Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3029798.3038308acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshriConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract

How do Patients in a Medical Interview Perceive a Robot versus Human Physician?

Published: 06 March 2017 Publication History

Abstract

This paper presents a study investigating perceptions of a human versus NAO robot physician conducting a simulated medical interview with undergraduate students. Results show that both human and NAO doctor were perceived to be credible and produced positive patient affect. However, the human doctor received significantly higher ratings when compared to the NAO. This pattern of results was fully explained by the higher social presence attributed to the human physician.

References

[1]
Edwards, C., Edwards, A., Spence, P., & Westerman, D. (2016). Initial interaction expectations with robots: Testing the human-to-human interaction script. Communication Studies, 67, 227--238.
[2]
Spence, P. R., Westerman, D., Edwards, C., & Edwards, A. (2014). Welcoming our robot overlords: Initial expectations about interaction with a robot. Communication Research Reports, 31, 272--280.
[3]
Sundar, S. S. (2008). The MAIN model: A heuristic approach to understanding technology effects on credibility. In M. J. Metzger & A. J. Flanigin's (Eds.) Digital media, youth, and credibility: The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation Series on Digital Media and Learning (pp. 73--100). The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.
[4]
McCroskey, J. C., & Teven, J. J. (1999). Goodwill: A reexamination of the construct and its measurement. Communication Monographs, 66, 90--103.
[5]
Kiesler, S., Zubrow, D., Moses, A. M., & Geller, V. (1985). Affect in computer-mediated communication: an experiment in synchronous terminal-to-terminal discussion, Human-Computer Interaction, 1,77--104.
[6]
Walther, J. B., & Bazarova, N. N. (2008). Validation and application of electronic propinquity theory to computer-mediated communication in groups. Communication Research, 35, 622--645.
[7]
Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: NY: The Guilford Press.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Gender and task effects of human – machine communication on trusting a Korean intelligent virtual assistantBehaviour & Information Technology10.1080/0144929X.2024.2306136(1-20)Online publication date: 31-Jan-2024
  • (2024)Cobotic service teams and power dynamics: Understanding and mitigating unintended consequences of human-robot collaboration in healthcare servicesJournal of the Academy of Marketing Science10.1007/s11747-024-01004-1Online publication date: 2-Mar-2024
  • (2022)Testing a theoretical model of trust in human-machine communication: emotional experience and social presenceBehaviour & Information Technology10.1080/0144929X.2022.214599842:16(2754-2767)Online publication date: 14-Nov-2022
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
HRI '17: Proceedings of the Companion of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction
March 2017
462 pages
ISBN:9781450348850
DOI:10.1145/3029798
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 06 March 2017

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. health communication
  2. main model
  3. social presence
  4. social robot

Qualifiers

  • Abstract

Conference

HRI '17
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

HRI '17 Paper Acceptance Rate 51 of 211 submissions, 24%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 192 of 519 submissions, 37%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)16
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 16 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Gender and task effects of human – machine communication on trusting a Korean intelligent virtual assistantBehaviour & Information Technology10.1080/0144929X.2024.2306136(1-20)Online publication date: 31-Jan-2024
  • (2024)Cobotic service teams and power dynamics: Understanding and mitigating unintended consequences of human-robot collaboration in healthcare servicesJournal of the Academy of Marketing Science10.1007/s11747-024-01004-1Online publication date: 2-Mar-2024
  • (2022)Testing a theoretical model of trust in human-machine communication: emotional experience and social presenceBehaviour & Information Technology10.1080/0144929X.2022.214599842:16(2754-2767)Online publication date: 14-Nov-2022
  • (2022)Social Robots and Digital Humans as Job Interviewers: A Study of Human Reactions Towards a More Naturalistic InteractionHuman-Computer Interaction. Technological Innovation10.1007/978-3-031-05409-9_34(455-474)Online publication date: 26-Jun-2022
  • (2021)Human-Robot Teaming Configurations: A Study of Interpersonal Communication Perceptions and Affective Learning in Higher EducationJournal of Communication Pedagogy10.31446/JCP.2021.1.124(123-132)Online publication date: 2021
  • (2021)The Space Between: Nature and Machine Heuristics in Evaluations of Organisms, Cyborgs, and RobotsCyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking10.1089/cyber.2020.016524:5(324-331)Online publication date: 1-May-2021
  • (2021)Feeling for Our Robot Overlords: Perceptions of Emotionally Expressive Social Robots in Initial InteractionsCommunication Studies10.1080/10510974.2021.188045772:2(251-265)Online publication date: 20-Feb-2021
  • (2021)“They’re always wrong anyway”: exploring differences of credibility, attraction, and behavioral intentions in professional, amateur, and robotic-delivered weather forecastsCommunication Quarterly10.1080/01463373.2021.187716469:1(67-86)Online publication date: 3-Feb-2021
  • (2021)Human-Robot Interactions Design for Interview Process: Needs-Affordances-Features PerspectiveHCI in Business, Government and Organizations10.1007/978-3-030-77750-0_43(645-655)Online publication date: 3-Jul-2021
  • (2020)The Naked Truth?Companion of the 2020 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/3371382.3378362(269-271)Online publication date: 23-Mar-2020
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media