Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3009977.3009999acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicvgipConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Robust pedestrian tracking using improved tracking-learning-detection algorithm

Published: 18 December 2016 Publication History

Abstract

Manual analysis of pedestrians for surveillance of large crowds in real time applications is not practical. Tracking-Learning-Detection suggested by Kalal, Mikolajczyk and Matas [1] is one of the most prominent automatic object tracking system. TLD can track single object and can handle occlusion and appearance change but it suffers from limitations. In this paper, tracking of multiple objects and estimation of their trajectory is suggested using improved TLD. Feature tracking is suggested in place of grid based tracking to solve the limitation of tracking during out of plane rotation. This also leads to optimization of algorithm. Proposed algorithm also achieves auto-initialization with detection of pedestrians in the first frame which makes it suitable for real time pedestrian tracking.

References

[1]
Zdenek Kalal, Krystian Mikolajczyk, and Jiri Matas. Tracking-learning-detection. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 34(7):1409--1422, 2012.
[2]
Edward Rosten and Tom Drummond. Machine learning for high-speed corner detection. In European conference on computer vision, pages 430--443. Springer, 2006.
[3]
Navneet Dalal and Bill Triggs. Histograms of oriented gradients for human detection. In 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05), volume 1, pages 886--893. IEEE, 2005.
[4]
Zdenek Kalal, Jiri Matas, and Krystian Mikolajczyk. Pn learning: Bootstrapping binary classifiers by structural constraints. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2010 IEEE Conference on, pages 49--56. IEEE, 2010.
[5]
Amit Adam, Ehud Rivlin, and Ilan Shimshoni. Robust fragments-based tracking using the integral histogram. In 2006 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'06), volume 1, pages 798--805. IEEE, 2006.
[6]
Boris Babenko, Ming-Hsuan Yang, and Serge Belongie. Visual tracking with online multiple instance learning. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2009. CVPR 2009. IEEE Conference on, pages 983--990. IEEE, 2009.
[7]
Thomas G Dietterich, Richard H Lathrop, and Tomás Lozano-Pérez. Solving the multiple instance problem with axis-parallel rectangles. Artificial intelligence, 89(1):31--71, 1997.
[8]
Arnold WM Smeulders, Dung M Chu, Rita Cucchiara, Simone Calderara, Afshin Dehghan, and Mubarak Shah. Visual tracking: An experimental survey. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 36(7):1442--1468, 2014.
[9]
Jean-Yves Bouguet. Pyramidal implementation of the affine lucas kanade feature tracker description of the algorithm. Intel Corporation, 5(1--10):4, 2001.
[10]
Zdenek Kalal, Krystian Mikolajczyk, and Jiri Matas. Forward-backward error: Automatic detection of tracking failures. In Pattern recognition (ICPR), 2010 20th international conference on, pages 2756--2759. IEEE, 2010.
[11]
Henry Schneiderman. Feature-centric evaluation for efficient cascaded object detection. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2004. CVPR 2004. Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE Computer Society Conference on, volume 2, pages II--29. IEEE, 2004.
[12]
Paul Viola and Michael Jones. Rapid object detection using a boosted cascade of simple features. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2001. CVPR 2001. Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE Computer Society Conference on, volume 1, pages I--511. IEEE, 2001.
[13]
Vincent Lepetit, Pascal Lagger, and Pascal Fua. Randomized trees for real-time keypoint recognition. In 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05), volume 2, pages 775--781. IEEE, 2005.
[14]
J. Ross Quinlan. Induction of decision trees. Machine learning, 1(1):81--106, 1986.
[15]
Yi Wu, Jongwoo Lim, and Ming-Hsuan Yang. Online object tracking: A benchmark. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 2411--2418, 2013.

Index Terms

  1. Robust pedestrian tracking using improved tracking-learning-detection algorithm

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ICVGIP '16: Proceedings of the Tenth Indian Conference on Computer Vision, Graphics and Image Processing
    December 2016
    743 pages
    ISBN:9781450347532
    DOI:10.1145/3009977
    © 2016 Association for Computing Machinery. ACM acknowledges that this contribution was authored or co-authored by an employee, contractor or affiliate of a national government. As such, the Government retains a nonexclusive, royalty-free right to publish or reproduce this article, or to allow others to do so, for Government purposes only.

    Sponsors

    • Google Inc.
    • QI: Qualcomm Inc.
    • Tata Consultancy Services
    • NVIDIA
    • MathWorks: The MathWorks, Inc.
    • Microsoft Research: Microsoft Research

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 18 December 2016

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. pedestrian tracking
    2. tracking-learning-detection
    3. visual tracking

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    ICVGIP '16
    Sponsor:
    • QI
    • MathWorks
    • Microsoft Research

    Acceptance Rates

    ICVGIP '16 Paper Acceptance Rate 95 of 286 submissions, 33%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 95 of 286 submissions, 33%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • 0
      Total Citations
    • 165
      Total Downloads
    • Downloads (Last 12 months)2
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 01 Oct 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media