Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
research-article

Driving Regulation: Using Topic Models to Examine Political Contention in the U.S. Trucking Industry

Published: 01 April 2014 Publication History

Abstract

Public comments submitted during agency rulemakings can provide rich insight into stakeholders' viewpoints around contentious political issues but have been largely untapped as a data source by social scientists. This is in part due to the lack of access to comments in machine-readable formats and in part due to the difficulty in analyzing large corpora of textual data. However, new online repositories and analytic methodologies are beginning to open up this trove of data for researchers. Using data from the online portal regulations.gov, we employ probabilistic topic modeling to identify latent themes in a series of regulatory debates about electronic monitoring in the U.S. trucking industry. Our model suggests that different types of commenters use alternative discursive frames in talking about monitoring. Comments submitted by individuals were more likely to place the electronic monitoring debate in the context of broader logistical problems plaguing the industry, such as long wait times at shippers' terminals, while organizational stakeholders were more likely than individuals to frame their comments in terms of technological standards and language suggesting cost / benefit quantification.

References

[1]
Belzer M. H.Sweatshops on wheels: Winners and losers in trucking deregulation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2000:
[2]
BleiD. M. (2011). Introduction to probabilistic topic models. Communications of the ACM. Retrieved fromhttp://www.cs.princeton.edu/~blei/papers/Blei2011.pdf
[3]
Blei D. M.,Lafferty J. D.Text Mining: Classification, Clustering, and Applications. Srivastava A.Sahami M., ed. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis Group; 2009:71-93.
[4]
Blei D. M.,Ng A. Y.,Jordan M. I.Latent Dirichlet allocation.Journal of Machine Learning Research. 2003;3:993-1022
[5]
Boltanski L.,Thévenot L.The sociology of critical capacity.European Journal of Social Theory. 1999;2:359-377
[6]
Cardie C.,Farina C.,Aijaz A.,Rawding M.,Purpura SProceedings of the 2008 International Conference on Digital Government Research. Montreal, Canada: Digital Government Society of North America; 2008:244-253.
[7]
Chang J.,Boyd-Graber J.,Gerrish S.,Wang C.,Blei D. M.Proceedings of Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 2009. Bengio Y.Schuurmans D.Lafferty J.Williams C. K. I.Culotta A., ed. 2009:288-296.
[8]
Coglianese C.E-Rulemaking: Information technology and the regulatory process.Administrative Law Review. 2004a;56:353-396
[9]
Coglianese C.Information technology and regulatory policy: New directions for digital government research.Social Science Computer Review. 2004b;22:85-91
[10]
Coglianese C.Citizen participation in rulemaking: Past, present, and future.Duke Law Journal. 2006;55:943-968
[11]
Cuéllar M.Rethinking regulatory democracy.Administrative Law Review. 2005;57:411-500
[12]
Golden M. M.Interest groups in the rule-making process: Who participates? Whose voices get heard?.Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 1998;8:245-270
[13]
Grimmer J.,Stewart B. M.Text as data: The promise and pitfalls of automatic content analysis methods for political texts.Political Analysis. 2013;21:267-297
[14]
Krawiec K. D.Don't 'screw Joe the plummer¿: The sausage-making of financial reform.Arizona Law Review. 2013;55:53-103
[15]
Kwon N.,Shulman S. W.,Hovy EProceedings of the 2006 International Conference on Digital Government Research. Montreal, Canada: Digital Government Society of North America; 2006:
[16]
Lau G. X.,Law K. H.,Wiederhold G.Analyzing government regulations using structural and domain information.Computer. 2005;38:70-76
[17]
Mendelson N. A.Rulemaking, democracy, and torrents of e-mail.George Washington Law Review. 2011;79:1343-1380
[18]
Shulman S. W.,Schlosberg D.,Zavestoski S.,Courard-Hauri D.Electronic rulemaking: A public participation research agenda for the social sciences.Social Science Computer Review. 2003;21:162-178
[19]
Steelman T. A.The public comment process: What do citizens contribute to national forest management?.Journal of Forestry. 1999;97:22-26
[20]
Wagner W. E.Administrative law, filter failure, and information capture.Duke Law Journal. 2010;59:1321-1432
[21]
Wagner W.,Barnes K.,Peters L.Rulemaking in the shade: An empirical study of EPA's air toxic emission standards.Administrative Law Review. 2011;63:99-158
[22]
Yackee J. W.,Yackee S. W.A bias towards business? Assessing interest group influence on the U.S. bureaucracy.The Journal of Politics. 2006;68:128-139

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Making Sense of Citizens’ Input through Artificial Intelligence: A Review of Methods for Computational Text Analysis to Support the Evaluation of Contributions in Public ParticipationDigital Government: Research and Practice10.1145/36032545:1(1-30)Online publication date: 3-Jun-2023
  • (2022)Automated Topic Categorisation of Citizens’ Contributions: Reducing Manual Labelling Efforts Through Active LearningElectronic Government10.1007/978-3-031-15086-9_24(369-385)Online publication date: 6-Sep-2022
  • (2021)Public Responses and Concerns Regarding Vape Bans on Reddit: A Longitudinal Topic Modeling ApproachSocial Computing and Social Media: Experience Design and Social Network Analysis 10.1007/978-3-030-77626-8_26(391-403)Online publication date: 24-Jul-2021
  • Show More Cited By
  1. Driving Regulation: Using Topic Models to Examine Political Contention in the U.S. Trucking Industry

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image Social Science Computer Review
      Social Science Computer Review  Volume 32, Issue 2
      April 2014
      139 pages

      Publisher

      Sage Publications, Inc.

      United States

      Publication History

      Published: 01 April 2014

      Author Tags

      1. e-rulemaking
      2. latent Dirichlet allocation
      3. public comments
      4. topic modeling
      5. trucking

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
      Reflects downloads up to 17 Feb 2025

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2023)Making Sense of Citizens’ Input through Artificial Intelligence: A Review of Methods for Computational Text Analysis to Support the Evaluation of Contributions in Public ParticipationDigital Government: Research and Practice10.1145/36032545:1(1-30)Online publication date: 3-Jun-2023
      • (2022)Automated Topic Categorisation of Citizens’ Contributions: Reducing Manual Labelling Efforts Through Active LearningElectronic Government10.1007/978-3-031-15086-9_24(369-385)Online publication date: 6-Sep-2022
      • (2021)Public Responses and Concerns Regarding Vape Bans on Reddit: A Longitudinal Topic Modeling ApproachSocial Computing and Social Media: Experience Design and Social Network Analysis 10.1007/978-3-030-77626-8_26(391-403)Online publication date: 24-Jul-2021
      • (2020)Gatekeeping Fake News Discourses on Mainstream Media Versus Social MediaSocial Science Computer Review10.1177/089443931879584937:6(687-704)Online publication date: 30-Jun-2020
      • (2019)Latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA) and topic modelingMultimedia Tools and Applications10.1007/s11042-018-6894-478:11(15169-15211)Online publication date: 31-Jul-2019
      • (2018)A Bibliometric Review of Natural Language Processing Empowered Mobile ComputingWireless Communications & Mobile Computing10.1155/2018/18270742018Online publication date: 28-Jun-2018
      • (2016)Semantic search for public opinions on urban affairsInformation Processing and Management: an International Journal10.1016/j.ipm.2015.10.00452:3(430-445)Online publication date: 1-May-2016

      View Options

      View options

      Figures

      Tables

      Media

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media