Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3306618.3314241acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesaiesConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Tact in Noncompliance: The Need for Pragmatically Apt Responses to Unethical Commands

Published: 27 January 2019 Publication History

Abstract

There is a significant body of research seeking to enable moral decision making and ensure moral conduct in robots. One aspect of moral conduct is rejecting immoral human commands. For social robots, which are expected to follow and maintain human moral and sociocultural norms, it is especially important not only to engage in moral decision making, but also to properly communicate moral reasoning. We thus argue that it is critical for robots to carefully phrase command rejections. Specifically, the degree of politeness-theoretic face threat in a command rejection should be proportional to the severity of the norm violation motivating that rejection. We present a human subjects experiment showing some of the consequences of miscalibrated responses, including perceptions of the robot as inappropriately polite, direct, or harsh, and reduced robot likeability. This experiment intends to motivate and inform the design of algorithms to tactfully tune pragmatic aspects of command rejections autonomously.

References

[1]
Ronald C Arkin. 2008. Governing Lethal Behavior: Embedding Ethics in a Hybrid Deliberative/Reactive Robot Architecture. In Proceedings of HRI. ACM, 121--128.
[2]
Wilma Bainbridge, Justin Hart, Elizabeth Kim, and Brian Scassellati. 2011. The Benefits of Interactions with Physically Present Robots over Video-Displayed Agents. Social Robotics, Vol. 3, 1 (2011), 41--52.
[3]
Christoph Bartneck, Dana Kulić, Elizabeth Croft, and Susana Zoghbi. 2009. Measurement Instruments for the Anthropomorphism, Animacy, Likeability, Perceived Intelligence, and Perceived Safety of Robots. Social Robotics, Vol. 1, 1 (2009), 71--81.
[4]
Gordon Briggs and Matthias Scheutz. 2014. How Robots can Affect Human Behavior: Investigating the Effects of Robotic Displays of Protest and Distress. Int'l Journal of Social Robotics (2014).
[5]
Gordon Briggs and Matthias Scheutz. 2015. "Sorry, I can't do that": Developing Mechanisms to Appropriately Reject Directives in Human-Robot Interactions. In AAAI Fall Symposium Series .
[6]
Penelope Brown and Stephen Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage .Cambridge University Press.
[7]
Michael Buhrmester, Tracy Kwang, and Samuel D Gosling. 2011. Amazon's Mechanical Turk: A New Source of Inexpensive, yet High-Quality, Data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, Vol. 6, 1 (2011), 3--5.
[8]
Matthew JC Crump, John V McDonnell, and Todd M Gureckis. 2013. Evaluating Amazon's Mechanical Turk as a Tool for Experimental Behavioral Research. PloS one, Vol. 8, 3 (2013).
[9]
Maartje Ma De Graaf, Somaya Ben Allouch, and Tineke Klamer. 2015. Sharing a life with Harvey: Exploring the acceptance of and relationship-building with a social robot. Computers in human behavior, Vol. 43 (2015), 1--14.
[10]
Friederike Eyssel and Dieta Kuchenbrandt. 2012. Social categorization of social robots: Anthropomorphism as a function of robot group membership. British Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 51, 4 (2012), 724--731.
[11]
Kerstin Fischer, Katrin Lohan, and Kilian Foth. 2012. Levels of Embodiment: Linguistic Analyses of Factors Influencing HRI. In Proceedings of HRI. Boston, MA, 463--470.
[12]
Felix Gervits, Gordon Briggs, and Matthias Scheutz. 2017. The Pragmatic Parliament: A Framework for Socially-Appropriate Utterance Selection in Artificial Agents. In COGSCI .
[13]
Francesca Gino. 2015. Understanding ordinary unethical behavior: Why people who value morality act immorally. Current opinion in behavioral sciences, Vol. 3 (2015), 107--111.
[14]
Susanne Göckeritz, Marco FH Schmidt, and Michael Tomasello. 2014. Young Children's Creation and Transmission of Social Norms. Cognitive Development (2014).
[15]
Todd Gureckis, Jay Martin, John McDonnell, et almbox. 2016. psiTurk: An Open-Source Framework for Conducting Replicable Behavioral Experiments Online. Behavior Research Methods, Vol. 48, 3 (2016), 829--842.
[16]
Ryan Blake Jackson and Tom Williams. 2018. Robot: Asker of Questions and Changer of Norms?. In Proceedings of ICRES .
[17]
Andrew F. Jarosz and Jennifer Wiley. 2014. What Are the Odds? A Practical Guide to Computing and Reporting Bayes Factors. The Journal of Problem Solving, Vol. 7 (2014).
[18]
relax JASP Team et almbox. 2016. Jasp. Version 0.8. 0.0. software (2016).
[19]
Danette Ifert Johnson, Michael E. Roloff, and Melissa A. Riffee. 2004. Politeness theory and refusals of requests: Face threat as a function of expressed obstacles. Communication Studies, Vol. 55, 2 (2004).
[20]
Malte F. Jung, Nikolas Martelaro, and Pamela J. Hinds. 2015. Using Robots to Moderate Team Conflict: The Case of Repairing Violations. In Proceedings of HRI. ACM, 229--236.
[21]
Peter H Kahn, Takayuki Kanda, Hiroshi Ishiguro, Brian T Gill, Jolina H Ruckert, Solace Shen, Heather Gary, Aimee L Reichert, Nathan G Freier, and Rachel L Severson. 2012. Do People Hold a Humanoid Robot Morally Accountable for the Harm it Causes?. In HRI. Boston, MA, 33--40.
[22]
James Kennedy, Paul Baxter, and Tony Belpaeme. 2014. Children Comply with a Robot's Indirect Requests. In HRI .
[23]
Jamy Li. 2015. The Benefit of Being Physically Present: A Survey of Experimental Works Comparing Copresent Robots, Telepresent Robots and Virtual Agents. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Vol. 77 (2015), 23--37.
[24]
Patrick Lin, George Bekey, and Keith Abney. 2008. Autonomous Military Robotics: Risk, Ethics, and Design. Technical Report. Cal. Poly. State Univ. San Luis Obispo.
[25]
Bertram F Malle, Matthias Scheutz, Thomas Arnold, John Voiklis, and Corey Cusimano. 2015. Sacrifice One for the Good of Many?: People Apply Different Moral Norms to Human and Robot Agents. In Proceedings of HRI. 117--124.
[26]
Tatsuya Nomura, Takayuki Uratani, Takayuki Kanda, Kazutaka Matsumoto, Hiroyuki Kidokoro, Yoshitaka Suehiro, and Sachie Yamada. 2015. Why Do Children Abuse Robots?. In HRI Extended Abstracts. 63--64.
[27]
Vasumathi Raman, Constantine Lignos, Cameron Finucane, Kenton C. T. Lee, Mitch Marcus, and Hadas Kress-Gazit. 2013. Sorry Dave, I'm Afraid I Can't Do That: Explaining Unachievable Robot Tasks Using Natural Language. In Proceedings of RSS .
[28]
B. Scassellati, H. Admoni, and M. Mataric. 2012. Robots for use in autism research. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering, Vol. 14 (2012), 275--294.
[29]
Noel Sharkey and Amanda Sharkey. 2010. The Crying Shame of Robot Nannies: an Ethical Appraisal. Interaction Studies, Vol. 11, 2 (2010), 161--190.
[30]
Reid Simmons, Maxim Makatchev, Rachel Kirby, Min Kyung Lee, et almbox. 2011. Believable Robot Characters. AI Magazine, Vol. 32, 4 (2011).
[31]
Neil Stewart, Jesse Chandler, and Gabriele Paolacci. 2017. Crowdsourcing Samples in Cognitive Science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences (2017).
[32]
Kazuaki Tanaka, Hideyuki Nakanishi, and Hiroshi Ishiguro. 2014. Comparing Video, Avatar, and Robot Mediated Communication: Pros and Cons of Embodiment. In Proceedings of ICCT. 96--110.
[33]
Peter-Paul Verbeek. 2011. Moralizing Technology: Understanding and Designing the Morality of Things .University of Chicago Press.
[34]
Kazuyoshi Wada and Takanori Shibata. 2007. Living with Seal Robots -- its Sociopsychological and Physiological Influences on the Elderly at a Care House. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, Vol. 23, 5 (2007), 972--980.
[35]
James Wen, Amanda Stewart, Mark Billinghurst, Arindam Dey, Chad Tossell, and Victor Finomore. 2018. He Who Hesitates is Lost (...In Thoughts over a Robot). In Proceedings of TechMindSociety .
[36]
Tom Williams, Ryan Blake Jackson, and Jane Lockshin. 2018. A Bayesian Analysis of Moral Norm Malleability during Clarification Dialogues. In Proceedings of COGSCI .
[37]
H. A. Yanco and J. Drury. 2004. Classifying human-robot interaction: an updated taxonomy. In IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Vol. 3. 2841--2846.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)GPT-4 as a Moral Reasoner for Robot Command RejectionProceedings of the 12th International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction10.1145/3687272.3688319(54-63)Online publication date: 24-Nov-2024
  • (2024)Using Robot Social Agency Theory to Understand Robots' Linguistic AnthropomorphismCompanion of the 2024 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/3610978.3640747(447-452)Online publication date: 11-Mar-2024
  • (2024)What a Thing to Say! Which Linguistic Politeness Strategies Should Robots Use in Noncompliance Interactions?Proceedings of the 2024 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/3610977.3634943(501-510)Online publication date: 11-Mar-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
AIES '19: Proceedings of the 2019 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society
January 2019
577 pages
ISBN:9781450363242
DOI:10.1145/3306618
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 27 January 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. human-robot interaction
  2. natural language generation
  3. robot ethics

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Funding Sources

Conference

AIES '19
Sponsor:
AIES '19: AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society
January 27 - 28, 2019
HI, Honolulu, USA

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 61 of 162 submissions, 38%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)37
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4
Reflects downloads up to 24 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)GPT-4 as a Moral Reasoner for Robot Command RejectionProceedings of the 12th International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction10.1145/3687272.3688319(54-63)Online publication date: 24-Nov-2024
  • (2024)Using Robot Social Agency Theory to Understand Robots' Linguistic AnthropomorphismCompanion of the 2024 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/3610978.3640747(447-452)Online publication date: 11-Mar-2024
  • (2024)What a Thing to Say! Which Linguistic Politeness Strategies Should Robots Use in Noncompliance Interactions?Proceedings of the 2024 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/3610977.3634943(501-510)Online publication date: 11-Mar-2024
  • (2024)More Than Binary: Transgender and Non-binary Perspectives on Human Robot InteractionProceedings of the 2024 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/3610977.3634939(697-705)Online publication date: 11-Mar-2024
  • (2024)Can robot advisers encourage honesty?: Considering the impact of rule, identity, and role-based moral adviceInternational Journal of Human-Computer Studies10.1016/j.ijhcs.2024.103217184(103217)Online publication date: Apr-2024
  • (2023)Fresh StartProceedings of the 2023 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/3568162.3576959(112-121)Online publication date: 13-Mar-2023
  • (2023)Confrontation and Cultivation: Understanding Perspectives on Robot Responses to Norm Violations2023 32nd IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN)10.1109/RO-MAN57019.2023.10309577(2336-2343)Online publication date: 28-Aug-2023
  • (2023)On Further Reflection... Moral Reflections Enhance Robotic Moral Persuasive CapabilityPersuasive Technology10.1007/978-3-031-30933-5_19(290-304)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
  • (2022)Teacher, Teammate, Subordinate, FriendProceedings of the 2022 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction10.5555/3523760.3523809(353-362)Online publication date: 7-Mar-2022
  • (2022)Enabling Morally Sensitive Robotic Clarification RequestsACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/350379511:2(1-18)Online publication date: 4-Mar-2022
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media