Article

Free access

Patterns in property specifications for finite-state verification

Authors:

Matthew B. Dwyer,

George S. Avrunin,

James C. CorbettAuthors Info & Claims

ICSE '99: Proceedings of the 21st international conference on Software engineering

Pages 411 - 420

https://doi.org/10.1145/302405.302672

Published: 16 May 1999 Publication History

PDF eReader

References

[1]

G. Avrunin, U. Buy, J. Corbett, L. Dillon, and J. Wileden. Automated analysis of concurrent systems with the constrained expression toolset. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 17(11):1204-1222, Nov. 1991.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[2]

K. M. Chandy and J. Misra. Parallel Program Design: A Foundation. Addison Wesley Publishing Company, Inc., Reading, Massachusetts, 1988.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[3]

E. Clarke, E. Emerson, and A. Sistla. Automatic verification of finite-state concurrent systems using temporal logic specifications. ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems, 8(2):244-263, Apr. 1986.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[4]

R. Cleaveland, J. Parrow, and B. Steffen. The Concurrency Workbench: A semantics based tool for the verification of concurrent systems. ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems, 15(1):36-72, Jan. 1993.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[5]

J. C. Corbett and G. S. Avrunin. Using integer programming to verify general safety and liveness properties. Formal Methods in System Design, 6:97-123, Jan. 1995.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[6]

R. Darimont and A. van Lamsweerde. Formal refinement patterns for goal-driven requirements elaboration. In D. Garlan, editor, Proceedings of the Fourth ACM SIGSOFT Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering, pages 179-190, San Francisco, Oct. 1996. ACM (Proceedings appeared in Software Engineering Notes, 21(6).

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[7]

L. K. Dillon, G. Kutty, L. E. Moser, P. M. Melliar- Smith, and Y. S. Ramakrishna. A graphical interval logic for specifying concurrent systems. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, 3(2):131-165, Apr. 1994.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[8]

Dover, G. Avrunin, and J. Corbett. A System of Specification Patterns. http: //uvw . cis . ksu. edu/ santos/spec-patterns, 1997.

Google Scholar

[9]

M. Dwyer, G. Avrunin, and J. Corbett. Property specification patterns for finite-state verification. In M. Ardis, editor, Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Formal Methods in Software Practice, pages 7-15, Mar. 1998.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[10]

M. Dwyer and L. Clarke. Data flow analysis for verifying properties of concurrent programs. Software Engineering Notes, 19(5):62-75, Dec. 1994. Proceedings of the Second ACM SIGSOFT Symposium on Foundations of Software Engineering.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[11]

N. E. Fuchs 'and R. Schwitter. Attempt0 Controlled English (ACE). In CLAW 96, the First International Workshop on Controlled Language Applications, 1996.

Google Scholar

[12]

E. Gamma, R. Helm, R. Johnson, and J. Vlissides. Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software. Addison-Wesley, 1994.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[13]

N. Halbwachs, P. Caspi, P. Raymond, and D. Pilaud. The synchronous programming language LUS- TRE. Proceedings of the IEEE, 79(9), Sept. 1991.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[14]

Z. Har'El and R. P. Kurshan. Software for analytical devleopment of communication protocols. AT&T Technical Journal, 69(1):44-59, 1990.

Google Scholar

[15]

L. Lamport. The Temporal Logic of Actions. ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems, 16(3):872-923, May 1994.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[16]

Z. Manna and A. Pnueli. Tools and rules for the practicing verifier. Technical Report STAN-CS-90-1321, Stanford University, July 1990. appeared in Carnegie Mellon Computer Science: A 25 year Commemorative, ACM Press, 1990.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[17]

Z. Manna and A. Pnueli. The Temporal Logic of Reactive and Concurrent Systems: Specification. Springer- Verlag, 1991.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[18]

P. Massonet and A. van Lamsweerde. Analogical reuse of requirements frameworks. In Proceedings of RE '97- Third International Conference on Requirements Engineering, 1997.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[19]

K. McMillan. Symbolic Model Checking. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1993.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[20]

K. Olender and L. Osterweil. Cecil:, A sequencing constraint language for automatic static analysis generation. IEEE nansuctions on Software Engineering, 16(3):268-280, Mar. 1990.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[21]

S. S. Owicki and L. Lamport. Proving liveness properties of concurrent systems. ACM 'i'+ansactions on Programming Languages and Systems, 4:455495, July 1982.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[22]

D. Rosenblum. Formal methods and testing: Why the state-of-the-art is not the state-of-the-practice (IS- STA'96/FMSP'96 panel summary). ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 21(4), July 1996.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

Cited By

View all

Chernenko IAnureev IGaranina N(2024)Requirement patterns in deductive verification of poST ProgramsModeling and Analysis of Information Systems10.18255/1818-1015-2024-1-6-3131:1(6-31)Online publication date: 28-Mar-2024
https://doi.org/10.18255/1818-1015-2024-1-6-31
Gordon CHermans FBohrer R(2024)Mocking Temporal LogicProceedings of the 2024 ACM SIGPLAN International Symposium on SPLASH-E10.1145/3689493.3689980(98-109)Online publication date: 17-Oct-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3689493.3689980
Gordon CEdwards JTaeumel M(2024)The Linguistics of ProgrammingProceedings of the 2024 ACM SIGPLAN International Symposium on New Ideas, New Paradigms, and Reflections on Programming and Software10.1145/3689492.3689806(162-182)Online publication date: 17-Oct-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3689492.3689806
Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Property specification patterns for finite-state verification
FMSP '98: Proceedings of the second workshop on Formal methods in software practice
Managing space for finite-state verification
ICSE '06: Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Software engineering

Finite-state verification (FSV) techniques attempt to prove properties about a model of a system by examining all possible behaviors of that model. This approach suffers from the state-explosion problem, where the size of the model or the analysis costs ...
Patterns for Timed Property Specifications

Patterns for property specification enable non-experts to write formal specifications that can be used for automatic model checking. The existing patterns identified in [Dwyer, M.B., G.S. Avrunin and J.C. Corbett, Property specification patterns for ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

ICSE '99: Proceedings of the 21st international conference on Software engineering

May 1999

741 pages

ISBN:1581130740

DOI:10.1145/302405

Chairmen:
Barry Boehm
Univ. of Southern Califoria, Los Angeles
,
David Garlan
Carnegie Mellon Univ., Pittsburgh, PA
,
Jeff Kramer
Imperial College, London, UK

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 16 May 1999

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Article

Conference

ICSE99

Sponsor:

SIGPLAN
SIGAda
SIGSOFT
IEEE-CS
IEEE-CS\TCSE

ICSE99: 1999 International Conference on Software Engineering

May 16 - 22, 1999

California, Los Angeles, USA

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 276 of 1,856 submissions, 15%

Upcoming Conference

ICSE 2025

2025 IEEE/ACM 46th International Conference on Software Engineering

April 26 - May 3, 2025

Ottawa , ON , Canada

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

1,059
Total Citations
View Citations
3,199
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)517
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)64

Reflects downloads up to 23 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

Chernenko IAnureev IGaranina N(2024)Requirement patterns in deductive verification of poST ProgramsModeling and Analysis of Information Systems10.18255/1818-1015-2024-1-6-3131:1(6-31)Online publication date: 28-Mar-2024
https://doi.org/10.18255/1818-1015-2024-1-6-31
Gordon CHermans FBohrer R(2024)Mocking Temporal LogicProceedings of the 2024 ACM SIGPLAN International Symposium on SPLASH-E10.1145/3689493.3689980(98-109)Online publication date: 17-Oct-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3689493.3689980
Gordon CEdwards JTaeumel M(2024)The Linguistics of ProgrammingProceedings of the 2024 ACM SIGPLAN International Symposium on New Ideas, New Paradigms, and Reflections on Programming and Software10.1145/3689492.3689806(162-182)Online publication date: 17-Oct-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3689492.3689806
Faqrizal INivon QSalaün GFuria CLopes APlat NGnesi S(2024)Automated Repair of Violated Eventually Properties in Concurrent ProgramsProceedings of the 2024 IEEE/ACM 12th International Conference on Formal Methods in Software Engineering (FormaliSE)10.1145/3644033.3644383(66-76)Online publication date: 14-Apr-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3644033.3644383
Al Lail MViesca ACardenas HZarour MPerez ARoychoudhury APaiva AAbreu RStorey M(2024)TPV: A Tool for Validating Temporal Properties in UML Class DiagramsProceedings of the 2024 IEEE/ACM 46th International Conference on Software Engineering: Companion Proceedings10.1145/3639478.3640044(114-118)Online publication date: 14-Apr-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3639478.3640044
Chen XJin ZZhang MMallet FLiu XZhou T(2024)A Scalable Approach to Detecting Safety Requirements Inconsistencies for Railway SystemsIEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems10.1109/TITS.2024.341886425:8(8375-8386)Online publication date: Aug-2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2024.3418864
Ung GAmilon JGurov DLidström CNyberg MPalmskog K(2024)Post-Hoc Formal Verification of Automotive Software with Informal Requirements: An Experience Report2024 IEEE 32nd International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE)10.1109/RE59067.2024.00035(287-298)Online publication date: 24-Jun-2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/RE59067.2024.00035
Xu YFeng JMiao W(2024)Learning from Failures: Translation of Natural Language Requirements into Linear Temporal Logic with Large Language Models2024 IEEE 24th International Conference on Software Quality, Reliability and Security (QRS)10.1109/QRS62785.2024.00029(204-215)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/QRS62785.2024.00029
Kenmogne LMocanu S(2024)Explainable AI for Process-Aware Attack Detection in Industrial Control Systems2024 IEEE 10th International Conference on Network Softwarization (NetSoft)10.1109/NetSoft60951.2024.10588940(363-368)Online publication date: 24-Jun-2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/NetSoft60951.2024.10588940
Hotellier EBoukhobza NSicard FFrancq JMocanu S(2024)Behavior-Based Intrusion Detection Approach Deployed on a Naval Testbed2024 IEEE 29th International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA)10.1109/ETFA61755.2024.10710831(1-8)Online publication date: 10-Sep-2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/ETFA61755.2024.10710831
Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Cited By

Index Terms

Recommendations

Property specification patterns for finite-state verification

Managing space for finite-state verification

Patterns for Timed Property Specifications