Cited By
View all- Ojha NDubey SVaish A(2024)Computational Thinking ToolsRevolutionizing Curricula Through Computational Thinking, Logic, and Problem Solving10.4018/979-8-3693-1974-1.ch009(151-166)Online publication date: 31-May-2024
Exploring concurrency on computational thinking tools
Article No.: 28, Pages 1 - 10
Abstract
Computational thinking (CT) tools express their designers' perspective on how a selected set of Computer Science concepts should be introduced, typically hiding details to avoid unnecessary complexity. This paper focuses on how concurrency is dealt with by five well-known tools in this domain: Scratch, Alice, AgentSheets, NetLogo and Greenfoot. We present the results of a systematic analysis contrasting their model of concurrent behavior with the corresponding programming interface messages that trigger their users' interpretation and learning of concurrency-related concepts. We present and discuss the conceptualizations that potentially emerge from using these five tools and compare them with established concurrency concepts. Our findings indicate opportunities for an explicit exploration of how some concurrency aspects are implemented in games and simulations built with CT tools. We believe that this might facilitate future learning and comprehension of complex concurrency concepts, considering that the knowledge embedded in these tools can also influence students' understanding of concurrency.
References
[1]
Mordechai Ben-Ari and Yifat Ben-David Kolikant. 1999. Thinking Parallel: The Process of Learning Concurrency. Proceedings of the 4th Annual SIGCSE/SIGCUE ITiCSE Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, ACM, 13--16.
[2]
Morderchai Ben-Ari. 2006. Principles of Concurrent and Distributed Computing. Pearson.
[3]
Yifat Ben-David Kolikant. 2004. Learning concurrency: evolution of students' understanding of synchronization. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 60, 2, 243--268.
[4]
Javier Esparza. 2010. A false history of true concurrency: From Petri to tools. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 180--186.
[5]
Russell Feldhausen, Scott Bell, and Daniel Andresen. 2014. Minimum Time, Maximum Effect: Introducing Parallel Computing in CS0 and STEM Outreach Activities Using Scratch. XSEDE 2014, 7.
[6]
JJ Ferreira, CS de Souza, and LC de Castro Salgado. 2012. Combining cognitive, semiotic and discourse analysis to explore the power of notations in visual programming. Proceedings ofVL/HCC'2012, 8.
[7]
Eileen Kraemer. 2010. Characterizing Comprehension of Concurrency Concepts. PPIG 2010 - 22nd Annual Workshop.
[8]
Zhen Li and Eileen Kraemer. 2013. Programming with Concurrency: Threads, Actors, and Coroutines. 2013 IEEE International Symposium on Parallel & Distributed Processing, Workshops and Phd Forum, 1304--1311.
[9]
Jan Lönnberg, Lauri Malmi, and Anders Berglund. 2008. Helping Students Debug Concurrent Programs. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Computing Education Research, ACM, 76--79.
[10]
Orni Meerbaum-Salant, Michal Armoni, and Mordechai (Moti) Ben-Ari. 2010. Learning computer science concepts with scratch. Proceedings of the Sixth international workshop on Computing education research - ICER '10, 69.
[11]
Seymour Papert. 1980. Mindstorms: Children, Computers and Powerful Ideas. Basic Books.
[12]
Wolfgang Reisig. 2013. Understanding Petri Nets. Springer.
[13]
Alexander Repenning and Andri Ioannidou. 2008. Broadening participation through scalable game design. ACM SIGCSE 2008, 305.
[14]
Alexander Repenning, David Webb, and Andri Ioannidou. 2010. Scalable game design and the development of a checklist for getting computational thinking into public schools. Proceedings of the 41st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, ACM Press, 265.
[15]
Mitchel Resnick. 1991. MultiLogo: A Study of Children and Concurrent Programming. Interactive Learning Environments 1, 3, 153--170.
[16]
Shmuel Schwarz and Mordechai Ben-Ari. 2006. Why Don't They Do What We Want Them to Do? September, 266--274.
[17]
Clarisse Sieckenius De CS de Souza, ACB Ana Cristina Bicharra Garcia, Cleyton Slaviero, et al. 2011. Semiotic traces of computational thinking acquisition. IS-EUD 2011, Springer, 1--16.
[18]
Clarisse Sieckenius de Souza and Carla Faria Leitão. 2009. Semiotic Engineering Methods for Scientific Research in HCI. Morgan & Claypool.
Recommendations
WFR-TM
Transactional Memory (TM) is a promising concurrent programming paradigm which employs transactions to achieve synchronization in accessing common data known as transactional variables. A transaction may either commit, making its updates to ...
Relaxed Concurrency Control in Software Transactional Memory
Some of today's TM systems implement the two-phase-locking (2PL) algorithm which aborts transactions every time a conflict occurs. 2PL is a simple algorithm that provides fast transactional operations. However, it limits concurrency in benchmarks with ...
Review on teaching and learning of computational thinking through programming
Programming can help foster computational thinking (CT).Lack of programming-related studies for K-12 despite increased interest.Future studies can focus on intervention in regular classroom setting.Examine programming process with think-aloud protocol ...
Comments
Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
November 2015
514 pages
ISBN:9781450353625
DOI:10.1145/3148456
Copyright © 2015 ACM.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 03 November 2015
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
Conference
IHC 2015
IHC 2015: XIV Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computer Systems
November 3 - 6, 2015
Salvador, Brazil
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 331 of 973 submissions, 34%
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- View Citations1Total Citations
- 90Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)6
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 30 Dec 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
Cited By
View all- Ojha NDubey SVaish A(2024)Computational Thinking ToolsRevolutionizing Curricula Through Computational Thinking, Logic, and Problem Solving10.4018/979-8-3693-1974-1.ch009(151-166)Online publication date: 31-May-2024
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in