Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3340764.3340797acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmundcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Perceived Authenticity, Empathy, and Pro-social Intentions evoked through Avatar-mediated Self-disclosures

Published: 08 September 2019 Publication History

Abstract

Avatars are our digital embodied alter egos. Virtual embodiment by avatars allows social interaction with others using the full spectrum of verbal and non-verbal behaviour. Still, one's avatar appearances is elective. Hence, avatars make it possible for users to discuss and exchange sensible or even problematic personal topics potentially hiding their real identity and hence preserving anonymity and privacy. While previous works identified similarities how participants perceive avatars compared to human stimuli, there is a question as to whether avatar-mediated self-disclosure is authentic and results in similar social responses. In the present study, we created a comparable stimulus set to investigate this issue and conducted an online study (N=172) for comparison. Our results indicate that avatars can be perceived as authentic and that empathy is attributed in similar level than to a human stimulus. In an exploratory model, we found that for in the overall results, authenticity fostered emotional empathy which in turn fostered pro-social intentions. We argue that avatars may serve as a valuable supporting medium for HCI applications related to mental well-being, self-disclosure, and support.

References

[1]
Jascha Achenbach, Thomas Waltemate, Marc Erich Latoschik, and Mario Botsch. 2017. Fast Generation of Realistic Virtual Humans. In 23rd ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology (VRST). 12:1--12:10.
[2]
Jeremy Bailenson and Jim Blascovich. 2004. Avatars., 64--68 pages.
[3]
Christopher P Barlett and Douglas A Gentile. 2012. Attacking others online: The formation of cyberbullying in late adolescence. Psychology of Popular Media Culture 1, 2 (2012), 123.
[4]
C Daniel Batson, Marina P Polycarpou, Eddie Harmon-Jones, Heidi J Imhoff, Erin C Mitchener, Lori L Bednar, Tricia R Klein, and Lori Highberger. 1997. Empathy and attitudes: Can feeling for a member of a stigmatized group improve feelings toward the group? Journal of personality and social psychology 72, 1 (1997), 105.
[5]
Lars Bergkvist and John R Rossiter. 2007. The predictive validity of multiple-item versus single-item measures of the same constructs. Journal of marketing research 44, 2 (2007), 175--184.
[6]
Hector Betancourt. 1990. An attribution-empathy model of helping behavior: Behavioral intentions and judgments of help-giving. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 16, 3 (1990), 573--591. 00216.
[7]
Carolina Cruz-Neira, Daniel J Sandin, Thomas A DeFanti, Robert V Kenyon, and John C Hart. 1992. The CAVE: audio visual experience automatic virtual environment. Commun. ACM 35, 6 (1992), 64--73.
[8]
Mark H Davis. 1983. Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of personality and social psychology 44, 1 (1983), 113.
[9]
Aline W de Borst and Beatrice de Gelder. 2015. Is it the real deal? Perception of virtual characters versus humans: an affective cognitive neuroscience perspective. Frontiers in Psychology 6 (2015), 576.
[10]
Jean Decety and Philip L Jackson. 2004. The functional architecture of human empathy. Behavioral and cognitive neuroscience reviews 3, 2 (2004), 71--100.
[11]
Chris Dede. 2009. Immersive interfaces for engagement and learning. science 323, 5910 (2009), 66--69.
[12]
Nancy Eisenberg and Paul A Miller. 1987. The relation of empathy to prosocial and related behaviors. Psychological bulletin 101, 1 (1987), 91.
[13]
Krystina A Finlay and Walter G Stephan. 2000. Improving Intergroup Relations: The Effects of Empathy on Racial Attitudes 1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 30, 8 (2000), 1720--1737.
[14]
Alexandra Frischen, Daniel Loach, and Steven P. Tipper. {n. d.}. Seeing the World through Another PersonÃćâĆňâĎćs Eyes: Simulating Selective Attention via Action Observation. 111, 2 ({n. d.}), 212--218.
[15]
Alexandra Livia Georgescu, Bojana Kuzmanovic, Daniel Roth, Gary Bente, and Kai Vogeley. 2014. The Use of Virtual Characters to Assess and Train Non-Verbal Communication in High-Functioning Autism. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 8 (2014), 807.
[16]
Jean-Yves Gerlitz and JÃijrgen Schupp. 2005. Zur Erhebung der Big-Five-basierten persoenlichkeitsmerkmale im SOEP. DIW Research Notes 4 (2005), 2005.
[17]
Sara Green-Hamann, Kristen Campbell Eichhorn, and John C. Sherblom. 2011. An Exploration of Why People Participate in Second Life Social Support Groups. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 16, 4 (07 2011), 465--491.
[18]
Li-tze Hu and Peter M Bentler. 1999. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural equation modeling: a multidisciplinary journal 6, 1 (1999), 1--55.
[19]
Kyle Johnsen, Robert Dickerson, Andrew Raij, Benjamin Lok, Jonathan Jackson, Min Shin, Jonathan Hernandez, Amy Stevens, and D Scott Lind. 2005. Experiences in using immersive virtual characters to educate medical communication skills. In Virtual Reality, 2005. Proceedings. VR 2005. IEEE. IEEE, 179--186.
[20]
Reynol Junco. 2012. Too much face and not enough books: The relationship between multiple indices of Facebook use and academic performance. Computers in human behavior 28, 1 (2012), 187--198.
[21]
Jari Kätsyri, Klaus Förger, Meeri Mäkäräinen, and Tapio Takala. 2015. A review of empirical evidence on different uncanny valley hypotheses: support for perceptual mismatch as one road to the valley of eeriness. Frontiers in Psychology 6 (2015), 390.
[22]
Susanna Kautiainen, Leena Koivusilta, Tomi Lintonen, Suvi M Virtanen, and Aarja Rimpelä. 2005. Use of information and communication technology and prevalence of overweight and obesity among adolescents. International journal of obesity 29, 8 (2005), 925.
[23]
Christoph Klimmt, Dorothée Hefner, Leonard Reinecke, Diana Rieger, and Peter Vorderer. 2018. The permanently online and permanently connected mind. Mapping the cognitive structures behind mobile Internet use. Permanently online, permanently connected. Living and communication in a POPC world (2018), 18--28.
[24]
Sara H Konrath, William J Chopik, Courtney K Hsing, and Ed O'Brien. 2014. Changes in adult attachment styles in American college students over time: A meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review 18, 4 (2014), 326--348.
[25]
Claus Lamm, C Daniel Batson, and Jean Decety. 2007. The neural substrate of human empathy: effects of perspective-taking and cognitive appraisal. Journal of cognitive neuroscience 19, 1 (2007), 42--58.
[26]
Marc Erich Latoschik, Florian Kern, Jan-Philipp Stauffert, Andrea Bartl, Mario Botsch, and Jean-Luc Lugrin. 2019. Not Alone Here?! Scalability and User Experience of Embodied Ambient Crowds in Distributed Social Virtual Reality. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics (TVCG) 25, 5 (2019), 2134--2144.
[27]
Marc Erich Latoschik, Daniel Roth, Dominik Gall, Jascha Achenbach, Thomas Waltemate, and Mario Botsch. 2017. The Effect of Avatar Realism in Immersive Social Virtual Realities. In 23rd ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology (VRST). 39:1--39:10.
[28]
Kwan Min Lee. 2004. Presence, explicated. Communication theory 14, 1 (2004), 27--50.
[29]
Kwan Min Lee, Younbo Jung, Jaywoo Kim, and Sang Ryong Kim. 2006. Are Physically Embodied Social Agents Better than Disembodied Social Agents?: The Effects of Physical Embodiment, Tactile Interaction, and People's Loneliness in Human-Robot Interaction. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 64, 10 (2006), 962--973.
[30]
Jean-Luc Lugrin, Marc Erich Latoschik, Michael Habel, Daniel Roth, Christian Seufert, and Silke Grafe. 2016. Breaking Bad Behaviors: A New Tool for Learning Classroom Management using Virtual Reality. Frontiers in ICT 3 (2016), 26.
[31]
Masahiro Mori. 1970. Bukimi No Tani {the Uncanny Valley}. Energy 7, 4 (1970), 33--35.
[32]
Clifford Nass and Youngme Moon. 2000. Machines and mindlessness: Social responses to computers. Journal of social issues 56, 1 (2000), 81--103.
[33]
Louisa Pavey, Tobias Greitemeyer, and Paul Sparks. 2012. "I help because I want to, not because you tell me to" - Empathy increases autonomously motivated helping. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 38, 5 (2012), 681--689.
[34]
Tabitha C Peck, Sofia Seinfeld, Salvatore M Aglioti, and Mel Slater. 2013. Putting yourself in the skin of a black avatar reduces implicit racial bias. Consciousness and cognition 22, 3 (2013), 779--787.
[35]
Ivelina V. Piryankova, Hong Yu Wong, Sally A. Linkenauger, Catherine Stinson, Matthew R. Longo, Heinrich H. BÃijlthoff, and Betty J. Mohler. 2014. Owning an Overweight or Underweight Body: Distinguishing the Physical, Experienced and Virtual Body. PLOS ONE 9, 8 (08 2014), 1--13.
[36]
Andrew B. Raij, Kyle Johnsen, Robert F. Dickerson, Benjamin C. Lok, Marc S. Cohen, Margaret Duerson, Rebecca Rainer Pauly, Amy O. Stevens, Peggy Wagner, and D. Scott Lind. 2007. Comparing interpersonal interactions with a virtual human to those with a real human. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics 13, 3 (2007), 443--457.
[37]
Yves Rosseel. 2012. Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling and more. Version 0.5-12 (BETA). Journal of statistical software 48, 2 (2012), 1--36.
[38]
Daniel Roth, Jean-Luc Lugrin, Dmitri Galakhov, Arvid Hofmann, Gary Bente, Marc Erich Latoschik, and Arnulph Fuhrmann. 2016. Avatar Realism and Social Interaction Quality in Virtual Reality. In Proceedings of the 23rd IEEE Virtual Reality (IEEE VR) conference. 277--278.
[39]
Daniel Roth and Carolin Wienrich. 2018. Effects of Media Immersiveness on the Perception of Virtual Characters. Proceedings of the GI VR/AR Workshop (2018).
[40]
Valentin Schwind and Solveigh Jäger. 2016. The Uncanny Valley and the Importance of Eye Contact. i-com 15, 1 (2016), 93--104.
[41]
Johanna Shapiro. 2011. Illness narratives: reliability, authenticity and the empathic witness. Institute of Medical Ethics.
[42]
Ketaki Shriram, Soon Youn Oh, and Jeremy Bailenson. 2017. 22 Virtual Reality and Prosocial Behavior. Social signal processing (2017), 304.
[43]
R Nathan Spreng*, Margaret C McKinnon*, Raymond A Mar, and Brian Levine. 2009. The Toronto Empathy Questionnaire: Scale development and initial validation of a factor-analytic solution to multiple empathy measures. Journal of personality assessment 91, 1 (2009), 62--71.
[44]
Andrew Surtees, Ian Apperly, and Dana Samson. 2013. Similarities and differences in visual and spatial perspective-taking processes. Cognition 129, 2 (2013), 426--438.
[45]
Theo Van Leeuwen. 2001. What is authenticity? Discourse studies 3, 4 (2001), 392--397.
[46]
Theresa K Vescio, Gretchen B Sechrist, and Matthew P Paolucci. 2003. Perspective taking and prejudice reduction: The mediational role of empathy arousal and situational attributions. European Journal of Social Psychology 33, 4 (2003), 455--472.
[47]
Astrid M Von der Puetten, Nicole C Krämer, Jonathan Gratch, and Sin-Hwa Kang. 2010. It doesn't matter what you are! Explaining social effects of agents and avatars. Computers in Human Behavior 26, 6 (2010), 1641--1650.
[48]
Peter Vorderer. 2015. Der mediatisierte Lebenswandel. Publizistik 60, 3 (2015), 259--276.
[49]
Thomas Waltemate, Dominik Gall, Daniel Roth, Mario Botsch, and Marc Erich Latoschik. 2018. The Impact of Avatar Personalization and Immersion on Virtual Body Ownership, Presence, and Emotional Response. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics 24, 4 (2018), 1643--1652.
[50]
Joseph B Walther. 2007. Selective self-presentation in computermediated communication: Hyperpersonal dimensions of technology, language, and cognition. Computers in Human Behavior 23, 5 (2007), 2538--2557.
[51]
Thibaut Weise, Sofien Bouaziz, Hao Li, and Mark Pauly. 2011. Realtime Performance-based Facial Animation. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2011 Papers (SIGGRAPH '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 77:1--77:10.
[52]
Nick Yee and Jeremy N Bailenson. 2006. Walk a mile in digital shoes: The impact of embodied perspective-taking on the reduction of negative stereotyping in immersive virtual environments. Proceedings of PRESENCE 24 (2006), 26.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Interface as a Mirror: Reflexivity of the Individual and the CollectiveФилософия и культура10.7256/2454-0757.2024.3.70212(82-97)Online publication date: Mar-2024
  • (2024)Situating Empathy in HCI/CSCW: A Scoping ReviewProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36870528:CSCW2(1-37)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2024
  • (2024)Metaverse and regenerative tourism: the role of avatars in promoting sustainable practicesAsia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research10.1080/10941665.2024.235040129:7(869-884)Online publication date: 13-May-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
MuC '19: Proceedings of Mensch und Computer 2019
September 2019
863 pages
ISBN:9781450371988
DOI:10.1145/3340764
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 08 September 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Avatars
  2. Empathy
  3. Social Perception
  4. Virtual Characters

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

MuC'19
MuC'19: Mensch-und-Computer
September 8 - 11, 2019
Hamburg, Germany

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)106
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)11
Reflects downloads up to 16 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Interface as a Mirror: Reflexivity of the Individual and the CollectiveФилософия и культура10.7256/2454-0757.2024.3.70212(82-97)Online publication date: Mar-2024
  • (2024)Situating Empathy in HCI/CSCW: A Scoping ReviewProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36870528:CSCW2(1-37)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2024
  • (2024)Metaverse and regenerative tourism: the role of avatars in promoting sustainable practicesAsia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research10.1080/10941665.2024.235040129:7(869-884)Online publication date: 13-May-2024
  • (2024)A scoping review of interventions targeting HIV stigma in women living with HIVAIDS Care10.1080/09540121.2024.240868236:12(1719-1730)Online publication date: 3-Oct-2024
  • (2023)CanChat: A Cantonese Empathetic Chatbot for Secondary School Student Counseling2023 International Symposium on Educational Technology (ISET)10.1109/ISET58841.2023.00041(170-175)Online publication date: 17-Jul-2023
  • (2023)How do people respond to computer-generated versus human faces? A systematic review and meta-analysesComputers in Human Behavior Reports10.1016/j.chbr.2023.10028310(100283)Online publication date: May-2023
  • (2022)Something Personal from the Metaverse: Goals, Topics, and Contextual Factors of Self-Disclosure in Commercial Social VRProceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3491102.3502008(1-17)Online publication date: 29-Apr-2022
  • (2022)A comparison of natural user interface and graphical user interface for narrative in HMD-based augmented realityMultimedia Tools and Applications10.1007/s11042-021-11723-081:4(5795-5826)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2022
  • (2021)BibliographieComprendre et soigner l'homme connecté10.3917/dunod.tisse.2021.01.0239(239-258)Online publication date: 31-Mar-2021

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media