Post-Roe Public Discourse: A Temporal Analysis of Discussion on US Abortion Law Changes
Pages 609 - 615
Abstract
The "Post-Roe" refers to the period following the June 2022 Supreme Court decision to overrule Roe v. Wade, the 1973 abortion right law. Since this overturn of this law, substantial public discourse was noticed across the US and this controversial issue has trended on all news media agencies and social media platforms. Several studies have analyzed public opinion and the impact of this legal change on healthcare, economic challenges, and society. However, little work has been done to identify the shift in discussion over time. Our research analyzes YouTube and Reddit comments to perceive insights into the evolving spectrum of public opinion on abortion legislation by utilizing NLP techniques and opinion mining. By systematically categorizing comments to extract themes and employing a temporal analysis approach, we identify shifts in public sentiment across different phases of time, such as immediate reactions, peak debate, and long-term responses. Our preliminary findings show that different themes prevail at different phases and primary concerns shift over time. This study might help policymakers, activists, and social commentators understand these shifts to effectively address the evolving concerns of the public and take measures accordingly.
References
[1]
JESSIE BLAESER. 2023. How abortion coverage changed in the media, according to the data. https://www.politico.com/news/2023/12/27/politics-rules-abortion- coverage- 00131080
[2]
Rong-Ching Chang, Ashwin Rao, Qiankun Zhong, Magdalena Wojcieszak, and Kristina Lerman. 2023. # RoeOverturned: Twitter Dataset on the Abortion Rights Controversy. In Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, Vol. 17. 997--1005.
[3]
Sarah K Cowan, Michael Hout, and Stuart Perrett. 2024. Updating a time-series of survey questions: The case of abortion attitudes in the general social survey. Sociological Methods & Research 53, 1 (2024), 193--234.
[4]
ZehuiDaiandCoryHiggs.2024.SocialNetworkandSemanticAnalysisofRoev. Wades Reversal on Twitter. Social Science Computer Review 42, 1 (2024), 186--200.
[5]
Alexander Dunkel, Gennady Andrienko, Natalia Andrienko, Dirk Burghardt, Eva Hauthal, and Ross Purves. 2019. A conceptual framework for studying collective reactions to events in location-based social media. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 33, 4 (2019), 780--804.
[6]
Center for Reproductive Rights. 2022. After Roe Fell: Abortion Laws by State. https://reproductiverights.org/maps/abortion- laws- by- state/
[7]
JennyAHiggins,MadisonLands,TarynMValley,EmmaCarpenter,andLaura Jacques. 2021. Real-time effects of payer restrictions on reproductive healthcare: a qualitative analysis of cost-related barriers and their consequences among US abortion seekers on Reddit. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18, 17 (2021), 9013.
[8]
Chiao-Fang Hsu, James Caverlee, and Elham Khabiri. 2011. Hierarchical comments-based clustering. In Proceedings of the 2011 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing. 1130--1137.
[9]
Julia P Latchana. 2023. Roe v. Wade Overturned: An Analysis of Themes in Reddit Posts and Public Interviews. Masters thesis. Florida Atlantic University.
[10]
St. Ambrose University Library. 2024. Hot Topics: Abortion. https://libguides. sau.edu/
[11]
Adam Liptak. 2022. In 6-to-3 Ruling, Supreme Court Ends Nearly 50 Years of Abor- tion Rights. https://www.nytimes.com/2022/06/24/us/roe-wade-overturned- supreme- court.html
[12]
Heran Mane, Xiaohe Yue, Weijun Yu, Amara Channell Doig, Hanxue Wei, Nataly Delcid, Afia-Grace Harris, Thu T Nguyen, and Quynh C Nguyen. 2022. Examina- tion of the Publics Reaction on Twitter to the Over-Turning of Roe v Wade and Abortion Bans. In Healthcare, Vol. 10. MDPI, 2390.
[13]
Miles Osborne, Sean Moran, Richard McCreadie, Alexander Von Lunen, Martin Sykora, Elizabeth Cano, Neil Ireson, Craig Macdonald, Iadh Ounis, Yulan He, et al. 2014. Real-time detection, tracking, and monitoring of automatically discovered events in social media. In Proceedings of 52nd annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics: system demonstrations. 37--42.
[14]
Planned Parenthood. 2022. Roe v. Wade Overturned: How the Supreme Court Let Politicians Outlaw Abortion. https://www.plannedparenthoodaction.org/ issues/abortion/roe- v- wade
[15]
Elizabeth Pleasants, Lindsay Parham, Karen Weidert, Emma Anderson, Eliza Dolgins, Ndola Prata, Ushma D Upadhyay, and Cassondra Marshall. 2024. Waiting to start abortion: A qualitative exploration of narratives of waiting shared in a Reddit community for abortion post-Dobbs leak in 2022. Social Science & Medicine 349 (2024), 116877.
[16]
Zoe H Pleasure, Andréa Becker, Dana M Johnson, Kathleen Broussard, and Laura Lindberg. 2024. How TikTok is being used to talk about abortion post-Roe: A content analysis of the most liked abortion TikToks. Contraception (2024), 110384.
[17]
Nils Reimers and Iryna Gurevych. 2019. Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networks. arXiv:1908.10084 [cs.CL]
[18]
Cornell Law School. [n. d.]. Roe v. Wade (1973). https://www.law.cornell.edu/ wex/roe_v_wade_(1973)
[19]
Robyn Speer, Joshua Chin, and Catherine Havasi. 2017. Conceptnet 5.5: An open multilingual graph of general knowledge. In Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, Vol. 31.
[20]
Robyn Speer, Joshua Chin, and Catherine Havasi. 2018. ConceptNet 5.5: An Open Multilingual Graph of General Knowledge. arXiv:1612.03975 [cs.CL]
[21]
Karl Swanson, Akshay Ravi, Sameh Saleh, Benjamin Weia, Elizabeth Pleasants, and Simone Arvisais-Anhalt. 2023. Effect of recent abortion legislation on Twitter user engagement, sentiment, and expressions of trust in clinicians and privacy of health information: content analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research 25 (2023), e46655.
[22]
Mikalai Tsytsarau, Themis Palpanas, and Malu Castellanos. 2014. Dynamics of news events and social media reaction. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. 901--910.
[23]
Danny Valdez, Lucrecia Mena-Meléndez, Brandon L Crawford, and Kristen N Jozkowski. 2024. Analyzing Reddit Forums Specific to Abortion That Yield Diverse Dialogues Pertaining to Medical Information Seeking and Personal Worldviews: Data Mining and Natural Language Processing Comparative Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 26 (2024), e47408.
[24]
Georgia Warnke. 2023. Legitimate differences: Interpretation in the abortion con- troversy and other public debates. Univ of California Press.
[25]
Rachel Wilson-Lowe. 2023. Talking about abortion online: A qualitative exploration of how and why women use the Internet to seek social support around abortion. Ph. D. Dissertation. University of Glasgow.
Index Terms
- Post-Roe Public Discourse: A Temporal Analysis of Discussion on US Abortion Law Changes
Recommendations
Assembling law and technology in the public sector: the case of e-justice reforms
dg.o '15: Proceedings of the 16th Annual International Conference on Digital Government ResearchThis paper discusses how laws and technology interact when e-government reforms are designed and deployed in highly regulated public sector organisations. The contribution focuses on how laws and regulations are re-designed into ICTs and the effect this ...
Political Will and Strategic Use of YouTube to Advancing Government Transparency: An Analysis of Jakarta Government-Generated YouTube Videos
EGOV 2013: Proceedings of the 12th IFIP WG 8.5 International Conference on Electronic Government - Volume 8074Government transparency is critical to cut government bureaucracy and corruption, which diminish political accountability and legitimacy, erode trust in government, and hinder citizen engagement and government performance. Previously, Jakarta's local ...
U.S. Cybercrime Law: Defining Offenses
In recent years, a new term has arisen—“cybercrime”—which essentially denotes the use of computer technology to commit or to facilitate the commission of unlawful acts, or “crimes.” This article explains why we treat cybercrime as a special class of “...
Comments
Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
November 2024
755 pages
ISBN:9798400711145
DOI:10.1145/3678884
- General Chairs:
- Rosta Farzan,
- Claudia López,
- Program Chairs:
- Daniel Cardoso Llach,
- Daniele Quercia,
- Maryam Mustafa,
- Shuo Niu,
- Marisol Wong-Villacrés
Copyright © 2024 Owner/Author.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.
Sponsors
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 13 November 2024
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
Conference
CSCW '24
Sponsor:
CSCW '24: The 27th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing
November 9 - 13, 2024
San Jose, Costa Rica
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 2,235 of 8,521 submissions, 26%
Upcoming Conference
CSCW '25
- Sponsor:
- sigchi
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 37Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)37
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)37
Reflects downloads up to 21 Nov 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in