Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
research-article

An Analysis of Approaches Taken in the ACM RecSys Challenge 2018 for Automatic Music Playlist Continuation

Published: 18 September 2019 Publication History

Abstract

The ACM Recommender Systems Challenge 2018 focused on the task of automatic music playlist continuation, which is a form of the more general task of sequential recommendation. Given a playlist of arbitrary length with some additional meta-data, the task was to recommend up to 500 tracks that fit the target characteristics of the original playlist. For the RecSys Challenge, Spotify released a dataset of one million user-generated playlists. Participants could compete in two tracks, i.e., main and creative tracks. Participants in the main track were only allowed to use the provided training set, however, in the creative track, the use of external public sources was permitted. In total, 113 teams submitted 1,228 runs to the main track; 33 teams submitted 239 runs to the creative track. The highest performing team in the main track achieved an R-precision of 0.2241, an NDCG of 0.3946, and an average number of recommended songs clicks of 1.784. In the creative track, an R-precision of 0.2233, an NDCG of 0.3939, and a click rate of 1.785 was obtained by the best team. This article provides an overview of the challenge, including motivation, task definition, dataset description, and evaluation. We further report and analyze the results obtained by the top-performing teams in each track and explore the approaches taken by the winners. We finally summarize our key findings, discuss generalizability of approaches and results to domains other than music, and list the open avenues and possible future directions in the area of automatic playlist continuation.

References

[1]
Sebastiano Antenucci, Simone Boglio, Emanuele Chioso, Ervin Dervishaj, Shuwen Kang, Tommaso Scarlatti, and Maurizio Ferrari Dacrema. 2018. Artist-driven layering and user’s behaviour impact on recommendations in a playlist continuation scenario. In Proceedings of the ACM Recommender Systems Challenge (RecSysChallenge’18).
[2]
Dmitry Bogdanov, Alastair Porter, Perfecto Herrera, and Xavier Serra. 2016. Cross-collection evaluation for music classification tasks. In Proceedings of the 17th International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference (ISMIR’16).
[3]
Piotr Bojanowski, Edouard Grave, Armand Joulin, and Tomas Mikolov. 2016. Enriching word vectors with subword information. arXiv preprint arXiv:1607.04606.
[4]
Geoffray Bonnin and Dietmar Jannach. 2015. Automated generation of music playlists: Survey and experiments. Comput. Surveys 47, 2 (2015), 26.
[5]
Chris J. C. Burges. 2010. From RankNet to LambdaRank to LambdaMART: An overview. Technical Report.
[6]
Robin Burke. 2002. Hybrid recommender systems: Survey and experiments. User Model. User-Adapt. Interact. 12, 4 (Nov. 2002), 331--370.
[7]
Ching-Wei Chen, Paul Lamere, Markus Schedl, and Hamed Zamani. 2018. RecSys challenge 2018: Automatic music playlist continuation. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys’18).
[8]
Ruey-Cheng Chen, Luke Gallagher, Roi Blanco, and J. Shane Culpepper. 2017. Efficient cost-aware cascade ranking in multi-stage retrieval. In Proceedings of the 40th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR’17). ACM, New York, NY, 445--454.
[9]
Shuo Chen, Josh L. Moore, Douglas Turnbull, and Thorsten Joachims. 2012. Playlist prediction via metric embedding. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD’12). ACM, New York, NY, 714--722.
[10]
Tianqi Chen and Carlos Guestrin. 2016. XGBoost: A scalable tree boosting system. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining (KDD’16). ACM, New York, NY, 785--794.
[11]
Van Dang, Michael Bendersky, and W. Bruce Croft. 2013. Two-stage learning to rank for information retrieval. In Advances in Information Retrieval. Springer, Berlin, 423--434.
[12]
Jean-Charles de Borda. 1781. Mémoire sur les élections au scrutin. Histoire de l’Académie Royale des Sciences.
[13]
Michael D. Ekstrand, F. Maxwell Harper, Martijn C. Willemsen, and Joseph A. Konstan. 2014. User perception of differences in recommender algorithms. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys’14). ACM, New York, NY, 161--168.
[14]
Guglielmo Faggioli, Mirko Polato, and Fabio Aiolli. 2018. Efficient similarity-based methods for the playlist continuation task. In Proceedings of the ACM Recommender Systems Challenge (RecSysChallenge’18).
[15]
Andres Ferraro, Dmitry Bogdanov, Jisang Yoon, Kwangseob Kim, and Xavier Serra. 2018. Automatic playlist continuation using a hybrid recommender system combining features from text and audio. In Proceedings of the ACM Recommender Systems Challenge (RecSysChallenge’18).
[16]
Jerome H. Friedman. 2001. Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine. Ann. Stat. 29, 5 (2001), 1189--1232.
[17]
Ian Goodfellow, Yoshua Bengio, and Aaron Courville. 2016. Deep learning. MIT Press. Retrieved from http://www.deeplearningbook.org.
[18]
Xiangnan He, Lizi Liao, Hanwang Zhang, Liqiang Nie, Xia Hu, and Tat-Seng Chua. 2017. Neural collaborative filtering. In Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW’17). International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, Republic and Canton of Geneva, Switzerland, 173--182.
[19]
Sepp Hochreiter and Jürgen Schmidhuber. 1997. Long short-term memory. Neural Comput. 9, 8 (1997), 1735--1780.
[20]
Yifan Hu, Yehuda Koren, and Chris Volinsky. 2008. Collaborative filtering for implicit feedback datasets. In Proceedings of the 8th IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM’08). 263--272.
[21]
Kalervo Järvelin and Jaana Kekäläinen. 2002. Cumulated gain-based evaluation of IR techniques. ACM Trans. Info. Syst. 20, 4 (Oct. 2002), 422--446.
[22]
Karen Spärck Jones. 1972. A statistical interpretation of term specificity and its application in retrieval. Journal of Documentation 28 (1972), 11--21.
[23]
Surya Kallumadi, Bhaskar Mitra, and Tereza Iofciu. 2018. A line in the sand: Recommendation or ad-hoc retrieval? In Proceedings of the ACM Recommender Systems Challenge (RecSysChallenge’18).
[24]
Iman Kamehkhosh, Dietmar Jannach, and Geoffray Bonnin. 2018. How automated recommendations affect the playlist creation behavior of users. In Proceedings of the 23rd ACM Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces Workshops: Intelligent Music Interfaces for Listening and Creation (MILC’18).
[25]
Mesut Kaya and Derek Bridge. 2018. Automatic playlist continuation using subprofile-aware diversification. In Proceedings of the ACM Recommender Systems Challenge (RecSysChallenge’18).
[26]
Domokos M. Kelen, Daniel Berecz, Ferenc Béres, and Andrés A. Benczur. 2018. Efficient K-NN for playlist continuation. In Proceedings of the ACM Recommender Systems Challenge (RecSysChallenge’18).
[27]
Jaehun Kim, Minz Won, Cynthia C. S. Liem, and Alan Hanjalic. 2018. Towards seed-free music playlist generation: Enhancing collaborative filtering with playlist title information. In Proceedings of the ACM Recommender Systems Challenge (RecSysChallenge’18).
[28]
Bart P. Knijnenburg, Martijn C. Willemsen, Zeno Gantner, Hakan Soncu, and Chris Newell. 2012. Explaining the user experience of recommender systems. User Model. User-Adapt. Interact. 22, 4--5 (2012), 441--504.
[29]
Maciej Kula. 2015. Metadata embeddings for user and item cold-start recommendations. In Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on New Trends on Content-based Recommender Systems co-located with 9th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. 14--21.
[30]
Aristomenis S. Lampropoulos, Paraskevi S. Lampropoulou, and George A. Tsihrintzis. 2012. A cascade-hybrid music recommender system for mobile services based on musical genre classification and personality diagnosis. Multimedia Tools Appl. 59, 1 (July 2012), 241--258.
[31]
Victor Lavrenko and W. Bruce Croft. 2001. Relevance-based language models. In Proceedings of the 24th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR’01). ACM, New York, NY, 120--127.
[32]
Lei Li, Dingding Wang, Tao Li, Daniel Knox, and Balaji Padmanabhan. 2011. SCENE: A scalable two-stage personalized news recommendation system. In Proceedings of the 34th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR’11). ACM, New York, NY, 125--134.
[33]
A. J. Lonsdale and A. C. North. 2011. Why do we listen to music? A uses and gratifications analysis. Brit. J. Psychol. 102 (2011), 108--134.
[34]
Malte Ludewig, Iman Kamehkhosh, Nick Landia, and Dietmar Jannach. 2018. Effective nearest-neighbor music recommendations. In Proceedings of the ACM Recommender Systems Challenge (RecSysChallenge’18).
[35]
Alireza Makhzani, Jonathon Shlens, Navdeep Jaitly, Ian Goodfellow, and Brendan Frey. 2015. Adversarial autoencoders. arXiv preprint arXiv:1511.05644.
[36]
Brian McFee and Gert Lanckriet. 2011. The natural language of playlists. In Proceedings of the 12th International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference (ISMIR’11).
[37]
Gabriel Meseguer-Brocal, Geoffroy Peeters, Guillaume Pellerin, Michel Buffa, Elena Cabrio, Catherine Faron Zucker, Alain Giboin, Isabelle Mirbel, Romain Hennequin, Manuel Moussallam, Francesco Piccoli, and Thomas Fillon. 2017. WASABI: A two million song database project with audio and cultural metadata plus webaudio enhanced client applications. In Proceedings of the Web Audio Conference on Collaborative Audio. Queen Mary University of London.
[38]
Tomas Mikolov, Ilya Sutskever, Kai Chen, Greg S. Corrado, and Jeff Dean. 2013. Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 26, C. J. C. Burges, L. Bottou, M. Welling, Z. Ghahramani, and K. Q. Weinberger (Eds.). Curran Associates, 3111--3119.
[39]
Diego Monti, Enrico Palumbo, Giuseppe Rizzo, Pasquale Lisena, Raphaël Troncy, Michael Fell, Elena Cabrio, and Maurizio Morisio. 2018. An ensemble approach of recurrent neural networks using pre-trained embeddings for playlist completion. In Proceedings of the ACM Recommender Systems Challenge (RecSysChallenge’18).
[40]
Steffen Rendle, Christoph Freudenthaler, Zeno Gantner, and Lars Schmidt-Thieme. 2009. BPR: Bayesian personalized ranking from implicit feedback. In Proceedings of the 25th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI’09). AUAI Press, Arlington, VA, 452--461. Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1795114.1795167.
[41]
S. E. Robertson and S. Walker. 1994. Some simple effective approximations to the 2-poisson model for probabilistic weighted retrieval. In Proceedings of the 17th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR’94). Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, 232--241. Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=188490.188561.
[42]
Vasiliy Rubtsov, Mikhail Kamenshikov, Ilya Valyaev, Vasiliy Leksin, and Dmitry I. Ignatov. 2018. A hybrid two-stage recommender system for automatic playlist continuation. In Proceedings of the ACM Recommender Systems Challenge (RecSysChallenge’18).
[43]
Alan Said. 2016. A short history of the RecSys challenge. 37 (12 2016), 102--104.
[44]
Gerard Salton and Christopher Buckley. 1988. Term-weighting approaches in automatic text retrieval. Info. Process. Manage. 24, 5 (1988), 513--523.
[45]
Thomas Schäfer, Peter Sedlmeier, Christine Städtler, and David Huron. 2013. The psychological functions of music listening. Front. Psychol. 4 (2013).
[46]
Markus Schedl, Hamed Zamani, Ching-Wei Chen, Yashar Deldjoo, and Mehdi Elahi. 2018. Current challenges and visions in music recommender systems research. Int. J. Multimedia Info. Retriev. 7, 2 (June 2018), 95--116.
[47]
Nava Tintarev, Christoph Lofi, and Cynthia C. S. Liem. 2017. Sequences of diverse song recommendations: An exploratory study in a commercial system. In Proceedings of the 25th Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization (UMAP’17). ACM, New York, NY, 391--392.
[48]
Iacopo Vagliano, Lukas Galke, Florian Mai, and Ansgar Scherp. 2018. Using adversarial autoencoders for automatic playlist continuation. In Proceedings of the ACM Recommender Systems Challenge (RecSysChallenge’18).
[49]
Andreu Vall, Massimo Quadrana, Markus Schedl, Gerhard Widmer, and Paolo Cremonesi. 2017. The importance of song context in music playlists. In Proceedings of the 11th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys’17).
[50]
Timo van Niedek and Arjen de Vried. 2018. Random walk with restart for automatic playlist continuation and query-specific adaptations. In Proceedings of the ACM Recommender Systems Challenge (RecSysChallenge’18).
[51]
Maksims Volkovs, Himanshu Rai, Zhaoyue Cheng, Ga Wu, Yichao Lu, and Scott Sanner. 2018. Two-stage model for automatic playlist continuation at scale. In Proceedings of the ACM Recommender Systems Challenge (RecSysChallenge’18).
[52]
Lidan Wang, Jimmy Lin, and Donald Metzler. 2011. A cascade ranking model for efficient ranked retrieval. In Proceedings of the 34th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR’11). ACM, New York, NY, 105--114.
[53]
Hojin Yang, Yoonki Jeong, Minjin Choi, and Jongwuk Lee. 2018. MMCF: Multimodal collaborative filtering for automatic playlist continuation. In Proceedings of the ACM Recommender Systems Challenge (RecSysChallenge’18).
[54]
Xing Zhao, Qingquan Song, James Caverlee, and Xia Hu. 2018. TrailMix: An ensemble recommender system for playlist curation and continuation. In Proceedings of the ACM Recommender Systems Challenge (RecSysChallenge’18).
[55]
Lin Zhu, Bowen He, Mengxin Ji, Cheng Ju, and Yihong Chen. 2018. Automatic music playlist continuation via neighbor-based collaborative filtering and discriminative reweighting/reranking. In Proceedings of the ACM Recommender Systems Challenge (RecSysChallenge’18).

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Everyday artificial intelligence unveiled: Societal awareness of technological transformationOeconomia Copernicana10.24136/oc.296115:2(367-406)Online publication date: 30-Jun-2024
  • (2024)Surveying More Than Two Decades of Music Information Retrieval Research on PlaylistsACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology10.1145/368839815:6(1-68)Online publication date: 12-Aug-2024
  • (2024)Bridging Search and Recommendation in Generative Retrieval: Does One Task Help the Other?Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems10.1145/3640457.3688123(340-349)Online publication date: 8-Oct-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. An Analysis of Approaches Taken in the ACM RecSys Challenge 2018 for Automatic Music Playlist Continuation

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

        Information & Contributors

        Information

        Published In

        cover image ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology
        ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology  Volume 10, Issue 5
        Special Section on Advances in Causal Discovery and Inference and Regular Papers
        September 2019
        314 pages
        ISSN:2157-6904
        EISSN:2157-6912
        DOI:10.1145/3360733
        Issue’s Table of Contents
        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        Published: 18 September 2019
        Accepted: 01 July 2019
        Revised: 01 June 2019
        Received: 01 October 2018
        Published in TIST Volume 10, Issue 5

        Permissions

        Request permissions for this article.

        Check for updates

        Author Tags

        1. Recommender systems
        2. automatic playlist continuation
        3. benchmark
        4. challenge
        5. evaluation
        6. music recommendation systems

        Qualifiers

        • Research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed

        Funding Sources

        • Center for Intelligent Information Retrieval

        Contributors

        Other Metrics

        Bibliometrics & Citations

        Bibliometrics

        Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)189
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)30
        Reflects downloads up to 18 Nov 2024

        Other Metrics

        Citations

        Cited By

        View all
        • (2024)Everyday artificial intelligence unveiled: Societal awareness of technological transformationOeconomia Copernicana10.24136/oc.296115:2(367-406)Online publication date: 30-Jun-2024
        • (2024)Surveying More Than Two Decades of Music Information Retrieval Research on PlaylistsACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology10.1145/368839815:6(1-68)Online publication date: 12-Aug-2024
        • (2024)Bridging Search and Recommendation in Generative Retrieval: Does One Task Help the Other?Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems10.1145/3640457.3688123(340-349)Online publication date: 8-Oct-2024
        • (2024)LARP: Language Audio Relational Pre-training for Cold-Start Playlist ContinuationProceedings of the 30th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining10.1145/3637528.3671772(2524-2535)Online publication date: 25-Aug-2024
        • (2024)Integrating Repeat Listening Patterns for Enhanced Music Recommendation2024 18th International Conference on Ubiquitous Information Management and Communication (IMCOM)10.1109/IMCOM60618.2024.10418302(1-7)Online publication date: 3-Jan-2024
        • (2024)Conclusions and Open ChallengesTechnical and Regulatory Perspectives on Information Retrieval and Recommender Systems10.1007/978-3-031-69978-8_6(143-146)Online publication date: 24-Oct-2024
        • (2024)Privacy and SecurityTechnical and Regulatory Perspectives on Information Retrieval and Recommender Systems10.1007/978-3-031-69978-8_5(103-141)Online publication date: 24-Oct-2024
        • (2024)TransparencyTechnical and Regulatory Perspectives on Information Retrieval and Recommender Systems10.1007/978-3-031-69978-8_4(69-102)Online publication date: 24-Oct-2024
        • (2024)Biases, Fairness, and Non-discriminationTechnical and Regulatory Perspectives on Information Retrieval and Recommender Systems10.1007/978-3-031-69978-8_3(29-67)Online publication date: 24-Oct-2024
        • (2024)Regulatory InitiativesTechnical and Regulatory Perspectives on Information Retrieval and Recommender Systems10.1007/978-3-031-69978-8_2(11-27)Online publication date: 24-Oct-2024
        • Show More Cited By

        View Options

        Login options

        Full Access

        View options

        PDF

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format.

        HTML Format

        Media

        Figures

        Other

        Tables

        Share

        Share

        Share this Publication link

        Share on social media