Working with AI Sound: Exploring the Future of Workplace AI Sound Technologies
Article No.: 2, Pages 1 - 21
Abstract
The workplace is a site for the rapid development and deployment of Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems. However, our research suggests that their adoption could already be hindered by critical issues such as trust, privacy, and security. This paper examines the integration of AI-enabled sound technologies in the workplace, with a focus on enhancing well-being and productivity through a soundscape approach while addressing ethical concerns. To explore these concepts, we used scenario-based design and structured feedback sessions with knowledge workers from open-plan offices and those working from home. To do this, we present initial design concepts for AI sound analysis and control systems. Based on the perspectives gathered, we present user requirements and concerns, particularly regarding privacy and the potential for workplace surveillance, emphasising the need for user consent and levels of transparency in AI deployments. Navigating these ethical considerations is a key implication of the study. We advocate for novel ways to incorporate people’s involvement in the design process through co-design and serious games to shape the future of AI audio technologies in the workplace.
References
[1]
Alessandro Acquisti and Ralph Gross. 2006. Imagined Communities: Awareness, Information Sharing, and Privacy on the Facebook. In Privacy Enhancing Technologies(Lecture Notes in Computer Science), George Danezis and Philippe Golle (Eds.). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 36–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/11957454_3
[2]
John R. Aiello and Kathryn J. Kolb. 1995. Electronic Performance Monitoring and Social Context: Impact on Productivity and Stress. Journal of Applied Psychology 80, 3 (1995), 339–353. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.80.3.339
[3]
Yousef Al Horr, Mohammed Arif, Amit Kaushik, Ahmed Mazroei, Martha Katafygiotou, and Esam Elsarrag. 2016. Occupant Productivity and Office Indoor Environment Quality: A Review of the Literature. Building and Environment 105 (Aug. 2016), 369–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.06.001
[4]
Östen Axelsson, Mats E. Nilsson, and Birgitta Berglund. 2010. A Principal Components Model of Soundscape Perception. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 128, 5 (Nov. 2010), 2836–2846. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3493436
[5]
Arne Berger, Aloha Hufana Ambe, Alessandro Soro, Dries De Roeck, and Margot Brereton. 2019. The Stories People Tell About The Home Through IoT Toolkits. In Proceedings of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference(DIS ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 7–19. https://doi.org/10.1145/3322276.3322308
[6]
Gabriel Bibbó, Arshdeep Singh, and Mark D. Plumbley. 2023. Recognise and Notify Sound Events Using a Raspberry PI Based Standalone Device [Demo]. In IEEE Workshop on Applications of Signal Processing to Audio and Acoustics (WASPAA 2023). New Paltz, NY, USA.
[7]
Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2019. Reflecting on Reflexive Thematic Analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health 11, 4 (Aug. 2019), 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806
[8]
Emre Cakir, Toni Heittola, Heikki Huttunen, and Tuomas Virtanen. 2015. Multi-Label vs. Combined Single-Label Sound Event Detection with Deep Neural Networks. 2015 23rd European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO) (Aug. 2015), 2551–2555. https://doi.org/10.1109/EUSIPCO.2015.7362845
[9]
Dan Calacci. 2022. Organizing in the End of Employment: Information Sharing, Data Stewardship, and Digital Workerism. In Proceedings of the 1st Annual Meeting of the Symposium on Human-Computer Interaction for Work(CHIWORK ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1145/3533406.3533424
[10]
Shreya Chowdhary, Anna Kawakami, Mary L Gray, Jina Suh, Alexandra Olteanu, and Koustuv Saha. 2023. Can Workers Meaningfully Consent to Workplace Wellbeing Technologies?. In Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency(FAccT ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 569–582. https://doi.org/10.1145/3593013.3594023
[11]
Emily Corrigan-Kavanagh, Andres Fernandez, and Mark Plumbley. 2022. Envisioning Sound Sensing Technology for Enhancing Urban Living. In Environments By Design. Architecture Media Politics Society, 11.
[12]
Andy Crabtree, Peter Tolmie, and Will Knight. 2017. Repacking ‘Privacy’ for a Networked World. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 26, 4 (Dec. 2017), 453–488. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-017-9276-y
[13]
Vedant Das Swain, Shane Williams, Adam Fourney, and Shamsi T. Iqbal. 2022. Two Birds with One Phone: The Role of Mobile Use in the Daily Practices of Remote Information Work. In Proceedings of the 1st Annual Meeting of the Symposium on Human-Computer Interaction for Work(CHIWORK ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1145/3533406.3533416
[14]
Sarah Diefenbach, Lara Christoforakos, Daniel Ullrich, and Andreas Butz. 2022. Invisible but Understandable: In Search of the Sweet Spot between Technology Invisibility and Transparency in Smart Spaces and Beyond. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction 6, 10 (Oct. 2022), 95. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti6100095
[15]
Biyun Ding, Tao Zhang, Chao Wang, Ganjun Liu, Jinhua Liang, Ruimin Hu, Yulin Wu, and Difei Guo. 2024. Acoustic Scene Classification: A Comprehensive Survey. Expert Systems with Applications 238 (March 2024), 121902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.121902
[16]
Martin Ljungdahl Eriksson and Lena Pareto. 2016. Sound Bubbles for Productive Office Work. In Nordic Contributions in IS Research(Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing), Ulrika Lundh Snis (Ed.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 29–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43597-8_3
[17]
Martin Ljungdahl Eriksson, Lena Pareto, Ricardo Atienza, and Kjetil Falkenberg Hansen. 2018. My Sound Space: An Attentional Shield for Immersive Redirection. In Proceedings of the Audio Mostly 2018 on Sound in Immersion and Emotion(AM ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/3243274.3243309
[18]
Kasper Fangel Skov, Peter Axel Nielsen, and Jesper Kjeldskov. 2023. Tuning Shared Hospital Spaces: Sound Zones in Healthcare. In Proceedings of the 18th International Audio Mostly Conference. ACM, Edinburgh United Kingdom, 63–70. https://doi.org/10.1145/3616195.3616198
[19]
Sofia Felipe Contin de Oliveira, Francesco Aletta, and Jian Kang. 2023. Self-Rated Health Implications of Noise for Open-Plan Office Workers: An Overview of the Literature. Building Acoustics (Feb. 2023), 1351010X231152841. https://doi.org/10.1177/1351010X231152841
[20]
Casey Fiesler and Blake Hallinan. 2018. "We Are the Product": Public Reactions to Online Data Sharing and Privacy Controversies in the Media. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173627
[21]
Cornelia Gerdenitsch, Till Bieg, Myriam Gaitsch, Philip Schörpf, Manfred Tscheligi, and Simone Kriglstein. 2023. Tracking to Success? A Critical Reflection on Workplace Quantified-Self Technologies from a Humanistic Perspective. In Proceedings of the 2nd Annual Meeting of the Symposium on Human-Computer Interaction for Work(CHIWORK ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1145/3596671.3597653
[22]
Steven M. Goodman, Ping Liu, Dhruv Jain, Emma J. McDonnell, Jon E. Froehlich, and Leah Findlater. 2021. Toward User-Driven Sound Recognizer Personalization with People Who Are d/Deaf or Hard of Hearing. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 5, 2 (June 2021). https://doi.org/10.1145/3463501
[23]
Marc C. Green and Mark D. Plumbley. 2021. Federated Learning With Highly Imbalanced Audio Data. arxiv:2105.08550 [cs, eess]
[24]
Annu Haapakangas, Valtteri Hongisto, Jukka Hyönä, Joonas Kokko, and Jukka Keränen. 2014. Effects of Unattended Speech on Performance and Subjective Distraction: The Role of Acoustic Design in Open-Plan Offices. Applied Acoustics 86 (2014), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2014.04.018
[25]
Tyler Hayes. 2020. The Science behind Endel’s AI-powered Soundscapes. https://www.amazon.science/latest-news/the-science-behind-endels-ai-powered-soundscapes.
[26]
Naja Holten Møller, Gina Neff, Jakob Grue Simonsen, Jonas Christoffer Villumsen, and Pernille Bjørn. 2021. Can Workplace Tracking Ever Empower? Collective Sensemaking for the Responsible Use of Sensor Data at Work. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 5, GROUP (July 2021), 219:1–219:21. https://doi.org/10.1145/3463931
[27]
Rune Møberg Jacobsen, Kasper Fangel Skov, Stine S Johansen, Mikael B. Skov, and Jesper Kjeldskov. 2023. Living with Sound Zones: A Long-term Field Study of Dynamic Sound Zones in a Domestic Context. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Hamburg Germany, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3581535
[28]
Alon Jacovi, Ana Marasović, Tim Miller, and Yoav Goldberg. 2021. Formalizing Trust in Artificial Intelligence: Prerequisites, Causes and Goals of Human Trust in AI. In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency(FAccT ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 624–635. https://doi.org/10.1145/3442188.3445923
[29]
Helena Jahncke, Staffan Hygge, Niklas Halin, Anne Marie Green, and Kenth Dimberg. 2011. Open-Plan Office Noise: Cognitive Performance and Restoration. Journal of Environmental Psychology 31, 4 (Dec. 2011), 373–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2011.07.002
[30]
Qiuqiang Kong, Yin Cao, Turab Iqbal, Yuxuan Wang, Wenwu Wang, and Mark D. Plumbley. 2020. PANNs: Large-Scale Pretrained Audio Neural Networks for Audio Pattern Recognition. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing 28 (2020), 2880–2894. https://doi.org/10.1109/TASLP.2020.3030497
[31]
Alexey Krasnov, Edward R Green, Bret Engels, and Barry Corden. 2019. Enhanced Speech Privacy in Office Spaces. Building Acoustics 26, 1 (March 2019), 57–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/1351010X18798105
[32]
Q.Vera Liao and S. Shyam Sundar. 2022. Designing for Responsible Trust in AI Systems: A Communication Perspective. In Proceedings of the 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency(FAccT ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1257–1268. https://doi.org/10.1145/3531146.3533182
[33]
Joseph Lindley, Haider Ali Akmal, Franziska Pilling, and Paul Coulton. 2020. Researching AI Legibility through Design. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376792
[34]
Joseph Lindley, David Philip Green, Glenn McGarry, Franziska Pilling, Paul Coulton, and Andy Crabtree. 2022. Towards a Master Narrative for Trust in Autonomous Systems: Trust as a Distributed Concern. Journal of Responsible Technology (Dec. 2022), 100057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrt.2022.100057
[35]
Martin Ljungdahl Eriksson, Lena Pareto, and Ricardo Atienza. 2019. The Sound Bubble : An Aesthetic Additive Design Approach to Actively Enhance Acoustic Office Environments. In 13th Conference on Sound and Music Computing. Zentrum für Mikrotonale Musik und Multimediale Komposition (ZM4), Hochschule für Musik und Theater, 253–260.
[36]
Gareth Loudon, Dimitrios Zampelis, and Gina Deininger. 2017. Using Real-time Biofeedback of Heart Rate Variability Measures to Track and Help Improve Levels of Attention and Relaxation. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCHI Conference on Creativity and Cognition. ACM, Singapore Singapore, 348–355. https://doi.org/10.1145/3059454.3059466
[37]
Diep Luong, Minh Tran, Shayan Gharib, Konstantinos Drossos, and Tuomas Virtanen. 2023. Representation Learning for Audio Privacy Preservation Using Source Separation and Robust Adversarial Learning. In 2023 IEEE Workshop on Applications of Signal Processing to Audio and Acoustics (WASPAA). 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/WASPAA58266.2023.10248153
[38]
Clara Mancini, Yvonne Rogers, Arosha K. Bandara, Tony Coe, Lukasz Jedrzejczyk, Adam N. Joinson, Blaine A. Price, Keerthi Thomas, and Bashar Nuseibeh. 2010. Contravision: Exploring Users’ Reactions to Futuristic Technology. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’10). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 153–162. https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753350
[39]
Ivan Manokha. 2020. The Implications of Digital Employee Monitoring and People Analytics for Power Relations in the Workplace. Surveillance & Society 18, 4 (Nov. 2020), 540–554. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v18i4.13776
[40]
Peter Mantello and Manh-Tung Ho. 2023. Emotional AI and the Future of Wellbeing in the Post-Pandemic Workplace. AI & SOCIETY (Feb. 2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-023-01639-8
[41]
Kirsten Martin and R. Edward Freeman. 2003. Some Problems with Employee Monitoring. Journal of Business Ethics 43, 4 (April 2003), 353–361. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023014112461
[42]
Wendy Martinez, Johann Benerradi, Serena Midha, Horia A. Maior, and Max L. Wilson. 2022. Understanding the Ethical Concerns for Neurotechnology in the Future of Work. In Proceedings of the 1st Annual Meeting of the Symposium on Human-Computer Interaction for Work(CHIWORK ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1145/3533406.3533423
[43]
Alexandra Mateescu. 2023. Challenging Worker Datafication. Technical Report. Data & Society Research Institute.
[44]
Ravi Mehta, Rui Zhu, and Amar Cheema. 2012. Is Noise Always Bad? Exploring the Effects of Ambient Noise on Creative Cognition. Journal of Consumer Research 39, 4 (2012), 784–799.
[45]
Annamaria Mesaros, Toni Heittola, Tuomas Virtanen, and Mark D. Plumbley. 2021. Sound Event Detection: A Tutorial. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine 38, 5 (Sept. 2021), 67–83. https://doi.org/10.1109/MSP.2021.3090678
[46]
Tommy Nilsson, Andy Crabtree, Joel Fischer, and Boriana Koleva. 2019. Breaching the Future: Understanding Human Challenges of Autonomous Systems for the Home. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 23, 2 (April 2019), 287–307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-019-01210-7
[47]
Tommy Nilsson, Andy Crabtree, Joel Fischer, and Boriana Koleva. 2019. Creating Worlds: Exploring Animated Videos as a Tool for Contextualization in User Research. In Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI EA ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290607.3311776
[48]
Tamara K. Nopper and Eve Zelickson. 2023. Wellness Capitalism: Employee Health, the Benefits Maze, and Worker Control. SSRN Electronic Journal (2023). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4444397
[49]
James E K Parker and Sean Dockray. 2023. ‘All Possible Sounds’: Speech, Music, and the Emergence of Machine Listening. Sound Studies 9, 2 (July 2023), 253–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/20551940.2023.2195057
[50]
Giuseppina Emma Puglisi, Sonja Di Blasio, Louena Shtrepi, and Arianna Astolfi. 2021. Remote Working in the COVID-19 Pandemic: Results From a Questionnaire on the Perceived Noise Annoyance. Frontiers in Built Environment 7 (2021), 688484. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2021.688484
[51]
Stuart Reeves. 2012. Envisioning Ubiquitous Computing. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1573–1582. https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2208278
[52]
Wolfgang Reinhardt, Benedikt Schmidt, Peter Sloep, and Hendrik Drachsler. 2011. Knowledge Worker Roles and Actions—Results of Two Empirical Studies. Knowledge and Process Management 18, 3 (2011), 150–174. https://doi.org/10.1002/kpm.378
[53]
Caitlin Riggs and Jonas Braasch. 2016. Real-Time Natural Soundscape Generation Based on Current Weather Conditions for Workspace Voice-Masking. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 140, 4_Supplement (Oct. 2016), 3041. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4969444
[54]
Mary Beth Rosson and John M. Carroll. 2002. Scenario-Based Design. In The Human-Computer Interaction Handbook: Fundamentals, Evolving Technologies and Emerging Applications, J. Jack and A. Sears (Eds.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1032–1050.
[55]
Arshdeep Singh and Mark D. Plumbley. 2022. A Passive Similarity Based CNN Filter Pruning for Efficient Acoustic Scene Classification. In Interspeech 2022.
[56]
Seung Yeon Son, Duck Hyun Cho, and Seung-Wan Kang. 2017. The Impact of Close Monitoring on Creativity and Knowledge Sharing: The Mediating Role of Leader-Member Exchange. Creativity and Innovation Management 26, 3 (2017), 256–265. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12219
[57]
Jiao Sun, Q. Vera Liao, Michael Muller, Mayank Agarwal, Stephanie Houde, Kartik Talamadupula, and Justin D. Weisz. 2022. Investigating Explainability of Generative AI for Code through Scenario-Based Design. In 27th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces. 212–228.
[58]
Tarja Susi, Mikael Johannesson, and Per Backlund. 2007. Serious Games : An Overview. Technical Report. Institutionen för kommunikation och information.
[59]
N. Tomashenko, Brij Mohan Lal Srivastava, Xin Wang, Emmanuel Vincent, Andreas Nautsch, Junichi Yamagishi, Nicholas Evans, Jose Patino, Jean-François Bonastre, Paul-Gauthier Noé, and Massimiliano Todisco. 2020. Introducing the VoicePrivacy Initiative. In Interspeech 2020. ISCA, 1693–1697. https://doi.org/10.21437/Interspeech.2020-1333
[60]
Simone Torresin, Rossano Albatici, Francesco Aletta, Francesco Babich, Tin Oberman, Agnieszka Elzbieta Stawinoga, and Jian Kang. 2021. Indoor Soundscapes at Home during the COVID-19 Lockdown in London – Part I: Associations between the Perception of the Acoustic Environment, Occupantś Activity and Well-Being. Applied Acoustics 183 (Dec. 2021), 108305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2021.108305
[61]
Simone Torresin, Eleanor Ratcliffe, Francesco Aletta, Rossano Albatici, Francesco Babich, Tin Oberman, and Jian Kang. 2022. The Actual and Ideal Indoor Soundscape for Work, Relaxation, Physical and Sexual Activity at Home: A Case Study during the COVID-19 Lockdown in London. Frontiers in Psychology 13 (Dec. 2022), 1038303. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1038303
[62]
Tuomas Virtanen, Mark D. Plumbley, and Dan Ellis. 2018. Computational Analysis of Sound Scenes and Events. Springer International Publishing, Berlin, Germany.
[63]
Daniel Wallace and Jordan Cheer. 2020. Design and Evaluation of Personal Audio Systems Based on Speech Privacy Constraints. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 147, 4 (April 2020), 2271–2282. https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0001065
[64]
Jennifer Williams, Karla Pizzi, Paul-Gauthier Noe, and Sneha Das. 2024. Exploratory Evaluation of Speech Content Masking. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2401.03936 arxiv:2401.03936 [cs, eess]
[65]
Jennifer Williams, Karla Pizzi, Natalia Tomashenko, and Sneha Das. 2024. Anonymizing Speaker Voices: Easy to Imitate, Difficult to Recognize?. In ICASSP 2024 - 2024 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). 12491–12495. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASSP48485.2024.10445935
[66]
Jennifer Williams, Vahid Yazdanpanah, and Sebastian Stein. 2022. Safe Audio AI Services in Smart Buildings. In Proceedings of the 9th ACM International Conference on Systems for Energy-Efficient Buildings, Cities, and Transportation(BuildSys ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 266–269. https://doi.org/10.1145/3563357.3564076
[67]
Christine T. Wolf. 2019. Explainability Scenarios: Towards Scenario-Based XAI Design. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces. 252–257.
[68]
Shoshana Zuboff. 2019. The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. PublicAffairs, New York.
Index Terms
- Working with AI Sound: Exploring the Future of Workplace AI Sound Technologies
Recommendations
Soundscape, sonification, and sound activism
In this article, the author will argue that the act of listening through public soundwalks and other formal and informal exercises builds environmental and social awareness and promotes changes in social and cultural practices. By examining the act of ...
Experiences of Personal Sound Technologies
Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2021AbstractListening to sound individually while in close proximity of other people is increasingly enabled by a range of technologies. One still in development is sound zone technology that aims to provide personal sound without headphones or other wearable ...
Immersive auditory display system 'sound cask': three-dimensional sound field reproduction system based on the boundary surface control principle
VRST '18: Proceedings of the 24th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and TechnologySound cask was developed to realize the perfect 3D auditory display that creates 3D sound waves around the listener's head just the same as the primary sound field, based on the boundary surface control (BoSC) principle.
If we consider the sound ...
Comments
Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
June 2024
297 pages
ISBN:9798400710179
DOI:10.1145/3663384
Copyright © 2024 ACM.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 25 June 2024
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
- Research
- Refereed limited
Funding Sources
Conference
CHIWORK 2024
CHIWORK 2024: Annual Symposium on Human-Computer Interaction for Work
June 25 - 27, 2024
Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 81Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)81
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)25
Reflects downloads up to 12 Nov 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Get Access
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign inFull Access
View options
View or Download as a PDF file.
PDFeReader
View online with eReader.
eReaderHTML Format
View this article in HTML Format.
HTML Format