Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
article

Research Note---The Impact of Community Commitment on Participation in Online Communities

Published: 01 December 2011 Publication History

Abstract

Online discussion communities have become a widely used medium for interaction, enabling conversations across a broad range of topics and contexts. Their success, however, depends on participants' willingness to invest their time and attention in the absence of formal role and control structures. Why, then, would individuals choose to return repeatedly to a particular community and engage in the various behaviors that are necessary to keep conversation within the community going? Some studies of online communities argue that individuals are driven by self-interest, while others emphasize more altruistic motivations. To get beyond these inconsistent explanations, we offer a model that brings dissimilar rationales into a single conceptual framework and shows the validity of each rationale in explaining different online behaviors. Drawing on typologies of organizational commitment, we argue that members may have psychological bonds to a particular online community based on (a) need, (b) affect, and/or (c) obligation. We develop hypotheses that explain how each form of commitment to a community affects the likelihood that a member will engage in particular behaviors (reading threads, posting replies, moderating the discussion). Our results indicate that each form of community commitment has a unique impact on each behavior, with need-based commitment predicting thread reading, affect-based commitment predicting reply posting and moderating behaviors, and obligation-based commitment predicting only moderating behavior. Researchers seeking to understand how discussion-based communities function will benefit from this more precise theorizing of how each form of member commitment relates to different kinds of online behaviors. Community managers who seek to encourage particular behaviors may use our results to target the underlying form of commitment most likely to encourage the activities they wish to promote.

References

[1]
Ahuja, M. K. and Galvin, J. E., "Socialization in virtual groups," J. Management, v29, pp. 161-185, 2003.
[2]
Andrews, D., Nonnecke, B. and Preece, J., "Electronic survey methodology: A case study in reaching hard-to-involve Internet users," Internat. J. Human-Comput. Interaction, v16, pp. 185-210, 2003.
[3]
Arguello, J., Butler, B., Joyce, E., Kraut, R., Ling, K. S. and Wang, X., "Talk to me: Foundations for successful individual-group interactions in online communities," CHI 2006: Proc. ACM Conf. Human-Factors Comput. Systems, pp. 959-968, 2006.
[4]
Ashforth, B. E., Saks, A. M. and Lee, R. T., "Socialization and newcomer adjustment: The role of organizational context," Human Relations, v51, pp. 897-926, 1998.
[5]
Bagozzi, R. P. and Dholakia, U. M., "Intentional social action in virtual communities," J. Interactive Marketing, v16, pp. 2-21, 2002.
[6]
Becker, H. S., "Notes on the concept of commitment," Amer. J. Sociol., v66, pp. 32-42, 1960.
[7]
Bergquist, M. and Ljungberg, J., "The power of gifts: Organizing social relationships in open source communities," Inform. Systems J., v11, pp. 305-320, 2001.
[8]
Blanchard, A. L. and Markus, M. L., The experienced “sense” of a virtual community: Characteristics and processes, Data Base Adv. Inform. Systems, v35, pp. 64-79, 2004.
[9]
Brickman, P., Wortman, B. and Sorrentino, R. M., "Commitment," Commitment, Conflict, and Caring, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, pp. 1-18, 1987.
[10]
Burnett, G. and Bonnici, L., "Beyond the faq: Explicit and implicit norms in usenet newsgroups," Library Inform. Sci. Res., v25, pp. 333, 2003.
[11]
Butler, B. S., "Membership size, communication activity, and sustainability: A resource-based model of online social structures," Inform. Systems Res., v12, pp. 346-362, 2001.
[12]
Butler, B., Sproull, L., Kiesler, S., Kraut, R., Weisband, S. and Atwater, L., "Community effort in online groups: Who does the work and why?," Leadership at a Distance, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 171-194, 2007.
[13]
Chin, W. W. and Marcoulides, G. A., "The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling," Modern Methods for Business Research, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 295-336, 1998.
[14]
Christensen, C. M. and Raynor, M. E., "Why hard-nosed executives should care about management theory," Harvard Bus. Rev., v81, pp. 66-74, 2003.
[15]
Clear, T. R. and Karp, D. R., "Towards the ideal of community justice," NIJ J., pp. 20-28, 2000.
[16]
Cohen, A., Multiple Commitments at Work: An Integrative Approach, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, 2003.
[17]
Constant, D., Kiesler, S. and Sproull, L., "What's mine is ours, or is it? A study of attitudes about information sharing," Inform. Systems Res., v5, pp. 400-421, 1994.
[18]
Constant, D., Sproull, L. and Kiesler, S., "The kindness of strangers: The usefulness of electronic weak ties for technical advice," Organ. Sci.: J. Inst. Management Sci., v7, pp. 119-135, 1996.
[19]
Cook, J. and Wall, T., "New work attitude measures of trust, organizational commitment and personal need nonfulfillment," J. Occupational Psych., v53, pp. 39-52, 1980.
[20]
de Souza, C.S. and Preece, J., "A framework for analyzing and understanding online communities," Interacting Comput., v16, pp. 579-610, 2004.
[21]
Dillman, D. A., Mail and Internet Survey: The Tailored Design Method, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2000.
[22]
Ekeh, P., Social Exchange Theory: The Two Traditions, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1974.
[23]
Festinger, L., A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA, 1957.
[24]
Fisher, D., Smith, M. and Welser, H. T., "You are who you talk to: Detecting roles in usenet newsgroups," Proc. 39th Hawaii Internat. Conf. System Sci., 2006.
[25]
Furlong, M. S., "An electronic community for older adults: The seniornet network," J. Comm., v39, pp. 145-153, 1989.
[26]
Gefen, D. and Ridings, C. M., "If you spoke as she does, sir, instead of the way you do: A sociolinguistics perspective of gender differences in virtual communities," Data Base Adv. Inform. Systems, v36, pp. 78-92, 2005.
[27]
Gouldner, A. W., "The norm of reciprocity," Amer. Sociol. Rev., v25, pp. 165-167, 1960.
[28]
Grant, A. M., "Relational job design and the motivation to make a prosocial difference," Acad. Management Rev., v32, pp. 393-417, 2007.
[29]
Greer, B. G., "Psychological and social functions of an e-mail mailing list for persons with cerebral palsy," CyberPsychology, v3, pp. 221-233, 2000.
[30]
Griffeth, R. W., Hom, P. W. and Gaertner, S., "A meta-analysis of antecedents and correlates of employee turnover: Updated moderator tests, and research implications for the next millennium," J. Management, v26, pp. 463-488, 2000.
[31]
Hall, H. and Graham, D., "Creation and recreation: Motivating collaboration to generate knowledge capital in online communities," Internat. J. Inform. Management, v24, pp. 235-246, 2004.
[32]
Herring, S. C., Computer-Mediated Communication: Linguistic, Social, and Cross-Cultural Perspectives, John Benjamins, Philadelphia, 1996.
[33]
Herrmann, T., Jahnke, I., Loser, K.-U., Darses, F., Dieng, R., Simone, C. and Zackland, M., "The role concept as a basis for designing community systems," Cooperative Systems Design, IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp. 163-178, 2004.
[34]
Hof, R. D., "The power of us: Mass collaboration on the Internet is shaking up business," Bus. Week, pp. 74-82, 2005.
[35]
Horrigan, J. B., Rainie, L. and Fox, S., "Online communities: Networks that nurture long-distance relationships and local ties," Pew Internet American Life Project, Washington, DC, pp. 1-28, 2001.
[36]
Hsiu-Fen, L. and Gwo-Guang, L., "Determinants of success for online communities: An empirical study," Behav. Inform. Tech., v25, pp. 479-488, 2006.
[37]
Jaros, S. J., Jermier, J. M., Koehler, J. W. and Sincich, T., "Effects of continuance, affective, and moral commitment on the withdrawal process: An evaluation of eight structural equation models," Acad. Management J., v36, pp. 951-995, 1993.
[38]
Jones, S. G. and Jones, S. G., "Understanding community in the information age," Cybersociety: Computer-Mediated Communication and Community, Sage Publications, London, pp. 10-35, 1995.
[39]
Jones, Q., Ravid, G. and Rafaeli, S., "Information overload and the message dynamics of online interaction spaces: A theoretical model and empirical exploration," Inform. Systems Res., v15, pp. 194-210, 2004.
[40]
Joyce, E. and Kraut, R. E., "Predicting continued participation in newsgroups," J. Comput.-Mediated Comm., v11, pp. 723-747, 2006.
[41]
Kang, I., Lee, K. C., Lee, S. and Choie, J., "Investigation of online community voluntary behavior using cognitive maps," Comput. Hum. Behav., v23, pp. 111-126, 2007.
[42]
Kim, A. J., Community Building on the Web, Peachpit Press, Berkeley, CA, 2000.
[43]
Koh, J., Kim, Y.-G., Butler, B. and Bock, G.-W., "Encouraging participation in virtual communities," Comm. ACM, v50, pp. 68-73, 2007.
[44]
Kollock, P., Smith, M. and Herring, S., "Managing the virtual commons: Cooperation and conflict in computer communities," Computer-Mediated Communication: Linguistic, Social and Cross-Cultural Perspectives, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 109-128, 1996.
[45]
Lakhani, K. and von Hippel, E., How open source software works: “Free” user-to-user assistance, Res. Policy, v32, pp. 923-943, 2003.
[46]
Lampe, C. and Resnick, P., "Slash(dot) and burn: Distributed moderation in a large online conversation space," ACM Comput. Human Interaction Conf. 2004, Vienna, 2004.
[47]
Lampel, J. and Bhalla, A., "The role of status seeking in online communities: Giving the gift of experience," J. Comput.-Mediated Comm., v12, pp. 100-121, 2007.
[48]
Lee, G. K. and Cole, R. E., "From a firm-based to a community-based model of knowledge creation: The case of the Linux kernel development," Organ. Sci.: J. Inst. Management Sci., v14, pp. 633-649, 2003.
[49]
Lerner, J. and Tirole, J., "The simple economics of open source," J. Indust. Econom., v50, pp. 197-234, 2002.
[50]
Ma, M. and Agarwal, R., "Through a glass darkly: Information technology design, identity, verification, and knowledge contribution in online communities," Inform. Systems Res., v18, pp. 42-67, 2007.
[51]
Markus, M. L., Manville, B. and Agres, C., "What makes a virtual organization work---Lessons from the open source world," Sloan Management Rev., v42, pp. 13-26, 2000.
[52]
Mathieu, J. E. and Zajac, D. M., "A review and meta-analysis of the antecedents, correlates, and consequences of organizational commitment," Psych. Bull., v108, pp. 171-194, 1990.
[53]
Meyer, J. P. and Allen, N. J., "A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment," Human Resource Management Rev., v1, pp. 61-89, 1991.
[54]
Meyer, J. P. and Allen, N. J., Commitment in the Workplace: Theory, Research, and Application, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, 1997.
[55]
Meyer, J. P. and Herscovitch, L., "Commitment in the workplace: Toward a general model," Human Resource Management Rev., v11, pp. 299-326, 2001.
[56]
Meyer, J. P., Stanley, D. J., Herscovitch, L. and Topolnytsky, L., "Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: A meta-analysis of antecedents, correlates, and consequences," J. Vocational Behav., v61, pp. 20-52, 2002.
[57]
Moon, J. Y. and Sproull, L. S., "The role of feedback in managing the Internet-based volunteer work force," Inform. Systems Res., v19, pp. 494-515, 2008.
[58]
Mowday, R. T., "Reflections on the study and relevance of organizational commitment," Human Resource Management Rev., v8, pp. 387-401, 1998.
[59]
Noddings, N., Caring: A Feminine Approach to Ethics and Moral Education, University of California Press, Berkeley, 1984.
[60]
Oreg, S. and Nov, O., "Exploring motivations for contributing to open source initiatives: The roles of contribution context and personal values," Comput. Human Behav., v24, pp. 2055-2073, 2008.
[61]
Organ, D. W. and Ryan, K., "A meta-analytic review of attitudinal and dispositional predictors of organizational citizenship behavior," Personnel Psych., v48, pp. 775-802, 1995.
[62]
Pirolli, P. and Card, S. K., "Information foraging," Psych. Rev., v106, pp. 643-675, 1999.
[63]
Porter, L. W., Steers, R. M., Mowday, R. T. and Boulian, P. V., "Organizational commitment, job satisfaction, and turnover among psychiatric technicians," J. Appl. Psych., v59, pp. 603-609, 1974.
[64]
Preece, J., "Empathy online," Virtual Reality, v4, pp. 74-84, 1999.
[65]
Preece, J., Online Communities: Supporting Sociability, Designing Usability, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK, 2000.
[66]
Preece, J., "Etiquette online: From nice to necessary," Comm. ACM, v47, pp. 560-061, 2004.
[67]
Preece, J. and Ghozati, K., "In search of empathy online: A review of 100 online communities," Proc. 1998 Assoc. for Inform. Systems Americas Conf., pp. 92-94, 1998.
[68]
Ren, Y., Kraut, R. and Kiesler, S., "Applying common identity and bond theory to design of online communities," Organ. Stud., v28, pp. 377-408, 2007.
[69]
Rheingold, H., The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1993.
[70]
Ridings, C. M. and Gefen, D., "Virtual community attraction: Why people hang out online," J. Comput.-Mediated Comm., v10, pp. Article 4, 2004.
[71]
Ridings, C. M., Gefen, D. and Arinze, B., "Some antecedents and effects of trust in virtual communities," J. Strategic Inform. Systems, v11, pp. 271-295, 2002.
[72]
Ridings, C. M., Gefen, D. and Arinze, B., "Psychological barriers: Lurker and poster motivation and behavior in online communities," Comm. AIS, v18, pp. 329-354, 2006.
[73]
Riketta, M., "Attitudinal organizational commitment and job performance: A meta--analysis," J. Organ. Behav., v23, pp. 257-266, 2002.
[74]
Rousseau, D. M., The “problem” of the psychological contract considered, J. Organ. Behav., v19, pp. 665-671, 1998.
[75]
Sampson, R. J., Wilson, J. Q. and Petersilia, J., "The community," Crime, Institute for Contemporary Studies, San Francisco, pp. 193-216, 1995.
[76]
Saubramanian, A. and Pardhan, S., "The repeatability of mnread acuity charts and variability at different test differences," Optometry Vision Sci., v83, pp. 572-576, 2006.
[77]
Somers, M. J., "Organizational commitment, turnover, and absenteeism: An examination of direct and interaction effects," J. Organ. Behav., v16, pp. 49-58, 1995.
[78]
Somers, M. J. and Birnbaum, D., "Work-related commitment and job performance: It's also the nature of the performance that counts," J. Organ. Behav., v19, pp. 621-634, 1998.
[79]
Sproull, L. and Kiesler, S., Connections: New Ways of Working in the Networked Organization, MIT Press, Boston, 1991.
[80]
Swailes, S., "Organizational commitment: A critique of the construct and measures," Internat. J. Management Rev., v4, pp. 155-178, 2002.
[81]
Wasko, M. M. and Faraj, S., “It is what one does”: Why people participate and help others in electronic communities of practice, J. Strategic Inform. Systems, v9, pp. 155-173, 2000.
[82]
Wasko, M. M. and Faraj, S., "Social capital and knowledge contribution," MIS Quart., v29, pp. 35-57, 2005.
[83]
Wellman, B., Gulia, M., Kollock, P. and Smith, M., "Net surfers don't ride alone: Virtual communities as communities," Communities in Cyberspace: Perspectives on New Forms of Social Organization, University of California Press, Berkeley, pp. 167-194, 1999.
[84]
Welser, H. T., Gleave, E., Fisher, D. and Smith, M., "Visualizing the signatures of social roles in online discussion groups," J. Soc. Structure, v8, pp. 1-32, 2007.
[85]
Whitener, E. M. and Walz, P. M., "Exchange theory determinants of affective and continuance commitment and turnover," J. Vocational Behav., v42, pp. 265-281, 1993.
[86]
Wiener, Y., "Commitment in organizations: A normative view," Acad. Management Rev., v7, pp. 418-428, 1982.
[87]
Williams, R. L. and Cothrel, J., "Four smart ways to run online communities," Sloan Management Rev., v41, pp. 81-91, 2000.
[88]
Zhang, W. and Watts, S. A., "Capitalizing on content: Information adoption in two online communities," J. Assoc. Inform. Systems, v9, pp. 73-94, 2008.

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

Publisher

INFORMS

Linthicum, MD, United States

Publication History

Published: 01 December 2011
Received: 18 June 2008

Author Tags

  1. Web 2.0
  2. commitment
  3. discussion groups
  4. online behavior
  5. online communities
  6. social media
  7. social technologies
  8. virtual communities

Qualifiers

  • Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 03 Oct 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)The Influence of Media Capabilities on Knowledge Contribution in Online CommunitiesInformation Systems Research10.1287/isre.2023.122535:1(165-183)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2024
  • (2024)How self-disclosure builds cancer communities through authentic stories on YouTubeComputers in Human Behavior10.1016/j.chb.2024.108226156:COnline publication date: 9-Jul-2024
  • (2023)Spoiled for Choice? Personalized Recommendation for Healthcare DecisionsInformation Systems Research10.1287/isre.2022.119134:4(1493-1512)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2023
  • (2023)Let's Quit Together: Exploring Textual Factors Promoting Supportive Interactions in Online Cannabis Support ForumsACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems10.1145/3614178.361418154:3(11-36)Online publication date: 4-Aug-2023
  • (2023)Understanding Moderators’ Conflict and Conflict Management Strategies with Streamers in Live Streaming CommunitiesProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3580982(1-12)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
  • (2023)Influence by osmosisComputers in Human Behavior10.1016/j.chb.2023.107706143:COnline publication date: 1-Jun-2023
  • (2023)Exploring the factors influencing online civic engagement in a smart cityComputers in Human Behavior10.1016/j.chb.2023.107682143:COnline publication date: 1-Jun-2023
  • (2022)An Exploration Study on the Consequence of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Online Q&A CommunitiesJournal of Global Information Management10.4018/JGIM.30160330:1(1-22)Online publication date: 10-Jun-2022
  • (2022)More than the QuantityManagement Science10.1287/mnsc.2021.423868:9(6865-6888)Online publication date: 1-Sep-2022
  • (2022)Linking Psychological Ownership to Innovative Behaviour in the WorkplaceComplexity10.1155/2022/49358342022Online publication date: 1-Jan-2022
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

Get Access

Login options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media