Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3369457.3370916acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesozchiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Towards Surgical Robots: Understanding Interaction Challenges in Knee Surgery

Published: 10 January 2020 Publication History

Abstract

Knee arthroscopy is a very common elective surgery, which is performed globally. Research has stated that there are currently several issues surrounding this surgery which reveal surgeons are frustrated with their instruments, cause unintended damage, and have high levels of cognitive and physical demands. The aim of this research is to explore in greater detail what is actually occurring during surgery and gain insights from the knee surgeons to illuminate the current frailties entangled with knee arthroscopy. This research consists of a field study observing four consultant orthopaedic knee surgeons performing knee arthroscopies, of which a total of 15 surgeries were video-recorded. Cards were created based on the analysis of the videos, which were then used to prompt further reflection in interviews with two of the four knee surgeons. From this study we endeavour to explore how knee surgeons currently employ instruments during knee surgery and the challenges that they experience. Our findings focus on a surgeon's perspective on the following challenges: (1) instrument limitations, (2) limited visibility, and (3) physical and cognitive pressures. Based on these limitations, we explore how current robotic surgical platforms could be introduced as a first step towards designing surgical robots for knee arthroscopy, that will result in more desirable patient outcomes as well as greater satisfaction for the knee surgeons.

References

[1]
Setareh Aghel Manesh, Tanya Beran, Ehud Sharlin, and Saul Greenberg. 2014. Medi, human robot interaction in pediatric health. In Proceedings of the extended abstracts of the 32nd annual ACM conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI EA '14. ACM, Toronto, Canada, 153--154. https://doi.org/10.1145/2559206.2579529
[2]
American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2014. Meniscus Tears. http://orthoinfo.aaos.org/topic.cfm?topic=a00358
[3]
Ignacio Avellino, Gilles Bailly, Geoffroy Canlorbe, Jérémie Belgihti, Guillaume Morel, and Marie-Aude Vitrani. 2019. Impacts of Telemanipulation in Robotic Assisted Surgery. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Proceedings (CHI2019). ACM, Glasgow, Scotland, 1--15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300813
[4]
Ryan a. Beasley. 2012. Medical Robots: Current Systems and Research Directions. Journal of Robotics 2012 (2012), 1--14. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/401613 arXiv:401613
[5]
M. Brattwall, E.Jacobson, M. Forssblad, and J. Jakobsson. 2010. Knee arthroscopy routines and practice. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 18, 12 (2010), 1656--1660. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-010-1266-2
[6]
Jessica Burgner, D. Caleb Rucker, Hunter B. Gilbert, Philip J. Swaney, Paul T. Russell, Kyle D. Weaver, and Robert J. Webster. 2014. A Telerobotic System for Transnasal Surgery. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics 19, 3 (2014), 996--1006. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMECH.2013.2265804
[7]
Jessica Burgner-Kahrs, D. Caleb Rucker, and Howie Choset. 2015. Continuum Robots for Medical Applications: A Survey. IEEE Transactions on Robotics 31, 6 (2015), 1261--1280. https://doi.org/10.1109/TRO.2015.2489500
[8]
L V Calderita, P Bustos, C Suárez Mejías, F Fernández, and A Bandera. 2013. THERAPIST: Towards an Autonomous Socially Interactive Robot for Motor and Neurorehabilitation Therapies for Children. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare. ACM, Venice, Italy, 374--377. https://doi.org/10.4108/icst.pervasivehealth.2013.252348
[9]
F Martí Carrillo, J Butchart, S Knight, A Scheinberg, L Wise, L Sterling, and C Mccarthy. 2016. "Help me help you": A Human-Assisted Social Robot in Paediatric Rehabilitation. In OzCHI '16: Proceedings of the 28th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction. ACM, Launceston, Australia, 1--3. https://doi.org/10.1145/3010915.3011858
[10]
Nicklas H. Christensen, Oliver G. Hjermitslev, Frederik Falk, Marco B. Madsen, Frederik H. Østergaard, Martin Kibsgaard, Martin Kraus, Johan Poulsen, and Jane Petersson. 2017. Depth cues in augmented reality for training of robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery. In Proceedings of the 21st International Academic Mindtrek Conference. ACM, Tampere, Finland, 120--126. https://doi.org/10.1145/3131085.3131123
[11]
Pieter Duysburgh, Shirley A. Elprama, and An Jacobs. 2014. Exploring the social-technological gap in telesurgery. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing. ACM, Baltimore, USA, 1537--1548. https://doi.org/10.1145/2531602.2531717
[12]
Shirley Elprama, Katriina Kilpi, Pieter Duysburgh, An Jacobs, Lotte Vermeulen, and Jan Van Looy. 2013. Identifying barriers in telesurgery by studying current team practices in robot-assisted surgery. In 2013 7th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare and Workshops. IEEE, Venice, Italy, 224--231. https://doi.org/10.4108/icst.pervasivehealth.2013.252005
[13]
Johnathan A. Engh, Davneet S. Minhas, Douglas Kondziolka, and Cameron N. Riviere. 2010. Percutaneous intracerebral navigation by duty-cycled spinning of flexible bevel-tipped needles. Neurosurgery 67, 4 (2010), 1117--1122. https://doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0b013e3181ec1551
[14]
Carolin Fellmann, Daryoush Kashi, and Jessica Burgner-Kahrs. 2015. Evaluation of input devices for teleoperation of concentric tube continuum robots for surgical tasks. In SPIE Medical Imaging, Vol. 9415. SPIE, Florida, USA, 1--9. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2076741
[15]
A G Gallagher, N McClure, J McGuigan, K Ritchie, and N P Sheehy. 1998. An ergonomic analysis of the fulcrum effect in the acquisition of endoscopic skills. Endoscopy 30, 07 (1998), 617--620.
[16]
Roger E. Goldman, Andrea Bajo, Lara S. MacLachlan, Ryan Pickens, S. Duke Herrell, and Nabil Simaan. 2013. Design and performance evaluation of a minimally invasive telerobotic platform for transurethral surveillance and intervention. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 60, 4 (2013), 918--925. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2012.2226031
[17]
Kanako Harada, Denny Oetomo, Ekawahyu Susilo, Arianna Menciassi, David Daney, Jean-pierre Merlet, and Paolo Dario. 2010. A reconfigurable modular robotic endoluminal surgical system: vision and preliminary results. Robotica 28, Special Issue 02 (2010), 171--183. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0263574709990610
[18]
Yu-Hsuan Huang, Hao-Yu Chang, Wan-ling Yang, Yu-Kai Chiu, Tzu-Chieh Yu, Pei-Hsuan Tsai, and Ming Ouhyoung. 2018. CatAR: A Novel Stereoscopic Augmented Reality Cataract Surgery Training System with Dexterous Instruments Tracking Technology. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Montreal, Canada, 465:1----465:12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174039
[19]
Anjali Jaiprakash, William B O'Callaghan, Sarah L Whitehouse, Ajay Pandey, Liao Wu, Jonathan Roberts, and Ross W Crawford. 2017. Orthopaedic surgeon attitudes towards current limitations and the potential for robotic and technological innovation in arthroscopic surgery. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery 25, 1 (2017), 230949901668499. https://doi.org/10.1177/2309499016684993
[20]
Sooyeon Jeong, Cynthia Breazeal, Deirdre Logan, and Peter Weinstock. 2017. Huggable: Impact of embodiment on promoting verbal and physical engagement for young pediatric inpatients. In 26th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication. IEEE, Lisbon, Portugal, 121--126. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2017.8172290
[21]
Seung kook Jun, Madusudanan Sathia Narayanan, Pankaj Singhal, Sudha Garimella, and Venkat Krovi. 2013. Evaluation of robotic minimally invasive surgical skills using motion studies. Journal of Robotic Surgery 7, 3 (2013), 241--249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-013-0419-y
[22]
Amy C. Lehman, Nathan A. Wood, Shane Farritor, Matthew R. Goede, and Dmitry Oleynikov. 2011. Dexterous miniature robot for advanced minimally invasive surgery. Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques 25, 1 (2011), 119--123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1143-6
[23]
Hongpeng Liu, Ying Xu, Lei Hu, Peifu Tang, and Lifeng Wang. 2018. An Investigation of Errors in Fluoroscopic Navigation for Robot-Assisted Orthopedic Surgery. In Proceedings of the 2018 8th International Conference on Bioscience, Biochemistry and Bioinformatics. ACM, Tokyo, Japan, 134--138. https://doi.org/10.1145/3180382.3180394
[24]
C McCarthy, J Butchart, M George, D Kerr, H Kingsley, A M Scheinberg, and L Sterling. 2015. Robots in rehab: towards socially assistive robots for paediatric rehabilitation. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Australian Special Interest Group for Computer Human Interaction. ACM, Melbourne, Australia, 39--43. https://doi.org/10.1145/2838739.2838791
[25]
Ilana Nisky, Felix Huang, Amit Milstein, Carla M. Pugh, Ferdinando A. Mussa-Ivaldi, and Amir Karniel. 2012. Perception of stiffness in laparoscopy - The fulcrum effect. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 173 (2012), 313--319. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-022-2-313
[26]
Donald A Norman. 2013. The design of everyday things: Revised and expanded edition. Basic books.
[27]
Jeremy Opie, Anjali Jaiprakash, Bernd Ploderer, Ross Crawford, Margot Brereton, and Jonathan Roberts. 2018. Understanding the challenges and needs of knee arthroscopy surgeons to inform the design of surgical robots. In OzCHI '18 Proceedings of the 30th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction. ACM, Melbourne, Australia, 458--462. https://doi.org/10.1145/3292147.3292213
[28]
Hannah R M Pelikan, Amy Cheatle, Malte F Jung, and Steven J Jackson. 2018. Operating at a Distance - How a Teleoperated Surgical Robot Reconfigures Teamwork in the Operating Room. Journal Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction - CSCW 2, November (2018), 138:28.
[29]
A. J. Price, G. Erturan, K. Akhtar, A. Judge, A. Alvand, and J. L. Rees. 2015. Evidence-based surgical training in Orthopaedics: How many arthroscopies of the knee are needed to achieve consultant level performance? Bone and Joint Journal 97-B, 10 (2015), 1309--1315. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.97B10.35973
[30]
Rabiatul Adawiah Abdul Rahman, Fazah Akhtar Hanapiah, Husna Hassan Basri, Norjasween Abdul Malik, and Hanafiah Yussof. 2015. Use of Humanoid Robot in Children with Cerebral Palsy: The Ups and Downs in Clinical Experience. In IEEE International Symposium on Robotics and Intelligent Sensors. IEEE, Langkawi, Malaysia, 394--399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.12.316
[31]
Andrew Razjigaev, Ross Crawford, Jonathan Roberts, and Liao Wu. 2017. Teleoperation of a Concentric Tube Robot through Hand Gesture Visual Tracking. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO 2017). IEEE, Macau, China, 1175--1180.
[32]
B. Robins, K. Dautenhahn, R. Te Boekhorst, and A. Billard. 2005. Robotic assistants in therapy and education of children with autism: Can a small humanoid robot help encourage social interaction skills? Universal Access in the Information Society 4, 2 (2005), 105--120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-005-0116-3
[33]
G. Robinson and J.B.C. Davies. 1999. Continuum robots-a state of the art. In IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. IEEE, Detroit, USA, 2849--2854. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROBOT.1999.774029
[34]
Marco Salerno, Ketao Zhang, Arianna Menciassi, and Jian S. Dai. 2016. A Novel 4-DOF Origami Grasper With an SMA-Actuation System for Minimally Invasive Surgery. IEEE Transactions on Robotics 32, 3 (2016), 484--498. https://doi.org/10.1109/TRO.2016.2539373
[35]
Fumio Sasazawa, Maria Antico, Ajay Pandey, Jonathan Roberts, Norimasa Iwasaki, Ross Crawford, and Davide Fontanarosa. 2017. Towards Robotic Knee Arthroscopy: creating a 3D ultrasound based knee atlas to introduce 4D ultrasonography as robotic vision modality for guidance. Technical Report. Hakodate, Japan.
[36]
Nabil Simaan, Kai Xu, Ankur Kapoor, Wei Wei, Peter Kazanzides, Paul Flint, and Russell Taylor. 2009. Design and Integration of a Telerobotic System for Minimally Invasive Surgery of the Throat. The International journal of robotics research 28, 9 (2009), 1134--1153. https://doi.org/10.1177/0278364908104278
[37]
David Sirkin, Brian Mok, Stephen Yang, and Wendy Ju. 2015. Mechanical Ottoman: How Robotic Furniture Offers and Withdraws Support. In Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. ACM, Portland, USA, 11--18.
[38]
Monique Tabak, Miriam Cabrita, Thomas Schüler, David Hörst, René Heuven, Benjamin Kinast, and Annika Thomas. 2017. âĂIJ Dinner is ready !âĂİ: Virtual Reality Assisted Training for Chronic Pain Rehabilitation. In Extended Abstracts Publication of the Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play. Amsterdam, Netherlands, 283--289.
[39]
Russell H. Taylor. 2006. A perspective on medical robotics. Proc. IEEE 94, 9 (2006), 1652--1664. https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2006.880669
[40]
Russell H Taylor, Arianna Menciassi, Gabor Fichtinger, and Paolo Dario. 2008. Medical Robotics in Computer-Integrated Surgery. In Handbook of Robotics (2nd ed.), Bruno Siciliano and Oussama Khatib (Eds.). Springer, Chapter 52, 1199--1222. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30301-5
[41]
Kazuyoshi Wada, Takanori Shibata, Tomoko Saito, and Kazuo Tanie. 2004. Effects of robot-assisted activity for elderly people and nurses at a day service center. Proc. IEEE 92, 11 (2004), 1780--1788. https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2004.835378
[42]
Jed R Wood and Larry E Wood. 2008. Card Sorting: Current Practices and Beyond. Journal of Usability Studies 4, 1 (2008), 1--6.
[43]
Ruimin Zhang, Myounghoon Jeon, Chung Hyuk Park, and Ayanna Howard. 2015. Robotic Sonification for Promoting Emotional and Social Interactions of Children with ASD. In Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction Extended Abstracts. ACM, Portland, USA, 111--112. https://doi.org/10.1145/2701973.2702033

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Optimal Vision-Based Orientation Steering Control for a 3-D Printed Dexterous Snake-Like Manipulator to Assist TeleoperationIEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics10.1109/TMECH.2023.330066229:2(1260-1271)Online publication date: Apr-2024

Index Terms

  1. Towards Surgical Robots: Understanding Interaction Challenges in Knee Surgery

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    OzCHI '19: Proceedings of the 31st Australian Conference on Human-Computer-Interaction
    December 2019
    631 pages
    ISBN:9781450376969
    DOI:10.1145/3369457
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    In-Cooperation

    • HFESA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society of Australia Inc.

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 10 January 2020

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Arthroscopy
    2. Human Robotic Interaction
    3. Minimally Invasive Surgery
    4. Robotic Assisted Surgery

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    OZCHI'19
    OZCHI'19: 31ST AUSTRALIAN CONFERENCE ON HUMAN-COMPUTER-INTERACTION
    December 2 - 5, 2019
    WA, Fremantle, Australia

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 362 of 729 submissions, 50%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)35
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3
    Reflects downloads up to 18 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Optimal Vision-Based Orientation Steering Control for a 3-D Printed Dexterous Snake-Like Manipulator to Assist TeleoperationIEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics10.1109/TMECH.2023.330066229:2(1260-1271)Online publication date: Apr-2024

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media