Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3366423.3380051acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesthewebconfConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open access

End-to-End Deep Attentive Personalized Item Retrieval for Online Content-sharing Platforms

Published: 20 April 2020 Publication History

Abstract

Modern online content-sharing platforms host billions of items like music, videos, and products uploaded by various providers for users to discover items of their interests. To satisfy the information needs, the task of effective item retrieval (or item search ranking) given user search queries has become one of the most fundamental problems to online content-sharing platforms. Moreover, the same query can represent different search intents for different users, so personalization is also essential for providing more satisfactory search results. Different from other similar research tasks, such as ad-hoc retrieval and product retrieval with copious words and reviews, items in content-sharing platforms usually lack sufficient descriptive information and related meta-data as features. In this paper, we propose the end-to-end deep attentive model (EDAM) to deal with personalized item retrieval for online content-sharing platforms using only discrete personal item history and queries. Each discrete item in the personal item history of a user and its content provider are first mapped to embedding vectors as continuous representations. A query-aware attention mechanism is then applied to identify the relevant contexts in the user history and construct the overall personal representation for a given query. Finally, an extreme multi-class softmax classifier aggregates the representations of both query and personal item history to provide personalized search results. We conduct extensive experiments on a large-scale real-world dataset with hundreds of million users from a large video media platform at Google. The experimental results demonstrate that our proposed approach significantly outperforms several competitive baseline methods. It is also worth mentioning that this work utilizes a massive dataset from a real-world commercial content-sharing platform for personalized item retrieval to provide more insightful analysis from the industrial aspects.

References

[1]
Martín Abadi, Paul Barham, Jianmin Chen, Zhifeng Chen, Andy Davis, Jeffrey Dean, Matthieu Devin, Sanjay Ghemawat, Geoffrey Irving, Michael Isard, 2016. Tensorflow: A system for large-scale machine learning. In 12th {USENIX} Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation ({OSDI} 16). 265–283.
[2]
Qingyao Ai, Daniel N Hill, SVN Vishwanathan, and W Bruce Croft. 2019. A Zero Attention Model for Personalized Product Search. arXiv preprint arXiv:1908.11322 (2019).
[3]
Qingyao Ai, Yongfeng Zhang, Keping Bi, Xu Chen, and W Bruce Croft. 2017. Learning a hierarchical embedding model for personalized product search. In Proceedings of the 40th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. ACM, 645–654.
[4]
Kamelia Aryafar, Devin Guillory, and Liangjie Hong. 2017. An Ensemble-based Approach to Click-Through Rate Prediction for Promoted Listings at Etsy. In Proceedings of the ADKDD’17. ACM, 10.
[5]
Paul N Bennett, Ryen W White, Wei Chu, Susan T Dumais, Peter Bailey, Fedor Borisyuk, and Xiaoyuan Cui. 2012. Modeling the impact of short-and long-term behavior on search personalization. In Proceedings of the 35th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval. ACM, 185–194.
[6]
Jean Burgess and Joshua Green. 2018. YouTube: Online video and participatory culture. John Wiley & Sons.
[7]
Jingyuan Chen, Hanwang Zhang, Xiangnan He, Liqiang Nie, Wei Liu, and Tat-Seng Chua. 2017. Attentive collaborative filtering: Multimedia recommendation with item-and component-level attention. In Proceedings of the 40th International ACM SIGIR conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. ACM, 335–344.
[8]
Paul Covington, Jay Adams, and Emre Sargin. 2016. Deep neural networks for youtube recommendations. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM conference on recommender systems. ACM, 191–198.
[9]
Mariam Daoud, Lynda Tamine-Lechani, and Mohand Boughanem. 2008. Learning user interests for a session-based personalized search. In Proceedings of the second international symposium on Information interaction in context. ACM, 57–64.
[10]
James Davidson, Benjamin Liebald, Junning Liu, Palash Nandy, Taylor Van Vleet, Ullas Gargi, Sujoy Gupta, Yu He, Mike Lambert, Blake Livingston, 2010. The YouTube video recommendation system. In Proceedings of the fourth ACM conference on Recommender systems. ACM, 293–296.
[11]
Huizhong Duan and ChengXiang Zhai. 2015. Mining coordinated intent representation for entity search and recommendation. In Proceedings of the 24th ACM International on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. ACM, 333–342.
[12]
Huizhong Duan, ChengXiang Zhai, Jinxing Cheng, and Abhishek Gattani. 2013. A probabilistic mixture model for mining and analyzing product search log. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM international conference on Information & Knowledge Management. ACM, 2179–2188.
[13]
Anjan Goswami, Naren Chittar, and Chung H Sung. 2011. A study on the impact of product images on user clicks for online shopping. In Proceedings of the 20th international conference companion on World wide web. ACM, 45–46.
[14]
Mihajlo Grbovic and Haibin Cheng. 2018. Real-time personalization using embeddings for search ranking at airbnb. In Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining. ACM, 311–320.
[15]
Jiafeng Guo, Yixing Fan, Qingyao Ai, and W Bruce Croft. 2016. A deep relevance matching model for ad-hoc retrieval. In Proceedings of the 25th ACM International on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. ACM, 55–64.
[16]
Yangyang Guo, Zhiyong Cheng, Liqiang Nie, Yinglong Wang, Jun Ma, and Mohan Kankanhalli. 2019. Attentive long short-term preference modeling for personalized product search. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS) 37, 2 (2019), 19.
[17]
Malay Haldar, Mustafa Abdool, Prashant Ramanathan, Tao Xu, Shulin Yang, Huizhong Duan, Qing Zhang, Nick Barrow-Williams, Bradley C Turnbull, Brendan M Collins, 2019. Applying deep learning to Airbnb search. In Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining. ACM, 1927–1935.
[18]
Balázs Hidasi, Alexandros Karatzoglou, Linas Baltrunas, and Domonkos Tikk. 2015. Session-based recommendations with recurrent neural networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1511.06939(2015).
[19]
Geoffrey E Hinton and Ruslan R Salakhutdinov. 2006. Reducing the dimensionality of data with neural networks. science 313, 5786 (2006), 504–507.
[20]
Yujing Hu, Qing Da, Anxiang Zeng, Yang Yu, and Yinghui Xu. 2018. Reinforcement learning to rank in e-commerce search engine: Formalization, analysis, and application. In Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining. ACM, 368–377.
[21]
Po-Sen Huang, Xiaodong He, Jianfeng Gao, Li Deng, Alex Acero, and Larry Heck. 2013. Learning deep structured semantic models for web search using clickthrough data. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM international conference on Information & Knowledge Management. ACM, 2333–2338.
[22]
Sebastien Jean, Kyunghyun Cho, Roland Memisevic, and Yoshua Bengio. 2015. On using very large target vocabulary for neural machine translation. In 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing of the Asian Federation of Natural Language Processing, ACL-IJCNLP 2015. Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), 1–10.
[23]
Shubhra Kanti Karmaker Santu, Parikshit Sondhi, and ChengXiang Zhai. 2017. On application of learning to rank for e-commerce search. In Proceedings of the 40th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. ACM, 475–484.
[24]
Diederik P Kingma and Jimmy Ba. 2014. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980(2014).
[25]
Jing Li, Pengjie Ren, Zhumin Chen, Zhaochun Ren, Tao Lian, and Jun Ma. 2017. Neural attentive session-based recommendation. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. ACM, 1419–1428.
[26]
Sheng Li, Jaya Kawale, and Yun Fu. 2015. Deep collaborative filtering via marginalized denoising auto-encoder. In Proceedings of the 24th ACM International on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. ACM, 811–820.
[27]
Soon Chong Johnson Lim, Ying Liu, and Wing Bun Lee. 2010. Multi-facet product information search and retrieval using semantically annotated product family ontology. Information Processing & Management 46, 4 (2010), 479–493.
[28]
Christopher Manning, Prabhakar Raghavan, and Hinrich Schütze. 2010. Introduction to information retrieval. Natural Language Engineering 16, 1 (2010), 100–103.
[29]
Nicolaas Matthijs and Filip Radlinski. 2011. Personalizing web search using long term browsing history. In Proceedings of the fourth ACM international conference on Web search and data mining. ACM, 25–34.
[30]
Bhaskar Mitra, Fernando Diaz, and Nick Craswell. 2017. Learning to match using local and distributed representations of text for web search. In Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web. International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, 1291–1299.
[31]
Makbule Gulcin Ozsoy, Kezban Dilek Onal, and Ismail Sengor Altingovde. 2014. Result diversification for tweet search. In International Conference on Web Information Systems Engineering. Springer, 78–89.
[32]
Nish Parikh and Neel Sundaresan. 2011. Beyond relevance in marketplace search. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management. ACM, 2109–2112.
[33]
Steffen Rendle, Christoph Freudenthaler, Zeno Gantner, and Lars Schmidt-Thieme. 2009. BPR: Bayesian personalized ranking from implicit feedback. In Proceedings of the twenty-fifth conference on uncertainty in artificial intelligence. AUAI Press, 452–461.
[34]
Xuehua Shen, Bin Tan, and ChengXiang Zhai. 2005. Implicit user modeling for personalized search. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management. ACM, 824–831.
[35]
Börkur Sigurbjörnsson and Roelof Van Zwol. 2008. Flickr tag recommendation based on collective knowledge. In Proceedings of the 17th international conference on World Wide Web. ACM, 327–336.
[36]
David Sontag, Kevyn Collins-Thompson, Paul N Bennett, Ryen W White, Susan Dumais, and Bodo Billerbeck. 2012. Probabilistic models for personalizing web search. In Proceedings of the fifth ACM international conference on Web search and data mining. ACM, 433–442.
[37]
Bin Tan, Xuehua Shen, and ChengXiang Zhai. 2006. Mining long-term search history to improve search accuracy. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. ACM, 718–723.
[38]
Yury Ustinovskiy and Pavel Serdyukov. 2013. Personalization of web-search using short-term browsing context. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM international conference on Information & Knowledge Management. ACM, 1979–1988.
[39]
Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N Gomez, Łukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin. 2017. Attention is all you need. In Advances in neural information processing systems. 5998–6008.
[40]
Jan Vosecky, Kenneth Wai-Ting Leung, and Wilfred Ng. 2014. Collaborative personalized twitter search with topic-language models. In Proceedings of the 37th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research & development in information retrieval. ACM, 53–62.
[41]
Chen Wu, Ming Yan, and Luo Si. 2017. Ensemble methods for personalized e-commerce search challenge at CIKM Cup 2016. arXiv preprint arXiv:1708.04479(2017).
[42]
Jun Yu, Sunil Mohan, Duangmanee Pew Putthividhya, and Weng-Keen Wong. 2014. Latent dirichlet allocation based diversified retrieval for e-commerce search. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM international conference on Web search and data mining. ACM, 463–472.
[43]
Hamed Zamani, Michael Bendersky, Xuanhui Wang, and Mingyang Zhang. 2017. Situational context for ranking in personal search. In Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web. International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, 1531–1540.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Turning backdoors for efficient privacy protection against image retrieval violationsInformation Processing & Management10.1016/j.ipm.2023.10347160:5(103471)Online publication date: Sep-2023
  • (2022)EANA: Reducing Privacy Risk on Large-scale Recommendation ModelsProceedings of the 16th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems10.1145/3523227.3546769(399-407)Online publication date: 12-Sep-2022
  • (2022)Multi-Resolution Attention for Personalized Item SearchProceedings of the Fifteenth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining10.1145/3488560.3498426(508-516)Online publication date: 11-Feb-2022
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. End-to-End Deep Attentive Personalized Item Retrieval for Online Content-sharing Platforms
    Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    WWW '20: Proceedings of The Web Conference 2020
    April 2020
    3143 pages
    ISBN:9781450370233
    DOI:10.1145/3366423
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 20 April 2020

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Item retrieval
    2. attention mechanism
    3. online content-sharing platforms
    4. personalization
    5. real-world log analysis.

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    WWW '20
    Sponsor:
    WWW '20: The Web Conference 2020
    April 20 - 24, 2020
    Taipei, Taiwan

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 1,899 of 8,196 submissions, 23%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)146
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)25
    Reflects downloads up to 25 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2023)Turning backdoors for efficient privacy protection against image retrieval violationsInformation Processing & Management10.1016/j.ipm.2023.10347160:5(103471)Online publication date: Sep-2023
    • (2022)EANA: Reducing Privacy Risk on Large-scale Recommendation ModelsProceedings of the 16th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems10.1145/3523227.3546769(399-407)Online publication date: 12-Sep-2022
    • (2022)Multi-Resolution Attention for Personalized Item SearchProceedings of the Fifteenth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining10.1145/3488560.3498426(508-516)Online publication date: 11-Feb-2022
    • (2021)Learning to Represent Human Motives for Goal-directed Web BrowsingProceedings of the 15th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems10.1145/3460231.3474260(361-371)Online publication date: 13-Sep-2021
    • (2021)You Get What You Chat: Using Conversations to Personalize Search-Based RecommendationsAdvances in Information Retrieval10.1007/978-3-030-72113-8_14(207-223)Online publication date: 27-Mar-2021

    View Options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format.

    HTML Format

    Login options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media