Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
article

Personalization in Email Marketing: The Role of Noninformative Advertising Content

Published: 01 March 2018 Publication History

Abstract

In collaboration with three companies selling a diverse set of products, we conducted randomized field experiments in which experimentally tailored email ads were sent to millions of individuals. We found consistently that personalizing the emails by adding consumer-specific information e.g., recipient's name benefited the advertisers. Importantly, such content is not likely to be informative about the advertised product or the company. In our main experiment, we found that adding the name of the message recipient to the email's subject line increased the probability of the recipient opening it by 20% from 9.05% to 10.80%, which translated to an increase in sales' leads by 31% from 0.39% to 0.51% and a reduction in the number of individuals unsubscribing from the email campaign by 17% from 1.2% to 1.0%. We present similar experiments conducted with other companies, which show that the effects we document extend from objectives ranging from acquiring new customers to retaining customers who have purchased from the company in the past. Our investigation of several possible mechanisms suggests that such content increases the effort consumers make in processing the other content in the rest of the advertising message. Our paper quantifies the benefits from personalization and sheds light on the role of noninformative advertising content by analyzing several detailed measures of recipient's interaction with the message. It provides external validity to psychological mechanisms and has clear implications for the firms that are designing their advertising campaigns.
Data and the online appendix are available at <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" href="https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2017.1066">https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2017.1066</ext-link>.

References

[1]
Allport GW (1937) Personality (Holt, New York).
[2]
Ansari A, Mela CF (2003) E-customization. J. Marketing Res. 40(2): 131-145.
[3]
Bagwell K (2007) The economic analysis of advertising. Handbook Indust. Organ. 3:1701-1844.
[4]
Bertrand M, Karlan D, Mullainathan S, Shafir E, Zinman J (2010) What's advertising content worth? Evidence from a consumer credit marketing field experiment. Quart. J. Econom. 125(1):263-306.
[5]
Bleier A, Eisenbeiss M (2015) Personalized online advertising effectiveness: The interplay of what, when, and where. Marketing Sci. 34(5):669-688.
[6]
Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JPT, Rothstein HR (2009) Introduction to Meta-Analysis (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK).
[7]
Braver SL, Thoemmes FJ, Rosenthal R (2014) Continuously cumulating meta-analysis and replicability. Perspect. Psych. Sci. 9(3):333-342.
[8]
Cacioppo JT, Petty RE, Kao CF, Rodriguez R (1986) Central and peripheral routes to persuasion: An individual difference perspective. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 51(5):1032-1043.
[9]
Cherry EC (1953) Some experiments on the recognition of speech, with one and with two ears. J. Acoustical Soc. America 25(5):975-979.
[10]
Della Vigna S, Gentzkow M (2010) Persuasion: Empirical evidence. Ann. Rev. Econom. 2(1):643-669.
[11]
Deshpandé R, Stayman DM (1994) A tale of two cities: Distinctiveness theory and advertising effectiveness. J. Marketing Res. 31(1):57-64.
[12]
Dijkstra A (2008) The psychology of tailoring-ingredients in computer-tailored persuasion. Soc. Personality Psych. Compass 2(2):765-784.
[13]
Eastlack JO Jr, Rao AG (1989) Advertising experiments at the Campbell Soup company. Marketing Sci. 8(1):57-71.
[14]
Experian Marketing Services (2014) The coupon report: Benchmark data and analysis for e-mail marketers. Technical report. https://www.experian.com/assets/marketing-services/white-papers/EMS_coupon_report_WP.pdf.
[15]
Goldfarb A, Tucker C (2011a) Online display advertising: Targeting and obtrusiveness. Marketing Sci. 30(3):389-404.
[16]
Goldfarb A, Tucker C (2012) Privacy and innovation. Lerner J, Stern S, eds. Innovation Policy and the Economy, Vol. 12 (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 65-89.
[17]
Goldfarb A, Tucker CE (2011b) Privacy regulation and online advertising. Management Sci. 57(1):57-71.
[18]
Haugtvedt CP, Petty RE (1992) Personality and persuasion: Need for cognition moderates the persistence and resistance of attitude changes. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 63(2):308-319.
[19]
Hawkins RP, Kreuter M, Resnicow K, Fishbein M, Dijkstra A (2008) Understanding tailoring in communicating about health. Health Ed. Res. 23(3):454-466.
[20]
Higgins JPT, Green S (2008) Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, Vol. 5 (Wiley Online Library, Hoboken, NJ).
[21]
Kahneman D, Knetsch JL, Thaler RH (1990) Experimental tests of the endowment effect and the Coase theorem. J. Political Econom. 98(6):1325-1348.
[22]
Kihlstrom JF, Cantor N (1984) Mental representations of the self. Adv. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 17:1-47.
[23]
Lambrecht A, Tucker C (2013) When does retargeting work? Information specificity in online advertising. J. Marketing Res. 50:561-576.
[24]
Lewis RA, Rao JM (2015) The unfavorable economics of measuring the returns to advertising. Quart. J. Econom. 130(4):1941-1973.
[25]
Lodish LM, Abraham M, Kalmenson S, Livelsberger J, Lubetkin B, Richardson B, Stevens ME (1995) How T.V. advertising works: A meta-analysis of 389 real world split cable T.V. advertising experiments. J. Marketing Res. 32(2):125-139.
[26]
Markus H (1977) Self-schemata and processing information about the self. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 35(2):63-78.
[27]
Markus H, Wurf E (1987) The dynamic self-concept: A social psychological perspective. Annual Rev. Psych. 38(1):299-337.
[28]
McConnell AR (2011) The multiple self-aspects framework: Self-concept representation and its implications. Personality Soc. Psych. Rev. 15(1):3-27.
[29]
Nelson P (1974) Advertising as information. J. Political Econom. 82(4): 729-754.
[30]
Newman RS (2005) The cocktail party effect in infants revisited: Listening to one's name in noise. Developmental Psych. 41(2):352-362.
[31]
Nuttin JM (1985) Narcissism beyond gestalt and awareness: The name letter effect. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. 15(3):353-361.
[32]
Perloff RM, Brock TC (1980) And thinking makes it so: Cognitive responses to persuasion. Roloff ME, Miller GR, eds. Persuasion: New Directions in Theory and Research (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA), 67-99.
[33]
Petty RE, Cacioppo JT (1986a) The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion (Springer, New York).
[34]
Petty RE, Cacioppo JT (1986b) Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change (Springer, New York).
[35]
Petty RE, Cacioppo JT (1990) Involvement and persuasion: Tradition versus integration. Psych. Bull. 107(3):367-374.
[36]
Petty RE, Barden J, Wheeler SC (2009) The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion: Health promotions that yield sustained behavioral change. DiClemente RJ, Crosby RA, Kegler M, eds. Emerging Theories in Health Promotion Practice and Research (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco), 185-214.
[37]
Petty RE, Cacioppo JT, Haugtvedt CP (1992) Ego-involvement and persuasion: An appreciative look at the Sherif's contribution to the study of self-relevance and attitude change. Granberg D, Sarup G, eds. Social Judgment and Intergroup Relations (Springer, New York), 147-174.
[38]
Petty RE, Cacioppo JT, Schumann D (1983) Central and peripheral routes to advertising effectiveness: The moderating role of involvement. J. Consumer Res. 10(2):135-146.
[39]
Petty RE, Haugtvedt CP, Smith SM (1995) Elaboration as a determinant of attitude strength: Creating attitudes that are persistent, resistant, and predictive of behavior. Attitude Strength: Antecedents Consequences 4:93-130.
[40]
Petty RE, Wheeler SC, Bizer G (2000) Matching effects in persuasion: An elaboration likelihood analysis. Maio G, Olson J, eds. Why We Evaluate: Functions of Attitudes (Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ), 133-162.
[41]
Petty RE, Wheeler SC, Tormala ZT (2013) Persuasion and attitude change. Weiner IB, Lerner MJ, eds. Comprehensive Handbook of Psychology, 2nd ed., Vol. 5 (John Wiley & Sons, New York), 369-390.
[42]
Reed A (2004) Activating the self-importance of consumer selves: Exploring identity salience effects on judgments. J. Consumer Res. 31(2):286-295.
[43]
Resnik A, Stern BL (1977) An analysis of information content in television advertising. J. Marketing 41(1):50-53.
[44]
SimpleRelevance (2014) Email fail: An in-depth evaluation of top 20 Internet retailers' email personalization capabilities. SimpleRelevance Research Report. http://docplayer.net/1377895-Email-fail-an-in-depth-evaluation-of-top-20-internet-retailers-email-personalization-capabilities-abstract.html.
[45]
Staats AW, Staats CK (1958) Attitudes established by classical conditioning. J. Abnormal Soc. Psych. 57(1):37-40.
[46]
Sudhir K, Roy S, Cherian M (2016) Do sympathy biases induce charitable giving? The effects of advertising content. Marketing Sci. 35(6):849-869.
[47]
Tacikowski P, Nowicka A (2010) Allocation of attention to self-name and self-face: An ERP study. Biol. Psych. 84(2):318-324.
[48]
Tucker CE (2012) The economics of advertising and privacy. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 30(3):326-329.
[49]
Tucker CE (2014) Social networks, personalized advertising, and privacy controls. J. Marketing Res. 51(5):546-562.
[50]
Wattal S, Telang R, Mukhopadhyay T, Boatwright P (2012) What's in a "name"? Impact of use of customer information in email advertisements. Inform. Systems Res. 23(3-part-1):679-697.
[51]
Wegener DT, Downing J, Krosnick JA, Petty RE (1995) Measures and manipulations of strength-related properties of attitudes: Current practice and future directions. Attitude Strength: Antecedents Consequences 4:455-487.
[52]
Wheeler SC, Petty RE, Bizer GY (2005) Self-schema matching and attitude change: Situational and dispositional determinants of message elaboration. J. Consumer Res. 31(4):787-797.
[53]
White TB, Zahay DL, Thorbjørnsen H, Shavitt S (2008) Getting too personal: Reactance to highly personalized email solicitations. Marketing Lett. 19(1):39-50.
[54]
Wolford G, Morrison F (1980) Processing of unattended visual information. Memory Cognition 8(6):521-527.

Cited By

View all
  1. Personalization in Email Marketing: The Role of Noninformative Advertising Content

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image Marketing Science
    Marketing Science  Volume 37, Issue 2
    March 2018
    155 pages

    Publisher

    INFORMS

    Linthicum, MD, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 01 March 2018
    Accepted: 10 June 2017
    Received: 05 April 2016

    Author Tags

    1. advertising
    2. advertising content
    3. advertising tailoring
    4. email marketing
    5. experimental design
    6. field experiments
    7. personalization

    Qualifiers

    • Article

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 28 Feb 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Unlimited TestingMarketing Science10.1287/mksc.2021.012643:2(419-439)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2024
    • (2023)Practice Prize ReportMarketing Science10.1287/mksc.2022.141242:1(6-10)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2023
    • (2023)Estimating Marketing Component EffectsMarketing Science10.1287/mksc.2022.140142:4(704-728)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2023
    • (2023)Do Students Read Instructor Emails? A Case Study of Intervention Email Open RatesProceedings of the 23rd Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research10.1145/3631802.3631813(1-12)Online publication date: 13-Nov-2023
    • (2023)“It may take ages”: Understanding Human-Centred Lateral Phishing Attack Detection in OrganisationsProceedings of the 2023 European Symposium on Usable Security10.1145/3617072.3617116(344-355)Online publication date: 16-Oct-2023
    • (2023)How Language Formality in Security and Privacy Interfaces Impacts Intended ComplianceProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3581275(1-12)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
    • (2023)“We Need a Big Revolution in Email Advertising”: Users’ Perception of Persuasion in Permission-based Advertising EmailsProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3581163(1-21)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
    • (2022)The Value of Verified Employment Data for Consumer LendingMarketing Science10.1287/mksc.2021.133541:4(795-814)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2022
    • (2022)Multi-Objective Personalization in Multi-Stakeholder Organizational Bulk E-mailProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/35556416:CSCW2(1-27)Online publication date: 11-Nov-2022
    • (2022)The Distressing Ads That Persist: Uncovering The Harms of Targeted Weight-Loss Ads Among Users with Histories of Disordered EatingProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/35551026:CSCW2(1-23)Online publication date: 11-Nov-2022
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    View options

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media