Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3025171.3025185acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiuiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

SIRUP: Serendipity In Recommendations via User Perceptions

Published: 07 March 2017 Publication History

Abstract

In this paper, we propose a model to operationalise serendipity in content-based recommender systems. The model, called SIRUP, is inspired by the Silvia's curiosity theory, based on the fundamental theory of Berlyne, aims at (1) measuring the novelty of an item with respect to the user profile, and (2) assessing whether the user is able to manage such level of novelty (coping potential). The novelty of items is calculated with cosine similarities between items, using Linked Open Data paths. The coping potential of users is estimated by measuring the diversity of the items in the user profile. We deployed and evaluated the SIRUP model in a use case with TV recommender using BBC programs dataset. Results show that the SIRUP model allows us to identify serendipitous recommendations, and, at the same time, to have 71% precision.

References

[1]
Akiyama, T., Obara, K., and Tanizaki, M. Proposal and evaluation of serendipitous recommendation method using general unexpectedness. In Workshop on the Practical Use of Recommender Systems, Algorithms and Technologies (PRSAT 2010), CEUR-WS.org (2010), 3.
[2]
Berlyne, D. E. A theory of human curiosity. British Journal of Psychology. General Section 45, 3 (1954), 180--191.
[3]
Berlyne, D. E. Conflict, arousal, and curiosity. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, NY, US, 1960.
[4]
CBS Statistic Netherlands. Statistics Netherlands: 9 in 10 people access the internet every day {Press release}. Retrieved from http://goo.gl/hjjqrp, 2015.
[5]
Cremonesi, P., Garzotto, F., and Turrin, R. Investigating the persuasion potential of recommender systems from a quality perspective: An empirical study. ACM Trans. Interact. Intell. Syst. 2, 2 (June 2012), 11:1--11:41.
[6]
Cremonesi, P., Garzottto, F., and Turrin, R. User effort vs. accuracy in rating-based elicitation. In Proceedings of the Sixth ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, RecSys '12, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2012), 27--34.
[7]
Csikszentmihalyi, M. Flow: The psychology of optimal experience, 1990.
[8]
de Gemmis, M., Lops, P., Semeraro, G., and Musto, C. An Investigation on the Serendipity Problem in Recommender Systems. Inf. Process. Manage. 51, 5 (Sept. 2015), 695--717.
[9]
De Vocht, L., Beecks, C., Verborgh, R., Mannens, E., Seidl, T., and Van de Walle, R. Effect of heuristics on serendipity in path-based storytelling with linked data. In Human Interface and the Management of Information: Information, Design and Interaction: 18th International Conference, HCI International 2016 Toronto, Canada, July 17--22, 2016, Proceedings, Part I, S. Yamamoto, Ed., Springer International Publishing (Cham, 2016), 238--251.
[10]
Dijkshoorn, C., Aroyo, L., Schreiber, G., Wielemaker, J., and Jongma, L. Using Linked Data to Diversify Search Results a Case Study in Cultural Heritage. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management, Springer International Publishing (Cham, 2014), 109--120.
[11]
Dimitrova, V., Lau, L., Thakker, D., Yang-Turner, F., and Despotakis, D. Exploring exploratory search: A user study with linked semantic data. In Proceedings of the 2Nd International Workshop on Intelligent Exploration of Semantic Data, IESD '13, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2013), 2:1--2:8.
[12]
Dojchinovski, M., and Vitvar, T. Personalised access to linked data. In Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management: 19th International Conference, EKAW 2014, Linköping, Sweden, November 24--28, 2014. Proceedings, Springer International Publishing (Cham, 2014), 121--136.
[13]
Ericsson Consumerlab. TV AND MEDIA 2015. The empowered TV and media consumer's influence. Tech. rep., Ericsson, 2015. Available online at http://goo.gl/0iEWDv.
[14]
Gaffney, T. If Content is King, Video is Heir to the Throne. http://goo.gl/Q79j2L, 2013.
[15]
Hartig, O. Sparql for a web of linked data: Semantics and computability. In The Semantic Web: Research and Applications: 9th Extended Semantic Web Conference, ESWC 2012, Heraklion, Crete, Greece, May 27--31, 2012. Proceedings, Springer Berlin Heidelberg (Berlin, Heidelberg, 2012), 8--23.
[16]
Hollink, L., Malaisé, V., and Schreiber, G. Enriching a thesaurus to improve retrieval of audiovisual documents. In Semantic Multimedia: Third International Conference on Semantic and Digital Media Technologies, SAMT 2008, Koblenz, Germany, December 3--5, 2008. Proceedings, Springer Berlin Heidelberg (Berlin, Heidelberg, 2008), 47--60.
[17]
Iaquinta, L., de Gemmis, M., Lops, P., Semeraro, G., Filannino, M., and Molino, P. Introducing serendipity in a content-based recommender system. In Proceedings of the 2008 8th International Conference on Hybrid Intelligent Systems, HIS '08, IEEE Computer Society (Washington, DC, USA, 2008), 168--173.
[18]
Kashdan, T. B. Curiosity. In Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification, C. Peterson and M. E. P. Seligman, Eds. Oxford University Press and American Psychological Association, New York and Washington DC, 2004, 125--141.
[19]
Loewenstein, G. The psychology of curiosity: A review and reinterpretation. Psychological Bulletin 116, 1 (1994), 75--98.
[20]
Maccatrozzo, V., Aroyo, L., and Van Hage, W. R. Crowdsourced evaluation of semantic patterns for recommendation. In Late-Breaking Results, Project Papers and Workshop Proceedings of the 21st Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization., Rome, Italy, June 10--14, 2013, vol. 997 of CEUR Workshop Proceedings, CEUR-WS.org (2013), 15--21.
[21]
Macedo, P., Cardoso, J., and Pinto, A. M. Enriching Electronic Programming Guides with Web Data. In Proceeding of the 2nd International Workshop on Linked Media (LiME2014) (Crete, Greece, 2014).
[22]
Malaisé, V., Isaac, A., Gazendam, L., and Brugman, H. Anchoring dutch cultural heritage thesauri to wordnet: Two case studies. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Language Technology for Cultural Heritage Data (LaTeCH 2007), ACL (Prague, Czech Republic, 2007), 57--64.
[23]
Marie, N., Gandon, F., Ribière, M., and Rodio, F. Discovery hub: On-the-fly linked data exploratory search. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Semantic Systems, I-SEMANTICS '13, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2013), 17--24.
[24]
McNee, S. M., Riedl, J., and Konstan, J. A. Being accurate is not enough: How accuracy metrics have hurt recommender systems. In CHI '06 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI EA '06, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2006), 1097--1101.
[25]
Musto, C., Narducci, F., Lops, P., Semeraro, G., de Gemmis, M., Barbieri, M., Korst, J. H. M., Pronk, V., and Clout, R. Enhanced semantic tv-show representation for personalized electronic program guides. In User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization: 20th International Conference, UMAP 2012, Montreal, Canada, July 16--20, 2012. Proceedings, Springer Berlin Heidelberg (Berlin, Heidelberg, 2012), 188--199.
[26]
Ossenbruggen, J., Amin, A., Hardman, L., Hildebrand, M., Assem, M., Omelayenko, B., Schreiber, G., Tordai, A., de Boer, V., Wielinga, B., Wielemaker, J., Niet, M., Taekema, J., Orsouw, M. F., Teesing, A., Trant, J., and Bearman, D. Searching and annotating virtual heritage collections with semantic-web techniques. In Proceedings of Museums and the Web 2007, Archives & Museum Informatics (March 2007), 1 -- 11. Available at http://goo.gl/jJGVU5.
[27]
Pariser, E. The Filter Bubble: What the Internet Is Hiding from You. Penguin Group, The, New York, NY, 2011.
[28]
Saleem, M., Kamdar, M. R., Iqbal, A., Sampath, S., Deus, H. F., and Ngonga Ngomo, A.-C. Fostering serendipity through big linked data. In Semantic Web Challenge at ISWC2013 (2013).
[29]
Schein, A. I., Popescul, A., Ungar, L. H., and Pennock, D. M. Methods and metrics for cold-start recommendations. In Proceedings of the 25th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, SIGIR '02, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2002), 253--260.
[30]
Shadbolt, N., Berners-Lee, T., and Hall, W. The semantic web revisited. IEEE Intelligent Systems 21, 3 (Jan 2006), 96--101.
[31]
Silvia, P. J. Emotional responses to art: From collation and arousal to cognition and emotion. Review of General Psychology 9 (2005), 342--357.
[32]
Silvia, P. J. Interest - the curious emotion. Current Directions in Psychological Science 17, 1 (2008), 57--60.
[33]
Waitelonis, J., and Sack, H. Towards exploratory video search using linked data. Multimedia Tools and Applications 59, 2 (2012), 645--672.
[34]
Walpole, H. To Mann, Monday 18 January 1754. In Horace Walpole's Correspondence, W.S. Lewis, Ed., vol. 20. Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut, USA, 1960, 407--411.
[35]
Zhang, Y. C., Séaghdha, D., Quercia, D., and Jambor, T. Auralist: Introducing serendipity into music recommendation. In Proceedings of the Fifth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, WSDM '12, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2012), 13--22.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Navigating Serendipity - An Experimental User Study On The Interplay of Trust and Serendipity In Recommender SystemsAdjunct Proceedings of the 32nd ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization10.1145/3631700.3664901(386-393)Online publication date: 27-Jun-2024
  • (2024)A Serendipitous Recommendation System Considering User CuriosityInformation Integration and Web Intelligence10.1007/978-3-031-78093-6_3(33-48)Online publication date: 4-Dec-2024
  • (2023)Serendipitous User Recommendation in Twitter by Consider Unexpected and Useful InterestsTwitterにおける興味の意外性と有用性を考慮したセレンディピティなユーザの推薦Joho Chishiki Gakkaishi10.2964/jsik_2023_02733:3(267-288)Online publication date: 30-Sep-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
IUI '17: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces
March 2017
654 pages
ISBN:9781450343480
DOI:10.1145/3025171
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 07 March 2017

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. curiosity
  2. design methods
  3. entertainment
  4. personalization
  5. qualitative methods
  6. recommender system
  7. serendipity
  8. television/video
  9. user and cognitive models
  10. user studies

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

IUI'17
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

IUI '17 Paper Acceptance Rate 63 of 272 submissions, 23%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 746 of 2,811 submissions, 27%

Upcoming Conference

IUI '25

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)39
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
Reflects downloads up to 04 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Navigating Serendipity - An Experimental User Study On The Interplay of Trust and Serendipity In Recommender SystemsAdjunct Proceedings of the 32nd ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization10.1145/3631700.3664901(386-393)Online publication date: 27-Jun-2024
  • (2024)A Serendipitous Recommendation System Considering User CuriosityInformation Integration and Web Intelligence10.1007/978-3-031-78093-6_3(33-48)Online publication date: 4-Dec-2024
  • (2023)Serendipitous User Recommendation in Twitter by Consider Unexpected and Useful InterestsTwitterにおける興味の意外性と有用性を考慮したセレンディピティなユーザの推薦Joho Chishiki Gakkaishi10.2964/jsik_2023_02733:3(267-288)Online publication date: 30-Sep-2023
  • (2023)The Role of Serendipity in User-Curated Music PlaylistsProceedings of the 12th Knowledge Capture Conference 202310.1145/3587259.3627552(140-147)Online publication date: 5-Dec-2023
  • (2023)The Influence of Personality Traits on User Interaction with Recommendation InterfacesACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems10.1145/355877213:1(1-39)Online publication date: 10-Mar-2023
  • (2023)Serendipity-Oriented Recommender System with Dynamic Unexpectedness Prediction2023 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC)10.1109/SMC53992.2023.10394368(1247-1252)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2023
  • (2022)PSR: Probabilistic Serendipitous Recommendations2022 International Conference on Computational Science and Computational Intelligence (CSCI)10.1109/CSCI58124.2022.00144(790-795)Online publication date: Dec-2022
  • (2022)Conversational recommender systems techniques, tools, acceptance, and adoptionExpert Systems with Applications: An International Journal10.1016/j.eswa.2022.117539203:COnline publication date: 1-Oct-2022
  • (2022)How do item features and user characteristics affect users’ perceptions of recommendation serendipity? A cross-domain analysisUser Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction10.1007/s11257-022-09350-x33:3(727-765)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2022
  • (2022)Data-driven personalisation of television content: a surveyMultimedia Systems10.1007/s00530-022-00926-628:6(2193-2225)Online publication date: 23-Apr-2022
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media