Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3332186.3332194acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagespearcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Automated Deep Learning Analysis of Purple Martin Videos Depicting Incubation and Provisioning

Published: 28 July 2019 Publication History

Abstract

Deep learning models have been developed to automatically analyze video clips of purple martin nesting behavior. Two separate models have been constructed, one for incubation and one for provisioning. The incubation model is a simple two class model that analyzes the videos to determine if an adult purple martin is incubating the eggs/young nestlings or not. The model is a Keras/Tensor Flow convolutional neural network (CNN) trained with 12 thousand still images and achieves a validation data set accuracy of 99.5% percent on still images. A comparison of the results of the automated video analysis with sample validation videos viewed manually shows good agreement; the model approaches human accuracy. Some conclusions from the incubation analysis will be discussed. The provisioning analysis requires a much more complex 3 class model which must distinguish between zero, one parent or both parents on the nest. With training sets including 26 thousand images the CNN model demonstrates a validation set accuracy of 99% on the still images. However, the actual video analysis presents difficulties. Several different CNN models have been tried but results were similar. The best results to date on analyzing the videos for provisioning events have been 88% accuracy with 10% false positives. A discussion of the conclusions from the provisioning model and model analysis will be presented.

References

[1]
Alexis L. Blackmer, Josh Ackerman, and Gabrielle A. Nevitt. 2004. Effects of investigator disturbance on hatching success and nest-site fidelity in a long-lived seabird, Leach's storm-petrel. Biological Conservation 116, 1 (2004), 141--148.
[2]
Grace E. Bottitta, H. Grant Gilchrist, A. Kift, and M. G. Meredith. 2002. A Pressure-Sensitive Wireless Device for Continuously Monitoring Avian Nest Attendance. Wildlife Society Bulletin 30, 4 (2002), 1033--1038. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3784269
[3]
C.R. Brown and S.A. Tarof. 2017. Purple martin (Progne subis). Account 287 in A. Poole, editor. The birds of North America online. Cornell Lab of Ornithology. http://bna.birds.cornell.edu/bna/species/287
[4]
François Chollet et al. 2015. Keras. https://github.com/fchollet/keras.
[5]
W.A. Cox, M.S. Pruett, T.J. Bensen, S.J. Chiavacci, and F.R. Thompson. 2012. Development of camera technology for monitoring nests. In Video surveillance of nesting birds. Studies in Avian Biology, Thompson F.R. Ribic, C.A. and P.J Pietz (Eds.). University of California Press, Berkley, CA.
[6]
S.K. Davis and T.G Holmes. 2012. Spragues Pipit incubation behavior. In Video surveillance of nesting birds. Studies in Avian Biology, Thompson F.R. Ribic, C.A. and P.J Pietz (Eds.). University of California Press, Berkley, CA.
[7]
Denis Charles Deeming. 2015. Nests, eggs, and incubation: new ideas about avian reproduction (first ed.). Oxford University Press, Oxford.
[8]
Anthony I. Dell, John A. Bender, Kristin Branson, Iain D. Couzin, Gonzalo G. de Polavieja, Lucas P.J.J. Noldus, Alfonso Perez-Escudero, Pietro Perona, Andrew D. Straw, Martin Wikelski, and Ulrich Brose. 2014. Automated image-based tracking and its application in ecology. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 29, 7 (2014), 417--428.
[9]
FFmpeg Developers. 2016. ffmpeg tool (Version be1d324). http://ffmpeg.org/.
[10]
K. C. Fraser, A. Shave, A. Savage, A. Ritchie, K. Bell, J. Siegrist, J. D. Ray, K. Applegate, and M. Pearman. 2017. Determining fine-scale migratory connectivity and habitat selection for a migratory songbird by using new GPS technology. Journal of Avian Biology 48, 3 (2017), 339--345. arXiv:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/jav.01091
[11]
Kevin C. Fraser, Cassandra Silverio, Patrick Kramer, Nanette Mickle, Robert Aeppli, and Bridget J. M. Stutchbury. 2013. A Trans-Hemispheric Migratory Songbird Does Not Advance Spring Schedules or Increase Migration Rate in Response to Record-Setting Temperatures at Breeding Sites. PLOS ONE 8, 5 (05 2013), 1--5.
[12]
Kevin C. Fraser, Bridget J. M. Stutchbury, Cassandra Silverio, Patrick M. Kramer, John Barrow, David Newstead, Nanette Mickle, Bruce F. Cousens, J. Charlene Lee, Danielle M. Morrison, Tim Shaheen, Paul Mammenga, Kelly Applegate, and John Tautin. 2012. Continent-wide tracking to determine migratory connectivity and tropical habitat associations of a declining aerial insectivore. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 279, 1749 (2012), 4901--4906. arXiv:https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rspb.2012.2207
[13]
Magnus Hvass. 2018. Tensor Flow Tutorials. https://github.com/Hvass-Labs/TensorFlow-Tutorials.
[14]
S. Charles Kendeigh. 1952. Parental care and its evolution in birds (second printing, with minor corrections and an addendum, february, 1955. ed.). Vol. 22, nos 1-3. University of Illinois Press, Urbana.
[15]
Roberta Kwok. 2019. AI empowers conservation biology. Nature 567, 7746 (March 2019), 133--134.
[16]
Mohammad Sadegh Norouzzadeh, Anh Nguyen, Margaret Kosmala, Alexandra Swanson, Meredith S. Palmer, Craig Packer, and Jeff Clune. 2018. Automatically identifying, counting, and describing wild animals in camera-trap images with deep learning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115, 25 (2018), E5716--E5725. arXiv:https://www.pnas.org/content/115/25/E5716.full.pdf
[17]
Anne Oppliger, Heinz Richner, and Philippe Christie. 1994. Effect of an ectoparasite on lay date, nest-site choice, desertion, and hatching success in the great tit (Parus major). Behavioral Ecology 5, 2 (1994), 130--134.
[18]
Sauer J. R., D. K. Niven, J. E. Hines, D. J. Ziolkowski Jr, K. L. Pardieck, J. E. Fallon, and W. A. Link. 2017. The North American Breeding Bird Survey, Results and Analysis 1966 - 2015. Version 2.07.2017. https://www.mbr-pwrc.usgs.gov/bbs/.
[19]
Daniel Raleigh, James D. Ray, Blake A. Grisham, Joe Siegrist, and Daniel U. Greene. 2019. Nest survival data confirm managed housing is an important component to the conservation of the eastern purple martin. Wildlife Society Bulletin 43, 1 (2019), 93--101. arXiv:https://wildlife.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/wsb.941
[20]
C. A. Rogers, R. J. Robertson, and B.J. Stutchbury. 1991. Parasitism of tree swallow nestlings. In Bird-parasite interactions: Ecology, Evolution and Behaviour, J. E. Loye and M. Zuk (Eds.). Oxford University Press, New York.
[21]
Karen Simonyan and Andrew Zisserman. 2014. Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition. CoRR abs/1409.1556 (2014). arXiv:1409.1556 http://arxiv.org/abs/1409.1556
[22]
J. A. Smith, C. B. Cooper, and S. J. Reynolds. 2015. Advances in techniques to study incubation. In Nests, eggs and incubation: new ideas about avian reproduction, D.C. Deeming and S.J. Reynolds (Eds.). Oxford University Press, New York.
[23]
Alexandra Swanson, Margaret Kosmala, Chris Lintott, Robert Simpson, Arfon Smith, and Craig Packer. 2015. Snapshot Serengeti, high-frequency annotated camera trap images of 40 mammalian species in an African savanna. Scientific Data 2, 150026 (2015).
[24]
Michael A. Tabak, Mohammad S. Norouzzadeh, David W. Wolfson, Steven J. Sweeney, Kurt C. Vercauteren, Nathan P. Snow, Joseph M. Halseth, Paul A. Di Salvo, Jesse S. Lewis, Michael D. White, Ben Teton, James C. Beasley, Peter E. Schlichting, Raoul K. Boughton, Bethany Wight, Eric S. Newkirk, Jacob S. Ivan, Eric A. Odell, Ryan K. Brook, Paul M. Lukacs, Anna K. Moeller, Elizabeth G. Mandeville, Jeff Clune, and Ryan S. Miller. 2018. Machine learning to classify animal species in camera trap images: Applications in ecology. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 10, 4 (2018), 585--590. arXiv:https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/2041-210X.13120
[25]
Frederic Tripet and Heinz Richner. 1997. Host Responses to Ectoparasites: Food Compensation by Parent Blue Tits. Oikos 78, 3 (1997), 557--561. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3545617
[26]
Jana Waldchen and Patrick Mader. 2018. Machine learning for image based species identification. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 9, 11 (2018), 2216--2225. arXiv:https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/2041-210X.13075
[27]
Ben G. Weinstein. 2018. A computer vision for animal ecology. Journal of Animal Ecology 87, 3 (2018), 533--545. arXiv:https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/1365-2656.12780
[28]
Marco Willi, Ross T. Pitman, Anabelle W. Cardoso, Christina Locke, Alexandra Swanson, Amy Boyer, Marten Veldthuis, and Lucy Fortson. 2018. Identifying animal species in camera trap images using deep learning and citizen science. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 10, 1 (2018), 80--91. arXiv:https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/2041-210X.13099
[29]
Ken Yasukawa, Judy L. Mcclure, Rebecca A. Boley, and Juliann Zanocco. 1990. Provisioning of nestlings by male and female red-winged blackbirds, Agelaius phoeniceus. Animal Behaviour 40, 1 (1990), 153--166.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Early parental nest initiation carries over to the departure date and quality of fledglings from the breeding grounds in the Purple MartinJournal of Ornithology10.1007/s10336-024-02147-2165:3(579-590)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2024
  • (2019)Deep learning analysis of nest camera video recordings reveals temperature-sensitive incubation behavior in the purple martin (Progne subis)Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology10.1007/s00265-019-2789-274:1Online publication date: 26-Dec-2019

Index Terms

  1. Automated Deep Learning Analysis of Purple Martin Videos Depicting Incubation and Provisioning

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    PEARC '19: Practice and Experience in Advanced Research Computing 2019: Rise of the Machines (learning)
    July 2019
    775 pages
    ISBN:9781450372275
    DOI:10.1145/3332186
    • General Chair:
    • Tom Furlani
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 28 July 2019

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Artificial Intelligence
    2. Incubation
    3. Provisioning
    4. Purple Martin
    5. convolutional neural networks

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    PEARC '19

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 133 of 202 submissions, 66%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)2
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
    Reflects downloads up to 01 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Early parental nest initiation carries over to the departure date and quality of fledglings from the breeding grounds in the Purple MartinJournal of Ornithology10.1007/s10336-024-02147-2165:3(579-590)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2024
    • (2019)Deep learning analysis of nest camera video recordings reveals temperature-sensitive incubation behavior in the purple martin (Progne subis)Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology10.1007/s00265-019-2789-274:1Online publication date: 26-Dec-2019

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media