Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3017680.3017727acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessigcseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Public Access

Micro-Classes: A Structure for Improving Student Experience in Large Classes

Published: 08 March 2017 Publication History

Abstract

As class-sizes grow in computer science, the personal attention received by students tends to diminish. This work aims to replicate small-class community effects within a large class by creating "micro-classes"---small groups within the large class. These micro-classes consist of 20--30 students led by graduate teaching assistants and undergraduate tutors who are specifically trained in small-classroom instructional techniques. This paper studies the outcomes of the micro-classes framework in an upper-division data structures course and compares them to outcomes from the same class taught in a large lecture, active-learning format. Students report increased satisfaction and a higher perception of community in the micro-classes section, though there was no discernible difference in student academic performance.

References

[1]
B. B. Alexander, A. C. Burda, and S. B. Millar. A community approach to learning calculus: Fostering success for underrepresented ethic minorities in an emerging scholars program. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 3, 1997.
[2]
G. Besana and L. Dettori. Together is better: Strengthening the confidence of women in computer science via a learning community. J. Comput. Sci. Coll., 19(5), May 2004.
[3]
J. Campbell, D. Horton, and M. Craig. Factors for success in online CS1. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, 2016.
[4]
Computing Research Association Taulbee Report. Undergrad computer science enrollments rise for fifth straight year. http://cra.org/. Accessed: 2014-07-01.
[5]
C. H. Crouch and E. Mazur. Peer instruction: Ten years of experience and results. American Journal of Physics, 69, 2001.
[6]
S. Freeman, S. L. Eddy, M. McDonough, M. K. Smith, N. Okoroafor, H. Jordt, and M. P. Wenderoth. Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 2014.
[7]
T. Howles. A study of attrition and the use of student learning communities in the computer science introductory programming sequence. Computer Science Education, 19(1), 2009.
[8]
M. A. Jaasma and R. J. Koper. The relationship of student-faculty out-of-class communication to instructor immediacy and trust and to student motivation. Communication Education, 48(1), 1999.
[9]
E. Lazowska and E. Roberts. Tsunami or sea change? responding to the explosion of student interest in computer science. In Workshop at the 2014 NCWIT Summit, May 2014.
[10]
C. O'Neal, M. Wright, C. Cook, T. Perorazio, and J. Purkiss. The impact of teaching assistants on student retention in the sciences: Lessons for ta training. Journal of College Science Teaching, 36(5), 2007.
[11]
E. Patitsas. A case study of the development of CS teaching assistants and their experiences with team teaching. In Proc. of the 13th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research, 2013.
[12]
L. Porter and B. Simon. Retaining nearly one-third more majors with a trio of instructional best practices in cs1. In Proceeding of the 44th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, 2013.
[13]
A. P. Rovai. Development of an instrument to measure classroom community. The Internet and Higher Education, 5(3), 2002.
[14]
A. P. Rovai. Sense of community, perceived cognitive learning, and persistence in asynchronous learning networks. The Internet and Higher Education, 5, 2002.
[15]
D. Schaffhauser. Georgia tech mooc-based degree program turns away nearly 2,000 applicants. http://campustechnology.com/. Accessed: 2016-07-01.
[16]
A. Settle, J. Lalor, and T. Steinbach. A computer science linked-courses learning community. In Proceedings of the 20th Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, 2015.
[17]
B. Simon, S. Esper, L. Porter, and Q. Cutts. Student experience in a student-centered peer instruction classroom. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on International Computing Education Research. ACM, 2013.
[18]
B. Simon, J. Parris, and J. Spacco. How we teach impacts student learning: Peer instruction vs. lecture in cs0. In Proceeding of the 44th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, 2013.
[19]
L. Springer, M. E. Stanne, and S. S. Donovan. Effects of small-group learning on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 69(1), 1999.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)"A field where you will be accepted": Belonging in student and TA interactions in post-secondary CS educationProceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research - Volume 110.1145/3568813.3600128(356-370)Online publication date: 7-Aug-2023
  • (2020)Teaching Methods in Computer Science EducationGuide to Teaching Computer Science10.1007/978-3-030-39360-1_10(181-220)Online publication date: 6-Aug-2020

Index Terms

  1. Micro-Classes: A Structure for Improving Student Experience in Large Classes

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    SIGCSE '17: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education
    March 2017
    838 pages
    ISBN:9781450346986
    DOI:10.1145/3017680
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 08 March 2017

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. active learning
    2. classroom community
    3. data structures
    4. gender
    5. large classes

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Funding Sources

    Conference

    SIGCSE '17
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    SIGCSE '17 Paper Acceptance Rate 105 of 348 submissions, 30%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 1,595 of 4,542 submissions, 35%

    Upcoming Conference

    SIGCSE Virtual 2024
    1st ACM Virtual Global Computing Education Conference
    December 5 - 8, 2024
    Virtual Event , NC , USA

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)189
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)22
    Reflects downloads up to 13 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2023)"A field where you will be accepted": Belonging in student and TA interactions in post-secondary CS educationProceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research - Volume 110.1145/3568813.3600128(356-370)Online publication date: 7-Aug-2023
    • (2020)Teaching Methods in Computer Science EducationGuide to Teaching Computer Science10.1007/978-3-030-39360-1_10(181-220)Online publication date: 6-Aug-2020

    View Options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Get Access

    Login options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media