 507-515. AAAI Press.
[19]
Shah, S.; Lowalekar, M.; and Varakantham, P. 2022. Joint Pricing and Matching for City-Scale Ride-Pooling. Proceedings of the International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling, 32(1): 499-507.
[20]
Uber. 2018. Uber Matching Solution. https://marketplace.uber.com/matching. Accessed: 2021-12-04.
[21]
Xu, Z.; Li, Z.; Guan, Q.; Zhang, D.; Li, Q.; Nan, J.; Liu, C.; Bian, W.; and Ye, J. 2018. Large-Scale Order Dispatch in On-Demand Ride-Hailing Platforms: A Learning and Planning Approach. In Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, KDD '18, 905-913.
[22]
Yan, C.; Zhu, H.; Korolko, N.; and Woodard, D. 2019. Dynamic pricing and matching in ride-hailing platforms. Naval Research Logistics (NRL), 67(8): 705-724.
[23]
Yang, Y.; Luo, R.; Li, M.; Zhou, M.; Zhang, W.; and Wang, J. 2018. Mean Field Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning. In Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), volume 80, 5571-5580.
[24]
Zheng, L.; Chen, L.; and Ye, J. 2018. Order dispatch in price-aware ridesharing. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, 11(8): 853-865.
[25]
Özkan, E. 2020. Joint pricing and matching in ridesharing systems. European Journal of Operational Research, 287(3): 1149-1160.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Driven by Motivation: Understanding Perceived Mobility Need Satisfaction in On-Demand RidepoolingProceedings of the 16th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications10.1145/3640792.3675733(405-416)Online publication date: 22-Sep-2024

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Guide Proceedings
AAAI'23/IAAI'23/EAAI'23: Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Thirty-Fifth Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Thirteenth Symposium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence
February 2023
16496 pages
ISBN:978-1-57735-880-0

Sponsors

  • Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence

Publisher

AAAI Press

Publication History

Published: 07 February 2023

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 21 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Driven by Motivation: Understanding Perceived Mobility Need Satisfaction in On-Demand RidepoolingProceedings of the 16th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications10.1145/3640792.3675733(405-416)Online publication date: 22-Sep-2024

View Options

View options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media